SUPERVISOR PROFILE AND RECORDED ROLL-CALL EVIDENCE
Jeff Sheehy
These are recorded positions on specific actions. A No is not automatically opposition to a project, and an Aye is not automatically support. Read the action and cited minutes.
FORMER SUPERVISOR
Contact
- District
- 8
- Service
- 2017-01-08 to 2018-07-11
- Official record
- Board profile or historical entry ↗
MOST RECENT 250 · NO
NO positions
File 180367: Supporting California State Senate Bill 1045 (Wiener, Stern) - Conservatorship: Chronic Homelessness and Substance Abuse Disorders
LLM summaryA motion to refer the amended resolution supporting California Senate Bill 1045 to committee failed.
Source textSupervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Resolution be REFERRED AS AMENDED to Committee. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 180116: Appropriation - $1,100,000 of Prior Year’s Fund Balance in General Fund to Department of Public Works for Street & Sidewalk Cleaning Pilot Enhancement Project - FY2017-2018
LLM summaryAn ordinance appropriating $1,100,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Public Works for a Street and Sidewalk Cleaning Pilot Enhancement Project was finally passed.
Source text180116 [Appropriation - $1,100,000 of Prior Year’s Fund Balance in General Fund to Department of Public Works for Street & Sidewalk Cleaning Pilot Enhancement Project - FY2017-2018] Sponsors: Kim; Fewer, Ronen and Peskin Ordinance appropriating $1,100,000 of prior year’s fund balance in General Fund to Public Works for funding Street & Sidewalk Cleaning Pilot Enhancement Project in FY2017-2018. (Fiscal Impact) FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 180116: Appropriation - $1,100,000 of Prior Year’s Fund Balance in General Fund to Department of Public Works for Street & Sidewalk Cleaning Pilot Enhancement Project - FY2017-2018
LLM summaryAn ordinance appropriating $1,100,000 from the General Fund to the Department of Public Works for a Street and Sidewalk Cleaning Pilot Enhancement Project passed on first reading as amended.
Source textOrdinance appropriating $1,100,000 of prior year’s fund balance in General Fund to Public Works for funding Street & Sidewalk Cleaning Pilot Enhancement Project in FY2017-2018. (Fiscal Impact) PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 180280: Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code - Campaign Finance and Conflict of Interest
LLM summaryA motion to amend the Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code regarding campaign finance and conflict of interest definitions failed.
Source textCity and County of San Francisco Page 209 Printed at 1:04 pm on 5/3/18 Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 4/3/2018 Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED in Section 1.104 by adding definitions for ‘Financial Interest’, ‘Land Use Matter’; and by adding a new Section 1.127 regarding ‘Contribution Limits - Persons with Land Use Matters Before a Decision-Making Body’. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 180162: Opposing California State Senate Bill 827 (Wiener) - Transit-Rich Housing Bonus
LLM summaryA resolution opposing California State Senate Bill 827, which impacts local development value recapture, was adopted as amended.
Source textResolution opposing California Senate Bill 827, authored by Senator Wiener, which would fundamentally constrain, if not negate, San Francisco’s local ability to recapture critical public value of development projects citywide and override local planning process. Supervisor Breed requested the question be DIVIDED so that consideration of the language to oppose SB 827 be taken separately. After further discussions and clarification, Angela Calvillo, Clerk of the Board, informed Supervisor Breed that the request to divide the question should be withdrawn; Supervisor Breed concurred. Resolution No. 084-18 ADOPTED AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 180162: Opposing California State Senate Bill 827 (Wiener) - Transit-Rich Housing Bonus
LLM summaryA resolution opposing California State Senate Bill 827, which affects local planning authority, was adopted as amended.
Source textally flawed, based on its preemption of San Francisco’s sovereign charter authority and undermining of San Francisco’s ability to recapture public value from private developers in exchange for the added benefits of density and height; and’; and Page 3, Lines 4-8, by striking ‘is committed to working with other jurisdictions, affordable housing and tenant advocates to address the State’s housing crisis by amending SB 827’ and adding ‘joins with other local jurisdictions and a growing statewide coalition of housing, “complete neighborhood”, environmental and tenant advocates, including those based in every district in San Francisco, in opposing SB 827’, Lines 9-12, by striking ‘FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco is committed to working with its State Legislative Delegation to craft the necessary amendments to SB 827 in order to protect San Francisco’s sovereign charter authority and recapture value from the added benefits of density and height; and, be it’, and Line 14, by adding ‘permanent’ before ‘affordable’, by striking ‘crises’ and adding ‘crisis throughout California’ after ‘housing’. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 171138: Administrative Code - Indigenous Peoples Day
LLM summaryAn ordinance to declare the second Monday in October as Indigenous Peoples Day was referred to the Rules Committee but the motion failed.
Source text171138 [Administrative Code - Indigenous Peoples Day] Sponsor: Cohen Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to declare the second Monday in October to be Indigenous Peoples Day. Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Ordinance be REFERRED to the Rules Committee. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171306: Charter Amendment - Appointed Board Members and Commissioners Seeking Elective Office
LLM summaryA charter amendment was submitted to require appointed board members to forfeit their positions upon filing for elective office.
Source text171306 [Charter Amendment - Appointed Board Members and Commissioners Seeking Elective Office] Sponsors: Peskin; Kim, Safai and Yee Charter Amendment (First Draft) to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to provide that appointed members of boards and commissions under the Charter forfeit their offices upon filing a declaration of candidacy for state or local elective office; at an election to be held on June 5, 2018. ORDERED SUBMITTED by the following vote:
File 171138: Administrative Code - Indigenous Peoples Day
LLM summaryAn ordinance to declare the second Monday in October as Indigenous Peoples Day was continued to the Board of Supervisors meeting on January 30, 2018.
Source text171138 [Administrative Code - Indigenous Peoples Day] Sponsor: Cohen Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to declare the second Monday in October to be Indigenous Peoples Day. Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Tang, moved that this Ordinance be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of January 30, 2018. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171190: Conditionally Disapproving the Conditional Use Authorization and Approving with Additional Conditions - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street
LLM summaryA motion conditionally disapproving a Conditional Use Authorization for a project at 2161-2165 Irving Street was made, with additional conditions proposed.
Source text171190 [Conditionally Disapproving the Conditional Use Authorization and Approving with Additional Conditions - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street] Motion conditionally disapproving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 20027, approving a Conditional Use Authorization identified as Planning Case No. 2016-002424CUA for a proposed project located at 2161-2165 Irving Street, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) (Charter, Section 4.105, and Planning Code, Section 308.1(d), provides that the Board of Supervisors may disapprove the decision of the Planning Commission by a vote of not less than two-thirds of the members of the Board.) Supervisor Tang, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Motion be AMENDED by adding a condition that the Medical Cannabis Dispensary operate between 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. for one year during a trial period. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171130: Conditionally Disapproving the Conditional Use Authorization and Approving with Additional Conditions - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street
LLM summaryThe Board conditionally disapproved the Conditional Use Authorization for a project at 2161-2165 Irving Street and considered additional conditions.
Source text171130 [Conditionally Disapproving the Conditional Use Authorization and Approving with Additional Conditions - Proposed Project at 2161-2165 Irving Street] Motion conditionally disapproving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 20027, approving a Conditional Use Authorization identified as Planning Case No. 2016-002424CUA for a proposed project located at 2161-2165 Irving Street, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) (Charter, Section 4.105, and Planning Code, Section 308.1(d), provides that the Board of Supervisors may disapprove the decision of the Planning Commission by a vote of not less than two-thirds of the members of the Board.) Supervisor Tang, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Motion be AMENDED by adding a condition that the Medical Cannabis Dispensary operate between 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. for one year during a trial period. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171042: Various Codes - Regulation of Cannabis Businesses
LLM summaryAn amendment to the cannabis regulation ordinance was proposed but failed, which aimed to change the effective date for certain provisions.
Source textng cannabis under the authority of a medical cannabis dispensary permit, starting April 1, 2018; 14) establishing a sunset date of December 31, 2018, for Article 33 of the Health Code (“Medical Cannabis Act”); 15) requiring the Department of Public Health to implement an ongoing public health education campaign about the safe consumption and health benefits of cannabis; 16) requiring the Controller to submit a report to the Board of Supervisors within one year of the effective date of Article 16 recommending whether the issuance of cannabis business permits should be subject to any limits; 17) establishing an Equity Operator Fund to receive any monies appropriated for the purpose of assisting Equity Operators; 18) eliminating the duty of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to send letters annually to state and federal officials requesting that cannabis be regulated and taxed; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. Supervisor Yee, seconded by Supervisor Fewer, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED in Article 16, Section 1606(a), by changing ‘January 1, 2019’ to ‘January 1, 2020.' The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171041: Planning Code - Cannabis Regulation
LLM summaryA motion to amend the cannabis regulation ordinance with various restrictions and requirements failed.
Source textSupervisor Yee, seconded by Supervisor Tang, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED by requiring a Medical Cannabis Dispensary Use that converts to a Cannabis Retail Use in the Ocean Avenue and West Portal NCDs and on Taraval Street be subject to Mandatory Discretionary Review; by prohibiting Cannabis Retail Use within a 1000 foot radius of existing schools or day care centers, and prohibiting Cannabis Retail Use within a 1200 foot radius of existing schools or day care centers on Taraval Street between Forest Side Avenue and 19th Avenue; allowing a maximum of two Medical Cannabis Dispensaries or Cannabis Retail Uses in the Ocean Avenue NCT; and making other clarifying and conforming changes. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171041: Planning Code - Cannabis Regulation
LLM summaryAn amendment to the cannabis regulation ordinance regarding the restriction of a 600 foot radius between Cannabis Retail Uses failed due to lack of a second.
Source textSupervsior Ronen moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED by striking the restriction of a 600 foot radius between Cannabis Retail Uses. The motion FAILED since no second was attained. Supervisor Ronen, seconded by Supervisor Cohen, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE, by striking the limit of three Medical Cannabis Dispensary Uses or Cannabis Retail Uses within the Excelsior Outer Mission Street Neighborhood Commercial District. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 171041: Planning Code - Cannabis Regulation
LLM summaryA motion to amend the cannabis regulation ordinance to limit Medical Cannabis Dispensaries and Cannabis Retail Uses in certain areas failed.
Source textCity and County of San Francisco Page 868 Printed at 1:11 pm on 1/3/18 Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 11/28/2017 Supervisor Tang, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED by allowing a maximum of two Medical Cannabis Dispensaries or Cannabis Retail Uses in the area bound by Lincoln Way, Sunset Boulevard, the Pacific Ocean, and Sloat Boulevard; and by allowing a maximum of one Medical Cannabis Dispensary or Cannabis Retail Use in the Noriega Street NCD, Irving Street NCD, Taraval NCD, and Judah Street NCD. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171041: Planning Code - Cannabis Regulation
LLM summaryA motion to amend the cannabis regulation ordinance to prohibit Medical Cannabis Dispensary Uses within a 600 foot radius of schools and day care centers failed.
Source textSupervisor Tang, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED by prohibiting Medical Cannabis Dispensary Uses within a 600 foot radius of existing schools and day care centers. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171041: Planning Code - Cannabis Regulation
LLM summaryA motion to amend the cannabis regulation ordinance to prohibit Medical Cannabis Dispensary Uses within a 1000 foot radius of schools failed.
Source textSupervisor Tang, seconded by Supervisor Kim, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED by prohibiting Medical Cannabis Dispensary Uses within a 1000 foot radius of existing schools. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171041: Planning Code - Cannabis Regulation
LLM summaryAn ordinance concerning cannabis regulation was proposed, including various amendments, but several motions to further amend it failed.
Source textoducts, cannabis cultivation, and cannabis testing; 2) allow Medical Cannabis Dispensaries in additional zoning districts; 3) establish a land use process for the conversion of existing Medical Cannabis Dispensaries to Cannabis Retail establishments; 4) establish location and operating conditions for cannabis uses; 5) repeal Ordinance No. 186-17, which limited the number of medical cannabis dispensaries in Supervisorial District 11; 6) create a limit of three Medical Cannabis Dispensaries and Cannabis retail uses, in any combination, in the Excelsior Outer Mission Street Neighborhood Commercial District; 7) delete superseded Planning Code provisions; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1, and public necessity, convenience and welfare findings pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. Supervisor Tang, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED by prohibiting Cannabis Retail Uses within a 1000 foot radius of existing schools or day care centers. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171056: Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Categorical Exemption Determination - 20 Nobles Alley
LLM summaryA motion to prepare findings reversing a categorical exemption for a project at 20 Nobles Alley was continued to a later meeting.
Source text171056 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Categorical Exemption Determination - 20 Nobles Alley] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 20 Nobles Alley is categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Ronen, moved that this Motion be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 6, 2018. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171055: Conditionally Reversing the Categorical Exemption Determination - 20 Nobles Alley
LLM summaryA motion to conditionally reverse the categorical exemption determination for 20 Nobles Alley was continued to a future meeting but ultimately failed.
Source text171055 [Conditionally Reversing the Categorical Exemption Determination - 20 Nobles Alley] Motion conditionally reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 20 Nobles Alley is categorically exempt from further environmental review, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Ronen, moved that this Motion be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 6, 2018. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171054: Affirming the Categorical Exemption Determination - 20 Nobles Alley
LLM summaryA motion affirming the categorical exemption determination for 20 Nobles Alley was continued to a future meeting but ultimately failed.
Source text171054 [Affirming the Categorical Exemption Determination - 20 Nobles Alley] Motion affirming the determination by the Planning Department that a proposed project at 20 Nobles Alley is categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Ronen, moved that this Motion be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 6, 2018. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 171053: Hearing - Appeal of Determination of Categorical Exemption From Environmental Review - 20 Nobles Alley
LLM summaryA hearing regarding the appeal of the categorical exemption determination for 20 Nobles Alley was continued to a future meeting but ultimately failed.
Source textappeal, responded to questions raised throughout the discussion, and further requested the Board to approve the appeal. Susan Star; Matthias Mormino; Marla Nye; Wyland Strobel; Chris Bigalo; spoke in support of the appeal. Tanya Sheyner, Pilar LaValley, and Eilesh Tuffy (Planning Department) provided an overview of the decision of the Planning Department and responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Eustace de Saint Phalle (Project Sponsor) provided an overview of the project, responded to questions raised throughout the discussion, and further requested the Board to uphold the decision of the Planning Department. Male Speaker; Rick Savary; Carrie Bronea; Tom Brigham; spoke in support of the project and in opposition to the appeal. Marc Bruno (Appellant) provided a rebuttal and further requested the Board to approve the appeal. Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney) provided additional information and answered questions raised throughout the discussion. There were no other speakers. Supervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Ronen, moved that this Hearing be CONTINUED OPEN to the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 6, 2018. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 170901: Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization Appeal - Proposed Project at 2505 Noriega Street
LLM summaryA motion was approved to prepare findings supporting the disapproval of a Conditional Use Authorization for a project at 2505 Noriega Street.
Source text170901 [Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization Appeal - Proposed Project at 2505 Noriega Street] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings in support of the Board of Supervisors’ disapproval of the proposed Conditional Use Authorization identified as Planning Case No. 2014-003153CUA for a proposed project located at 2505 Noriega Street. (Clerk of the Board) Motion No. M17-159 Supervisor Tang, seconded by Supervisor Safai, moved that this Motion be APPROVED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 170900: Conditionally Disapproving Conditional Use Authorization - Proposed Project at 2505 Noriega Street
LLM summaryA motion was approved to conditionally disapprove a Conditional Use Authorization for a proposed project at 2505 Noriega Street.
Source text170900 [Conditionally Disapproving Conditional Use Authorization - Proposed Project at 2505 Noriega Street] Motion conditionally disapproving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 19961, approving a Conditional Use Authorization identified as Planning Case No. 2014-003153CUA for a proposed project located at 2505 Noriega Street, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) Motion No. M17-158 Supervisor Tang, seconded by Supervisor Safai, moved that this Motion be APPROVED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 170899: Approving Conditional Use Authorization - Proposed Project at 2505 Noriega Street
LLM summaryA motion was made to table the approval of a Conditional Use Authorization for a project at 2505 Noriega Street.
Source text170899 [Approving Conditional Use Authorization - Proposed Project at 2505 Noriega Street] Motion approving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 19961, approving a Conditional Use Authorization identified as Planning Case No. 2014-003153CUA for a proposed project located at 2505 Noriega Street; and adopting findings pursuant to Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Tang, seconded by Supervisor Safai, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 170892: Preparation of Findings Related to Board’s Disapproval of the Decision of Public Works Director to Revoke Flower-Vending Stand Permit - 250 Post Street
LLM summaryA motion directing the Clerk to prepare findings related to the Board's disapproval of a flower-vending stand permit at 250 Post Street was tabled.
Source text170892 [Preparation of Findings Related to Board’s Disapproval of the Decision of Public Works Director to Revoke Flower-Vending Stand Permit - 250 Post Street] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings relating to the Board of Supervisors' decision to disapprove the decision of Public Works Director to revoke the Flower-Vending Stand Permit authorizing placement and operation of flower-vending stand on sidewalk at 250 Post Street, and uphold the appeal of Harold Hoogasian. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 170891: Conditionally Disapproving the Decision of the Public Works Director to Revoke a Flower-Vending Stand Permit - 250 Post Street
LLM summaryA motion conditionally disapproving the revocation of a flower-vending stand permit at 250 Post Street was tabled.
Source text170891 [Conditionally Disapproving the Decision of the Public Works Director to Revoke a Flower-Vending Stand Permit - 250 Post Street] Motion conditionally disapproving the decision of the Public Works Director to revoke the Flower-Vending Stand Permit authorizing placement and operation of flower-vending stand on sidewalk at 250 Post Street, and upholding the appeal of Harold Hoogasian, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 170890: Approving the Decision of the Public Works Director to Revoke a Flower-Vending Stand Permit - 250 Post Street
LLM summaryA motion approving the revocation of a flower-vending stand permit at 250 Post Street and rejecting the appeal was approved.
Source text170890 [Approving the Decision of the Public Works Director to Revoke a Flower-Vending Stand Permit - 250 Post Street] Motion approving the decision of the Public Works Director to revoke the Flower-Vending Stand Permit authorizing placement and operation of a flower-vending stand on the sidewalk at 250 Post Street, and rejecting the appeal of Harold Hoogasian. (Clerk of the Board) Motion No. M17-149 Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Yee, moved that this Motion be APPROVED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 170865: Zoning - Interim Moratorium on Medical Cannabis Dispensaries
LLM summaryAn interim moratorium on medical cannabis dispensaries was finally passed as amended.
Source text(Pursuant to California Government Code, Section 65858(a), this matter requires a four-fifths vote of the full membership of the Board of Supervisors (9 votes) for passage.) FINALLY PASSED AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 170751: Planning Code, Zoning Map - One Oak Street Project
LLM summaryAn ordinance to amend the Planning Code and zoning map for the One Oak Street project was not passed on the first reading.
Source text170751 [Planning Code, Zoning Map - One Oak Street Project] Ordinance amending the Planning Code by revising Sheet HT07 of the Zoning Map, to change the height and bulk district classification of Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0836, portions of Lot Nos. 001 and 005, for the One Oak Project, at the Van Ness Avenue / Oak Street / Market Street Intersection, as follows: rezoning the eastern portion of the property, along Van Ness Avenue, located at Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0836, Lot No. 001 (1500 Market Street), from 120/400-R-2 to 120-R-2; rezoning the central portion of the property, located at Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0836, Lot No. 005 (1540 Market Street), from 120-R-2 to 120/400-R-2; affirming the Planning Commission’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings, including findings of public necessity, convenience and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Planning Commission) NOT PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 170750: General Plan Amendments - One Oak Street Project
LLM summaryAn ordinance to amend the General Plan for the One Oak Street project was not passed on the first reading.
Source text170750 [General Plan Amendments - One Oak Street Project] Ordinance amending the General Plan by revising the height and bulk designations for the One Oak Street project, at the Van Ness Avenue / Oak Street / Market Street Intersection, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0836, Lot Nos. 001 and 005, on Map 3 of the Market and Octavia Area Plan and on Map 5 of the Downtown Area Plan; adopting findings under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan as proposed for amendment, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 340. (Planning Commission) NOT PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
File 170441: Health Code - Banning the Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products
LLM summaryAn ordinance to ban the sale of flavored tobacco products was not repealed.
Source text170441 [Health Code - Banning the Sale of Flavored Tobacco Products] Sponsors: Cohen; Safai, Breed, Farrell, Sheehy, Tang and Yee Ordinance amending the Health Code to prohibit tobacco retailers from selling flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes. (Economic Impact) NOT REPEALED by the following vote:
File 170275: Administrative Code - Establishing an Office of Cannabis and Extending the Term of the Cannabis State Legalization Task Force
LLM summaryAn ordinance was proposed to establish an Office of Cannabis and extend the Cannabis State Legalization Task Force, but a motion to continue it failed.
Source text170275 [Administrative Code - Establishing an Office of Cannabis and Extending the Term of the Cannabis State Legalization Task Force] Sponsors: Sheehy; Cohen Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to establish an Office of Cannabis; to authorize the Director of the Office of Cannabis to issue permits to cannabis-related businesses; to direct the Director of the Office of Cannabis to collect permit application and annual license fees following the enactment of a subsequent ordinance establishing the amounts of those fees; and to extend the term of the Cannabis State Legalization Task Force. (Fiscal Impact) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney), Debra Newman (Office of the Budget and Legislative Analyst), and Adam Nguyen (Office of the City Administrator) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Fewer, seconded by Supervisor Cohen, moved that this Ordinance be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of September 12, 2017. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 170349: Administrative Code - Owner Move-In Reporting Requirements
LLM summaryA motion to amend the Administrative Code to include specific filing requirements for Buyout Agreements failed.
Source textSupervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED on Page 11, Line 8, by adding a new Subsection 37.9E(h) that reads ‘Filing of Buyout Agreements. The landlord shall file a copy of the Buyout Agreement with the Rent Board no sooner than the 46th day after the Buyout Agreement is executed by all parties, and no more than 59 days after the agreement is executed by all parties. Any waiver of rights by a tenant in a Buyout Agreement executed on or after January 1, 2018, that is not filed with the Rent Board within 59 days after execution shall not be enforceable. Buyout agreements rescinded under subsection (g) need not be filed with the Rent Board.’ The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 170349: Administrative Code - Owner Move-In Reporting Requirements
LLM summaryA motion to amend the Administrative Code regarding Owner Move-In reporting requirements failed.
Source textCity and County of San Francisco Page 520 Printed at 5:19 pm on 9/6/17 Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 6/27/2017 Supervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED on Page 11, Line 8, by adding a new Subsection 37.9E(h) regarding 'Filing of Buyout Agreements.' The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 150969: Planning Code - Affordable Housing Bonus Programs
LLM summaryAn amendment to the Planning Code concerning specific locations on Ocean Avenue was proposed but failed to pass.
Source textSupervisor Yee, seconded by Supervisor Fewer, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED on Page 12, Lines 8-9, by adding ‘(F) is not located on Ocean Avenue between Paloma Avenue and 19th Avenue’; and on Page 24, Lines 12-13, by adding ‘and (F) is not located on Ocean Avenue between Paloma Avenue and 19th Avenue.’ The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 150969: Planning Code - Affordable Housing Bonus Programs
LLM summaryAn amendment to the Planning Code regarding affordable housing was proposed but failed to pass.
Source textSupervisor Ronen, seconded by Supervisor Fewer, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED on Page 13, Line 23, by adding ‘(11) does not demolish or remove any space rented by a legacy business listed in the Legacy Business Registry under Administrative Code Section 2A.242.’ The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 170316: Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Project at 953 Treat Avenue
LLM summaryA motion to table the preparation of findings reversing the categorical exemption determination for a project at 953 Treat Avenue was carried.
Source textSupervisor Tang, seconded by Supervisor Farrell, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 170315: Conditionally Reversing the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Project at 953 Treat Avenue
LLM summaryA motion to table the conditional reversal of the categorical exemption determination for a project at 953 Treat Avenue was carried.
Source textSupervisor Tang, seconded by Supervisor Farrell, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 170314: Affirming the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed Project at 953 Treat Avenue
LLM summaryA motion to approve the affirmation of the categorical exemption determination for a project at 953 Treat Avenue was carried.
Source textMotion No. M17-066 Supervisor Tang, seconded by Supervisor Farrell, moved that this Motion be APPROVED. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 170214: Purchase and Sale Agreement - Lendlease Development, Inc. - 30 Van Ness Avenue - $70,000,000
LLM summaryA resolution to approve a purchase and sale agreement for City-owned property at 30 Van Ness Avenue was continued to a future meeting.
Source textNess Avenue - $70,000,000] Sponsors: Mayor; Kim Resolution approving a purchase and sale agreement by and between the City and County of San Francisco and Lendlease Development, Inc. for the sale of City-owned property located at 30 Van Ness Avenue for $70,000,000; including a City lease-back at an annual rent expense of $4,500,000 increasing by 3% per year after each year of the initial period and at the beginning of each extension option exercised, if any, for a period of not more than three years in the initial term, with two one-year options to extend; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; adopting findings that the sale is consistent with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and urging the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development and the Planning Department to explore certain development strategies relating to affordable housing at the site in connection with any future development. Supervisor Safai, seconded by Supervisor Breed, moved that this Resolution be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of April 4, 2017. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 170213: Purchase and Sale Agreement - SF Prosperity 2, LLC - 1660 Mission Street and 1680 Mission Street - $52,000,000
LLM summaryA resolution for a purchase and sale agreement with SF Prosperity 2, LLC for properties at 1660 and 1680 Mission Street for $52 million was continued.
Source text170213 [Purchase and Sale Agreement - SF Prosperity 2, LLC - 1660 Mission Street and 1680 Mission Street - $52,000,000] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution approving a purchase and sale agreement by and between the City and County of San Francisco and SF Prosperity 2, LLC, for the sale of City-owned properties located at 1660 Mission Street and 1680 Mission Street for $52,000,000; including a City lease-back at an annual rent expense of $3,362,220 increasing by 3% per year for each year after the initial period, with rent to be set at the then fair market rental value prior to the beginning of each extension option exercised, if any, for a period of not more than three years in the initial term, with two one-year options to extend; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and adopting findings that the sale is consistent with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. Supervisor Safai, seconded by Supervisor Breed, moved that this Resolution be CONTINUED to the Board of Supervisors meeting of April 4, 2017. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 170217: Urging the California State Legislature to Amend the Revenue and Taxation Code to Enable San Francisco to Levy a Personal Income Tax and a Corporate Income Tax
LLM summaryA resolution urging amendments to the Revenue and Taxation Code to enable income tax levies in San Francisco was adopted as amended.
Source textADOPTED AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 170161: Urging the California State Legislature to Amend the Revenue and Taxation Code to Enable California Local Jurisdictions to Levy a Personal Income Tax and a Corporation Tax
LLM summaryA resolution urging the California legislature to amend the Revenue and Taxation Code to allow local jurisdictions to levy personal and corporate income taxes was not adopted.
Source text170161 [Urging the California State Legislature to Amend the Revenue and Taxation Code to Enable California Local Jurisdictions to Levy a Personal Income Tax and a Corporation Tax] Sponsors: Peskin; Fewer, Ronen, Kim, Yee, Safai and Cohen Resolution urging the California state legislature to amend the Revenue and Taxation Code to enable local California jurisdictions to levy personal and corporate income taxes, which the City and County of San Francisco could utilize as a sustained source of funding for transportation and public health priorities. NOT ADOPTED pursuant to Board Rule 4.23.1 that requires an affirmative vote of eight members, by the following vote:
File 161136: Amending Board Rules - Administration of Oaths
LLM summaryA proposed amendment regarding the administration of oaths was not approved as amended.
Source textNOT APPROVED AS AMENDED pursuant to Board Rule 3.26.1 that requires an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Board, by the following vote:
File 161241: Interim Zoning Controls - Indoor Agriculture
LLM summaryA resolution regarding interim zoning controls for indoor agriculture was proposed to be amended, but the motion to amend failed.
Source textSupervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Sheehy, moved that this Resolution be AMENDED on Page 4, Lines 3 and 8, by changing the date from 'November 8, 2016' to 'November 25, 2016.' Before the vote was taken, Supervisor Sheehy withdrew his motion to second. Supervisor Kim, seconded by Supervisor Fewer, moved that this Resolution be AMENDED on Page 4, Lines 3 and 8, by changing the date from 'November 8, 2016' to 'November 25, 2016.' The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 161178: General Plan Amendments - Implementing the City’s Vision Zero Policy Regarding Pedestrian Safety
LLM summaryAn ordinance amending the General Plan to implement the City’s Vision Zero policy for pedestrian safety was not passed on first reading.
Source text161178 [General Plan Amendments - Implementing the City’s Vision Zero Policy Regarding Pedestrian Safety] Ordinance amending the Transportation and Urban Design Elements of the General Plan to implement the City’s Vision Zero policy regarding pedestrian safety; making findings, including findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Planning Commission) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Lily Langois (Planning Department) and Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. NOT PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote: