SUPERVISOR PROFILE AND RECORDED ROLL-CALL EVIDENCE
Katy Tang
These are recorded positions on specific actions. A No is not automatically opposition to a project, and an Aye is not automatically support. Read the action and cited minutes.
FORMER SUPERVISOR
Contact
- District
- 4
- Service
- 2013-02-27 to 2019-01-08
- Official record
- Board profile or historical entry ↗
MOST RECENT 250 · NO
NO positions
File 180785: Supporting California State Proposition 10 - The Affordable Housing Act - November 6, 2018 Ballot
LLM summaryThe resolution supporting California State Proposition 10, concerning affordable housing, was amended and adopted.
Source textUpon approval of both divided questions to amend the Resolution, the Resolution was AMENDED as a whole. Resolution No. 329-18 ADOPTED AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 180785: Supporting California State Proposition 10 - The Affordable Housing Act - November 6, 2018 Ballot
LLM summaryA motion to amend the resolution supporting California State Proposition 10 was carried.
Source textSupervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Ronen, moved that this Resolution be AMENDED on Page 3, Lines 13-14, by striking ‘and/or single-family homes’. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 180785: Supporting California State Proposition 10 - The Affordable Housing Act - November 6, 2018 Ballot
LLM summaryA resolution supporting California State Proposition 10 was amended and continued for further consideration.
Source textusing Act - November 6, 2018 Ballot] Sponsors: Peskin; Fewer, Mandelman, Ronen, Kim and Brown Resolution supporting California State Proposition 10, The Affordable Housing Act, on the November 6, 2018, ballot; and reaffirming the City and County of San Francisco’s support for repeal of the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act. Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Ronen, moved that this Resolution be AMENDED, AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE, on Page 3, Lines 11-12, by striking ‘FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City and County of San Francisco also affirms that single-family homes should be exempted from rent control; and, be it’, and Lines 13-14, by striking ‘and/or single-family homes’. Before the vote was taken, a request to DIVIDE the question was made. Supervisor Peskin requested the question to amend the Resolution be DIVIDED to consider each amendment separately. Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Ronen, moved that this Resolution be AMENDED on Page 3, Lines 11-12, by striking ‘FURTHER RESOLVED, That the City and County of San Francisco also affirms that single-family homes should be exempted from rent control; and, be it’. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 180785: Supporting California State Proposition 10 - The Affordable Housing Act - November 6, 2018 Ballot
LLM summaryA resolution supporting California State Proposition 10 was not adopted, reaffirming the city's stance on the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act.
Source text180785 [Supporting California State Proposition 10 - The Affordable Housing Act - November 6, 2018 Ballot] Sponsors: Peskin; Fewer, Mandelman, Ronen, Kim and Brown Resolution supporting California State Proposition 10, The Affordable Housing Act, on the November 6, 2018, ballot; and reaffirming the City and County of San Francisco’s support for repeal of the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act. Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. NOT ADOPTED by the following vote:
File 180538: Appointments, Police Commission - Cindy Elias and John Hamasaki
LLM summaryA motion was approved confirming the appointments of Cindy Elias and John Hamasaki to the Police Commission.
Source text180538 [Appointments, Police Commission - Cindy Elias and John Hamasaki] Motion confirming the appointments of Cindy Elias, term ending April 30, 2019, and John Hamasaki, term ending April 30, 2022, to the Police Commission. (Rules Committee) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Sheehy requested that this Motion be DUPLICATED. Supervisor Sheehy, seconded by Supervisor Breed, moved that the original Motion be AMENDED to only reference John Hamasaki's appointment, and that the duplicated Motion be AMENDED to only reference Cindy Elias' appointment. The motion failed by the following vote:
File 180367: Supporting California State Senate Bill 1045 (Wiener, Stern) - Conservatorship: Chronic Homelessness and Substance Abuse Disorders
LLM summaryA motion to refer the amended resolution supporting California Senate Bill 1045 to committee failed.
Source textSupervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Resolution be REFERRED AS AMENDED to Committee. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 180301: Preparation of Findings Related to Tentative Map - 668-678 Page Street
LLM summaryA motion directing the Clerk to prepare findings related to a tentative map for a residential conversion at 668-678 Page Street was tabled.
Source text180301 [Preparation of Findings Related to Tentative Map - 668-678 Page Street] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings relating to the Board of Supervisors' decision to approve the application of a proposed Tentative Parcel Map to convert a three-story-over-garage, six-unit building, into residential condominiums at 668-678 Page Street, Assessor's Parcel Block No. 0843, Lot No. 015. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Safai, seconded by Supervisor Cohen, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 180300: Conditionally Disapproving Decision of Public Works and Approving the Tentative Map Application - 668-678 Page Street
LLM summaryA motion conditionally disapproving a Public Works decision on a tentative map application for 668-678 Page Street was tabled.
Source text180300 [Conditionally Disapproving Decision of Public Works and Approving the Tentative Map Application - 668-678 Page Street] Motion conditionally disapproving the decision of Public Works and approving an application for a proposed Tentative Parcel Map to convert a three-story-over-garage, six-unit building, into residential condominiums at 668-678 Page Street, Assessor's Parcel Block No. 0843, Lot No. 015, subject to the Board’s subsequent adoption of written findings, including findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Safai, seconded by Supervisor Cohen, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 180299: Approving the Decision of Public Works and Disapproving the Tentative Map Application - 668-678 Page Street
LLM summaryA motion approving the decision of Public Works to disapprove a tentative map application for 668-678 Page Street was approved.
Source text180299 [Approving the Decision of Public Works and Disapproving the Tentative Map Application - 668-678 Page Street] Motion approving the decision of Public Works and disapproving an application for a proposed Tentative Parcel Map to convert a three-story-over-garage, six-unit building, into residential condominiums at 668-678 Page Street, Assessor's Parcel Block No. 0843, Lot No. 015. (Clerk of the Board) Motion No. M18-060 Supervisor Safai, seconded by Supervisor Cohen, moved that this Motion be APPROVED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 180116: Appropriation - $1,100,000 of Prior Year’s Fund Balance in General Fund to Department of Public Works for Street & Sidewalk Cleaning Pilot Enhancement Project - FY2017-2018
LLM summaryAn ordinance appropriating $1,100,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Public Works for a Street and Sidewalk Cleaning Pilot Enhancement Project was finally passed.
Source text180116 [Appropriation - $1,100,000 of Prior Year’s Fund Balance in General Fund to Department of Public Works for Street & Sidewalk Cleaning Pilot Enhancement Project - FY2017-2018] Sponsors: Kim; Fewer, Ronen and Peskin Ordinance appropriating $1,100,000 of prior year’s fund balance in General Fund to Public Works for funding Street & Sidewalk Cleaning Pilot Enhancement Project in FY2017-2018. (Fiscal Impact) FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 180116: Appropriation - $1,100,000 of Prior Year’s Fund Balance in General Fund to Department of Public Works for Street & Sidewalk Cleaning Pilot Enhancement Project - FY2017-2018
LLM summaryAn ordinance appropriating $1,100,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Public Works for a Street and Sidewalk Cleaning Pilot Enhancement Project passed on first reading as amended.
Source textOrdinance appropriating $1,100,000 of prior year’s fund balance in General Fund to Public Works for funding Street & Sidewalk Cleaning Pilot Enhancement Project in FY2017-2018. (Fiscal Impact) PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 180088: Administrative Code - Mayoral Appearance at the Board of Supervisors
LLM summaryAn ordinance amending the Administrative Code to change the process for the Mayor's appearance at the Board of Supervisors was finally passed.
Source text180088 [Administrative Code - Mayoral Appearance at the Board of Supervisors] Sponsors: Peskin; Ronen Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to modify the process for the Mayor to appear at the Board of Supervisors for a question-and-answer session. (Supervisor Stefani dissented in Committee.) Ordinance No. 064-18 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 180280: Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code - Campaign Finance and Conflict of Interest
LLM summaryA motion to amend the Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code regarding campaign finance and conflict of interest definitions failed.
Source textCity and County of San Francisco Page 209 Printed at 1:04 pm on 5/3/18 Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 4/3/2018 Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED in Section 1.104 by adding definitions for ‘Financial Interest’, ‘Land Use Matter’; and by adding a new Section 1.127 regarding ‘Contribution Limits - Persons with Land Use Matters Before a Decision-Making Body’. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 180162: Opposing California State Senate Bill 827 (Wiener) - Transit-Rich Housing Bonus
LLM summaryA resolution opposing California State Senate Bill 827, which affects local planning authority, was adopted as amended.
Source textally flawed, based on its preemption of San Francisco’s sovereign charter authority and undermining of San Francisco’s ability to recapture public value from private developers in exchange for the added benefits of density and height; and’; and Page 3, Lines 4-8, by striking ‘is committed to working with other jurisdictions, affordable housing and tenant advocates to address the State’s housing crisis by amending SB 827’ and adding ‘joins with other local jurisdictions and a growing statewide coalition of housing, “complete neighborhood”, environmental and tenant advocates, including those based in every district in San Francisco, in opposing SB 827’, Lines 9-12, by striking ‘FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco is committed to working with its State Legislative Delegation to craft the necessary amendments to SB 827 in order to protect San Francisco’s sovereign charter authority and recapture value from the added benefits of density and height; and, be it’, and Line 14, by adding ‘permanent’ before ‘affordable’, by striking ‘crises’ and adding ‘crisis throughout California’ after ‘housing’. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 180088: Administrative Code - Mayoral Appearance at the Board of Supervisors
LLM summaryAn ordinance regarding the Mayor's appearance at the Board of Supervisors was passed on first reading.
Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 180088: Administrative Code - Mayoral Appearance at the Board of Supervisors
LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to modify the process for the Mayor's appearance at the Board of Supervisors for question-and-answer sessions.
Source text180088 [Administrative Code - Mayoral Appearance at the Board of Supervisors] Sponsors: Peskin; Ronen Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to modify the process for the Mayor to appear at the Board of Supervisors for a question-and-answer session. (Supervisor Stefani dissented in Committee.) Supervisor Ronen requested to be added as a co-sponsor. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 180054: Building Code - Waiver and Refund of Investigation Fee for Persons Registered with the Office of Cannabis
LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed to waive and refund investigation fees for individuals registered with the Office of Cannabis.
Source text180054 [Building Code - Waiver and Refund of Investigation Fee for Persons Registered with the Office of Cannabis] Sponsor: Sheehy Ordinance waiving and refunding investigation fees imposed by Building Code, Section 107A.5, for persons (as defined in Police Code, Section 1602) registered with the Office of Cannabis. Ordinance No. 048-18 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 180054: Building Code - Waiver and Refund of Investigation Fee for Persons Registered with the Office of Cannabis
LLM summaryAn ordinance waiving and refunding investigation fees for persons registered with the Office of Cannabis passed on first reading.
Source text180054 [Building Code - Waiver and Refund of Investigation Fee for Persons Registered with the Office of Cannabis] Sponsor: Sheehy Ordinance waiving and refunding investigation fees imposed by Building Code, Section 107A.5, for persons (as defined in Police Code, Section 1602) registered with the Office of Cannabis. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 171138: Administrative Code - Indigenous Peoples Day
LLM summaryAn ordinance to declare the second Monday in October as Indigenous Peoples Day was referred to the Rules Committee but the motion failed.
Source text171138 [Administrative Code - Indigenous Peoples Day] Sponsor: Cohen Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to declare the second Monday in October to be Indigenous Peoples Day. Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Ordinance be REFERRED to the Rules Committee. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171306: Charter Amendment - Appointed Board Members and Commissioners Seeking Elective Office
LLM summaryA charter amendment was submitted to require appointed board members to forfeit their positions upon filing for elective office.
Source text171306 [Charter Amendment - Appointed Board Members and Commissioners Seeking Elective Office] Sponsors: Peskin; Kim, Safai and Yee Charter Amendment (First Draft) to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to provide that appointed members of boards and commissions under the Charter forfeit their offices upon filing a declaration of candidacy for state or local elective office; at an election to be held on June 5, 2018. ORDERED SUBMITTED by the following vote:
File 180064: Confirming the Appointment of the Successor Mayor - Mark Farrell
LLM summaryAn amendment to confirm Mark Farrell as the successor Mayor was approved.
Source textSupervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Motion be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE, to confirm Mark Farrell as the successor Mayor of the City and County of San Francisco. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 180061: Hearing - Committee of the Whole - Public Hearing to Take Nominations and Appoint a Successor Mayor Due to a Vacancy in the Office of the Mayor
LLM summaryA public hearing was held to take nominations and appoint Supervisor Mark Farrell as the Successor Mayor due to a vacancy.
Source textMotion to select Supervisor Mark Farrell as Successor Mayor carried by the following vote:
File 171191: Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization Appeal - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street
LLM summaryA motion was approved to prepare findings related to the Conditional Use Authorization appeal for the project at 2161-2165 Irving Street.
Source textMotion No. M17-197 Supervisor Farrell, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Motion be APPROVED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 171191: Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization Appeal - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street
LLM summaryA motion was tabled directing the Clerk to prepare findings supporting the Board's disapproval of a Conditional Use Authorization for a project at 2161-2165 Irving Street.
Source text171191 [Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization Appeal - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings in support of the Board of Supervisors’ disapproval of the proposed Conditional Use Authorization identified as Planning Case No. 2016-002424CUA for a proposed project located at 2161-2165 Irving Street. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Farrell, seconded by Supervisor Cohen, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 171190: Conditionally Disapproving the Conditional Use Authorization and Approving with Additional Conditions - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street
LLM summaryThe Board conditionally disapproved the Conditional Use Authorization for a project at 2161-2165 Irving Street and approved it with additional conditions.
Source textMotion No. M17-196 Supervisor Farrell, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Motion be APPROVED AS AMENDED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 171190: Conditionally Disapproving the Conditional Use Authorization and Approving with Additional Conditions - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street
LLM summaryA motion to approve the Conditional Use Authorization with amendments was carried.
Source text(Charter, Section 4.105, and Planning Code, Section 308.1(d), provides that the Board of Supervisors may disapprove the decision of the Planning Commission by a vote of not less than two-thirds of the members of the Board.) Supervisor Farrell, seconded by Supervisor Cohen, moved that this Motion be APPROVED AS AMENDED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 171189: Approving Conditional Use Authorization - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street
LLM summaryA motion to table the approval of the Conditional Use Authorization for a project at 2161-2165 Irving Street was carried.
Source textSupervisor Farrell, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 171189: Approving Conditional Use Authorization - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street
LLM summaryA motion to approve the Conditional Use Authorization for a project at 2161-2165 Irving Street was tabled.
Source text171189 [Approving Conditional Use Authorization - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street] Motion approving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 20027, approving a Conditional Use Authorization identified as Planning Case No. 2016-002424CUA for a proposed project located at 2161-2165 Irving Street; and adopting findings pursuant to Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Farrell, seconded by Supervisor Cohen, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 171131: Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization Appeal - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street
LLM summaryThe Board approved the preparation of findings related to the Conditional Use Authorization appeal for a project at 2161-2165 Irving Street.
Source textMotion No. M17-195 Supervisor Farrell, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Motion be APPROVED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 171131: Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization Appeal - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street
LLM summaryThe Board directed the Clerk to prepare findings supporting the disapproval of the Conditional Use Authorization for a project at 2161-2165 Irving Street.
Source text171131 [Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization Appeal - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings in support of the Board of Supervisors’ disapproval of the proposed Conditional Use Authorization identified as Planning Case No. 2016-002424CUA for a proposed project located at 2161-2165 Irving Street. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Farrell, seconded by Supervisor Cohen, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 171130: Conditionally Disapproving the Conditional Use Authorization and Approving with Additional Conditions - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street
LLM summaryThe Board approved the Conditional Use Authorization for the proposed project at 2161-2165 Irving Street with amendments.
Source textMotion No. M17-194 Supervisor Farrell, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Motion be APPROVED AS AMENDED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 171130: Conditionally Disapproving the Conditional Use Authorization and Approving with Additional Conditions - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street
LLM summaryThe Board conditionally disapproved the Conditional Use Authorization for a proposed project at 2161-2165 Irving Street and approved it with additional conditions.
Source text(Charter, Section 4.105, and Planning Code, Section 308.1(d), provides that the Board of Supervisors may disapprove the decision of the Planning Commission by a vote of not less than two-thirds of the members of the Board.) Supervisor Farrell, seconded by Supervisor Cohen, moved that this Motion be APPROVED AS AMENDED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 171129: Approving Conditional Use Authorization - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street
LLM summaryThe Board tabled a motion regarding the approval of the Conditional Use Authorization for the proposed project at 2161-2165 Irving Street.
Source textSupervisor Farrell, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 171129: Approving Conditional Use Authorization - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street
LLM summaryThe Board tabled a motion to approve the Conditional Use Authorization for the proposed project at 2161-2165 Irving Street.
Source text171129 [Approving Conditional Use Authorization - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street] Motion approving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 20027, approving a Conditional Use Authorization identified as Planning Case No. 2016-002424CUA for a proposed project located at 2161-2165 Irving Street; and adopting findings pursuant to Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Farrell, seconded by Supervisor Cohen, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 171042: Various Codes - Regulation of Cannabis Businesses
LLM summaryAn amendment to the cannabis regulation ordinance was proposed but failed, which aimed to change the effective date for certain provisions.
Source textng cannabis under the authority of a medical cannabis dispensary permit, starting April 1, 2018; 14) establishing a sunset date of December 31, 2018, for Article 33 of the Health Code (“Medical Cannabis Act”); 15) requiring the Department of Public Health to implement an ongoing public health education campaign about the safe consumption and health benefits of cannabis; 16) requiring the Controller to submit a report to the Board of Supervisors within one year of the effective date of Article 16 recommending whether the issuance of cannabis business permits should be subject to any limits; 17) establishing an Equity Operator Fund to receive any monies appropriated for the purpose of assisting Equity Operators; 18) eliminating the duty of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to send letters annually to state and federal officials requesting that cannabis be regulated and taxed; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. Supervisor Yee, seconded by Supervisor Fewer, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED in Article 16, Section 1606(a), by changing ‘January 1, 2019’ to ‘January 1, 2020.' The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171041: Planning Code - Cannabis Regulation
LLM summaryAn amendment to the cannabis regulation ordinance regarding the restriction of a 600 foot radius between Cannabis Retail Uses failed due to lack of a second.
Source textSupervsior Ronen moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED by striking the restriction of a 600 foot radius between Cannabis Retail Uses. The motion FAILED since no second was attained. Supervisor Ronen, seconded by Supervisor Cohen, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE, by striking the limit of three Medical Cannabis Dispensary Uses or Cannabis Retail Uses within the Excelsior Outer Mission Street Neighborhood Commercial District. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 171056: Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Categorical Exemption Determination - 20 Nobles Alley
LLM summaryA motion to prepare findings reversing a categorical exemption for a project at 20 Nobles Alley was continued to a later meeting.
Source text171056 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Categorical Exemption Determination - 20 Nobles Alley] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 20 Nobles Alley is categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Ronen, moved that this Motion be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 6, 2018. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171055: Conditionally Reversing the Categorical Exemption Determination - 20 Nobles Alley
LLM summaryA motion to conditionally reverse the categorical exemption determination for 20 Nobles Alley was continued to a future meeting but ultimately failed.
Source text171055 [Conditionally Reversing the Categorical Exemption Determination - 20 Nobles Alley] Motion conditionally reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 20 Nobles Alley is categorically exempt from further environmental review, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Ronen, moved that this Motion be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 6, 2018. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171054: Affirming the Categorical Exemption Determination - 20 Nobles Alley
LLM summaryA motion affirming the categorical exemption determination for 20 Nobles Alley was continued to a future meeting but ultimately failed.
Source text171054 [Affirming the Categorical Exemption Determination - 20 Nobles Alley] Motion affirming the determination by the Planning Department that a proposed project at 20 Nobles Alley is categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Ronen, moved that this Motion be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 6, 2018. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171053: Hearing - Appeal of Determination of Categorical Exemption From Environmental Review - 20 Nobles Alley
LLM summaryA hearing regarding the appeal of the categorical exemption determination for 20 Nobles Alley was continued to a future meeting but ultimately failed.
Source textappeal, responded to questions raised throughout the discussion, and further requested the Board to approve the appeal. Susan Star; Matthias Mormino; Marla Nye; Wyland Strobel; Chris Bigalo; spoke in support of the appeal. Tanya Sheyner, Pilar LaValley, and Eilesh Tuffy (Planning Department) provided an overview of the decision of the Planning Department and responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Eustace de Saint Phalle (Project Sponsor) provided an overview of the project, responded to questions raised throughout the discussion, and further requested the Board to uphold the decision of the Planning Department. Male Speaker; Rick Savary; Carrie Bronea; Tom Brigham; spoke in support of the project and in opposition to the appeal. Marc Bruno (Appellant) provided a rebuttal and further requested the Board to approve the appeal. Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney) provided additional information and answered questions raised throughout the discussion. There were no other speakers. Supervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Ronen, moved that this Hearing be CONTINUED OPEN to the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 6, 2018. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 170751: Planning Code, Zoning Map - One Oak Street Project
LLM summaryAn ordinance to amend the Planning Code and zoning map for the One Oak Street project was not passed on the first reading.
Source text170751 [Planning Code, Zoning Map - One Oak Street Project] Ordinance amending the Planning Code by revising Sheet HT07 of the Zoning Map, to change the height and bulk district classification of Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0836, portions of Lot Nos. 001 and 005, for the One Oak Project, at the Van Ness Avenue / Oak Street / Market Street Intersection, as follows: rezoning the eastern portion of the property, along Van Ness Avenue, located at Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0836, Lot No. 001 (1500 Market Street), from 120/400-R-2 to 120-R-2; rezoning the central portion of the property, located at Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0836, Lot No. 005 (1540 Market Street), from 120-R-2 to 120/400-R-2; affirming the Planning Commission’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings, including findings of public necessity, convenience and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Planning Commission) NOT PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 170750: General Plan Amendments - One Oak Street Project
LLM summaryAn ordinance to amend the General Plan for the One Oak Street project was not passed on the first reading.
Source text170750 [General Plan Amendments - One Oak Street Project] Ordinance amending the General Plan by revising the height and bulk designations for the One Oak Street project, at the Van Ness Avenue / Oak Street / Market Street Intersection, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0836, Lot Nos. 001 and 005, on Map 3 of the Market and Octavia Area Plan and on Map 5 of the Downtown Area Plan; adopting findings under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan as proposed for amendment, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 340. (Planning Commission) NOT PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 170441: Health Code - Banning the Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products
LLM summaryAn ordinance to ban the sale of flavored tobacco products was not repealed.
Source text170441 [Health Code - Banning the Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products] Sponsors: Cohen; Safai, Breed, Farrell, Sheehy, Tang and Yee Ordinance amending the Health Code to prohibit tobacco retailers from selling flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes. (Economic Impact) NOT REPEALED by the following vote:
File 170275: Administrative Code - Establishing an Office of Cannabis and Extending the Term of the Cannabis State Legalization Task Force
LLM summaryAn ordinance was proposed to establish an Office of Cannabis and extend the Cannabis State Legalization Task Force, but a motion to continue it failed.
Source text170275 [Administrative Code - Establishing an Office of Cannabis and Extending the Term of the Cannabis State Legalization Task Force] Sponsors: Sheehy; Cohen Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to establish an Office of Cannabis; to authorize the Director of the Office of Cannabis to issue permits to cannabis-related businesses; to direct the Director of the Office of Cannabis to collect permit application and annual license fees following the enactment of a subsequent ordinance establishing the amounts of those fees; and to extend the term of the Cannabis State Legalization Task Force. (Fiscal Impact) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney), Debra Newman (Office of the Budget and Legislative Analyst), and Adam Nguyen (Office of the City Administrator) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Fewer, seconded by Supervisor Cohen, moved that this Ordinance be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of September 12, 2017. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 170349: Administrative Code - Owner Move-In Reporting Requirements
LLM summaryA motion to amend the Administrative Code to include specific filing requirements for Buyout Agreements failed.
Source textSupervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED on Page 11, Line 8, by adding a new Subsection 37.9E(h) that reads ‘Filing of Buyout Agreements. The landlord shall file a copy of the Buyout Agreement with the Rent Board no sooner than the 46th day after the Buyout Agreement is executed by all parties, and no more than 59 days after the agreement is executed by all parties. Any waiver of rights by a tenant in a Buyout Agreement executed on or after January 1, 2018, that is not filed with the Rent Board within 59 days after execution shall not be enforceable. Buyout agreements rescinded under subsection (g) need not be filed with the Rent Board.’ The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 170349: Administrative Code - Owner Move-In Reporting Requirements
LLM summaryA motion to amend the Administrative Code regarding Owner Move-In reporting requirements failed.
Source textCity and County of San Francisco Page 520 Printed at 5:19 pm on 9/6/17 Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 6/27/2017 Supervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED on Page 11, Line 8, by adding a new Subsection 37.9E(h) regarding 'Filing of Buyout Agreements.' The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 150969: Planning Code - Affordable Housing Bonus Programs
LLM summaryAn amendment to the Planning Code concerning specific locations on Ocean Avenue was proposed but failed to pass.
Source textSupervisor Yee, seconded by Supervisor Fewer, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED on Page 12, Lines 8-9, by adding ‘(F) is not located on Ocean Avenue between Paloma Avenue and 19th Avenue’; and on Page 24, Lines 12-13, by adding ‘and (F) is not located on Ocean Avenue between Paloma Avenue and 19th Avenue.’ The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 150969: Planning Code - Affordable Housing Bonus Programs
LLM summaryAn amendment to the Planning Code regarding affordable housing was proposed but failed to pass.
Source textSupervisor Ronen, seconded by Supervisor Fewer, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED on Page 13, Line 23, by adding ‘(11) does not demolish or remove any space rented by a legacy business listed in the Legacy Business Registry under Administrative Code Section 2A.242.’ The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 170316: Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Project at 953 Treat Avenue
LLM summaryA motion to prepare findings reversing the categorical exemption determination for a project at 953 Treat Avenue failed.
Source text170316 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Project at 953 Treat Avenue] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the determination by the Planning Department that a proposed project at 953 Treat Avenue is categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Ronen, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Motion be APPROVED. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 170315: Conditionally Reversing the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Project at 953 Treat Avenue
LLM summaryA motion conditionally reversing the categorical exemption determination for a project at 953 Treat Avenue failed.
Source text170315 [Conditionally Reversing the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Project at 953 Treat Avenue] Motion conditionally reversing the determination by the Planning Department that a proposed project at 953 Treat Avenue is categorically exempt from further environmental review, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Ronen, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Motion be APPROVED. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 170314: Affirming the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Project at 953 Treat Avenue
LLM summaryA motion affirming the categorical exemption determination for a project at 953 Treat Avenue failed.
Source text170314 [Affirming the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Project at 953 Treat Avenue] Motion affirming the determination by the Planning Department that a proposed project at 953 Treat Avenue is categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Ronen, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 170214: Purchase and Sale Agreement - Lendlease Development, Inc. - 30 Van Ness Avenue - $70,000,000
LLM summaryA resolution to approve a purchase and sale agreement for City-owned property at 30 Van Ness Avenue was continued to a future meeting.
Source textNess Avenue - $70,000,000] Sponsors: Mayor; Kim Resolution approving a purchase and sale agreement by and between the City and County of San Francisco and Lendlease Development, Inc. for the sale of City-owned property located at 30 Van Ness Avenue for $70,000,000; including a City lease-back at an annual rent expense of $4,500,000 increasing by 3% per year after each year of the initial period and at the beginning of each extension option exercised, if any, for a period of not more than three years in the initial term, with two one-year options to extend; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; adopting findings that the sale is consistent with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and urging the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development and the Planning Department to explore certain development strategies relating to affordable housing at the site in connection with any future development. Supervisor Safai, seconded by Supervisor Breed, moved that this Resolution be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of April 4, 2017. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 170213: Purchase and Sale Agreement - SF Prosperity 2, LLC - 1660 Mission Street and 1680 Mission Street - $52,000,000
LLM summaryA resolution for a purchase and sale agreement with SF Prosperity 2, LLC for properties at 1660 and 1680 Mission Street for $52 million was continued.
Source text170213 [Purchase and Sale Agreement - SF Prosperity 2, LLC - 1660 Mission Street and 1680 Mission Street - $52,000,000] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution approving a purchase and sale agreement by and between the City and County of San Francisco and SF Prosperity 2, LLC, for the sale of City-owned properties located at 1660 Mission Street and 1680 Mission Street for $52,000,000; including a City lease-back at an annual rent expense of $3,362,220 increasing by 3% per year for each year after the initial period, with rent to be set at the then fair market rental value prior to the beginning of each extension option exercised, if any, for a period of not more than three years in the initial term, with two one-year options to extend; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and adopting findings that the sale is consistent with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. Supervisor Safai, seconded by Supervisor Breed, moved that this Resolution be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of April 4, 2017. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 161136: Amending Board Rules - Administration of Oaths
LLM summaryA proposed amendment regarding the administration of oaths was not approved as amended.
Source textNOT APPROVED AS AMENDED pursuant to Board Rule 3.26.1 that requires an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Board, by the following vote:
File 161241: Interim Zoning Controls - Indoor Agriculture
LLM summaryA resolution regarding interim zoning controls for indoor agriculture was proposed to be amended, but the motion to amend failed.
Source textSupervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Sheehy, moved that this Resolution be AMENDED on Page 4, Lines 3 and 8, by changing the date from 'November 8, 2016' to 'November 25, 2016.' Before the vote was taken, Supervisor Sheehy withdrew his motion to second. Supervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Fewer, moved that this Resolution be AMENDED on Page 4, Lines 3 and 8, by changing the date from 'November 8, 2016' to 'November 25, 2016.' The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 161178: General Plan Amendments - Implementing the City’s Vision Zero Policy Regarding Pedestrian Safety
LLM summaryAn ordinance amending the General Plan to implement the City’s Vision Zero policy for pedestrian safety was not passed on first reading.
Source text161178 [General Plan Amendments - Implementing the City’s Vision Zero Policy Regarding Pedestrian Safety] Ordinance amending the Transportation and Urban Design Elements of the General Plan to implement the City’s Vision Zero policy regarding pedestrian safety; making findings, including findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Planning Commission) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Lily Langois (Planning Department) and Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. NOT PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 161307: Appointment, Police Commission - Bill Ong Hing
LLM summaryThe Rules Committee's nomination of Bill Ong Hing to the Police Commission was confirmed, with a failed amendment to replace him with John Hamasaki.
Source text161307 [Appointment, Police Commission - Bill Ong Hing] Motion confirming the Rules Committee's nomination of, and appointing, Bill Ong Hing, term ending April 30, 2018, to the Police Commission. (Rules Committee) (Supervisor Cohen dissented in committee.) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Bill Ong Hing who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Cohen, seconded by Supervisor Avalos, moved that this Motion be AMENDED on Page 1, Lines 1, 3, 7, and 10, by changing ‘Bill Ong Hing’ to ‘John Hamasaki.’ The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 161110: Police Code - Choice of Communications Services Providers in Multiple Occupancy Buildings
LLM summaryAn ordinance to amend the Police Code regarding communications services in multiple occupancy buildings was continued for a closed session hearing.
Source text161110 [Police Code - Choice of Communications Services Providers in Multiple Occupancy Buildings] Sponsors: Farrell; Mar Ordinance amending the Police Code to prohibit owners of multiple occupancy buildings from interfering with the choice of communications services providers by occupants, establish requirements for communications services providers to obtain access to multiple occupancy buildings, and establish remedies for violation of the access requirement. Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Buck Delventhal and William Sanders (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Kim, moved that this Ordinance be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of December 13, 2016, and schedule a Closed Session hearing on this subject matter to consult with the City Attorney. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 161093: Administrative Code - Short-Term Residential Rental Limit of 60 Days per Year and Private Right of Action
LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed to limit short-term rentals to 60 days per year and modify private right of action provisions.
Source text161093 [Administrative Code - Short-Term Residential Rental Limit of 60 Days per Year and Private Right of Action] Sponsors: Breed; Peskin, Campos and Kim Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to revise the Residential Unit Conversion Ordinance to limit short-term rental of a residential unit to no more than 60 days per calendar year if the unit was registered on or after November 15, 2016; prohibit neighbors outside the building at issue from filing a private right of action; allow certain nonprofit organizations to file a private right of action prior to a final determination of a violation by the Director of the Planning Department; and shorten the waiting period for certain interested parties to file a private right of action; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 161093: Administrative Code - Short-Term Residential Rental Limit of 60 Days per Year and Private Right of Action
LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to limit short-term rentals to 60 days per year and adjust private right of action rules.
Source text161093 [Administrative Code - Short-Term Residential Rental Limit of 60 Days per Year and Private Right of Action] Sponsors: Breed; Peskin, Campos and Kim Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to revise the Residential Unit Conversion Ordinance to limit short-term rental of a residential unit to no more than 60 days per calendar year if the unit was registered on or after October 11, 2016; prohibit neighbors outside the building at issue from filing a private right of action; allow certain nonprofit organizations to file a private right of action prior to a final determination of a violation by the Director of the Planning Department; shorten the waiting period for certain interested parties to file a private right of action; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 161169: Commending New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, State Senator Liz Krueger and State Assembly Member Linda Rosenthal for New York Assembly Bill A8704C
LLM summaryA resolution commending New York officials for Assembly Bill A8704C was not adopted.
Source text161169 [Commending New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, State Senator Liz Krueger and State Assembly Member Linda Rosenthal for New York Assembly Bill A8704C] Sponsor: Peskin Resolution commending New York State Senator Liz Krueger and Assembly Member Linda Rosenthal for co-sponsoring and passing New York State Assembly Bill A8704C, relating to prohibiting advertising for the use of dwelling units in class A multiple-dwelling buildings in New York City, and New York Governor Andrew Cuomo for signing it into law on October 21, 2016. NOT ADOPTED by the following vote:
File 160749: Administrative Code - Neighborhood Property Crime Units in Police Department
LLM summaryAn ordinance creating Neighborhood Property Crime Units in the Police Department was finally passed.
Source text160749 [Administrative Code - Neighborhood Property Crime Units in Police Department] Sponsors: Yee; Campos Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to create Neighborhood Property Crime Units at District stations in the Police Department. FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 160963: Appropriation - General Reserve to Department of Emergency Management - Earthquake Relief in Italy - $100,000
LLM summaryAn appropriation of $100,000 from the General Reserve to the Department of Emergency Management for earthquake relief in Italy was finally passed.
Source textFINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 160963: Appropriation - General Reserve to Department of Emergency Management - Earthquake Relief in Italy - $100,000
LLM summaryAn appropriation of $100,000 from the General Reserve to the Department of Emergency Management for earthquake relief in Italy was finally passed.
Source textFINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 160963: Appropriation - General Reserve to Department of Emergency Management - Earthquake Relief in Italy - $100,000
LLM summaryThe ordinance appropriating $100,000 for earthquake relief in Italy was finally passed.
Source text160963 [Appropriation - General Reserve to Department of Emergency Management - Earthquake Relief in Italy - $100,000] Sponsor: Peskin Ordinance appropriating $100,000 from the General Reserve to Department of Emergency Management to provide relief to earthquake victims in Italy for FY2016-2017. FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 160749: Administrative Code - Neighborhood Property Crime Units in Police Department
LLM summaryThe amended ordinance regarding Neighborhood Property Crime Units in the Police Department passed on first reading.
Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 160963: Appropriation - General Reserve to Department of Emergency Management - Earthquake Relief in Italy - $100,000
LLM summaryAn ordinance appropriating $100,000 from the General Reserve for earthquake relief in Italy passed on first reading.
Source text160963 [Appropriation - General Reserve to Department of Emergency Management - Earthquake Relief in Italy - $100,000] Sponsor: Peskin Ordinance appropriating $100,000 from the General Reserve to Department of Emergency Management to provide relief to earthquake victims in Italy for FY2016-2017. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 161010: Appointments, Cannabis State Legalization Task Force - Jesse Stout, Erich Pearson, Kevin Reed, Sara Payan, Duncan Talento Ley, Thea Selby, Jon Ballesteros, Barbara Fugate, Tom McElroy, Laura Thomas, Terrance Alan, Sarah Shrader, and Daisy Ozim
LLM summaryA motion was made to appoint several individuals to the Cannabis State Legalization Task Force, but an amendment to change one appointee failed.
Source text161010 [Appointments, Cannabis State Legalization Task Force - Jesse Stout, Erich Pearson, Kevin Reed, Sara Payan, Duncan Talento Ley, Thea Selby, Jon Ballesteros, Barbara Fugate, Tom McElroy, Laura Thomas, Terrance Alan, Sarah Shrader, and Daisy Ozim] Motion appointing Jesse Stout, Erich Pearson, Kevin Reed, Sara Payan, Duncan Talento Ley, Thea Selby, Jon Ballesteros, Barbara Fugate, Tom McElroy, Laura Thomas, Terrance Alan, Sarah Shrader, and Daisy Ozim, terms ending August 31, 2017, to the Cannabis State Legalization Task Force. (Rules Committee) Supervisor Cohen, seconded by Supervisor Farrell, moved that this Motion be AMENDED by striking 'Kevin Reed' as the appointee for seat 11 and adding 'Michael Nolan.' The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 160908: Urging the San Francisco Legislative Delegation to Amend or Oppose the Proposed “By-Right Housing Approvals” Budget Trailer Bill
LLM summaryThe motion to amend the urging of the San Francisco Legislative Delegation regarding the 'By-Right Housing Approvals' Budget Trailer Bill was not approved.
Source textNOT APPROVED AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 160698: Initiative Ordinance - Planning Code - Requiring Conditional Use Authorization for Replacement of Production, Distribution, Repair, Institutional Community, and Arts Activities Uses
LLM summaryAn initiative ordinance requiring Conditional Use authorization for certain use conversions was approved for submission to voters.
Source text160698 [Initiative Ordinance - Planning Code - Requiring Conditional Use Authorization for Replacement of Production, Distribution, Repair, Institutional Community, and Arts Activities Uses] Sponsors: Kim; Peskin and Campos Motion ordering submitted to the voters an Ordinance amending the Planning Code to require Conditional Use authorization for conversion of Production, Distribution, and Repair Use, Institutional Community Use, and Arts Activities Use and replacement space; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act, at an election to be held November 8, 2016. (Economic Impact) Motion No. M16-105 APPROVED by the following vote:
File 160583: Charter Amendment - Public Advocate
LLM summaryA charter amendment to create the Office of the Public Advocate and define its powers was ordered submitted for the November 8, 2016 election.
Source text160583 [Charter Amendment - Public Advocate] Sponsors: Campos; Avalos, Kim and Mar Charter Amendment (Fourth Draft) to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to: 1) create the Office of the Public Advocate; 2) set the Public Advocate’s powers and duties; 3) authorize the Public Advocate to review the administration of City programs, including programs for transmitting information to the public, and to receive, investigate, and attempt to resolve complaints regarding City services and programs; 4) authorize the Public Advocate to receive and investigate specified whistleblower complaints; 5) authorize the Public Advocate to appoint the Director of the Office of Citizen Complaints; 6) provide for the Public Advocate’s election, removal, and salary; and 7) set City policy regarding sufficient funding and minimum staffing for the Office of the Public Advocate; and setting operative dates, at an election to be held on November 8, 2016. Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. ORDERED SUBMITTED by the following vote:
File 160698: Initiative Ordinance - Planning Code - Requiring Conditional Use Authorization for Replacement of Production, Distribution, Repair, Institutional Community, and Arts Activities Uses
LLM summaryA motion to amend the Initiative Ordinance regarding Conditional Use authorization was carried.
Source textSupervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved the divided question that this Motion be AMENDED on Page 9, Lines 8-10. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 160588: Charter Amendment - Housing and Development Commission
LLM summaryA charter amendment was ordered submitted to require the Housing and Development Commission to review development agreements and inclusionary housing proposals before Board consideration.
Source text Department of Economic and Workforce Development and the Department of Housing and Community Development; to require the Commission to review and make recommendations regarding proposed development agreements and conveyance of certain surplus City property before the Board of Supervisors considers such proposals; to require the Commission to hold hearings and make recommendations regarding proposals to adopt or change inclusionary housing requirements for housing developments; to require the Commission to adopt rules creating competitive selection processes for the Department of Housing and Community Development’s expenditure of affordable housing funds and for the development of affordable housing on City-owned property under the jurisdiction of the Department of Housing and Community Development; and to provide that ordinances regarding inclusionary housing requirements and rules regarding competitive selection for affordable housing adopted under the processes set forth in the Charter may supersede ordinances and rules adopted by the Board of Supervisors or the voters prior to March 1, 2017, at an election to be held on November 8, 2016. ORDERED SUBMITTED by the following vote:
File 160187: Settlement of Lawsuit - David Zeller - $900,000
LLM summaryThe settlement of a lawsuit for $900,000 was not passed on first reading.
Source textNOT PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 160187: Settlement of Lawsuit - David Zeller - $900,000
LLM summaryAn ordinance authorizing the settlement of a lawsuit for $900,000 was not passed on first reading.
Source text160187 [Settlement of Lawsuit - David Zeller - $900,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by David Zeller against the City and County of San Francisco for $900,000; the lawsuit was filed on March 14, 2013, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-13-529554; entitled David Zeller v. San Francisco General Hospital, et al.; the lawsuit involves alleged medical malpractice. (City Attorney) NOT PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 160583: Charter Amendment - Public Advocate
LLM summaryRevisions were made to a Charter Amendment to include a nominee from the Police Commission as the Director of Public Advocate until an election is held.
Source textSupervisor Kim requested revisions to the amendments provided by Supervisor Avalos on Page 23, Line 4, by adding language that, until such time an election is held to appoint the Public Advocate, the Director of Public Advocate shall be a nominee of the Mayor from the Police Commission and subject to Board of Supervisors approval, and on Line 8, by striking ‘Mayor’ after 'until the' and adding 'Public Advocate'. Supervisor Avalos accepted those suggested revisions into his proposed amendment. Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Mar, moved that this Charter Amendment be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE, by adding the creation of the Department of Police Accountability into this Charter Amendment and re-name the Office of Citizen Complaints as the Department of Police Accountability. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 160583: Charter Amendment - Public Advocate
LLM summaryA Charter Amendment was amended to allow individuals who served in elected positions within the last four years to hold the office of Public Advocate and change appointment authority.
Source textSupervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Charter Amendment be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE, by eliminating the prohibition on persons who have served in an elected position in the last four years to hold the office of Public Advocate; and by changing the appointment authority for a nominee of the Police Commission to serve as the Director of the Office of Citizen Complaints from the Mayor to the Public Advocate. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 160589: Charter Amendment - Municipal Transportation Agency - Appointments to Board of Directors and Budget Process
LLM summaryA charter amendment proposes to change the appointment process for the SFMTA Board and adjust the budget rejection vote requirement for the Board of Supervisors.
Source text160589 [Charter Amendment - Municipal Transportation Agency - Appointments to Board of Directors and Budget Process] Sponsors: Yee; Kim, Peskin and Campos Charter Amendment (Second Draft) to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to split the power to make appointments to the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) Board of Directors between the Mayor and the Board of Supervisors, to lower the vote by which the Board of Supervisors may reject the SFMTA Budget from seven to six, and to make related changes implementing these amendments, at an election to be held on November 8, 2016. (Supervisor Tang dissented in committee.) ORDERED SUBMITTED by the following vote:
File 160585: Charter Amendment - Dignity Fund
LLM summaryA motion was made to continue the charter amendment regarding the Dignity Fund for later consideration during the same meeting.
Source textAfter File No. 160586 was called, Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that this Charter Amendment be continued and considered later in this meeting. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 160585: Charter Amendment - Dignity Fund
LLM summaryA charter amendment to establish the Dignity Fund for Seniors and Adults with Disabilities was ordered submitted for the November 2016 election.
Source text160585 [Charter Amendment - Dignity Fund] Sponsors: Cohen; Mar, Yee, Avalos, Campos, Breed and Kim Charter Amendment (Third Draft) to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to: 1) establish the Dignity Fund to support Seniors and Adults with Disabilities; 2) require an annual contribution by the City to the Fund including an annual baseline amount of $38 million, increasing by $6 million for fiscal year 2017-2018, and increasing by $3 million a year for the next 9 years until fiscal year 2026-2027, and continuing at that amount, adjusted annually for changes in aggregate discretionary City revenues, for the next 10 years until fiscal year 2036-2037; 3) establish a planning process for expenditures from the Fund; 4) create an Oversight and Advisory Committee; 5) set an expiration date of June 30, 2037; and, 6) change the “Commission on Aging” to the “Aging and Adult Services Commission” and update its responsibilities, at an election to be held on November 8, 2016. (Supervisor Tang dissented in committee.) ORDERED SUBMITTED by the following vote:
File 151273: Charter Amendment - Filling Vacancies in Local Elective Office
LLM summaryA charter amendment requiring special elections for Board of Supervisors vacancies was ordered submitted for the November 2016 election.
Source text151273 [Charter Amendment - Filling Vacancies in Local Elective Office] Sponsors: Avalos; Mar Charter Amendment (Fifth Draft) to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to require the Department of Elections to hold a special election when there is a vacancy in the Office of Member of the Board of Supervisors, unless a regularly scheduled election will be held within 180 days of the vacancy; provide that the Mayor shall appoint an interim Supervisor to fill a supervisorial vacancy until an election is held to fill that vacancy, with the interim Supervisor being ineligible to compete in that election; and require the Mayor to fill vacancies in all local elective offices within 28 days of the vacancy, at an election to be held on November 8, 2016. ORDERED SUBMITTED by the following vote:
File 160628: Budget and Appropriation Ordinance for Departments - FYs 2016-2017 and 2017-2018
LLM summaryThe Budget and Appropriation Ordinance for FYs 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 was discussed, and an amendment regarding the Police Department's budget failed.
Source textion Ordinance for Departments - FYs 2016-2017 and 2017-2018] Sponsor: Mayor Budget and Appropriation Ordinance appropriating all estimated receipts and all estimated expenditures for Departments, including those selected departments recommended for approval by the Budget and Finance Committee on May 25, 2016, of the City and County of San Francisco as of May 31, 2016, for the FYs ending June 30, 2017, and June 30, 2018. (Fiscal Impact) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Acting Chief Toney Chaplin (Police Department), Harvey Rose, Budget and Legislative Analyst (Office of the Budget and Legislative Analyst), Ben Rosenfield, Controller (Office of the City Controller), and Melissa Whitehouse, Acting Budget Director (Mayor's Office), who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Mar, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE, by placing $30 million of the San Francisco's Police Department's budget on Board of Supervisors reserve pending quarterly presentation at the full Board on the Department's progress towards implementing reforms. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 160187: Settlement of Lawsuit - David Zeller - $900,000
LLM summaryAn ordinance authorizing a $900,000 settlement for a lawsuit filed by David Zeller was continued to a future meeting.
Source text160187 [Settlement of Lawsuit - David Zeller - $900,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by David Zeller against the City and County of San Francisco for $900,000; the lawsuit was filed on March 14, 2013, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-13-529554; entitled David Zeller v. San Francisco General Hospital, et al.; the lawsuit involves alleged medical malpractice. (City Attorney) Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Wiener, moved that this Ordinance be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of July 19, 2016. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 160585: Charter Amendment - Dignity Fund
LLM summaryAn amendment to the charter amendment concerning the Dignity Fund was proposed but failed.
Source textSupervisor Yee, seconded by Supervisor Mar, moved that this Charter Amendment be AMENDED on Page 17, Line 5, by adding 'The Board of Supervisors may recommend candidates for the three at-large members and the Mayor shall consider any such recommendations in making the appointments.' after 'Notice of Appointment.'; and on Page 19, Lines 12-15, by adding 'The Board of Supervisors may recommend candidates for the Commission and the Mayor shall consider any such recommendations in making the appointments.' after 'four-year terms.' The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 160585: Charter Amendment - Dignity Fund
LLM summaryAn amendment to the charter amendment regarding the Dignity Fund was proposed but failed.
Source textSupervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Charter Amendment be AMENDED by splitting the Mayor and Board of Supervisors appointments to the Oversight and Advisory Committee and Aging and Adult Services Commission. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 160585: Charter Amendment - Dignity Fund
LLM summaryA charter amendment establishing the Dignity Fund was proposed, but an amendment regarding appointments failed.
Source texts until fiscal year 2026-2027, and continuing at that amount, adjusted annually for changes in aggregate discretionary City revenues, for the next 10 years until fiscal year 2036-2037; 3) establish a planning process for expenditures from the Fund; 4) create an Oversight and Advisory Committee; 5) set an expiration date of June 30, 2037; and, 6) change the “Commission on Aging” to the “Aging and Adult Services Commission” and update its responsibilities, at an election to be held on November 8, 2016. (Supervisor Tang dissented in committee.) Supervisor Yee, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that this Charter Amendment be AMENDED, on Page 17, Line 5, by adding 'The Mayor shall invite the Board of Supervisors to recommend candidates for the three at-large members and the Mayor shall consider any such recommendations in making the appointments.' after 'Notice of Appointment.'; and Page 18, Lines 12-15, by adding 'Prior to making the appointments, the Mayor shall invite the Board of Supervisors to recommend candidates for the Commission and the Mayor shall consider any such recommendations in making the appointments.' after 'four-year terms.' The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 160660: Urging the San Francisco Legislative Delegation to Amend or Oppose the Proposed “By Right Housing Approvals” Budget Trailer Bill
LLM summaryA resolution urging the San Francisco Legislative Delegation to amend or oppose the proposed housing approvals trailer bill was adopted.
Source text160660 [Urging the San Francisco Legislative Delegation to Amend or Oppose the Proposed “By Right Housing Approvals” Budget Trailer Bill] Sponsors: Peskin; Mar, Kim, Yee, Avalos and Campos Resolution urging the San Francisco Legislative Delegation to amend or oppose the “By Right Housing Approvals” proposed Trailer Bill in recognition of San Francisco’s local planning tools and significant contributions to regional housing development. ADOPTED by the following vote:
File 160579: Official Advertising - San Francisco Print Media Co., dba San Francisco Examiner - FY2016-2017
LLM summaryThe resolution designating San Francisco Print Media Co. as the official newspaper for advertising was adopted as amended.
Source textCity and County of San Francisco Page 485 Printed at 8:54 am on 8/4/16 Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 6/21/2016 Resolution designating San Francisco Print Media Co., dba San Francisco Examiner, to be the official newspaper of the City and County of San Francisco for all official advertising for FY2016-2017. (Office of Contract Administration) Resolution No. 251-16 ADOPTED AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 160579: Official Advertising - San Francisco Print Media Co., dba San Francisco Examiner - FY2016-2017
LLM summaryA resolution designating San Francisco Print Media Co. as the official newspaper for advertising was amended to remove The San Francisco Chronicle.
Source text160579 [Official Advertising - San Francisco Print Media Co., dba San Francisco Examiner - FY2016-2017] Resolution designating San Francisco Print Media Co., commonly known as The Examiner, for the period of July 1, 2016, through December 31, 2016, and The San Francisco Chronicle for the period of January 1, 2017, through June 30, 2017, to be the official newspapers of the City and County of San Francisco for all official advertising for FY2016-2017. (Office of Contract Administration) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Kofo Domingo (Office of Contract Administration); Diane Fitzgibbons (San Francisco Chronicle), and Female Speaker, who provided information and responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Resolution be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE, by removing the San Francisco Chronicle as official advertisers for the City and County of San Francisco. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 160228: Calling for a California State of Emergency Declaration on Homelessness
LLM summaryA resolution urging the Governor to declare a State of Emergency on Homelessness was adopted to enhance state and regional responses to the crisis.
Source text160228 [Calling for a California State of Emergency Declaration on Homelessness] Sponsors: Kim; Cohen, Campos, Peskin, Mar and Avalos Resolution urging Governor Jerry Brown to declare a State of Emergency on Homelessness to help coordinate region- and state-wide responses to this growing crisis, and provide supplementary state assistance to cities and counties to provide needed supportive services. Resolution No. 211-16 ADOPTED by the following vote:
File 160407: Appointments, Sunshine Ordinance Task Force - Josh Wolf, Leuwam Tesfai, Bruce Wolfe, Dave Maass, Frank Cannata, Chris Hyland, and Louise Fischer
LLM summaryThe Board approved the appointment of Bruce Wolfe to the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force.
Source textMotion No. M16-061 The divided question to appoint Bruce Wolfe was APPROVED by the following vote:
File 160407: Appointments, Sunshine Ordinance Task Force - Josh Wolf, Leuwam Tesfai, Bruce Wolfe, Dave Maass, Frank Cannata, Chris Hyland, and Louise Fischer
LLM summaryA motion appointing members to the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force was amended and carried.
Source text160407 [Appointments, Sunshine Ordinance Task Force - Josh Wolf, Leuwam Tesfai, Bruce Wolfe, Dave Maass, Frank Cannata, Chris Hyland, and Louise Fischer] Motion appointing Josh Wolf, Leuwam Tesfai, David Pilpel, Dave Maass, Frank Cannata, Chris Hyland, and Louise Fischer, terms ending April 27, 2018, to the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. (Rules Committee) (Supervisor Mar dissented on the appointment of David Pilpel in Committee.) Supervisor Mar, seconded by Supervisor Avalos, moved that this Motion be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE, on Page 1, Line 1, Line 3, and Line 17, by striking 'David Pilpel' and adding 'Bruce Wolfe'; and Line 17, by striking 'succeeding themself' and adding 'succeeding David Pilpel'. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 160493: Formal Policy Discussions - May 10, 2016
LLM summaryA supermajority of the Board allowed the District 11 Board Member to ask a late question due to recent unexpected incidents at City Hall.
Source textngs in 2015. We just learned from the District Attorney today that he wants to establish a “special unit to investigate all officer involved shootings." This unit would be walled off from the regular work of the District Attorney's Office and would be housed outside of the Hall of Justice to maintain independence. The unit, comprised of 16 staff, including lawyers, investigators, and paralegals would investigate and decide whether to prosecute all officer involved shootings in San Francisco. The DA has requested a budget of $1.9 million to establish the unit. Will you commit to funding this unit in your budget? (Supervisor Campos, District 9) Mayor Lee addressed the Board of Supervisors and discussed the above referenced question from the District 9 Supervisor. Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that a supermajority of the Board allow the eligible Board Member from District 11 to ask a question that was not posed by the deadline, due to unexpected incidents that resulted in City Hall being occupied last week, the continued Police presence in and around City Hall since last week, and the need to deescalate the situation. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 160493: Formal Policy Discussions - May 10, 2016
LLM summaryA supermajority of the Board permitted the District 9 Board Member to ask a late question following the release of findings by a transparency panel.
Source textSupervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Cohen, moved that a supermajority of the Board allow the eligible Board Member from District 9 to ask a question that was not posed by the deadline, due to yesterday's release of the findings by the Blue Ribbon Panel on Transparency, Accountability, and Fairness. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 160493: Formal Policy Discussions - May 10, 2016
LLM summaryA supermajority of the Board allowed the District 3 Board Member to ask a late question due to unexpected circumstances.
Source textCity and County of San Francisco Page 371 Printed at 11:21 am on 6/22/16 Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 5/10/2016 Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Mar, moved that a supermajority of the Board allow the eligible Board Member from District 3 to ask a question that was not posed by the deadline, due to the unexpected circumstances that arose last Friday and also manifested in the suspension of the hunger strike. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 160493: Formal Policy Discussions - May 10, 2016
LLM summaryA motion to allow a Board member to ask a late question regarding police reform funding failed.
Source textSupervisor Yee, seconded by Supervisor Kim, moved that a supermajority of the Board allow the eligible Board Member from District 7 to ask a question that was not posed by the deadline, due to the Mayor's newly announced $17.5 million reform package to fund comprehensive police reforms and violence prevention. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 160493: Formal Policy Discussions - May 10, 2016
LLM summaryThe Board addressed demands for police reform and an investigation into civil rights violations within the Police Department.
Source texton of Internal Affairs devoted exclusively to addressing and rooting out bigotry, as well as institutional racism within the Police Department; and 3) that we make a formal request to the United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, calling for an investigation into the Police Department for violations of the civil rights of African-Americans and Latino-Americans. These above demands are based on the history of corruption and scandal within and by the Police Department, which have established a pervasive pattern of civil rights abuse and violation based on race. They appreciate our time and attention, they ask if we would support these demands. I support these demands, will you? (Supervisor Mar, District 1) Mayor Lee addressed the Board of Supervisors and discussed the above referenced question from the District 1 Supervisor. Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Avalos, moved that a supermajority of the Board allow the eligible Board Member from District 9 to ask a question that was not posed by the deadline, due to yesterday's release of the findings by the Blue Ribbon Panel on Transparency, Accountability, and Fairness. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 160493: Formal Policy Discussions - May 10, 2016
LLM summaryThe Board discussed formal policy questions related to recent protests and unrest in the community.
Source textathered at City Hall, resulting in numerous arrests and thousands of dollars of damage. This raises formal, time-sensitive policy questions. It was the latest in a series of unrest following racist and homophobic text scandals among SFPD officers, very controversial officer involved shootings, and multiple investigations into the department. The community is in pain. Protestors are demanding the removal of Chief Suhr, and I know you have said you will not do so. I respect that. But my question is: given that impasse, that disagreement, where does this end? Where do you see this situation heading? And how do we reconcile; how do we bring the City together and ensure everyone feels safe in their community? (Supervisor Breed, District 5) Mayor Lee addressed the Board of Supervisors and discussed the above referenced question from the District 5 Supervisor. Supervisor Mar, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that a supermajority of the Board allow the eligible Board Member from District 1 to ask a question that was not posed by the deadline, due to sudden and unexpected incidents related to the deep-seated bigotry within the Policy Department. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 160493: Formal Policy Discussions - May 10, 2016
LLM summaryThe Board granted a request for formal policy discussions regarding unexpected incidents that raised time-sensitive questions.
Source textiginal question submitted by the District 11 Supervisor, in light of the presence of sudden or unexpected incidents raising formal or time-sensitive policy questions. The request was granted without objection. Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney) to provide the four-step criteria test to allow eligible Supervisors to pose questions that could not have been anticipated prior to the deadline for appearance on the agenda, which include: 1) the question was posed after the 12:00 noon deadline on Wednesday, May 4, 2016; 2) there was a sudden or unexpected incident raising formal or time-sensitive policy questions; 3) members could not have anticipated the question prior to the deadline; and 4) the question cannot be adequately addressed at the next scheduled question time. Supervisor Breed, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that a supermajority of the Board allow the eligible Board Member from District 5 to ask a question that was not posed by the deadline, due to the numerous arrests and thousands of dollars in damage as a result of a large group from protestors who gathered at City Hall. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 160342: Appointments, Citizen's Committee on Community Development - Peter Cohen and Miquel Penn
LLM summaryThe motion appointing Peter Cohen to the Citizen's Committee on Community Development was approved as amended.
Source textCity and County of San Francisco Page 292 Printed at 1:02 pm on 6/15/16 Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 4/26/2016 Motion No. M16-056 The motion appointing Peter Cohen to the Citizen's Committee on Community Development was APPROVED AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 160342: Appointments, Citizen's Committee on Community Development - Peter Cohen and Miquel Penn
LLM summaryA motion appointing Peter Cohen and reappointing Miquel Penn to the Citizen's Committee on Community Development was amended and approved.
Source text160342 [Appointments, Citizen's Committee on Community Development - Peter Cohen and Miquel Penn] Motion appointing Megan Rohrer and reappointing Miquel Penn, terms ending February 23, 2018, to the Citizen's Committee on Community Development. (Rules Committee) (Supervisor Mar dissented on the appointment of Megan Rohrer in Committee.) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney) and Nicole Elliott (Mayor's Office) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Mar, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Motion be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE, on Page 1, Lines 1, 3, and 10, by striking 'Megan Rohrer' and adding 'Peter Cohen.' The motion carried by the following vote:
File 160258: Supporting California State Senate Bill 1286 (Leno) - Increasing Law Enforcement Transparency
LLM summaryThe resolution supporting California State Senate Bill 1286, which aims to increase law enforcement transparency, was adopted as amended and divided.
Source textThe remaining balance of the Resolution was ADOPTED AS AMENDED AND DIVIDED by the following vote:
File 160223: Declaring Existence of a Shelter Crisis
LLM summaryAn ordinance declaring the existence of a shelter crisis in San Francisco was finally passed.
Source text160223 [Declaring Existence of a Shelter Crisis] Sponsors: Campos; Kim, Avalos, Mar, Yee, Breed, Peskin and Cohen Ordinance making findings and declaring the existence of a shelter crisis in San Francisco under California Government Code, Sections 8698, et seq. Ordinance No. 057-16 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 160223: Declaring Existence of a Shelter Crisis
LLM summaryAn ordinance declaring the existence of a shelter crisis in San Francisco passed on first reading.
Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 160223: Declaring Existence of a Shelter Crisis
LLM summaryAn ordinance declaring the existence of a shelter crisis in San Francisco passed on first reading.
Source text160223 [Declaring Existence of a Shelter Crisis] Sponsors: Campos; Kim, Avalos, Mar, Yee, Breed, Peskin and Cohen Ordinance making findings and declaring the existence of a shelter crisis in San Francisco under California Government Code, Sections 8698, et seq. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 160117: Appropriation - Funding for the Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund - $100,000 - FY2015-2016
LLM summaryOrdinance No. 046-16 regarding the Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund was finally passed.
Source textOrdinance No. 046-16 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 160117: Appropriation - Funding for the Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund - $100,000 - FY2015-2016
LLM summaryAn ordinance appropriating $100,000 from the General Reserve to fund the Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund for FY2015-2016 was finally passed.
Source text160117 [Appropriation - Funding for the Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund - $100,000 - FY2015-2016] Sponsors: Peskin; Kim Ordinance appropriating $100,000 from the General Reserve to fund the Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund in FY2015-2016. (Fiscal Impact) FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 160116: Administrative Code - Establishing a San Francisco Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund
LLM summaryOrdinance No. 045-16 establishing the San Francisco Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund was finally passed.
Source textOrdinance No. 045-16 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 160116: Administrative Code - Establishing a San Francisco Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund
LLM summaryAn ordinance amending the Administrative Code to establish a San Francisco Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund was finally passed.
Source text160116 [Administrative Code - Establishing a San Francisco Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund] Sponsors: Peskin; Kim Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to establish a San Francisco Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund to be used to provide financial support to small businesses specifically impacted by Super Bowl-related events. (Fiscal Impact) FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 151178: Appropriation - General Fund Reserve - Facilities Improvements in the Recreation and Park Department - $2,500,000 - FY2015-2016
LLM summaryAn ordinance appropriating $2,500,000 from the General Fund Reserve for facilities improvements in the Recreation and Park Department was finally passed.
Source text151178 [Appropriation - General Fund Reserve - Facilities Improvements in the Recreation and Park Department - $2,500,000 - FY2015-2016] Sponsor: Avalos Ordinance appropriating $2,500,000 from the General Fund Reserve to the Recreation and Park Department for facilities improvements in the Geneva Car Barn in FY2015-2016. (Fiscal Impact) Ordinance No. 042-16 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 160228: Calling for a California State of Emergency Declaration on Homelessness
LLM summaryA resolution calling for a California State of Emergency on homelessness was not adopted as amended.
Source textPrivilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised during the discussion regarding a division of the question. NOT ADOPTED AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 160117: Appropriation - Funding for the Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund - $100,000 - FY2015-2016
LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to appropriate $100,000 from the General Reserve for the Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund.
Source text160117 [Appropriation - Funding for the Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund - $100,000 - FY2015-2016] Sponsors: Peskin; Kim Ordinance appropriating $100,000 from the General Reserve to fund the Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund in FY2015-2016. (Fiscal Impact) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Tom DeCaigny, Director (Arts Commission), who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 160116: Administrative Code - Establishing a San Francisco Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund
LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to establish a San Francisco Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund for small businesses affected by Super Bowl events.
Source text160116 [Administrative Code - Establishing a San Francisco Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund] Sponsors: Peskin; Kim Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to establish a San Francisco Super Bowl 50 Impact Fund to be used to provide financial support to small businesses specifically impacted by Super Bowl-related events. (Fiscal Impact) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Tom DeCaigny, Director (Arts Commission), who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 151178: Appropriation - General Fund Reserve - Facilities Improvements in the Recreation and Park Department - $2,500,000 - FY2015-2016
LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to appropriate $2,500,000 from the General Fund Reserve for facilities improvements in the Recreation and Park Department.
Source text151178 [Appropriation - General Fund Reserve - Facilities Improvements in the Recreation and Park Department - $2,500,000 - FY2015-2016] Sponsor: Avalos Ordinance appropriating $2,500,000 from the General Fund Reserve to the Recreation and Park Department for facilities improvements in the Geneva Car Barn in FY2015-2016. (Fiscal Impact) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 151257: Planning Code - Increasing Transportation Sustainability Fee for Non-residential Projects
LLM summaryAn ordinance to increase the Transportation Sustainability Fee for large non-residential projects was not finally passed after the Mayor's veto was sustained.
Source text151257 [Planning Code - Increasing Transportation Sustainability Fee for Non-residential Projects] Sponsors: Avalos; Campos and Mar Ordinance amending the Planning Code to increase the Transportation Sustainability Fee for Non-residential projects larger than 99,999 gross square feet, and to require Non-residential or Production, Distribution and Repair (PDR) projects that filed development or environmental applications on or before July 21, 2015, but that have not yet received approvals, to pay the Transportation Sustainability Fee with a partial refund; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings, including general findings, findings of public necessity, convenience and welfare, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. The Mayor's veto was SUSTAINED and the Ordinance was NOT FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 160115: Planning, Building Codes - Conditional Use Required to Remove Any Residential Unit; Mandatory Legalization of Unauthorized Units
LLM summaryThe ordinance concerning Conditional Use requirements for residential unit removal and unauthorized unit legalization passed on first reading as amended.
Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 151257: Planning Code - Increasing Transportation Sustainability Fee for Non-residential Projects
LLM summaryAn ordinance increasing the Transportation Sustainability Fee for large non-residential projects was finally passed.
Source text151257 [Planning Code - Increasing Transportation Sustainability Fee for Non-residential Projects] Sponsors: Avalos; Campos and Mar Ordinance amending the Planning Code to increase the Transportation Sustainability Fee for Non-residential projects larger than 99,999 gross square feet, and to require Non-residential or Production, Distribution and Repair (PDR) projects that filed development or environmental applications on or before July 21, 2015, but that have not yet received approvals, to pay the Transportation Sustainability Fee with a partial refund; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings, including general findings, findings of public necessity, convenience and welfare, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 151257: Planning Code - Increasing Transportation Sustainability Fee for Non-residential Projects
LLM summaryThe Planning Code amendment to increase the Transportation Sustainability Fee for non-residential projects passed on first reading.
Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 150940: Charter Amendment - Park, Recreation and Open Space Fund
LLM summaryA charter amendment to establish a baseline appropriation for the Park, Recreation and Open Space Fund was ordered submitted.
Source text150940 [Charter Amendment - Park, Recreation and Open Space Fund] Sponsors: Farrell; Mar, Wiener, Yee, Breed, Cohen and Avalos Charter Amendment (Fourth Draft) to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to require an annual baseline appropriation for the Park, Recreation and Open Space Fund based on City spending for park and recreation purposes in FY2015-2016, extend the annual set-aside and the baseline appropriation for 15 years to FY2045-2046, and modify the Recreation and Park Department’s planning obligations to include equity analysis and Board of Supervisors review, at an election to be held on June 7, 2016. ORDERED SUBMITTED by the following vote:
File 151272: Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program
LLM summaryA motion to prepare findings reversing the categorical exemption for the Commuter Shuttle Permit Program was continued.
Source text151272 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Commuter Shuttle Permit Program is categorically exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Motion be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 23, 2016. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 151271: Reversing the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program
LLM summaryA motion to reverse the categorical exemption for the Commuter Shuttle Permit Program was continued.
Source text151271 [Reversing the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program] Motion reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Commuter Shuttle Permit Program is categorically exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Motion be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 23, 2016. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 151270: Affirming Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program
LLM summaryThe Planning Department's determination that the proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program is categorically exempt from environmental review was affirmed and continued to a future meeting.
Source text151270 [Affirming Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program] Motion affirming the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Commuter Shuttle Permit Program is categorically exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Motion be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 23, 2016. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 151269: Public Hearing - Appeal of Categorical Exemption from Environmental Review - Proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program
LLM summaryA public hearing was held regarding an appeal of the categorical exemption for the Commuter Shuttle Permit Program, which was continued to a later Board meeting.
Source textal exemption from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act issued by the Planning Department on October 22, 2015, and approved by the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency on November 17, 2015, for the proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program. (Appellant: Rebecca L. Davis, on behalf of the Coalition for Fair, Legal and Environmental Transit, Sue Vaughan, and Robert Planthold) (Filed December 17, 2015). (Clerk of the Board) The President opened the public hearing and inquired as to whether any member of the public wished to address the Board relating to a proposed continuance by the appellant and project sponsor. Tom Gilberty; Erin McElroy; Ella Benhagai; Susan Vaughan; Ariana Casanova (SEIU 1021); Edward Nation; Francisco Da Costa; spoke in support of the continuance. Jaime Javier; Deepa Varma; spoke in opposition to the continuance. Silvia Johnson; shared various concerns. There were no other speakers. The President declared public comment on the continuance closed. Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Hearing be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 23, 2016. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 160015: Appointment, Entertainment Commission - Laura Thomas
LLM summaryAn amendment was made to appoint Laura Thomas to the Entertainment Commission, replacing Joaquin Castillo Arana, and the motion carried.
Source text160015 [Appointment, Entertainment Commission - Laura Thomas] Motion appointing Joaquin Castillo Arana, term ending July 1, 2017, to the Entertainment Commission. (Rules Committee) Supervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Avalos, moved that this Motion be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE, by striking 'Joaquin Castillo Arana' and adding 'Laura Thomas.' The motion carried by the following vote:
File 160036: Calling from Committee - Committee of the Whole - Charter Amendment (File No. 151274) - February 23, 2016
LLM summaryA motion was made to schedule a public hearing for a proposed Charter Amendment regarding affordable housing obligations on February 23, 2016.
Source text160036 [Calling from Committee - Committee of the Whole - Charter Amendment (File No. 151274) - February 23, 2016] Sponsor: Kim Motion scheduling the Board of Supervisors to sit as a Committee of the Whole on February 23, 2016, at 3:00 p.m., to hold a public hearing to consider a proposed Charter Amendment (File No. 151274) authorizing the Board of Supervisors to update the inclusionary or affordable housing obligations for housing development projects and setting forth increased interim requirements, to be proposed to the voters at the June 7, 2016, election. Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Motion be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE, by striking the waiver of Board Rule 3.26, and adding language to call the Charter Amendment (File No. 151274) from the Rules Committee pursuant to Board of Supervisors Rule 3.37. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 160037: Suspending Board Rule 3.26.1 and Amending Board Rule 3.31 - Extending the Joint City and School District Select Committee through March 1, 2017, and Setting Monthly Meetings
LLM summaryA motion was made to suspend Board Rule 3.26.1 and amend Rule 3.31 to extend the Joint City and School District Select Committee through March 1, 2017.
Source text160037 [Suspending Board Rule 3.26.1 and Amending Board Rule 3.31 - Extending the Joint City and School District Select Committee through March 1, 2017, and Setting Monthly Meetings] Sponsor: Kim Motion suspending the Board of Supervisors Rules of Order 3.26.1 to consider, without reference, an amendment to Board Rule 3.31 to extend the term of the Joint City and School District Select Committee through March 1, 2017; ordering the City and School District Select Committee meetings of the Board of Supervisors be held on the fourth Thursday of each month, except June, July, August, November, and December, at 3:30 p.m. in the Board of Supervisors Chamber. NOT APPROVED by the following vote:
File 151272: Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program
LLM summaryA motion was made to prepare findings reversing the Planning Department's categorical exemption for the proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program, which was continued to February 9, 2016.
Source text151272 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Commuter Shuttle Permit Program is categorically exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Motion be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 9, 2016. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 151271: Reversing the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program
LLM summaryA motion to reverse the Planning Department's categorical exemption for the proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program was also continued to February 9, 2016.
Source text151271 [Reversing the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program] Motion reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Commuter Shuttle Permit Program is categorically exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Motion be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 9, 2016. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 151270: Affirming Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program
LLM summaryA motion affirming the Planning Department's categorical exemption for the proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program was continued to February 9, 2016.
Source text151270 [Affirming Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program] Motion affirming the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Commuter Shuttle Permit Program is categorically exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Motion be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 9, 2016. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 151269: Public Hearing - Appeal of Categorical Exemption from Environmental Review - Proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program
LLM summaryA public hearing was held regarding an appeal of the categorical exemption for the proposed Commuter Shuttle Permit Program, which was continued to February 9, 2016.
Source text for Fair, Legal and Environmental Transit, Sue Vaughan, and Robert Planthold) (Filed December 17, 2015). (Clerk of the Board) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Tom McGuire (Municipal Transportation Agency), Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney), Camron Samii (Muncipal Transportation Agency), and Sarah Jones (Planning Department) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. The President inquired as to whether any member of the public wished to address the Board relating to a proposed continuance by the appellant and project sponsor. Doug Bloch and Tracey Kelly (Teamsters); Male Speaker; Mara; Jaime Areullo; Ariana Castanova (SEIU); Howard Mason; Sarah Sherburn Zimmer (Housing Rights Committee); Walter Paulson; Betty Mackie; Sam Maneer; Francisco Da Costa; spoke in support of the continuance. Male Speaker; Triss; John Arand; Leanne; Andrew; Nathaniel; Sara Gleason; James Driscoll; Donald Dewsnup; spoke in opposition to the continuance. There were no other speakers. Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Hearing be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 9, 2016. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 150943: Administrative Code - Bicycle Yield Enforcement Policy
LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed to amend the Administrative Code, establishing a Bicycle Yield Enforcement Policy that prioritizes safety and reduces enforcement for certain bicyclist violations.
Source text150943 [Administrative Code - Bicycle Yield Enforcement Policy] Sponsors: Avalos; Breed, Campos, Kim, Mar and Wiener Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to add Chapter 110 to establish the “San Francisco Right-of-Way Policy” to promote safety, tolerance, and harmony among all users of City Streets; make arrests and citations of bicyclists for failure to stop at a stop sign the lowest traffic enforcement priority, provided that the bicyclist first slows to a safe speed and yields the right-of-way to any other vehicle or pedestrian in the intersection; require quarterly reports from the Police Department on statistics related to traffic enforcement, injuries, and fatalities; urge the Municipal Transportation Agency to develop a program to educate the public about the Bicycle Yield Enforcement Policy; and require notification of state officials of this Ordinance. (Supervisor Cohen dissented in committee.) FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 150943: Administrative Code - Bicycle Yield Enforcement Policy
LLM summaryAn amended version of the Bicycle Yield Enforcement Policy was passed on first reading after being duplicated.
Source text(Supervisor Cohen dissented in committee.) Supervisor Avalos requested File No. 150943 be DUPLICATED AS AMENDED. See duplicated File No. 151268. PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 151257: Planning Code - Increasing Transportation Sustainability Fee for Nonresidential Projects
LLM summaryThe Board re-referred the amended ordinance increasing the Transportation Sustainability Fee for nonresidential projects to the Land Use and Transportation Committee.
Source textOrdinance amending the Planning Code to increase the Transportation Sustainability Fee for Non-residential projects larger than 99,999 gross square feet, and to require Non-residential or Production, Distribution and Repair (PDR) projects that filed development or environmental applications on or before July 21, 2015, but that have not yet received approvals, to pay the Transportation Sustainability Fee with a partial refund; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings, including general findings, findings of public necessity, convenience and welfare, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Ordinance be RE-REFERRED AS AMENDED to the Land Use and Transportation Committee. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 151257: Planning Code - Increasing Transportation Sustainability Fee for Nonresidential Projects
LLM summaryThe Board moved to amend the ordinance increasing the Transportation Sustainability Fee for nonresidential projects over 99,999 square feet.
Source textsportation Sustainability Fee to Hospitals and Health Services; amending Section 401 to add definitions reflecting these changes; amending Section 406 to clarify affordable housing and homeless shelter exemptions from the Transportation Sustainability Fee; making conforming amendments to the Area Plan fees in Planning Code, Article 4; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings, including general findings, findings of public necessity, convenience and welfare, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. Duplicated from File No. 151121. Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE, to raise the Transportation Sustainability Fee (TSF) from $2.00 to $21.04 for non-residential square footage over 99,999; and require non-residential projects that submitted an application before July 21, 2015, but have not received final approval, pay 50% of the difference between the TSF and the Transportation Impact Development Fee. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 150622: Administrative, Planning Codes - Preferences in Affordable Housing Programs
LLM summaryThe ordinance amends codes to clarify preferences in affordable housing programs, prioritizing certain displaced tenants and neighborhood residents.
Source text150622 [Administrative, Planning Codes - Preferences in Affordable Housing Programs] Sponsors: Mayor; Christensen, Cohen, Breed, Wiener and Farrell Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to clarify existing preferences in allocating City affordable housing units first to Certificate of Preference holders and second to tenants evicted under the Ellis Act, expand the second category of preference for eligible tenants displaced under the Ellis Act to include certain tenants displaced through an Owner Move-In or OMI eviction, and create a third preference for residents in the neighborhood where the affordable housing is located; to make conforming amendments to provisions of the Administrative and Planning Codes; to affirm the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and to make findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. Supervisor Farrell requested to be added as a co-sponsor. Ordinance No. 204-15 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 150622: Administrative, Planning Codes - Preferences in Affordable Housing Programs
LLM summaryThe ordinance regarding preferences in affordable housing programs was passed on first reading as amended.
Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 150622: Administrative, Planning Codes - Preferences in Affordable Housing Programs
LLM summaryThe ordinance concerning preferences in affordable housing programs was passed on first reading as amended.
Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 150622: Administrative, Planning Codes - Preferences in Affordable Housing Programs
LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to amend the Administrative Code regarding preferences in affordable housing allocations.
Source textCity and County of San Francisco Page 785 Printed at 1:20 pm on 1/15/16 Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 11/17/2015 Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to clarify existing preferences in allocating City affordable housing units first to Certificate of Preference holders and second to tenants evicted under the Ellis Act, expand the second category of preference for eligible tenants displaced under the Ellis Act to include certain tenants displaced through an Owner Move-In or OMI eviction, and create a third preference for residents in the neighborhood where the affordable housing is located; to make conforming amendments to provisions of the Administrative and Planning Codes; to affirm the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and to make findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 150790: Planning Code - Establishing a New Citywide Transportation Sustainability Fee
LLM summaryAn amendment requiring certain projects to pay 75% of the Transportation Sustainability Fee failed.
Source textSupervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED to require projects that were submitted between July 1, 2014, to July 21, 2015, to pay 75% of the Transportation Sustainability Fee. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 150790: Planning Code - Establishing a New Citywide Transportation Sustainability Fee
LLM summaryAn amendment to increase the Transportation Sustainability Fee for certain non-residential uses failed.
Source textomeless shelter exemptions from the Transportation Sustainability Fee; making conforming amendments to the Area Plan fees in Planning Code, Article 4; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act, and making findings, including general findings, findings of public necessity, convenience and welfare, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code Section 101.1. Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to John Rahaim, Director, and Lisa Chen (Planning Department), Jon Givner (Office of City Attorney), Ed Reiskin, Executive Director (Municipal Transportation Agency), and Tilly Chang, Executive Director (County Transportation Authority), who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Cohen requested to be added as a co-sponsor. Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED to increase the Transportation Sustainability Fee for non-residential uses between 800-99,999 gross square feet (gsf) from $0.50 to $18.54, and non-residential uses over 99,999 gsf from $4.00 to $23.04. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 150796: Confirming Support for the Sanctuary City and Due Process for All Ordinance and Urging the Sheriff to Immediately Rescind His Department-Wide Memorandum of March 13, 2015
LLM summaryA resolution confirming support for the Sanctuary City and Due Process for All Ordinance was tabled after a motion.
Source text150796 [Confirming Support for the Sanctuary City and Due Process for All Ordinance and Urging the Sheriff to Immediately Rescind His Department-Wide Memorandum of March 13, 2015] Sponsor: Farrell Resolution confirming the Board of Supervisors’ support for the Sanctuary City and Due Process for All Ordinance; and urging the Sheriff to immediately rescind his department-wide memorandum of March 13, 2015, regarding immigration and custom enforcement procedures, contact, and communication. Supervisor Cohen, seconded by Supervisor Avalos, moved that this Resolution be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 150646: Administrative Code - Amendments to Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance
LLM summaryThe maximum number of roommates permitted under the Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance was finally passed.
Source textOrdinance No. 171-15 The divided portion of the question relating to the maximum number of roommates permitted was FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 150646: Administrative Code - Amendments to Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance
LLM summaryThe Board discussed amendments to the Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance, dividing the question regarding maximum roommates permitted, which passed on first reading.
Source texts to state in notices to vacate for certain good cause evictions the lawful rent for the unit at the time the notice is served; 9) require the Rent Board to prepare a form in English, Chinese, Spanish, Vietnamese, Tagalog, and Russian stating that a notice to vacate may lead to a lawsuit to evict and stating that advice regarding notices to vacate is available from the Rent Board; 10) require landlords to attach a copy of the Rent Board form in the primary language of the tenant to each notice to vacate; and 11) require landlords to plead and prove in any action to recover possession that at least one of the grounds of Administrative Code, Section 37.9(a)-(b) stated in the notice to vacate is the dominant motive for recovering possession. Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Delene Wolf, Executive Director (Rent Board), who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Wiener requested the question be DIVIDED to consider separately Page 8, Line 9, through Page 9, Line 19, regarding the maximum number of roommates permitted. The divided question relating to the maximum number of roommates permitted was PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 150813: Administrative Code - Expanding the San Francisco Disaster Recovery Fund
LLM summaryThe Board discussed amendments to the ordinance expanding the San Francisco Disaster Recovery Fund, but a proposed amendment failed.
Source text150813 [Administrative Code - Expanding the San Francisco Disaster Recovery Fund] Sponsors: Mayor; Tang and Farrell Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to rename the San Francisco Disaster Recovery Fund as the San Francisco Disaster Recovery and Emergency Response and Recovery Fund, redesignate the fund as a category eight fund, and specify how the City may use the fund. Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Todd Rydstrom, Deputy City Controller, who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Yee, seconded by Supervisor Avalos, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED on Page 3, Lines 4-5, by adding '(e) Exception to Fund Category. All expenditures in excess of $100,000 shall require the approval, by resolution, of the Board of Supervisors.' The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 150363: Administrative Code - Short-Term Residential Rentals
LLM summaryAn ordinance to amend the Administrative Code regarding short-term residential rentals was proposed but the motion to amend it failed.
Source textOrdinance amending the Administrative Code to revise the Residential Unit Conversion Ordinance to: limit short-term rental of a Residential Unit to no more than 120 days per calendar year; revise the definition of interested parties who may enforce the provisions of Chapter 41A, through a private right of action to include permanent residents residing within 100 feet of the residential unit; create an additional private right of action under certain circumstances; change the administrative hearing process from mandatory to at the request of any party found in violation of this Chapter; create an Office of Short-Term Residential Rental Administration and Enforcement staffed by the Planning Department, Department of Building Inspection, and Tax Collector’s Office; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Economic Impact) Supervisor Yee, seconded by Supervisor Mar, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 150295: Administrative Code - Short-Term Residential Rentals
LLM summaryAn amended ordinance regarding short-term residential rentals was not passed on first reading.
Source textNOT PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 150082: Planning Code, Zoning Map - Establishing the Divisadero Street Neighborhood Commercial Transit District
LLM summaryAn ordinance to establish the Divisadero Street Neighborhood Commercial Transit District was proposed but a motion to continue it failed.
Source text150082 [Planning Code, Zoning Map - Establishing the Divisadero Street Neighborhood Commercial Transit District] Sponsor: Breed Ordinance amending the Planning Code to establish the Divisadero Street Neighborhood Commercial Transit District along Divisadero Street between Haight and O’Farrell Streets in place of the Divisadero Street Neighborhood Commercial District and make conforming and other technical changes to various other sections; amending the Zoning Map to make changes that conform with the Code amendments; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that this item be continued until later in the meeting. The motion failed by the following vote:
File 150081: Planning Code, Zoning Map - Establishing the Fillmore Street Neighborhood Commercial Transit District
LLM summaryAn ordinance to establish the Fillmore Street Neighborhood Commercial Transit District was introduced but a motion to continue the item failed.
Source text150081 [Planning Code, Zoning Map - Establishing the Fillmore Street Neighborhood Commercial Transit District] Sponsor: Breed Ordinance amending the Planning Code to establish the Fillmore Street Neighborhood Commercial Transit District along Fillmore Street between Bush and McAllister Streets in place of the Fillmore Street Neighborhood Commercial District, amending various other sections to make conforming and other technical changes; amending the Zoning Map to make changes that conform with the Code amendments; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that this item be continued until later in the meeting. The motion failed by the following vote:
File 150679: Establishing a Population-Based Police Staffing Policy
LLM summaryA motion to re-refer the resolution on population-based police staffing policy to the Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee failed.
Source textSupervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that this Resolution be RE-REFERRED to the Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 150679: Establishing a Population-Based Police Staffing Policy
LLM summaryA resolution to establish a population-based police staffing policy was introduced, but a motion to amend it failed.
Source text150679 [Establishing a Population-Based Police Staffing Policy] Sponsors: Wiener; Cohen and Farrell Resolution establishing a Board of Supervisors policy that police staffing levels be adjusted to account for population and neighborhood growth. Duplicated as Amended from File No. 150628 by Supervisor Avalos. Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that this Resolution be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 150628: Establishing a Population-Based Police Staffing Policy
LLM summaryA motion to re-refer the resolution on population-based police staffing policy to the Land Use and Transportation Committee failed.
Source textSupervisor Breed, seconded by Supervisor Wiener, moved an amendment of the whole bearing same title which, pursuant to the Precedence of Motions, yields to a motion to re-refer to Committee. Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that this Resolution be RE-REFERRED to the Land Use and Transportation Committee. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 150628: Establishing a Population-Based Police Staffing Policy
LLM summaryA motion to re-refer the resolution on population-based police staffing policy to the Land Use and Transportation Committee failed.
Source text150628 [Establishing a Population-Based Police Staffing Policy] Sponsors: Wiener; Cohen and Farrell Resolution establishing a Board of Supervisors policy that police staffing levels be adjusted to account for population and neighborhood growth. Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Avalos, moved that this Resolution be RE-REFERRED to the Land Use and Transportation Committee. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 150175: Administrative Code - Chapter 6 Public Works Contracting
LLM summaryAn ordinance related to public works contracting was continued on first reading to a later date.
Source texte contracts for Job Order Contracts and as-needed contracts; 5) authorize execution of master as-needed construction contracts; 6) increase the limit of the amount of a task order from $400,000 to $600,000 by linking it to the Threshold Amount in master as-needed contracts on an if-and-as-needed basis for services that the Department of Public Health and the Division of Real Estate are authorized to procure; 7) provide greater flexibility and clarify requirements for the design-build and construction manager/general contractor project delivery methods; 8) authorize the Director of Transportation to procure rail grinding and related services through a negotiated project delivery method; 9) allow departments to advertise bids on a public website and/or in a local newspaper or periodical; 10) add procedure upon rejection or failure of professional services proposals and upon professional services contractor’s failure to deliver; and 11) make various other changes and clarifications in Chapter 6. (Public Works) (Fiscal Impact) Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Mar, moved that this Ordinance be CONTINUED ON FIRST READING to June 23, 2015. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 150363: Administrative Code - Short-Term Residential Rentals
LLM summaryA motion to terminate debate on an ordinance limiting short-term rentals failed, and the ordinance was discussed further.
Source text150363 [Administrative Code - Short-Term Residential Rentals] Sponsors: Mayor; Farrell Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to revise the Residential Unit Conversion Ordinance to: limit short-term rental of a residential unit to no more than 120 days per calendar year; revise the definition of interested parties who may enforce the provisions of Chapter 41A, through a private right of action to include permanent residents residing within 100 feet of the residential unit; create an additional private right of action under certain circumstances; create an Office of Short-Term Residential Rental Administration and Enforcement staffed by the Planning Department, Department of Building Inspection, and Tax Collector’s Office; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Economic Impact) Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisors Campos and Mar, moved to TERMINATE DEBATE on the Ordinance, which requires a two-thirds vote of the Supervisors present. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 150295: Administrative Code - Short-Term Residential Rentals
LLM summaryA motion to terminate debate on an ordinance regulating short-term rentals failed, and further discussion was held.
Source textental of a residential unit to no more than 60 days per calendar year; require hosting platforms to verify that a residential unit is on the City Registry prior to listing, remove a listing once a residential unit has been rented for tourist or transient use for more than 60 days in a calendar year, and provide certain usage data to the Planning Department; revise the definition of interested parties who may enforce the provision of Chapter 41A through a private right of action to include permanent residents residing within 100 feet; amend the private right of action provisions to allow for a private right of action against hosting platforms and create an additional private right of action against owners, business entities, and hosting platforms under certain circumstances; provide for criminal penalties against hosting platforms in violation of this Chapter 41A; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Economic Impact) Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisors Campos and Mar, moved to TERMINATE DEBATE on the Ordinance, which requires a two-thirds vote of the Supervisors present. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 150461: Zoning - Interim Moratorium on Certain New Residential Uses and Elimination of Production, Distribution, and Repair Uses in a Portion of the Mission Area Plan of the General Plan
LLM summaryThe urgency ordinance regarding the interim moratorium on new residential uses was not finally passed.
Source textPrivilege of the floor was granted unanimously to AnMarie Rodgers (Planning Department) and Olson Lee, Director (Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. NOT FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 150461: Zoning - Interim Moratorium on Certain New Residential Uses and Elimination of Production, Distribution, and Repair Uses in a Portion of the Mission Area Plan of the General Plan
LLM summaryAn urgency ordinance for an interim moratorium on certain new residential uses in the Mission Area Plan was partially voted on.
Source texthe moratorium for the issuance of permits for 100% affordable housing projects, and to allow the elimination of PDR uses where necessary to permit 100% affordable housing projects, in a portion of the Mission Area Plan of the General Plan (comprising the area bounded by the north side of Cesar Chavez Street from the east side of Valencia Street to the west side of Potrero Avenue; the west side of Potrero Avenue from the north side of Cesar Chavez Street to the south side of 20th Street; the south side of 20th Street from the west side of Potrero Avenue to the west side of Bryant Street; the west side of Bryant Street from the south side of 20th Street to the south side of U.S. Route 101; the south side of U.S. Route 101 from the west side of Bryant Street to the east side of Valencia Street; the east side of Valencia Street from the south side of U.S. Route 101 to the north side of Cesar Chavez Street); affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. A partial vote was taken on the motion that the Urgency Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED:
File 150227: Urging the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board to Adopt Proof of Labor Harmony Conditions for Commuter Shuttle Operators
LLM summaryA resolution urging the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board to require proof of labor harmony for commuter shuttle operators was discussed, but an amendment failed.
Source text150227 [Urging the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board to Adopt Proof of Labor Harmony Conditions for Commuter Shuttle Operators] Sponsor: Wiener Resolution urging the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board to adopt a requirement that applicants demonstrate labor harmony conditions as part of the Commuter Shuttle Pilot Program and any other permanent Commuter Shuttle Program. Privilege of the floor was granted to Jon Givner, Deputy City Attorney, who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that this Resolution be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 141301: Appropriation - Cost of Doing Business for Non-Profit Agencies - General City Responsibility - $3,400,000 - FY2014-2015
LLM summaryAn ordinance proposing a $3,400,000 appropriation for non-profit agencies was not passed on first reading.
Source text141301 [Appropriation - Cost of Doing Business for Non-Profit Agencies - General City Responsibility - $3,400,000 - FY2014-2015] Sponsors: Mar; Campos, Kim and Avalos Ordinance appropriating $3,400,000 from the General Fund Reserve to General City Responsibility to fund a cost of business allocation for non-profit agencies that contract with the City and County of San Francisco. (Fiscal Impact) NOT PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 140793: Follow-Up Board Response - Civil Grand Jury Report - Ethics in the City: Promise, Practice or Pretense
LLM summaryA motion was made to amend the Board's response to the Civil Grand Jury report on ethics, but the motion failed.
Source text140793 [Follow-Up Board Response - Civil Grand Jury Report - Ethics in the City: Promise, Practice or Pretense] Motion responding to the Civil Grand Jury request to provide a status update on the Board of Supervisors’ responses to Recommendation Nos. 2, 11, 16, 18, and 21 contained in the 2013-2014 Civil Grand Jury Report, entitled “Ethics in the City: Promise, Practice or Pretense;” and urging the Mayor to cause implementation of accepted findings and recommendations through his/her department heads and through the development of the annual budget. (Government Audit and Oversight Committee) Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that this Motion be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 141234: Affirming the Board of Supervisors Commitment to Equal Justice and the Right to Protest and Urging Reforms in National Policing and Judicial Practices
LLM summaryThe Board did not adopt an amended resolution affirming its commitment to equal justice.
Source textSupervisor Breed DUPLICATED AS AMENDED. See File No. 141295. NOT ADOPTED AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 141165: Committee of the Whole - Receive Public Comment on Possible Nominations and Open Election of Board President
LLM summaryA motion to receive public comment and open the election for Board President was referred to committee but failed.
Source text141165 [Committee of the Whole - Receive Public Comment on Possible Nominations and Open Election of Board President] Sponsor: Chiu Motion scheduling the Board of Supervisors to sit as a Committee of the Whole on November 18, 2014, for the purpose of receiving public comment on nominations and to open the election for the Office of Board President, in the event a vacancy occurs, to fill the unexpired portion of the term ending January 8, 2015, at 12:00 p.m. Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Mar, moved that this Motion be REFERRED to Committee. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 141071: Preparation of Findings Related to the Conditional Use Authorization - 431 Balboa Street
LLM summaryA motion was made to prepare findings related to the Conditional Use Authorization for 431 Balboa Street, but it failed.
Source text141071 [Preparation of Findings Related to the Conditional Use Authorization - 431 Balboa Street] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings relating to the proposed Conditional Use Authorization identified as Planning Case No. 2012.0059C on property located at 431 Balboa Street. (Clerk of the Board) Privilege of the floor was granted to Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Mar, seconded by Supervisor Kim, moved that this Motion be APPROVED. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 141070: Disapproving the Conditional Use Authorization Decision - 431 Balboa Street
LLM summaryA motion to disapprove the Conditional Use Authorization decision for 431 Balboa Street was proposed but failed.
Source text141070 [Disapproving the Conditional Use Authorization Decision - 431 Balboa Street] Motion disapproving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 19237, approving a Conditional Use Authorization identified as Planning Case No. 2012.0059C on property located at 431 Balboa Street, and adopting findings pursuant to Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Clerk of the Board) Privilege of the floor was granted to Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Mar, seconded by Supervisor Kim, moved that this Motion be APPROVED. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 141069: Approving the Conditional Use Authorization Decision - 431 Balboa Street
LLM summaryA motion to approve the Conditional Use Authorization decision for 431 Balboa Street was proposed but failed.
Source text141069 [Approving the Conditional Use Authorization Decision - 431 Balboa Street] Motion approving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 19237, approving a Conditional Use Authorization identified as Planning Case No. 2012.0059C on property located at 431 Balboa Street, and adopting findings pursuant to Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Clerk of the Board) Privilege of the floor was granted to Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Mar, seconded by Supervisor Kim, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 141000: Appropriation - Support for HIV Prevention - Department of Public Health - $301,600 - FY2014-2015
LLM summaryAn ordinance was finally passed appropriating $301,600 from the General Fund Reserve for HIV prevention support by the Department of Public Health.
Source text141000 [Appropriation - Support for HIV Prevention - Department of Public Health - $301,600 - FY2014-2015] Sponsors: Campos; Mar, Kim, Avalos and Wiener Ordinance appropriating $301,600 from the General Fund Reserve to the Department of Public Health in FY 2014-2015, for HIV prevention support for access to PreExposure Prophylaxis medication to assist in the prevention of HIV infection transmission. (Fiscal Impact) Ordinance No. 229-14 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 141000: Appropriation - Support for HIV Prevention - Department of Public Health - $301,600 - FY2014-2015
LLM summaryAn ordinance appropriating $301,600 for HIV prevention support was passed on first reading.
Source text141000 [Appropriation - Support for HIV Prevention - Department of Public Health - $301,600 - FY2014-2015] Sponsors: Campos; Mar, Kim, Avalos and Wiener Ordinance appropriating $301,600 from the General Fund Reserve to the Department of Public Health in FY 2014-2015, for HIV prevention support for access to PreExposure Prophylaxis medication to assist in the prevention of HIV infection transmission. (Fiscal Impact) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 140874: Administrative, Subdivision Codes - Tenant Buyout Agreements
LLM summaryAn ordinance regarding tenant buyout agreements was finally passed, establishing new requirements for landlords and protections for tenants.
Source textgotiations; to require landlords to file a form with the Rent Board indicating the address of the unit that may become the subject of buyout negotiations; to require all buyout agreements to be in writing and to include certain statements about the tenant’s rights; to allow tenants to rescind buyout agreements for up to 45 days after the agreements are fully executed; to require landlords to file a copy of buyout agreements with the Rent Board; to require the Rent Board to create a publically available searchable database of buyout agreements; to require the Rent Board to provide an annual report to the Board of Supervisors regarding tenant buyouts; to authorize tenants to bring civil actions for actual damages and civil penalties against landlords who fail to provide the required disclosures about the tenants’ rights; to authorize certain non-profits to bring civil actions for a landlord’s failure to file a buyout agreement with the Rent Board; and amending the Subdivision Code to prohibit buildings from entering the condominium conversion lottery if the owners of the building have entered certain tenant buyout agreements. Ordinance No. 225-14 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 140874: Administrative, Subdivision Codes - Tenant Buyout Agreements
LLM summaryAn ordinance concerning tenant buyout agreements was passed on first reading as amended.
Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 140381: Administrative, Planning Codes - Amending Regulation of Short-Term Residential Rentals and Establishing Fee
LLM summaryAn amendment regarding hosting platforms and short-term rentals was proposed but failed due to a lack of support.
Source textSupervisor Yee proposed an amendment relating to hosting platforms that have paid their taxes. The motion died due to a lack of a second. Supervisor Yee, seconded by Supervisor Mar, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED in Section 41A.5(g)(2) by limiting short term rentals to 90 days and adding other restrictions for residential units located in RH-1(D) zoning districts. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 140381: Administrative, Planning Codes - Amending Regulation of Short-Term Residential Rentals and Establishing Fee
LLM summaryAn amendment to the ordinance regulating short-term rentals was proposed but failed, which would have made the ordinance operative only after tax compliance certification.
Source textSupervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Avalos, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED in Section 4(a-b), by making the ordinance operative only after the certification by the Treasurer/Tax Collector that all Hosting Platforms have remitted all Transient Occupancy Taxes that are due and payable. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 140381: Administrative, Planning Codes - Amending Regulation of Short-Term Residential Rentals and Establishing Fee
LLM summaryAn ordinance was amended to regulate short-term residential rentals, creating a registry and establishing an application fee, with certain exceptions for permanent residents.
Source text0381 [Administrative, Planning Codes - Amending Regulation of Short-Term Residential Rentals and Establishing Fee] Sponsor: Chiu Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to provide an exception for permanent residents to the prohibition on short-term residential rentals under certain conditions; to create procedures, including a registry administered by the Planning Department, for tracking short-term residential rentals and compliance; to establish an application fee for the registry; amending the Planning Code to clarify that short-term residential rentals shall not change a unit’s type as residential; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. Privilege of the floor was granted to Jon Givner, Deputy City Attorney, who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED in Administrative Code, Section 41A.5, by allowing short term rentals for no more than 90 days per year. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 141036: Administrative, Planning Codes - Amending Regulation of Short-Term Residential Rentals and Establishing Fee
LLM summaryAn amendment to prohibit short-term rentals in certain evicted units was approved.
Source textCity and County of San Francisco Page 722 Printed at 4:13 pm on 11/21/14 Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 10/7/2014 Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Breed, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED in Section 41A.4(d) by prohibiting short term rentals in certain units that have been the subject of an eviction under the Ellis Act. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 141036: Administrative, Planning Codes - Amending Regulation of Short-Term Residential Rentals and Establishing Fee
LLM summaryA motion to amend the short-term rental ordinance to require tax certification before it becomes operative failed.
Source textSupervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Avalos, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED in Section 41A.5 making the ordinance operative only after certification by the Treasurer/Tax Collector that all Hosting Platforms have remitted all Transient Occupancy Taxes due and payable. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 141036: Administrative, Planning Codes - Amending Regulation of Short-Term Residential Rentals and Establishing Fee
LLM summaryAmendments to the ordinance on short-term rentals were proposed and one motion regarding civil actions by non-profits was approved.
Source textSupervisor Mar, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED relating to short term rentals in subsidized affordable units. Supervisor Mar withdrew the motion. Supervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED in Section 41A.5(d) relating to ability of certain non-profit organizations to bring civil actions regarding violations in rent controlled units. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 141036: Administrative, Planning Codes - Amending Regulation of Short-Term Residential Rentals and Establishing Fee
LLM summaryAn ordinance amending regulations for short-term residential rentals and establishing a fee was discussed, with various amendments proposed and some motions failing.
Source text141036 [Administrative, Planning Codes - Amending Regulation of Short-Term Residential Rentals and Establishing Fee] Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to provide an exception for permanent residents to the prohibition on short-term residential rentals under certain conditions; to create procedures, including a registry administered by the Planning Department, for tracking short-term residential rentals and compliance; to establish an application fee for the registry; amending the Planning Code to clarify that short-term residential rentals shall not change a unit’s type as residential; and making environmental findings and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. Duplicated as Amended from File No. 140381. Supervisor Mar, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED in Section 41A.4 prohibiting short term rentals in legal in law units. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 140381: Administrative, Planning Codes - Amending Regulation of Short-Term Residential Rentals and Establishing Fee
LLM summaryAn amendment allowing short-term rentals for no more than 90 days per year failed to pass.
Source textSupervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Mar, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED in Section 41A.5 allowing short term rentals no more than 90 days per year. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 140381: Administrative, Planning Codes - Amending Regulation of Short-Term Residential Rentals and Establishing Fee
LLM summaryA proposed amendment to exclude short-term rentals in certain districts failed due to a lack of support, while another amendment limiting rentals to 90 days also failed.
Source textSupervisor Yee proposed an amendment to exclude short term rentals in RH-1 and RH-1(D) districts. The motion died due to a lack of a second. Supervisor Yee, seconded by Supervisor Mar, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED in Section 41A.5(g)(2) limiting short term rentals to 90 days and adding other restrictions for residential units located in RH-1(D) zoning districts. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 140822: Intent to Prioritize Funding a Cost of Doing Business Supplemental Appropriation
LLM summaryA resolution expressing intent to prioritize funding for a cost of doing business supplemental appropriation was adopted.
Source textResolution No. 320-14 ADOPTED by the following vote:
File 140098: Initiative Ordinance - Business and Tax Regulations Code - Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages to Fund Food and Health Programs
LLM summaryA motion was approved to submit an initiative ordinance imposing a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages to voters for funding health and food programs.
Source text140098 [Initiative Ordinance - Business and Tax Regulations Code - Tax on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages to Fund Food and Health Programs] Sponsors: Mar, Wiener; Avalos, Cohen, Chiu and Campos Motion ordering submitted to the voters at an election to be held on November 4, 2014, an Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code by adding a new Article 8, imposing a tax of two cents per ounce on the distribution of sugar-sweetened beverages, to fund City-operated programs and City grants for active recreation and improving food access, health, and nutrition, and to fund San Francisco Unified School District physical education, after-school physical activity, health, or nutrition programs, and school lunch and other school nutrition programs. (Economic Impact) Motion No. M14-124 APPROVED by the following vote:
File 140556: Charter Amendment - Population-Based Adjustment to General Fund Appropriation to the Transportation Fund
LLM summaryA charter amendment was ordered submitted to adjust the General Fund appropriation to the Transportation Fund based on population increases.
Source text140556 [Charter Amendment - Population-Based Adjustment to General Fund Appropriation to the Transportation Fund] Sponsors: Wiener; Chiu Charter Amendment (Second Draft) to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to adjust the required annual appropriation from the General Fund to the Transportation Fund annually to reflect increases in the population of San Francisco, subject to discontinuation by the Mayor if the voters enact a new general tax on vehicles registered to a San Francisco address, at an election to be held on November 4, 2014; and making environmental findings. Supervisor Chiu requested to be added as a co-sponsor. ORDERED SUBMITTED by the following vote:
File 140554: Charter Amendment - Democratic Special Elections to Fill Mayoral and Board of Supervisors Vacancies
LLM summaryA charter amendment requiring special elections for mayoral and Board of Supervisors vacancies has not been ordered submitted.
Source text140554 [Charter Amendment - Democratic Special Elections to Fill Mayoral and Board of Supervisors Vacancies] Sponsors: Avalos; Campos and Mar Charter Amendment (Second Draft) to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to require the Department of Elections to hold a special election when there is a vacancy in the office of the Mayor or Member of the Board of Supervisors, unless a regularly scheduled election will be held within 180 days of the vacancy; to provide that the President of the Board of Supervisors serves as Acting Mayor until an election is held to fill a mayoral vacancy; and to provide that the Mayor appoints an interim Supervisor to fill a supervisorial vacancy until an election is held to fill that vacancy, with the interim Supervisor being ineligible to compete in that election, at an election to be held on November 4, 2014. NOT ORDERED SUBMITTED by the following vote:
File 140148: Street Encroachment - 1410 Stanyan Street
LLM summaryA resolution granting permission for street encroachment at 1410 Stanyan Street was not adopted after discussion.
Source text140148 [Street Encroachment - 1410 Stanyan Street] Resolution granting revocable permission to Kieran J. Woods to occupy a portion of the public right-of-way to construct and maintain various improvements, including a driveway, associated retaining wall, a vehicular carousel to provide access to a proposed new single family dwelling at 1410 Stanyan Street (Assessor’s Block No. 2706, Lot No. 035), landscaping, stairs leading to a public sitting area, and other related improvements within an existing unimproved portion of Stanyan Street between Clarendon and Mountain Spring Avenues; conditioning the permit; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Public Works Department) NOT ADOPTED by the following vote:
File 140371: Settlement of Lawsuit - Contest Promotions, LLC - City to Receive $375,000
LLM summaryAn ordinance authorizing the settlement of a lawsuit with Contest Promotions, LLC for $375,000 was continued on first reading.
Source text140371 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Contest Promotions, LLC - City to Receive $375,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Contest Promotions, LLC, against the City and County of San Francisco for $375,000; the lawsuit was filed on September 22, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. CV-09-4434 SI (MEJ); entitled Contest Promotions, LLC, v. City of San Francisco, et al.; other material terms of said settlement include resolution of Notices of Violation for unpermitted general advertising signs. (City Attorney) Supervisor Wiener, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that this Ordinance be CONTINUED ON FIRST READING to June 17, 2014, and setting a closed session on the same matter under existing ligitation for June 10, 2014. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 140500: Appointments, Sunshine Ordinance Task Force - David Pilpel, Todd David, and Louise Fischer
LLM summaryDavid Pilpel, Todd David, and Louise Fischer were appointed to the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force with terms ending April 27, 2016.
Source text140500 [Appointments, Sunshine Ordinance Task Force - David Pilpel, Todd David, and Louise Fischer] Motion appointing David Pilpel, Todd David, and Louise Fischer, terms ending April 27, 2016, to the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. (Rules Committee) Privilege of the floor was granted to Jon Givner, Deputy City Attorney, and Angela Calvillo, Clerk of the Board, who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that this Motion be RE-REFERRED to the Rules Committee. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 140390: Hearing - Homeless Outreach Services - FY2013-2014 - $1,387,500
LLM summaryThe Committee of the Whole heard and released a motion to allocate $1,387,500 for homeless outreach services.
Source textinance No. 42-14 (File No. 140121) in the amount of $1,387,500 for Homeless Outreach Services in FY2013-2014. (Clerk of the Board) The President inquired as to whether any member of the public wished to address the Committee of the Whole relating to the release of reserve relating to homeless outreach services as referenced in Ordinance No. 42-14 (File No. 140121). Supervisor Farrell made some opening remarks. Maria Martinez (Department of Public Health) provided an overview of the request for release of reserves and responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Ray Hartz (San Francisco Open Government); Peter Warfield (Library User's Association); Espinola Jackson; spoke in opposition of the release of reserves. There were no other speakers. The President declared public comment closed and adjourned as the Committee of the Whole, reconvening as the Board of Supervisors. HEARD AND RELEASED Committee of the Whole Adjourn and Report RELEASE OF RESERVE Supervisor Farrell, seconded by Supervisor Mar, moved to release $1,387,500 placed on Board of Supervisors' reserve for the Department of Public Health for homeless outreach services. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 140096: Administrative Code - Tenant Relocation Assistance Payment
LLM summaryAn ordinance was finally passed regarding tenant relocation assistance payments.
Source textOrdinance No. 054-14 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 140096: Administrative Code - Tenant Relocation Assistance Payment
LLM summaryAn ordinance was finally passed to amend the Administrative Code regarding tenant relocation assistance payments for evicted tenants under the Ellis Act.
Source text140096 [Administrative Code - Tenant Relocation Assistance Payment] Sponsors: Campos; Kim, Avalos and Mar Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to mitigate adverse impacts of tenant evictions to provide that when residential units are withdrawn from the rental market under the Ellis Act, each relocated tenant is entitled to the greater of the existing rent relocation payment, or the difference between the tenant’s current rent and the prevailing rent for a comparable apartment in San Francisco over a two year period; and allowing a landlord, through a hearing process, to obtain a revised relocation payment obligation based on an undue financial hardship adjustment or recalculated rent differential amount. FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 140096: Administrative Code - Tenant Relocation Assistance Payment
LLM summaryAn amendment to the Administrative Code regarding tenant relocation assistance payments passed on first reading.
Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 131148: Planning, Building, Administrative, and Subdivision Codes - Legalization of Dwelling Units Installed Without a Permit
LLM summaryAn ordinance to legalize dwelling units built without permits was finally passed after amendments.
Source textision Codes - Legalization of Dwelling Units Installed Without a Permit] Sponsors: Chiu; Wiener, Avalos, Mar, Breed and Cohen Ordinance amending the Planning and Building Codes to provide a process for granting legal status to existing dwelling units constructed without the required permits, temporarily suspending the code enforcement process for units in the process of receiving legal status, and prohibiting units from being legalized under the provisions of this Ordinance if there have been no-fault evictions; amending the Administrative Code to prohibit the costs of legalization from being passed through to the tenant; amending the Subdivision Code to prohibit legalized units from being subdivided and separately sold; affirming the Planning Department’s California Environmental Quality Act determination; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and directing the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to submit this Ordinance to the California Department of Housing and Community Development in accordance with California Government Code, Section 65852.2(h). Ordinance No. 043-14 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 140096: Administrative Code - Tenant Relocation Assistance Payment
LLM summaryThe tenant relocation assistance payment ordinance passed on first reading after amendments.
Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 140146: Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Exemption Determination - San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s Commuter Shuttle Policy and Pilot Program
LLM summaryA motion to prepare findings reversing the exemption of the SFMTA’s Commuter Shuttle Policy from environmental review was continued.
Source text140146 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Exemption Determination - San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s Commuter Shuttle Policy and Pilot Program] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s Commuter Shuttle Policy and Pilot Program is exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Avalos, moved that this Motion be CONTINUED to April 8, 2014. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 140145: Reversing the Exemption Determination - San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s Commuter Shuttle Policy and Pilot Program
LLM summaryA motion to continue the reversal of the exemption determination for the Commuter Shuttle Policy was failed.
Source text140145 [Reversing the Exemption Determination - San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s Commuter Shuttle Policy and Pilot Program] Motion reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s Commuter Shuttle Policy and Pilot Program is exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Avalos, moved that this Motion be CONTINUED to April 8, 2014. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 140144: Affirming the Exemption Determination - San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s Commuter Shuttle Policy and Pilot Program
LLM summaryA motion to continue the affirmation of the exemption determination for the Commuter Shuttle Policy was failed.
Source text140144 [Affirming the Exemption Determination - San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s Commuter Shuttle Policy and Pilot Program] Motion affirming the determination by the Planning Department that the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency’s Commuter Shuttle Policy and Pilot Program is exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Avalos, moved that this Motion be CONTINUED to April 8, 2014. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 131148: Planning, Building, Administrative, and Subdivision Codes - Legalization of Dwelling Units Installed Without a Permit
LLM summaryThe ordinance on the legalization of dwelling units installed without a permit passed on first reading after amendments.
Source textCity and County of San Francisco Page 199 Printed at 4:52 pm on 5/16/14 Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 4/1/2014 Supervisor Cohen requested to be added as a co-sponsor. PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 140121: Appropriation - General Fund Reserve - Homeless Outreach Services - $1,387,500 - FY2013-2014
LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed to allocate $1,387,500 from the General Fund Reserves for homeless outreach services in the fiscal year 2013-2014.
Source text140121 [Appropriation - General Fund Reserve - Homeless Outreach Services - $1,387,500 - FY2013-2014] Sponsors: Farrell; Breed, Campos and Chiu Ordinance appropriating $1,387,500 of General Fund Reserves to the Department of Public Health to provide homeless outreach services in FY2013-2014 and placing the $1,387,500 of General Fund monies on Board of Supervisors Reserve. (Fiscal Impact) Ordinance No. 042-14 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 140121: Appropriation - General Fund Reserve - Homeless Outreach Services - $1,387,500 - FY2013-2014
LLM summaryAn ordinance appropriating $1,387,500 for homeless outreach services was passed on first reading as amended.
Source textOrdinance appropriating $1,387,500 of General Fund Reserves to the Department of Public Health to provide homeless outreach services in FY2013-2014 and placing the $1,387,500 of General Fund monies on Board of Supervisors Reserve. (Fiscal Impact) Supervisor Chiu requested to be added as a co-sponsor. PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 140126: Departmental Study of Waterfront Ballot Initiative
LLM summaryA resolution regarding the Waterfront Ballot Initiative was referred to the Rules Committee.
Source textSupervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Farrell, moved that this Resolution be REFERRED to the Rules Committee. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 131034: Forgivable Loan Agreement - California Department of Housing and Community Development - 2115 Jennings Street - $978,000
LLM summaryResolution No. 408-13 was adopted as amended regarding the forgivable loan for 2115 Jennings Street.
Source textResolution No. 408-13 ADOPTED AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 130853: Preparation of Findings Related to the Appeal for Waiver, Adjustment, or Reduction of Condominium Conversion Fee - 489 Sanchez Street
LLM summaryA motion to prepare findings related to the appeal for a condominium conversion fee adjustment for 489 Sanchez Street was approved but failed.
Source text130853 [Preparation of Findings Related to the Appeal for Waiver, Adjustment, or Reduction of Condominium Conversion Fee - 489 Sanchez Street] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings relating to the Board of Supervisors' decision to approve a waiver, adjustment, or reduction of the condominium conversion fee in Subdivision Code, Section 1396.4, for 489 Sanchez Street. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Wiener, seconded by Supervisor Farrell, moved that this Motion be APPROVED. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 130852: Denying Appeal for Waiver, Adjustment, or Reduction of Condominium Conversion Fee - 489 Sanchez Street
LLM summaryAn appeal for a waiver, adjustment, or reduction of the condominium conversion fee for 489 Sanchez Street was denied and the motion to table it failed.
Source text130852 [Denying Appeal for Waiver, Adjustment, or Reduction of Condominium Conversion Fee - 489 Sanchez Street] Motion denying the appeal seeking a waiver, adjustment, or reduction of the condominium conversion fee in Subdivision Code, Section 1396.4, for 489 Sanchez Street. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Wiener, seconded by Supervisor Farrell, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 130851: Approving Waiver, Adjustment, or Reduction of Condominium Conversion Fee - 489 Sanchez Street
LLM summaryA motion to approve a waiver, adjustment, or reduction of the condominium conversion fee for 489 Sanchez Street failed.
Source text130851 [Approving Waiver, Adjustment, or Reduction of Condominium Conversion Fee - 489 Sanchez Street] Motion approving a waiver, adjustment, or reduction of the condominium conversion fee in Subdivision Code, Section 1396.4, for 489 Sanchez Street. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Wiener, seconded by Supervisor Farrell, moved that this Motion be APPROVED to waive the application fee. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 130829: Urging the Public Utilities Commission to Set Not-to-Exceed Rates for CleanPowerSF Without Any Further Delay
LLM summaryA resolution urges the Public Utilities Commission to promptly set not-to-exceed rates for CleanPowerSF, and it was adopted.
Source text130829 [Urging the Public Utilities Commission to Set Not-to-Exceed Rates for CleanPowerSF Without Any Further Delay] Sponsors: Breed; Avalos, Mar and Campos Resolution reiterating the Board of Supervisor’s support for CleanPowerSF, citing the Board’s role as the preeminent policymaking body in San Francisco, urging the Public Utilities Commission to set not-to-exceed rates for CleanPowerSF without any further delay, and promising further action if the Public Utilities Commission fails to set rates. Resolution No. 331-13 ADOPTED by the following vote:
File 120669: Subdivision Code - Condominium Conversion Fee
LLM summaryAn ordinance was finally passed to amend the Subdivision Code regarding condominium conversion fees and related lottery procedures.
Source text120669 [Subdivision Code - Condominium Conversion Fee] Sponsors: Chiu; Kim, Yee and Campos Ordinance amending the Subdivision Code, by adding Section 1396.4, to adopt a condominium conversion fee applicable to certain buildings that would be permitted to convert during a seven year period, and subject to specified requirements, including lifetime leases for non-purchasing tenants; adding Section 1396.5, to suspend the annual condominium conversion lottery until 2024 and resume said lottery under specified circumstances tied to permanently affordable rental housing production; amending Section 1396, to restrict future condominium lotteries to buildings of no more than four units with a specified number of owner occupied units for three years prior to the lottery and provide an exception for certain five- and six-unit buildings to participate in the lottery; and adopting environmental findings. (Economic Impact) Supervisor Campos requested to be added as a co-sponsor. Ordinance No. 117-13 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 120669: Subdivision Code - Condominium Conversion Fee
LLM summaryAn ordinance amending the Subdivision Code related to a condominium conversion fee was passed on its first reading as amended.
Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 120669: Subdivision Code - Condominium Conversion Fee
LLM summaryAn ordinance concerning condominium conversion fees was discussed, with an amendment proposed but ultimately failed.
Source text120669 [Subdivision Code - Condominium Conversion Fee] Sponsors: Farrell; Wiener, Chiu, Yee and Kim Ordinance amending the Subdivision Code, by adding Section 1396.4, to adopt a condominium conversion impact fee applicable to certain buildings that would be permitted to convert during a seven year period, and subject to specified requirements, including lifetime leases for non-purchasing tenants; adding Section 1396.5, to suspend the annual condominium conversion lottery until 2024 and resume said lottery under specified circumstances tied to permanently affordable rental housing production; amending Section 1396, to restrict future condominium lotteries to buildings of no more than four units with a specified number of owner occupied units for three years prior to the lottery; and adopting environmental findings. (Economic Impact) (Supervisor Wiener dissented in Committee.) Privilege of the floor was granted to John Malamut, Deputy City Attorney, who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Chiu, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 130407: Appointment, Ethics Commission - Brett Andrews
LLM summaryA motion to appoint Brett Andrews to the Ethics Commission was re-referred to the Rules Committee but the motion failed.
Source text130407 [Appointment, Ethics Commission - Brett Andrews] Motion appointing Brett Andrews, term ending February 1, 2017, to the Ethics Commission. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Avalos, seconded by Supervisor Campos, moved that this Motion be RE-REFERRED to the Rules Committee. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 130274: Accept Gift - Design Services and Furniture - $26,445.43
LLM summaryA resolution authorizing the acceptance of a gift of design services and furniture was discussed, but an amendment to require additional filings failed.
Source text130274 [Accept Gift - Design Services and Furniture - $26,445.43] Resolution authorizing the Office of the District Attorney to retroactively accept a gift of design services and furniture, valued at a total of $26,445.43 from various donors. (District Attorney) (Supervisors Mar and Avalos dissented in Committee.) Privilege of the floor was granted to Jon Givner, Deputy City Attorney, and Cristine DeBerry (District Attorney's Office) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Campos, seconded by Supervisor Avalos, moved that this Resolution be AMENDED to allow the acceptance contingent on the District Attorney filing a Form 801 with the Fair Political Practices Commission, and further requiring the District Attorney to file a copy of the Form 801 with the Clerk of the Board for inclusion in the official file. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 120460: General Plan Map - California Pacific Medical Center: Cathedral Hill Campus
LLM summaryAn ordinance amending the General Plan for the California Pacific Medical Center's Cathedral Hill Campus was not passed on first reading.
Source text120460 [General Plan Map - California Pacific Medical Center: Cathedral Hill Campus] Ordinance amending the General Plan by amending Map 4 of the Urban Design Element to allow for development up to a height of 265 feet on the block bounded by Van Ness Avenue, Geary Boulevard, Franklin and Post Streets; amending Map 5 of the Urban Design Element to reflect the proposed maximum plan dimensions and maximum diagonal plan dimensions of 385' and 466', respectively, for the Cathedral Hill Hospital site, and 265' and 290', respectively, for the Cathedral Hill Medical Office Building site; amending Map 1 of the Van Ness Area Plan, to designate the sites of the proposed Cathedral Hill Hospital and Medical Office Building as the Van Ness Medical Use Subdistrict; amending Map 2 of the Van Ness Area Plan to create a 265-V height/bulk district coterminous with the Hospital site; and adopting findings, including environmental findings, Planning Code, Section 340, findings, and findings of consistency with the General Plan and the priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Planning Department) NOT PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 120459: General Plan Map - California Pacific Medical Center: St. Luke’s Campus
LLM summaryAn ordinance amending the General Plan for the California Pacific Medical Center's St. Luke’s Campus was not passed on first reading.
Source text120459 [General Plan Map - California Pacific Medical Center: St. Luke’s Campus] Ordinance amending the General Plan by amending Map 4 of the Urban Design Element to increase the height limit for the California Pacific Medical Center’s St. Luke’s Campus (Assessor's Parcel Block No. 6575/Lot Nos. 001, 002; Assessor's Parcel Block No. 6576/Lot No. 021, and the portion of San Jose Avenue between Cesar Chavez Street and 27th Street) to 105 feet; amending Map 5 of the Urban Design Element to reflect the proposed maximum plan dimensions and maximum diagonal plan dimensions of 227' and 270', respectively, for the St. Luke’s Replacement Hospital site and 204' and 228', respectively, for the medical office building site at the St. Luke’s Campus; and adopting findings, including environmental findings, Section 340, findings, and findings of consistency with the General Plan and the priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Planning Department) NOT PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 120458: General Plan - Van Ness Area Plan Amendments - California Pacific Medical Center: Cathedral Hill Campus
LLM summaryAn ordinance amending the Van Ness Area Plan for the California Pacific Medical Center's Cathedral Hill Campus was not passed on first reading.
Source text120458 [General Plan - Van Ness Area Plan Amendments - California Pacific Medical Center: Cathedral Hill Campus] Ordinance amending the General Plan, Van Ness Area Plan, in order to facilitate the development of a high density medical center at the transit nexus of Van Ness Avenue and Geary Boulevard and reflect various elements of this use; and adopting findings, including environmental findings, Planning Code, Section 340, findings, and findings of consistency with the General Plan and the priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Planning Department) NOT PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote: