SUPERVISOR PROFILE AND RECORDED ROLL-CALL EVIDENCE
Gavin Newsom
These are recorded positions on specific actions. A No is not automatically opposition to a project, and an Aye is not automatically support. Read the action and cited minutes.
FORMER SUPERVISOR
Contact
- District
- 2
- Service
- 1997-02-13 to 2004-01-08
- Official record
- Board profile or historical entry ↗
MOST RECENT 250 · EXCUSED
EXCUSED positions
File 021294: Business Tax
Source text(3) amend Article 12 (Business Registration Ordinance) to conform business registration requirements with the enactment of Article 12-A-1 (Gross Receipts Tax Ordinance) and amendments to Article 12-A (Payroll Expense Tax Ordinance) and Article 6 (Common Administrative Provisions); (4) amend Article 6 (Common Administrative Provisions) to (i) clarify common administrative provisions and conform them with the enactment of Article 12-A-1 (Gross Receipts Tax Ordinance) and amendments to Article 12-A (Payroll Expense Tax Ordinance) and Article 12 (Business Registration Ordinance), (ii) consolidate exemptions, definitions and other administrative provisions that apply to Article 12-A (Payroll Expense Tax Ordinance), Article 12-A-1 (Gross Receipts Tax Ordinance), Article 12 (Business Registration Ordinance) and other Articles of the Business and Tax Regulations Code, and (iii) eliminate the Board of Review; and (5) amend Section 501 of Article 7 to clarify the definition of "Permanent Residents" exempt from the tax on the transient occupancy of hotel rooms. Supervisor McGoldrick, seconded by Supervisor Maxwell, moved that this Ordinance be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 021292: Business Tax
Source text021292 [Business Tax] Supervisor McGoldrick Motion submitting the San Francisco Business Tax Reform Ordinance 2002 to the qualified electors of the City and County of San Francisco, at the November 5, 2002 general municipal election. Supervisor McGoldrick, seconded by Supervisor Maxwell, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 012127: Prohibition of New Live/Work Units
Source textf New Live/Work Units] Supervisors Ammiano, Daly Ordinance amending the San Francisco Planning Code by amending the definition of "Live/Work Unit" in Section 101.13 to clarify that the residential use and the integrated work space must be in the same unit, and by amending Section 233 to prohibit new Live/Work Units except for accessory uses authorized by Section 204.4. (Planning Commission Resolution #16359 adopted 3/7/02 recommending disapproval.Certificate of Exemption/Exclusion from Environmental Review dated 2/28/02) (Supervisor Hall dissenting in Committee.) (April 19, 2002 - VETOED by Mayor.) Note: The Board has 30 days to act from the date the legislation was signed by the Mayor.Override of a veto requires a 2/3rds vote of the Board, the Board may either vote the legislation up or down, no amendments.The 30th day from April 19, 2002 is May 19, 2002. Supervisor Newsom was previously excused from voting.(See Meeting Minutes of March 25, 2002.) Supervisor Daly requested to be added as a co-sponsor. Supervisor Daly, seconded by Supervisor McGoldrick,moved adoption to override the Mayor’s veto. Enacted Number: 56-02 ADOPTED OVER THE MAYOR’S VETO by the following vote:
File 012127: Prohibition of New Live/Work Units
Source text012127 [Prohibition of New Live/Work Units] Supervisors Ammiano, Daly Ordinance amending the San Francisco Planning Code by amending the definition of "Live/Work Unit" in Section 101.13 to clarify that the residential use and the integrated work space must be in the same unit, and by amending Section 233 to prohibit new Live/Work Units except for accessory uses authorized by Section 204.4. (Planning Commission Resolution #16359 adopted 3/7/02 recommending disapproval. Certificate of Exemption/Exclusion from Environmental Review dated 2/28/02) (Supervisor Hall dissenting in Committee.) (April 19, 2002 - VETOED by Mayor.) Note: The Board has 30 days to act from the date the legislation was signed by the Mayor. Override of a veto requires a 2/3rds vote of the Board, the Board may either vote the legislation up or down, no amendments. The 30th day from April 19, 2002 is May 19, 2002. Supervisor Newsom was previously excused from voting. See Meeting Minutes of March 25, 2002. Enacted Number: 56-02 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 012127: Prohibition of New Live/Work Units
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending ordinance. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 020156: Interim Zoning Controls - Live/Work Moratorium
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending resolution. ADOPTED by the following vote:
File 011638: Industrial Protection Zone Special Use District Zoning Code Amendment
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 011639: Industrial Protection Zone Special Use District Zoning Map Amendment
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 011638: Industrial Protection Zone Special Use District Zoning Code Amendment
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 011278: Prohibit construction of new live/work developments
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 011279: Community Land Trust Task Force
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 010274: Business Tax Gross Receipts
Source text010274 [Business Tax Gross Receipts] Supervisors Gonzalez, Peskin, Maxwell, Hall, Sandoval, Daly, McGoldrick Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code to (1) repeal Section 917.1 of Article 12-A and all of Article 12-B to eliminate the gross receipts method of calculating the tax on businesses; (2) enact a new Article 12 to amend business registration requirements consistent with the repeal of Article 12-B; and (3) enact a new Article 12-B to refund gross receipts-based tax payments for the 2000 tax year to the extent that such payments exceeded businesses’ tax liability for such year as measured by their payroll expense. (Fiscal impact.) April 2, 2001 - Supervisor Newsom excused from voting in Board. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 010513: Settlement of Obligation Bond Sale
Source textd Sale] Supervisor Peskin Resolution authorizing and directing the sale of not to exceed $69,060,000 City and County of San Francisco Settlement Obligation Bonds, Series 2001 (Business Tax Judgment); prescribing the form and terms of said bonds; authorizing the execution, authentication and registration of said bonds; providing for the appointment of depositories and other agents for said bonds; providing for the establishment of accounts relating thereto; approving the forms of the Official Notice of Sale and the Notice of Intention to Sell Bonds; directing the publication of the Notice of Intention to Sell Bonds; approving the form and execution of the Official Statement relating thereto; approving the form of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate; approving modifications to the documents approved herein; ratifying certain actions previously taken; and granting general authority to City officials to take necessary actions in connection with the authorization, issuance, sale and delivery of said bonds. (Fiscal impact.) (Supervisor Gonzalez dissenting in Committee.) April 2, 2001 - Supervisor Newsom excused from voting in Board. Enacted Number: 278-01 ADOPTED by the following vote:
File 010512: Settlement of Obligation Bond Issuance
Source text010512 [Settlement of Obligation Bond Issuance] Supervisor Peskin Resolution providing for the issuance of not to exceed $69,060,000 aggregate principal amount of City and County of San Francisco Settlement Obligation Bonds, Series 2001 (Business Tax Judgment); authorizing the execution, authentication and registration of said bonds; providing for an annual appropriation to pay the principal and interest thereof; providing for the appointment of depositories and other agents for said bonds; providing for the establishment of accounts relating thereto; ratifying certain actions previously taken; and granting general authority to City officials to take necessary actions in connection with the authorization, issuance, sale and delivery of said bonds. (Fiscal impact; companion measure to File 010513.) (Supervisor Gonzalez dissenting in Committee.) April 2, 2001 - Supervisor Newsom excused from voting in Board. Enacted Number: 277-01 ADOPTED by the following vote:
File 010437: Settlement of business tax lawsuits; authorization to make binding settlement offers; authorization to settle unlitigated claims
Source text1999 in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. 302983 (Court of Appeal No. A091910), entitled Eastman Kodak Company v. City and County of San Francisco; the General Motors lawsuit was filed on February 24, 1999 in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. 301510 (Court of Appeal A091914), entitled General Motors Corporation v. City and County of San Francisco; the other material terms of the settlements are that the settlements shall include any claims for the 2000 tax year, plaintiffs shall not file any claims for refunds otherwise due pursuant to any repeal of the gross receipts tax ordinance for the 2000 tax year, the plaintiffs shall agree to join in an application for a stipulated reversal of the trial court decisions pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 128; authorizing the City Attorney to make offers to allow judgment pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 998 in various business tax cases, for a total amount not to exceed $58,164,317.15; and further authorizing settlement of unlitigated claims, for a total amount not to exceed $345,981.79. (Supervisor Gonzalez dissenting in Committee.) PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 010437: Settlement of business tax lawsuits; authorization to make binding settlement offers; authorization to settle unlitigated claims
Source textal amount not to exceed $380,576.16. (Supervisor Gonzalez dissenting in Committee.) April 2, 2001 - Supervisor Newsom excused from voting in Board. Supervisor Ammiano moved to amend as follows: Page 1, line 5:reduce $112,889.78 by 9.09% to $102,628.10; Page 1, line 18:reduce $63,980,109.06 by 9.09% to $58,164,317.15; Page 1, line 19:reduce $380,576.16 by 9.09% to $345,981.79; Page 2, line 5: reduce $112,889.78 by 9.09% to $102,628.10; Page 8, line 10: reduce $63,980,109.06 by 9.09% to $58,164,317.15; Page 9, line 11: reduce $380,576.16 by 9.09% to $345,981.79; Add a new Section 5 to read: The Board authorizes the City Attorney to make settlement or 998 offers to any plaintiffs and claimants who agree to reduce their settlement figures by 9.09 percent, for a proportionate amount of the totals authorized in the ordinance. And directing the City Attorney and Clerk of the Board to make any other changes to the legislation that need to be made [reserve the right to clean up language] in order to conform the remaining text of the ordinance to these amendments. President Ammiano, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 010274: Business Tax Gross Receipts
Source text010274 [Business Tax Gross Receipts] Supervisors Gonzalez, Peskin, Maxwell, Hall, Sandoval, Daly, McGoldrick Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code to (1) repeal Section 917.1 of Article 12-A and all of Article 12-B to eliminate the gross receipts method of calculating the tax on businesses; (2) enact a new Article 12 to amend business registration requirements consistent with the repeal of Article 12-B; and (3) enact a new Article 12-B to refund gross receipts-based tax payments for the 2000 tax year to the extent that such payments exceeded businesses’ tax liability for such year as measured by their payroll expense. (Fiscal impact.) Supervisor Ammiano moved to continue consideration to April 16, 2001. President Ammiano, seconded by Supervisor Sandoval, moved that this Ordinance be CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 010513: Settlement of Obligation Bond Sale
Source textd $69,060,000 City and County of San Francisco Settlement Obligation Bonds, Series 2001 (Business Tax Judgment); prescribing the form and terms of said bonds; authorizing the execution, authentication and registration of said bonds; providing for the appointment of depositories and other agents for said bonds; providing for the establishment of accounts relating thereto; approving the forms of the Official Notice of Sale and the Notice of Intention to Sell Bonds; directing the publication of the Notice of Intention to Sell Bonds; approving the form and execution of the Official Statement relating thereto; approving the form of the Continuing Disclosure Certificate; approving modifications to the documents approved herein; ratifying certain actions previously taken; and granting general authority to City officials to take necessary actions in connection with the authorization, issuance, sale and delivery of said bonds. (Fiscal impact.) (Supervisor Gonzalez dissenting in Committee.) Supervisor Ammiano moved to continue consideration to April 16, 2001. President Ammiano, seconded by Supervisor Sandoval, moved that this Resolution be CONTINUED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 010512: Settlement of Obligation Bond Issuance
Source text010512 [Settlement of Obligation Bond Issuance] Supervisor Peskin Resolution providing for the issuance of not to exceed $69,060,000 aggregate principal amount of City and County of San Francisco Settlement Obligation Bonds, Series 2001 (Business Tax Judgment); authorizing the execution, authentication and registration of said bonds; providing for an annual appropriation to pay the principal and interest thereof; providing for the appointment of depositories and other agents for said bonds; providing for the establishment of accounts relating thereto; ratifying certain actions previously taken; and granting general authority to City officials to take necessary actions in connection with the authorization, issuance, sale and delivery of said bonds. (Fiscal impact; companion measure to File 010513.) (Supervisor Gonzalez dissenting in Committee.) Supervisor Ammiano moved to continue consideration to April 16, 2001. President Ammiano, seconded by Supervisor Sandoval, moved that this Resolution be CONTINUED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 010437: Settlement of business tax lawsuits; authorization to make binding settlement offers; authorization to settle unlitigated claims
Source textl Motors lawsuit was filed on February 24, 1999 in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. 301510 (Court of Appeal A091914), entitled General Motors Corporation v. City and County of San Francisco; the other material terms of the settlements are that the settlements shall include any claims for the 2000 tax year, plaintiffs shall not file any claims for refunds otherwise due pursuant to any repeal of the gross receipts tax ordinance for the 2000 tax year, the plaintiffs shall agree to join in an application for a stipulated reversal of the trial court decisions pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 128; authorizing the City Attorney to make offers to allow judgment pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure Section 998 in various business tax cases, for a total amount not to exceed $63,980,109.06; and further authorizing settlement of unlitigated claims, for a total amount not to exceed $380,576.16. (Supervisor Gonzalez dissenting in Committee.) Supervisor Ammiano moved to continue consideration to April 16, 2001. President Ammiano, seconded by Supervisor Sandoval, moved that this Ordinance be CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 010274: Business Tax Gross Receipts
Source textSupervisor Ammiano moved to continue consideration to April 9, 2001. President Ammiano, seconded by Supervisor Leno, moved that this Ordinance be CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 010513: Settlement of Obligation Bond Sale
Source textSupervisor Ammiano moved to continue consideration to April 9, 2001. President Ammiano, seconded by Supervisor Leno, moved that this Resolution be CONTINUED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 010512: Settlement of Obligation Bond Issuance
Source textSupervisor Ammiano moved to continue consideration to April 9, 2001. President Ammiano, seconded by Supervisor Leno, moved that this Resolution be CONTINUED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 010437: Settlement of business tax lawsuits; authorization to make binding settlement offers; authorization to settle unlitigated claims
Source textSupervisor McGoldrick requested his name be removed as co-sponsor. Supervisor Leno, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Ordinance be CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 010402: Pre-Tax Payroll Deduction Plan
Source textMotion to convene as a Committee of the Whole President Ammiano, seconded by Supervisor Leno, moved that the Board of Supervisors meet as a Committee of the Whole concerning the four matters relating to settlement of business tax lawsuits (Files 010437, 010512, 010513, 010274) on April 9, 2001 at 5:00 p.m. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 010081: Existing Litigation
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 010081: Existing Litigation
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 010081: Existing Litigation
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 010081: Existing Litigation
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 010215: Appointment
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 000276: Planning Code amendment to rename "Office Affordable Housing Production Program" as the "Jobs-Housing Linkage Program" and to apply the program to hotel, entertainment, and retail space Supervisors Ammiano, Bierman, Peskin, Daly, Leno Ordinance amending Article III, Chapter II, Part II of the San Francisco Municipal Code (Planning Code) by amending Sections 313, 313.1, 313.2, 313.3, 313.4, 313.5, 313.6, 313.7, 313.8, 313.9, 313.10, 313.11, 313.12, 313.13, and 313.14, to rename the "Office Affordable Housing Production Program" as the "Jobs-Housing Linkage Program," to apply the program to all new and expanded hotel space of at least 25,000 square feet, to all new and expanded entertainment space of at least 25,000 square feet, to all new and expanded retail space of at least 25,000 square feet, and to all new and expanded research and development space of at least 25,000 square feet; to set forth the number of housing units to be constructed for each type of development subject to this Ordinance; to increase the number of housing units and fees for office developments; and by adding Section 313.15 to require a study every five years determining the demand for housing created by commercial development. February 12, 2001 - Supervisor Newsom was excused from voting by previous action of the Board. Supervisor Leno requested to be added as co-sponsor. Enacted Number: 28-01 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote: Ayes: 10 - Ammiano, Daly, Gonzalez, Hall, Maxwell, McGoldrick, Leno, Peskin, Sandoval, Yee Excused: 1 - Newsom Recommendation of the Housing, Transportation and Land Use Committee 010060 [Rent passthrough
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 010063: Zoning, Live/Work Interim Order
Source textSupervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Daly, moved that this Resolution be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 010062: Zoning, Live/Work Moratorium
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending resolution. ADOPTED by the following vote:
File 010060: Rent passthrough
Source textOrdinance amending Administrative Code Chapter 37 "Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance" by adding a new Section 37.8C "Temporary Moratorium on Rent Board processing or approval of landlord petitions for certification and passthrough of non-seismic capital improvement, rehabilitation and energy conservation costs to tenants, during pendency of the Superior Court’s preliminary injunction staying implementation of November 2000 Proposition H." Supervisors Peskin, Daly requested to be added as co-sponsors. The roll was then called on the pending ordinance. PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 010060: Rent passthrough
Source textSupervisor Peskin submitted an amendment of the whole, bearing new title. Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor McGoldrick, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 000276: Planning Code amendment to rename "Office Affordable Housing Production Program" as the "Jobs-Housing Linkage Program" and to apply the program to hotel, entertainment, and retail space Supervisors Ammiano, Bierman Ordinance amending Article III, Chapter II, Part II of the San Francisco Municipal Code (Planning Code) by amending Sections 313, 313.1, 313.2, 313.3, 313.4, 313.5, 313.6, 313.7, 313.8, 313.9, 313.10, 313.11, 313.12, 313.13, and 313.14, to rename the "Office Affordable Housing Production Program" as the "Jobs-Housing Linkage Program," to apply the program to all new and expanded hotel space of at least 25,000 square feet, to all new and expanded entertainment space of at least 25,000 square feet, to all new and expanded retail space of at least 25,000 square feet, and to all new and expanded research and development space of at least 25,000 square feet; to set forth the number of housing units to be constructed for each type of development subject to this Ordinance; to increase the number of housing units and fees for office developments; and by adding Section 313.15 to require a study every five years determining the demand for housing created by commercial development. Supervisor Yee, seconded by President Ammiano, moved to excuse Supervisor Newsom from voting on this matter, at his request. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Ammiano, Daly, Gonzalez, Hall, Maxwell, McGoldrick, Leno, Newsom, Peskin, Sandoval, Yee Supervisor Ammiano submitted an amendment of the whole, bearing same title. President Ammiano, seconded by Supervisor McGoldrick, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: 10 - Ammiano, Daly, Gonzalez, Hall, Maxwell, McGoldrick, Leno, Peskin, Sandoval, Yee Excused: 1 - Newsom Supervisors Peskin, Daly requested to be added as co-sponsors. The roll was then called on the pending ordinance. PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote: Ayes: 10 - Ammiano, Daly, Gonzalez, Hall, Maxwell, McGoldrick, Leno, Peskin, Sandoval, Yee Excused: 1 - Newsom The President resumed the Chair. 002181 [Liquor License Transfer, 85 Natoma Street
Source textSupervisors Peskin, Daly requested to be added as co-sponsors. The roll was then called on the pending ordinance. PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 000276: Planning Code amendment to rename "Office Affordable Housing Production Program" as the "Jobs-Housing Linkage Program" and to apply the program to hotel, entertainment, and retail space Supervisors Ammiano, Bierman Ordinance amending Article III, Chapter II, Part II of the San Francisco Municipal Code (Planning Code) by amending Sections 313, 313.1, 313.2, 313.3, 313.4, 313.5, 313.6, 313.7, 313.8, 313.9, 313.10, 313.11, 313.12, 313.13, and 313.14, to rename the "Office Affordable Housing Production Program" as the "Jobs-Housing Linkage Program," to apply the program to all new and expanded hotel space of at least 25,000 square feet, to all new and expanded entertainment space of at least 25,000 square feet, to all new and expanded retail space of at least 25,000 square feet, and to all new and expanded research and development space of at least 25,000 square feet; to set forth the number of housing units to be constructed for each type of development subject to this Ordinance; to increase the number of housing units and fees for office developments; and by adding Section 313.15 to require a study every five years determining the demand for housing created by commercial development. Supervisor Yee, seconded by President Ammiano, moved to excuse Supervisor Newsom from voting on this matter, at his request. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Ammiano, Daly, Gonzalez, Hall, Maxwell, McGoldrick, Leno, Newsom, Peskin, Sandoval, Yee Supervisor Ammiano submitted an amendment of the whole, bearing same title. President Ammiano, seconded by Supervisor McGoldrick, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: 10 - Ammiano, Daly, Gonzalez, Hall, Maxwell, McGoldrick, Leno, Peskin, Sandoval, Yee Excused: 1 - Newsom Supervisors Peskin, Daly requested to be added as co-sponsors. The roll was then called on the pending ordinance. PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote: Ayes: 10 - Ammiano, Daly, Gonzalez, Hall, Maxwell, McGoldrick, Leno, Peskin, Sandoval, Yee Excused: 1 - Newsom The President resumed the Chair. 002181 [Liquor License Transfer, 85 Natoma Street
Source textSupervisor Ammiano submitted an amendment of the whole, bearing same title. President Ammiano, seconded by Supervisor McGoldrick, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 010150: Final Negative Declaration, Jobs-Housing Linkage Ordinance
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending resolution. ADOPTED by the following vote:
File 010081: Existing Litigation
Source text Board recessed at the hour of 4:05 p.m. to convene in closed session pursuant to the above motion. Reconvening of the Board The Board at the hour of 5:06 p.m. reconvened. Calling the Roll The following Supervisors were noted present:Supervisors Ammiano, Daly, Gonzalez, Hall, Leno, Maxwell, McGoldrick, Peskin, Sandoval - 9. Noted absent:Supervisors Newsom, Yee- 2. Report on Closed Session Deputy City Attorney Ted Lakey reported that the Board of Supervisors has met in closed session with the City Attorney, under the provisions of Government Code Section 54956.9 (c) and Administrative Code Section 67.10(d) for the purpose of conferring with, or receiving advice from, the City Attorney regarding the above pending litigation. The meeting was informational only and no action was taken. [Elect Not to Disclose] Motion that the Board finds that it is in the best interest of the public that the Board elect at this time not to disclose its closed session deliberations concerning the anticipated litigation listed above. Supervisor Leno, seconded by Supervisor Sandoval, moved not to disclose any information revealed in its closed session deliberation. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 010081: Existing Litigation
Source textPresent: Supervisors Ammiano, Daly, Gonzalez, Hall, Leno, Maxwell, McGoldrick, Peskin, Sandoval, Yee; Louise Renne, City Attorney; Malcolm Carson, Deputy City Attorney; Joe Quinn, Deputy City Attorney; Julie van Nostern, Deputy City Attorney; Ted Lakey, Deputy City Attorney; Karen Snell, outside counsel; Ed Harrington, Controller; Susan Leal, Treasurer; Gloria L. Young, Clerk of the Board; Jean Lum, Deputy Clerk. Tape Nos. 01 004; 01 005; 02 006 HEARD IN CLOSED SESSION. Supervisor Peskin requested this matter be continued to February 26, 2001 Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Leno, moved that this Litigation be CONTINUED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 992235: Street Vacation in Connection with YBC Plan Amendment
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 001270: Hearing - Street Vacation, Portion of Jessie Street
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 001257: Amendment to YBC Redevelopment Plan to Add Emporium Site Area
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 001269: Hearing - Amendment to YBC Redevelopment Plan to Add Emporium Site Area
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 992235: Street Vacation in Connection with YBC Plan Amendment
Source text992235 [Street Vacation in Connection with YBC Plan Amendment] Supervisors Yaki, Bierman Ordinance ordering the vacation of a portion of Jessie Street between Fourth and Fifth Streets in connection with the proposed expansion of the Yerba Buena Center Redevelopment Project Area and development of the Emporium Site and other property; establishing conditions for the effectiveness of the vacation; adopting findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; adopting findings that the vacation is consistent with the City’s General Plan and Eight Priority Policies of city Planning Code Section 101.1; and ratifying acts and authorizing actions in furtherance of the ordinance. (Companion measure to File 992234.) Supervisor Becerril excused from voting in Board. Supervisor Yaki requested this matter be continued to September 18, 2000. Supervisor Yaki, seconded by Supervisor Teng, moved that this Ordinance be CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 001270: Hearing - Street Vacation, Portion of Jessie Street
Source text001270 [Hearing - Street Vacation, Portion of Jessie Street] Supervisor Yaki Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to proposed ordinance ordering the vacation of a portion of Jessie Street between Fourth and Fifth Streets in connection with the proposed expansion of the Yerba Buena Center Redevelopment Project Area and development of the Emporium site and other property; establishing conditions for the effectiveness of the vacation; adopting findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; adopting findings that the vacation is consistent with the City’s General Plan and eight priority policies of City Planning Code Section 101.1; and ratifying acts and authorizing actions in furtherance of the ordinance. Supervisors Becerril and Newsom excused from voting in Board. Supervisor Yaki requested this matter be continued to September 18, 2000. Supervisor Yaki, seconded by Supervisor Teng, moved that this Hearing be CONTINUED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 001257: Amendment to YBC Redevelopment Plan to Add Emporium Site Area
Source textOrdinance No. 98-66, amended by Ordinance Nos. 202-71, 393-73, 386-76, 367-77, 420-97, 538-81, 477-86, 404-94, and 33-97) to expand the project area by adding land consisting of a portion of the block bounded by Market, Fourth, Mission and Fifth Streets and a portion of Mission Street between Fourth and Fifth Streets, specifically including Assessor’s Block 3705, Lots 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 33, 38 and 43; adopting findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; adopting findings that the Redevelopment Plan amendment is consistent with the city’s General Plan and Eight Priority Policies of city Planning Code Section 101.1; adopting other findings pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law; and approving certain limitations on development fees and exactions under the Redevelopment Plan in consideration of public benefits afforded by the project. (Fiscal impact.) Supervisors Becerril and Newsom excused from voting in Board. Supervisor Yaki requested this matter be continued to September 18, 2000. Supervisor Yaki, seconded by Supervisor Teng, moved that this Ordinance be CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 001269: Hearing - Amendment to YBC Redevelopment Plan to Add Emporium Site Area
Source texthe Yerba Buena Center Project Area (Ordinance No. 98-66, amended by Ordinance Nos. 202-71, 393-73, 386-76, 367-77, 420-97, 538-81, 477-86, 404-94, and 33-97) to expand the project area by adding land consisting of a portion of the block bounded by Market, Fourth, Mission and Fifth Streets and a portion of Mission Street between Fourth and Fifth Streets, specifically including Assessor’s Block 3705, Lots 9, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 33, 38 and 43; adopting findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; adopting findings that the Redevelopment Plan amendment is consistent with the City’s General Plan and Eight Priority Policies of city Planning Code Section 101.1; adopting other findings pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law; and approving certain limitations on development fees and exactions under the Redevelopment Plan in consideration of public benefits afforded by the project. Supervisors Becerril and Newsom excused from voting in Board. Supervisor Yaki requested this matter be continued to September 18, 2000. Supervisor Yaki, seconded by Supervisor Katz, moved that this Hearing be CONTINUED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 000695: Liquor License Transfer, 129 Carolina Street
Source textADOPTED by the following vote:
File 000616: Environmental Review - 2361 Lombard Street
Source text000616 [Environmental Review - 2361 Lombard Street] Motion certifying review of Final Negative Declaration relating to proposed Conditional Use Application No. 98.599C on property located at 2361 Lombard Street, south side between Scott and Pierce Streets, and adopting findings pursuant to Planning Code Section 101.1. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Leno, seconded by Supervisor Teng, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 000580: Findings -2361 Lombard Street
Source text000580 [Findings -2361 Lombard Street] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings relating to proposed Conditional Use Application No. 98.599C on property located at 2361 Lombard Street, south side between Scott and Pierce Streets, for action by the Board at its next meeting. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Leno, seconded by Supervisor Teng, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 000579: Appeal, Conditional,2361 Lombard Street
Source text000579 [Appeal, Conditional,2361 Lombard Street] Motion disapproving decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 15001 approving Conditional Use Application No. 98.599C on property located at 2361 Lombard Street, south side between Scott and Pierce Streets, and adopting findings pursuant to Planning Code Section 101.1. (Clerk of the Board) Enacted Number: M00-37 Supervisor Yaki, seconded by Supervisor Teng, moved that this Motion be APPROVED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 000578: Appeal, Conditional Use,2361 Lombard Street
Source text000578 [Appeal, Conditional Use,2361 Lombard Street] Motion approving decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 15001 approving Conditional Use Application No. 98.599C on property located at 2361 Lombard Street, south side between Scott and Pierce Streets, and adopting findings pursuant to Planning Code Section 101.1. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Leno, seconded by Supervisor Teng, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 991315: Amending Administrative Code, Residential Rent Control Chapter, to include the technical changes to conform local law with the State Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 000580: Findings - 2361 Lombard Street
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 000579: Appeal, Conditional, 2361 Lombard Street
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 000578: Appeal, Conditional Use, 2361 Lombard Street
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 000616: Environmental Review - 2361 Lombard Street
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 000577: Appeal, Conditional Use, 2361 Lombard Street
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 000377: Minor Sidewalk Encroachment Permit Appeal
Source text000377 [Minor Sidewalk Encroachment Permit Appeal] Motion disapproving the decision of the Director of Public Works’ approval of a minor sidewalk encroachment permit at 955 Green Street, south side between Jones and Leavenworth Streets, and denying the encroachment permit. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Kaufman, seconded by Supervisor Leno, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 000376: Minor Sidewalk Encroachment Permit Appeal
Source textMotion approving the decision of the Director of Public Works’ approval of a minor sidewalk encroachment permit at 955 Green Street, south side between Jones and Leavenworth Streets, with additional conditions imposed upon the permittee by the Board of Supervisors, and denying the appeal. (Clerk of the Board) APPROVED AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 000376: Minor Sidewalk Encroachment Permit Appeal
Source textSupervisor Becerril moved an amendment, seconded by Supervisor Kaufman, which would approve the Director of Public Work’s approval of a minor sidewalk encroachment permit at 955 Green Street with additional conditions imposed upon the permittee by the Board of Supervisors. After a period of debate, Supervisor Becerril moved substitute amendment toincorporate additional language to the above amendment.Title amended accordingly; City Attorney to prepare legislation. Supervisor Becerril, seconded by Supervisor Kaufman, moved that this Motion be AMENDED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 000376: Minor Sidewalk Encroachment Permit Appeal
Source text000376 [Minor Sidewalk Encroachment Permit Appeal] Motion approving the decision of the Director of Public Works’ approval of a minor sidewalk encroachment permit at 955 Green Street, south side between Jones and Leavenworth Streets, and denying the appeal. (Clerk of the Board) An attorney-client privilege confidential letter dated April 7, 2000 was received for Board members concerning this matter. Supervisor Newsom was excused from voting on this matter by previous action of the Board.(See April 3, 2000 Meeting Minutes.) Supervisor Yee, seconded by Supervisor Leno, moved to continue consideration to April 17, 2000. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 000377: Minor Sidewalk Encroachment Permit Appeal
Source textSupervisor Teng requested this matter be continued to April 10, 2000. Supervisor Teng, seconded by Supervisor Kaufman, moved that this Motion be CONTINUED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 000376: Minor Sidewalk Encroachment Permit Appeal
Source textSupervisor Teng requested this matter be continued to April 10, 2000. Supervisor Teng, seconded by Supervisor Kaufman, moved that this Motion be CONTINUED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 992271: Liquor Licenses, 1186 Folsom Street
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 992236: Increasing Tenant Relocation Benefits
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 992236: Increasing Tenant Relocation Benefits
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 991987: Liquor Licenses, 231 Scott Street
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 990998: Zoning - Live/Work Moratorium: Imposing Interim Zoning Controls
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 991156: Settlement: University of California to vacate its office/classroom space in building to be demolished for expansion of Moscone Convention Center in exchange the City will pay UC for Supervisor Newsom Ordinance authorizing settlement of litigation of City and County of San Francisco against the Regents of the University of California for $880,000 payable to University of California for training City employees. (City Attorney) (CCSF v. WCB More II Limited Partnership, et al. S.F. Superior Court No. 997-764.) Ordinance No. 235-99 Supervisor Yaki, seconded by Supervisor Leno, moved to excuse Supervisor Becerril from voting on this matter. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: 10 - Ammiano, Becerril, Bierman, Brown, Katz, Kaufman, Leno, Newsom, Yaki, Yee Absent: 1 - Teng FINALLY PASSED by the following vote: Ayes: 9 - Ammiano, Bierman, Brown, Katz, Kaufman, Leno, Newsom, Yaki, Yee Absent: 1 - Teng Excused: 1 - Becerril From Housing and Social Policy Committee Without Recommendation 990168 [Rent Ordinance
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 990168: Rent Ordinance
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 990168: Rent Ordinance
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 990168: Rent Ordinance
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 990168: Rent Ordinance
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 990168: Rent Ordinance
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 990998: Zoning - Live/Work Moratorium: Imposing Interim Zoning Controls
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 990997: Zoning - Live/Work Moratorium: Imposing an Order Prohibiting Action on Applications
Source textSupervisor Bierman, seconded by Supervisor Katz, moved that this Resolution be RE-REFERRED to the Transportation and Land Use Committee. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 990998: Zoning - Live/Work Moratorium: Imposing Interim Zoning Controls
Source textSupervisor Bierman requested this item be continued to August 9, 1999. Supervisor Bierman, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Resolution be CONTINUED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 990864: Liquor License Transfer, 1162 Folsom Street
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 990680: Liquor License Modification, 1402 Grant Avenue, ABC File 21-299655
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 990677: Liquor License Modification, 3098 24th Street, ABC File 21-333748
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 990574: Liquor License, 105-A Fillmore Street
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 990093: Conversion of Residential Rental Uses Interim Zoning Controls
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 982137: Caltrain Downtown Extension Project EIR/EIS
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 982134: Passenger Rail Service, Proposition I Implementation
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 982133: Downtown Caltrain Station
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 982132: AC Transit Relocation
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 990151: Suspend 30-Day Rule - Interim Zoning Controls, Residential Units Conversion
Source textAPPROVED by the following vote:
File 981688: Condominium Conversion Limitation
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981433: Mission Bay South Tax Allocation Agreement
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981437: Public Trust Agreement Amendment, Mission Bay
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981436: Mission Bay Port Land Transfer Amendment
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981435: Mission Bay City Land Transfer Amendment
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981431: Subdivision Code Amendment, Mission Bay
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981430: Zoning Map, Mission Bay
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981430: Zoning Map, Mission Bay
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981429: Planning Code Amendment, Mission Bay
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981429: Planning Code Amendment, Mission Bay
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981428: General Plan Amendment, Mission Bay
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981428: General Plan Amendment, Mission Bay
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981333: Mission Bay Street Vacation
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981432: Mission Bay North Tax Allocation Agreement
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981440: Mission Bay North Redevelopment Plan
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981440: Mission Bay North Redevelopment Plan
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981333: Mission Bay Street Vacation
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981333: Mission Bay Street Vacation
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981333: Mission Bay Street Vacation
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 981158: Owner Move-In Reform-Senior Housing Protection II
Source textSupervisors Kaufman and Newsom were excused by previous action of the Board. See Meeting Minutes of September 14, 1998. The Clerk, with the concurrence of Deputy City Attorney Ted Lakey, announced a clerical correction to Page 9, line 19, to renumber "g" to "i" and insert Sections 37.9(g) and 37.9(h) which were added by Ordinance 250-98 and inadvertently left out of this proposed legislation. CLERICAL CORRECTION. FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 981158: Owner Move-In Reform-Senior Housing Protection II
Source textre that the owner/relative move into the property within three months and live in the property for 36 months, to require a 50 percent or greater ownership interest in order to evict under OMI as to owners acquiring rental property after July 1, 1997, to limit evictions for owner’s relatives, to prohibit OMI eviction if any comparable unit owned by the landlord is vacant and available prior to the tenant’s vacation of the unit: (2) adding Section 37.9B to require owner documentation for OMI evictions, to provide rights to tenants evicted under OMI including a three-year right of re-rental and limitations on rent increases, and to provide a right to relocation costs for tenants of 12 months or more in multiple-unit buildings; (3) amending Section 37.10A to make it a misdemeanor for an owner to refuse to rent to a senior-age person because that person would acquire rights under this chapter; and (4) amending Section 37.11A to provide a right of civil legal action against an owner who attempts to prevent a person from acquiring rights under this chapter. (Amend Sections 37.9(a)(8), 37.10A, 37.11A; Adds Section 37.9B) PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 981158: Owner Move-In Reform-Senior Housing Protection II
Source text to owners acquiring rental property after July 1, 1997, to limit evictions for owner’s relatives, to prohibit OMI eviction if any comparable unit owned by the landlord is vacant and available prior to the tenant’s vacation of the units: (2) adding Section 37.9B to require owner documentation for OMI evictions, to provide rights to tenants evicted under OMI including a three-year right of re-rental and limitations on rent increases, and to provide a right to relocation costs for tenants of 12 months or more in multiple-unit buildings; (3) amending Section 37.10A to make it a misdemeanor for an owner to refuse to rent to a senior-age person because that person would acquire rights under this chapter; and (4) amending Section 37.11A to provide a right of civil legal action against an owner who attempts to prevent a person from acquiring rights under this chapter. Clerical correction to title: Delete "s" from the word "units". Supervisor Bierman moved an amendment of the whole. Ordinance No. 293-98 Supervisor Bierman, seconded by Supervisor Ammiano, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 98-1332: Mission Bay Street Vacation
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending resolution and it was adopted by the following vote:
File 98-0805: Moratorium, Owner Move-In
Source textSupervisor Teng assumed the Chair. The roll was then called on the pending ordinance and it was adopted by the following vote:
File 98-1047: Public Hearing Approval
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending resolution and it was adopted by the following vote:
File 98-0805: Moratorium, Owner Move-In
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending ordinance and it was passed on first reading by the following vote:
File 98-0844: Statute of Limitations
Source textNoted absent: Supervisors Kaufman, Newsom, Yee-3. Quorum present. ReportonClosedSession Adopted Motion that the Board finds that it is in the best interest of the public that the Board elects at this time not to disclose its closed session deliberations concerning the possible litigation. Supervisor Ammiano, seconded by Supervisor Medina, moved adoption. Motion adopted by the following vote:
File 98-0844: Statute of Limitations
Source textd to the following persons: Bob Planthold, parent participation; Carolyn, Sharon Art Studio; Wes Slagle, parking facility. There being no one else wishing to speak, the President declared the public comment portion of the meeting closed. AppointmentofPresidentProTempore At the request of the President, Supervisor Teng assumed the Chair. ConferencewithCityAttorney-Litigation FromthePresident Adopted [Closed Session] Motion that the Board of Supervisors convene in closed session with the City Attorney for the purpose of conferring with, or receiving advice from the City Attorney regarding pending litigation in the case of O’Hara v. City and County of San Francisco, California Court of Appeals No. A082474; S.F. Superior Court No. 992-704 (Owner-Move-In Litigation). The closed session will be held pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) and Administrative Code Section 67.11(b). SupervisorsKaufman,Newsom,YeeExcusedfromVoting. Supervisors Kaufman, Newsom and Yee were excused from voting on this item by previous action of the Board. (See Journal of Proceedings of April 13, 1998.) Supervisor Ammiano, seconded by Supervisor Medina, moved adoption. Adopted by the following vote:
File 98-0872: Suspend Thirty Day Rule
Source textAppointmentofPresidentProTempore At the request of the President, Supervisor Teng assumed the Chair. The roll was then called on the pending motion and it was adopted by the following vote:
File 98-0530: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force
Source textt; Rose Melendez, "Tier II" police retirement; Jim Keener, oppose bond interest pass-through; Christian Lightner, Bike to Work Day. There being no one else wishing to speak, the President declared the public comment portion of the meeting closed. AppointmentofPresidentProTempore At the request of the President, Supervisor Teng assumed the Chair. ConferencewithCityAttorney-Litigation FromthePresident Adopted [Closed Session] Motion that the Board of Supervisors convene in closed session with the City Attorney for the purpose of conferring with, or receiving advice from the City Attorney regarding pending litigation in the case of O’Hara v. City and County of San Francisco, California Court of Appeals No. A082474; S.F. Superior Court No. 992-704 (Owner-Move-In Litigation). The closed session will be held pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) and Administrative Code Section 67.11(b). SupervisorsKaufman,Newsom,YeeExcusedfromVoting Supervisors Kaufman, Newsom, Yee were previously excused from voting because of a possible conflict of interest. See Journal of Proceedings of April 13, 1998. The roll was then called on the main motion and it was adopted by the following vote:
File 98-0513: Planning Department Fees
Source text[Planning Department Fees] Ordinance amending Planning Code to modify and eliminate certain Planning Department fees, and deleting Section 358, the Sunset Clause. (Planning Department) File 98-0513, Ordinance No. 168-98 (Fiscal Impact.) (Repeals existing Article 3.5, converting Article 3.5A to a new Article 3.5; amends Sections 350 through 357 and deletes Section 358.) (Planning Commission Resolution No. 14605, adopted March 26, 1998, approving amendments.) Finally passed by the following vote:
File 98-0546: Environmental Review Fees
Source text[Environmental Review Fees] Ordinance amending Administrative Code, to modify and eliminate certain Planning Department fees, and deleting Section 31.46(g), the sunset clause. (Planning Department) File 98-0546, Ordinance No. 169-98 (Fiscal Impact.) (Repeals existing Section 31.46, converting Section 31.46A, to a new Section 31.46; amends Section 31.46 and deletes Section 31.46(g).) (Planning Commission Resolution No. 14605 adopted March 26, 1998, approving amendments.) Finally passed by the following vote:
File 98-0513: Planning Department Fees
Source textPassed on first reading by the following vote:
File 98-0546: Environmental Review Fees
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending ordinance and it was passed on first reading by the following vote:
File 98-0557: Final Map
Source textakey reported that the Board had met in closed session with the City Attorney as permitted by Government Code Section 94956.9(a) regarding the following litigation: KathleenO’Hara,RobertJ.Garay,SergioIantorno,KatherineBeckwith v.SanFrancisco, Intervenors: Katherine Alvord, Carmen Maldonado, and Josefina Lopez, S.F. Superior Court No. 992-704 (Owner Move-In litigation); UnitedStatesHouseofRepresentativesv.UnitedStatesDepartmentof Commerce,etal., Intervenors: Several major cities, including Los Angeles, New York, San Jose, Long Beach, Oakland, Santa Clara, Alameda County, and the City and County of San Francisco, United States District Court, District of Columbia No. 1:98CV00456-RCL (Census 2000 litigation); AirTransportAssociationofAmericav.SanFrancisco, U.S. District Court No. C97-1763CW (Challenge to Equal Benefits Ordinance). The meeting was informational only and no action was taken. Adopted Motion that the Board finds that it is in the best interest of the public that the Board elect at this time not to disclose its closed session deliberations concerning the possible litigation. Supervisor Yaki, seconded by Supervisor Brown, moved adoption. Adopted by the following vote:
File 98-0557: Final Map
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending motion and it was adopted by the following vote:
File a: Appeal of Eviction Moratorium Ruling
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending resolution and it was adopted by the following vote:
File 98-0324: Supporting AB 3037 and Opposing AB 297
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending resolution and it was adopted by the following vote:
File 98-0304: State Legislation, AB 3037, Smoke-free Worksite
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending resolution and it was adopted by the following vote:
File 111-97-4: Interim Zoning Controls, Ballpark Vicinity
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending resolution and it was adopted by the following vote:
File 109-97-4: Eviction Moratorium on Owner Move-Ins
Source text[Eviction Moratorium on Owner Move-Ins] Ordinance amending Administrative Code to prohibit, except under narrow circumstances, owner/relative move-in evictions that would result in the displacement of residential tenants who are 60 years of age or older or disabled and have been residing in the same rental unit for 10 years or more, or who are catastrophically ill and have been residing in the same rental unit for 5 years or more; this temporary moratorium would be in effect through June 30, 1999; and making technical non-substantive changes. Sponsors Supervisors Teng, Ammiano, Bierman, Medina. File 109-97-4, Ordinance No. 482-97 (Amends Section 37.9.) Finally passed by the following vote:
File 109-97-4: Eviction Moratorium on Owner Move-Ins
Source textPassed for second reading as amended by the following vote:
File 109-97-4: Eviction Moratorium on Owner Move-Ins
Source textSupervisor Teng, seconded by Supervisor Medina, moved an amendment of the whole bearing same title. Motion to amend adopted by the following vote:
File 37-97-7.4: Findings
Source text[Findings] Motion adopting findings related to the appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of Conditional Use Application No. 97.592CR, for the installation of six antennas on a new light pole and a base transceiver station on the rooftop parking level, of the existing Marina off-street parking garage as part of the wireless teleCOMMUNICATION s network, in an NC-2 (Small Scale Neighborhood Commercial) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District, pursuant to Section 711.83 of the Planning Code, on property located at 3224-3252 Pierce Street, east side between Lombard and Chestnut Streets; Lots 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13, in Assessor’s Block 490. File 37-97-7.4, Motion No. Adopted by the following vote:
File 37-97-7.1: Zoning Appeal, 3224-3252 Pierce Street
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending motion and it was adopted by the following vote:
File 126-97-1: Condominium Conversion Limitation
Source text[Condominium Conversion Limitation] Ordinance amending Subdivision Code, to extend the annual condominium conversion limitation for one additional year (expiring December 31, 1998). (Department of Public Works) File 126-97-1, Ordinance No. 434-97 (Amends Section 1396.) Finally passed by the following vote:
File 101-97-15: Appropriation, Port Commission
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending ordinance and it was finally passed by the following vote:
File 161-97-7.1: Redevelopment Agency Budget and Bonds
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending resolution and it was adopted by the following vote:
File 223-97-25: Liquor License Transfer, 2552 Taylor Street
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending resolution and it was adopted by the following vote:
File 101-97-4: Appropriation, Port Commission/FY 1997-98
Source text[Appropriation, Port Commission/FY 1997-98] Ordinance appropriating $4,450,000, Port Commission, Harbor Operating Fund Loan Revenue to purchase property for the Caltrans Site Acquisition Project for fiscal year 1997-98. (Mayor) File 101-97-4, Ordinance No. 325-97 Finally passed by the following vote:
File 262-97-5: Appropriation, Port Commission/FY 1997-98
Source text[Appropriation, Port Commission/FY 1997-98] Ordinance appropriating $4,450,000, Port Commission, Harbor Operating Fund Loan Revenue to purchase property for the Caltrans Site Acquisition Project for fiscal year 1997-98; companion measure to File 262-97-5. (Mayor) File 101-97-4, Ordinance No. Passed for second reading by the following vote:
File 262-97-1: China Basin Ballpark, CalTrans Parcel
Source text[China Basin Ballpark, CalTrans Parcel] Resolution approving and authorizing an agreement between the City and County, through its Port Commission, as buyer, and the State of California, Department of Transportation, as seller, for the purchase of real property bounded by King, Second, Berry and Third Streets (AB 3794, Lots 3B and 27), at a purchase price of $3,600,000; approving and authorizing agreements by the City to indemnify the State for hazardous materials and for the termination of tenancies, in connection with the purchase of the property; adopting findings that the purchase is consistent with the General Plan and eight priority policies of Planning Code Section 101.1; and ratifying prior acts; companion measure to File 262-97-1. Sponsors Supervisors Yaki, Teng. File 262-97-5, Resolution No. 705-97 (Fiscal Impact.) Adopted by the following vote:
File 262-97-1: China Basin Ballpark, Non-Relocation Agreement
Source text[China Basin Ballpark, Non-Relocation Agreement] Resolution approving and authorizing a non-relocation agreement and a guaranty from San Francisco Baseball Associates LP, owner of the San Francisco Giants Baseball Team, concerning certain assurances by the team owner for the benefit of the City in connection with the lease and development of a new ballpark at China Basin; adopting findings that the purchase is consistent with the City’s General Plan and eight priority policies of Planning Code Section 101.1; and ratifying prior acts; companion measure to File 262-97-1. Sponsors Supervisors Yaki, Teng. File 262-97-4, Resolution No. 704-97 Adopted by the following vote:
File 262-97-1: China Basin Ballpark, Ground Lease
Source text[China Basin Ballpark, Ground Lease] Resolution approving and authorizing a ground lease agreement between the City and County, through its Port Commission, as landlord, and China Basin Ballpark Company LLC, as tenant, concerning the lease of certain real property bounded generally by King Street, Second Street, China Basin Channel and Third Street, for the development and operation of a new ballpark for the San Francisco Giants and for other commercial, assembly and recreation uses; adopting findings that the lease is consistent with the City’s General Plan and eight priority policies of Planning Code Section 101.1; and ratifying prior acts; companion measure to File 262-97-1. Sponsors Supervisors Yaki, Teng. File 262-97-3, Resolution No. 703-97 Adopted by the following vote:
File 262-97-1: China Basin Ballpark, Disposition/Development
Source text[China Basin Ballpark, Disposition/Development] Resolution approving and authorizing a lease disposition and development agreement between the City and County, through its Port Commission, and China Basin Ballpark Company LLC, as developer, concerning an agreement to lease certain real property bounded generally by King Street, Second Street, China Basin Channel and Third Street, and governing the development of a new ballpark for the San Francisco Giants and for other commercial, assembly and recreation uses; adopting findings that the agreement is consistent with the City’s General Plan and eight priority policies of Planning Code Section 101.1; and ratifying prior acts; companion measure to File 262-97-1. Sponsors Supervisors Yaki, Teng. File 262-97-2, Resolution No. 702-97 Adopted by the following vote:
File 262-97-1: CEQA, China Basin Ballpark
Source textThe roll was then called on the pending resolution and it was adopted by the following vote:
File 164-97-3.1: Street Vacation
Source text[Street Vacation] Ordinance ordering the vacation of certain street areas within the site at China Basin for the San Francisco Giants Ballpark Project; adopting findings that the vacation is consistent with the City’s General Plan and eight priority policies of Planning Code Section 101.1; and ratifying earlier acts. Sponsors Supervisors Yaki, Teng. File 164-97-3.1, Ordinance No. 303-97 Finally passed by the following vote:
File 85-97-3: Supporting Completion of the Caltrain FEIS/EIR
Source text[Supporting Completion of the Caltrain FEIS/EIR] Resolution requesting that the work being done on the Downtown extension project reports and studies be completed and presented to the Board with conclusions; and instructing San Francisco representatives on the Joint Powers Board to communicate this resolution and the resolution adopted by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors on May 12 endorsing the Main/Beale South Design concept and program for a replacement facility for the Transbay Transit Terminal. Sponsors Supervisors Bierman, Katz. File 85-97-3, Resolution No. (June 30, 1997 - Adopted. July 9, 1997 - Returned to Board by Mayor, disapproved. July 14, 1997 - Consideration continued to July 21, 1997.) AppointmentofPresidentProTempore At the request of the President, Supervisor Leal assumed the Chair. The clerk stated an "aye" vote would support passage of the resolution and a "no" vote does not. The roll was then called on the question: Shall the resolution be adopted notwithstanding the Mayor’s veto. Refused adoption by the following vote:
File 164-97-3.1: Street Vacation
Source textPassed for second reading as amended by the following vote:
File 164-97-3.1: Street Vacation
Source textAppointmentofPresidentProTempore At the request of the President, Supervisor Leal assumed the Chair. Supervisor Yaki, seconded by Supervisor Teng, moved an amendment of the whole bearing same title. Amendment of the whole adopted by the following vote:
File 37-97-3.4: Findings
Source text[Findings] Motion adopting findings related to the appeal of the Planning Commission’s approval of Conditional Use Application No. 96.774CR, for the replacement of two existing light poles and the installation of a total of six antennas on the new poles, and the installation of a base transceiver station on the upper deck of the Lombard Garage in a P (Public) District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District pursuant to Section 234.2 of the Planning Code, at a building located at 2055 Lombard Street, south side, between Fillmore and Webster Streets, Lot 9 in Assessor’s Block 509, and approving the granting of the conditional use application with an additional condition. (Clerk of the Board) File 37-97-3.4 Adopted by the following vote:
File 271-97-5: Ballpark, General Plan Amendments
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 151-97-3: Ballpark, Rincon Point-South Beach
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 151-97-3: Ballpark, Rincon Point-South Beach
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 271-97-5.1: CEQA Findings, China Basin Ballpark
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 271-97-5.1: CEQA Findings, China Basin Ballpark
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 271-97-5.1: CEQA Findings, China Basin Ballpark
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 85-97-3: Supporting Completion of the Caltrain FEIS/EIR
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 37-97-3.3: Findings
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 37-97-3.2: Zoning Appeal
Source textAction text unavailable.
File 37-97-3.1: Zoning Appeal
Source textAction text unavailable.