Jackie Fielder

File 260858: Contract Agreement - OpenGov Inc. - Permitting Software Product Agreement - Not to Exceed $28,018,982.28

Source textResolution authorizing the Planning Department to enter into the First Amendment to the Agreement between the City and County of San Francisco and OpenGov Inc., for permitting software products and services; to increase the agreement by $22,118,982.28 for a total amount not to exceed $28,018,982.28; and to extend the term for 36 months from September 30, 2026, for a total term of October 1, 2025, through September 30, 2029. (Planning Department) ADOPTED AS AMENDED by the following vote:

File 251211: Public Works, Administrative, Planning, Business and Tax Regulations Codes - Street Tree Standards, Appeals, and Adopt-A-Tree Fund

Source textWong Ordinance amending the Public Works Code to allow development projects to satisfy street tree planting requirements through payment of an in lieu fee or providing alternative landscaping; exempt accessory dwelling units from street tree planting requirements; eliminate appeals to the Board of Appeals for hazardous tree removals undertaken by City departments and commissions; amending the Administrative Code to specify a separate account within the Adopt-A-Tree Fund to receive in lieu fees for street tree requirements; amending the Planning Code to update street tree applicability requirements; amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code to prescribe timeframes for the hearing and decision on appeals of certain street tree removals to the Board of Appeals; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302. (Supervisors Chan, Fielder, Sauter, and Walton voted No on First Reading.) FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 251211: Public Works, Administrative, Planning, Business and Tax Regulations Codes - Street Tree Standards, Appeals, and Adopt-A-Tree Fund

Source textcts to satisfy street tree planting requirements through payment of an in lieu fee or providing alternative landscaping; exempt accessory dwelling units from street tree planting requirements; eliminate appeals to the Board of Appeals for hazardous tree removals undertaken by City departments and commissions; amending the Administrative Code to specify a separate account within the Adopt-A-Tree Fund to receive in lieu fees for street tree requirements; amending the Planning Code to update street tree applicability requirements; amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code to prescribe timeframes for the hearing and decision on appeals of certain street tree removals to the Board of Appeals; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302. Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to David Moore (Public Works) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 260543: Police Code - Penalties for Prohibited Discharge of Fireworks

Source text260543 [Police Code - Penalties for Prohibited Discharge of Fireworks] Sponsors: Wong; Sherrill, Melgar, Sauter, Dorsey and Mandelman Ordinance amending the Police Code to provide penalties for the prohibited discharge of fireworks, including that a first offense is punishable as an infraction with a fine not less than $125 or more than $250, and a second and any subsequent offenses within five years of a prior offense are punishable as misdemeanors with a fine not less than $250 or more than $750, or imprisonment in the County Jail of not more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 260543: Police Code - Penalties for Prohibited Discharge of Fireworks

Source text260543 [Police Code - Penalties for Prohibited Discharge of Fireworks] Sponsors: Wong; Sherrill, Melgar, Sauter, Dorsey and Mandelman Ordinance amending the Police Code to provide penalties for the prohibited discharge of fireworks, including that a first offense is punishable as an infraction with a fine not less than $125 or more than $250, and a second and any subsequent offenses within five years of a prior offense are punishable as misdemeanors with a fine not less than $250 or more than $750, or imprisonment in the County Jail of not more than six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Supervisor Mandelman requested to be added as a co-sponsor. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 251003: Administrative Code - Expanding Drug-Free Permanent Supportive Housing

Source textto state that it is City policy to expand the availability of Site-Based Permanent Supportive Housing (“PSH”) that prohibits on-site illicit drug use among residents (“Drug-Free PSH”) to meet the demand of people experiencing homelessness who prefer such a residential option; require that City funding for new Site-Based PSH for people experiencing homelessness be used for Drug-Free PSH except where operation of the housing as Drug-Free PSH would conflict with standards imposed by law or by a condition of other funding, where the funding is for new construction, or the Board of Supervisors has waived the funding requirement based on specific findings; require the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (“HSH”) to survey residents of Site-Based PSH to assess their interest in living in either Drug-Tolerant PSH or Drug-Free PSH and report on the survey findings and HSH’s strategies to meet PSH residents’ demands; and require HSH to adopt rules and regulations establishing standards and protocols for evictions from City-funded Drug-Free Housing. (Racial Equity Impact) (Supervisors Chan, Chen, Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250630: Various Codes - Streamlining Reporting Requirements and Procedures, Removing Obsolete Programs and Requirements, and Other Code Cleanup

Source textting required for Tier 3 Love Our Neighborhood Project Applications, 8) eliminate the Parking Authority as a responsible party to report costs to maintenance districts of maintaining public improvements and facilities, 9) eliminate the Human Rights Commission as a body that verifies the absence of evictions for parcels whose owners apply for conversion of the form of ownership and for the purpose of the residential condominium conversion lottery, 10) update requirements for the Health Care Service Master Plan, 11) change the department responsible for submitting annual reports for the Van Ness & Market Community Facilities Fee, and 12) eliminate Planning Department monitoring of the Eastern Neighborhoods Area Plans; making other conforming amendments; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302. (City Attorney) (Supervisors Chan, Fielder, Melgar, and Walton voted No of First Reading.) FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 251003: Administrative Code - Expanding Drug-Free Permanent Supportive Housing

Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:

File 260536: Charter Amendment - Department, Board, Commission, and Advisory Body Updates

Source textns and authorities of certain bodies; 7) changing the planning and reporting schedule of the Department of Children, Youth, and Their Families (“DCYF”) and related policy bodies, and changing the names but not the functions of those related policy bodies; 8) specifying that elected members of the Retirement Board, Health Service Board, and Retiree Health Care Trust Fund Board may be removed only for official misconduct; 9) making various changes to departments’ operations and reporting requirements; 10) updating the Public Utilities Commission’s exclusive charge over matters related to water, power, and sewer infrastructure and services; 11) providing that the Board of Supervisors shall approve settlements or dismissals of legal proceedings recommended by the City Attorney by resolution, rather than by ordinance; 12) authorizing the City Administrator to conduct real estate strategic planning and to negotiate and manage acquisitions, leases, and conveyances of City real property; and 13) making clarifying edits, deleting obsolete language, and updating out-of-date references in various sections; at an election to be held on November 3, 2026. ORDERED SUBMITTED by the following vote:

File 250630: Various Codes - Streamlining Reporting Requirements and Procedures, Removing Obsolete Programs and Requirements, and Other Code Cleanup

Source textable Purchasing Ordinance, 7) reduce the scope of reporting required for Tier 3 Love Our Neighborhood Project Applications, 8) eliminate the Parking Authority as a responsible party to report costs to maintenance districts of maintaining public improvements and facilities, 9) eliminate the Human Rights Commission as a body that verifies the absence of evictions for parcels whose owners apply for conversion of the form of ownership and for the purpose of the residential condominium conversion lottery, 10) update requirements for the Health Care Service Master Plan, 11) change the department responsible for submitting annual reports for the Van Ness & Market Community Facilities Fee, and 12) eliminate Planning Department monitoring of the Eastern Neighborhoods Area Plans; making other conforming amendments; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302. (City Attorney) PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:

File 260079: Grant of Easement - Pacific Gas and Electric Company - 1800 Jerrold Avenue - Southeast Water Pollution Control Plant - At No Cost

LLM summaryA resolution was adopted to grant an easement to Pacific Gas and Electric Company at the Southeast Water Pollution Control Plant at no cost.

Source textat its Southeast Water Pollution Control Plant with more reliable, efficient, and modern technologies and facilities, at no cost for a term effective upon approval of this Resolution and recordation of the agreement by the City’s Office of the Assessor Recorder, pursuant to Charter, Section 9.118, and until PG&E surrenders or abandons the easement area or the agreement is terminated; determining that the grant of the easement at no cost will serve a public purpose by delivering an increased natural gas supply to SFPUC’s existing Southeast Water Pollution Control Plant and its new biosolids digesters facilities, in accordance with Administrative Code, Section 23.30; adopting findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and authorizing the Director of Property to execute documents, make certain modifications and take certain actions in furtherance of this Resolution, as defined herein. (Public Utilities Commission) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Jeremy Spitz (Public Utilities Commission) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Resolution No. 123-26 ADOPTED by the following vote:

File 251246: Hotel Development Incentive Agreement - Bespoke Hospitality, LLC - Hearst Hotel Development Project - 5 Third Street and 17-29 Third Street - Not to Exceed $40,000,000 in Net Present Value

LLM summaryAn ordinance was finally passed to approve a Hotel Development Incentive Agreement with Bespoke Hospitality for the Hearst Hotel Development Project, not exceeding $40,000,000.

Source text Project - 5 Third Street and 17-29 Third Street - Not to Exceed $40,000,000 in Net Present Value] Sponsors: Mayor; Dorsey Ordinance approving a Hotel Development Incentive Agreement between the City and County of San Francisco and Bespoke Hospitality, LLC for the Hearst Hotel Development Project, to provide financial assistance not to exceed $40,000,000 in net present value over 20 years calculated for measurement purposes only as a percentage of new Transient Occupancy Taxes the City actually receives from occupancy of guest rooms in a proposed new hotel, related to the development and operation of a project on certain real property known as 5 Third Street and 17-29 Third Street; waiving Chapter 21G of the Administrative Code and certain sections of the Labor and Employment Code; ratifying past actions and authorizing future actions in furtherance of this Ordinance; making findings under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Chan and Fielder voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 026-26 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 260102: Appointment, Sunshine Ordinance Task Force - Joseph Sangirardi

LLM summaryJoseph Sangirardi was appointed to the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force with a term ending on April 27, 2026.

Source text260102 [Appointment, Sunshine Ordinance Task Force - Joseph Sangirardi] Motion appointing Joseph Sangirardi, term ending April 27, 2026, to the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. (Rules Committee) Applicants considered in committee: Cynthia Dai, seat 10 Honest Charley Bodkin, seat 10 Joseph Sangirardi, seat 10 Kartik Sathappan, seat 10 Motion No. M26-012 APPROVED by the following vote:

File 251246: Hotel Development Incentive Agreement - Bespoke Hospitality, LLC - Hearst Hotel Development Project - 5 Third Street and 17-29 Third Street - Not to Exceed $40,000,000 in Net Present Value

LLM summaryThe Board passed a resolution approving a Hotel Development Incentive Agreement with Bespoke Hospitality, LLC for the Hearst Hotel Development Project.

Source textment Incentive Agreement between the City and County of San Francisco and Bespoke Hospitality, LLC for the Hearst Hotel Development Project, to provide financial assistance not to exceed $40,000,000 in net present value over 20 years calculated for measurement purposes only as a percentage of new Transient Occupancy Taxes the City actually receives from occupancy of guest rooms in a proposed new hotel, related to the development and operation of a project on certain real property known as 5 Third Street and 17-29 Third Street; waiving Chapter 21G of the Administrative Code and certain sections of the Labor and Employment Code; ratifying past actions and authorizing future actions in furtherance of this Ordinance; making findings under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Chan and Fielder voted No on First Reading.) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously Nicolas Menard (Office of the Budget and Legislative Analyst) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 260028: Professional Services Contract - ConnectionsCA, LLC. - RESET Center - Not to Exceed $14,537,426

LLM summaryThe Board adopted a resolution for a professional services contract with ConnectionsCA, LLC for the RESET Center, not to exceed $14,537,426.

Source text to exceed amount of $14,537,426 with an initial term of two years and two months, commencing on February 1, 2026, through March 31, 2028, with an option to extend for one additional year; authorizing the Sheriff to execute any amendments, make certain modifications and take certain actions that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City, and are necessary or advisable to effectuate the purposes of the contract; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Sheriff) (Fiscal Impact) Supervisors Mandelman and Sherrill requested to be added as co-sponsors. Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Adam Thongsavat (Mayor’s Office); Sheriff Paul Miyamoto and Undersheriff Katherine Johnson (Sheriff’s Office); and Brad Russi (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Fielder, seconded by Supervisor Chan, moved that this Resolution be RE-REFERRED to the Budget and Finance Committee. Before the vote was taken, Supervisor Fielder rescinded the motion and Supervisor Chan rescinded the second. Resolution No. 063-26 ADOPTED by the following vote:

File 251251: Police Code - Tenderloin and South of Market Retail Hours Restriction Pilot Program

LLM summaryThe Board passed an ordinance expanding the Tenderloin retail hours restriction pilot program to include a high-crime area in the Tenderloin and South of Market.

Source text251251 [Police Code - Tenderloin and South of Market Retail Hours Restriction Pilot Program] Sponsors: Dorsey; Mahmood and Wong Ordinance amending the Police Code to expand the current Tenderloin retail hours restriction pilot program, under which retail food and tobacco establishments in the restricted area are prohibited from being open to the public from 12:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m., or from 2:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. if subject to regulation by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, to encompass a high-crime area across the Tenderloin and South of Market neighborhoods; and to extend the duration of the pilot program, currently set to expire in July 2026, to instead expire 18 months from the effective date of this Ordinance. (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 024-26 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 251251: Police Code - Tenderloin and South of Market Retail Hours Restriction Pilot Program

LLM summaryAn ordinance amending the Police Code to expand and extend the retail hours restriction pilot program in the Tenderloin and South of Market neighborhoods was passed on first reading.

Source text251251 [Police Code - Tenderloin and South of Market Retail Hours Restriction Pilot Program] Sponsors: Dorsey; Mahmood and Wong Ordinance amending the Police Code to expand the current Tenderloin retail hours restriction pilot program, under which retail food and tobacco establishments in the restricted area are prohibited from being open to the public from 12:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m., or from 2:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. if subject to regulation by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, to encompass a high-crime area across the Tenderloin and South of Market neighborhoods; and to extend the duration of the pilot program, currently set to expire in July 2026, to instead expire 18 months from the effective date of this Ordinance. (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 251268: Establishing the San Francisco Downtown Revitalization and Economic Recovery Financing District - Approving the Downtown Revitalization Financing Plan and Related Documents and Actions

LLM summaryA resolution was adopted to establish the San Francisco Downtown Revitalization and Economic Recovery Financing District and approve the related financing plan and documents.

Source text251268 [Establishing the San Francisco Downtown Revitalization and Economic Recovery Financing District - Approving the Downtown Revitalization Financing Plan and Related Documents and Actions] Sponsors: Mayor; Sauter, Mahmood, Sherrill, Mandelman and Dorsey Resolution establishing the San Francisco Downtown Revitalization and Economic Recovery Financing District, approving the Downtown Revitalization Financing Plan, including the division of taxes set forth therein, and documents and actions related thereto, and authorizing the filing of a judicial validation action. (Fiscal Impact) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Jacob Bintliff (Mayor’s Office of Economic and Workforce Development) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Resolution No. 038-26 ADOPTED by the following vote:

File 251024: Building Code - Hydrogen-Fueling Station Equipment

LLM summaryAn ordinance creating a permit process for Hydrogen-Fueling Station Equipment installation was finally passed.

Source text251024 [Building Code - Hydrogen-Fueling Station Equipment] Ordinance amending the Building Code to create a permit and permitting process for Hydrogen-Fueling Station Equipment installation; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Building Inspection Commission) (Supervisors Chan and Fielder voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 012-26 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250811: Building Code - Building Permit Expiration Timelines

LLM summaryAn ordinance revising building permit expiration timelines was finally passed.

Source text250811 [Building Code - Building Permit Expiration Timelines] Sponsors: Mahmood; Dorsey Ordinance amending the Building Code to revise the timing of expiration of certain building permits and building permit applications; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Supervisor Chan, Chen, Fielder, Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 259-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250811: Building Code - Building Permit Expiration Timelines

LLM summaryThe Building Code amendment concerning permit expiration timelines was passed on first reading.

Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250811: Building Code - Building Permit Expiration Timelines

LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to amend the Building Code regarding the expiration timelines for certain building permits and applications.

Source text250811 [Building Code - Building Permit Expiration Timelines] Sponsors: Mahmood; Dorsey Ordinance amending the Building Code to revise the timing of expiration of certain building permits and building permit applications; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Supervisor Chan, Chen, Fielder, Walton voted No on First Reading.) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250985: Local Coastal Program Amendment - Family Zoning Plan

LLM summaryA resolution to amend the Local Coastal Program for the Family Zoning Plan was adopted.

Source text250985 [Local Coastal Program Amendment - Family Zoning Plan] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution transmitting to the California Coastal Commission for review and certification an amendment to the Implementation Program and Land Use Plan of the City’s certified Local Coastal Program to implement the Family Zoning Plan; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Supervisor Chen dissented in committee.) Resolution No. 577-25 ADOPTED by the following vote:

File 250701: Planning, Business and Tax Regulations Codes - Family Zoning Plan

LLM summaryAn ordinance amending various codes to implement the Family Zoning Plan was finally passed.

Source texte conforming changes to zoning tables in various Districts, including the Neighborhood Commercial District and Mixed Use Districts, 12) prohibit Lot mergers on Lots with Historic Buildings, subject to certain preservation obligations, and 13) reduce usable open space and bicycle parking requirements for senior housing; amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code regarding the Board of Appeals’ review of permits in the Housing Choice Program Housing Sustainability District; also, amending the Local Coastal Program to implement the Housing Choice-San Francisco Program and other associated changes in the City’s Coastal Zone, and directing the Planning Director to transmit the Ordinance to the Coastal Commission upon enactment; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302. (Economic Impact) (Supervisors Chan, Chen, Fielder, and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 245-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250700: Zoning Map - Family Zoning Plan

LLM summaryAn ordinance to amend the Zoning Map as part of the Family Zoning Plan was finally passed.

Source textistoric districts pursuant to Article 10; 2) change the height limits on certain lots in the R-4 Height and Bulk District; and 3) designating various parcels to be included in the Non-Contiguous San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Sites Special Use District (SFMTA SUD); amending the Local Coastal Program to: 1) reclassify all properties in the Coastal Zone to R-4 Height and Bulk District; 2) reclassify certain properties to RTO-C and Neighborhood Commercial District; 3) designate one parcel as part of the SFMTA SUD; and 4) directing the Planning Director to transmit the Ordinance to the Coastal Commission upon enactment; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings under the City’s Local Coastal Program and the California Coastal Act of 1976. (Economic Impact) (Supervisors Chan, Chen, Fielder, and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 244-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250966: General Plan Amendments - Family Zoning Plan

LLM summaryAn ordinance for General Plan amendments related to the Family Zoning Plan was finally passed.

Source textly Housing Zoning Program, including the Housing Choice-San Francisco Program, by adjusting guidelines regarding building heights, density, design, and other matters; amending the City’s Local Coastal Program to implement the Housing Choice-San Francisco Program and other associated changes in the City’s Coastal Zone, and directing the Planning Director to transmit the Ordinance to the Coastal Commission upon enactment; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 340. (Planning Commission) (Pursuant to Charter, Section 4.105, the Planning Commission recommends General Plan amendments to the Board of Supervisors for approval or rejection. If the Board fails to act within 90 days of receipt, the proposed General Plan amendment shall be deemed approved. Transmittal Date: September 22, 2025) (Supervisors Chan, Chen, Fielder, and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 243-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250701: Planning, Business and Tax Regulations Codes - Family Zoning Plan

LLM summaryThe Family Zoning Plan was passed on first reading.

Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250700: Zoning Map - Family Zoning Plan

LLM summaryAn ordinance designating parcels for the Non-Contiguous SFMTA Sites Special Use District was passed on first reading.

Source textesignating various parcels to be included in the Non-Contiguous San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Sites Special Use District (SFMTA SUD); amending the Local Coastal Program to: 1) reclassify all properties in the Coastal Zone to R-4 Height and Bulk District; 2) reclassify certain properties to RTO-C and Neighborhood Commercial District; 3) designate one parcel as part of the SFMTA SUD; and 4) directing the Planning Director to transmit the Ordinance to the Coastal Commission upon enactment; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings under the City’s Local Coastal Program and the California Coastal Act of 1976. (Economic Impact) (Supervisors Chan, Chen, Fielder, and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Lisa Chen (Planning Department) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250966: General Plan Amendments - Family Zoning Plan

LLM summaryGeneral Plan amendments related to the Family Zoning Plan were passed on first reading.

Source textdensity, design, and other matters; amending the City’s Local Coastal Program to implement the Housing Choice-San Francisco Program and other associated changes in the City’s Coastal Zone, and directing the Planning Director to transmit the Ordinance to the Coastal Commission upon enactment; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 340. (Planning Commission) (Pursuant to Charter, Section 4.105, the Planning Commission recommends General Plan amendments to the Board of Supervisors for approval or rejection. If the Board fails to act within 90 days of receipt, the proposed General Plan amendment shall be deemed approved. Transmittal Date: September 22, 2025) (Supervisors Chan, Chen, Fielder, and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Lisa Chen (Planning Department) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 251083: Behested Payment Waiver - Economic Revitalization Efforts

LLM summaryA resolution granting a six-month waiver of the Behested Payments Ordinance for economic revitalization efforts was adopted.

Source text251083 [Behested Payment Waiver - Economic Revitalization Efforts] Sponsors: Mayor; Sherrill and Mandelman Resolution authorizing a six-month waiver of the City’s Behested Payments Ordinance for the Mayor, members of the Mayor’s Office, and the Executive Director of the Office of Economic and Workforce Development to solicit donations from nonprofits, private organizations, grantmakers, foundations, and other persons and entities for the purpose of supporting the continued economic revitalization of San Francisco, pursuant to Section 3.620(f) of the Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code. (Supervisor Fielder dissented in committee.) Supervisor Mandelman requested to be added as a co-sponsor. Resolution No. 567-25 ADOPTED by the following vote:

File 251023: Appointments, Our City, Our Home Oversight Committee - Shanell Williams, Julia D'Antonio and William Lemon

LLM summaryShanell Williams, Julia D'Antonio, and William Lemon were appointed to the Our City, Our Home Oversight Committee with terms ending April 22, 2027.

Source text251023 [Appointments, Our City, Our Home Oversight Committee - Shanell Williams, Julia D'Antonio and William Lemon] Motion appointing Shanell Williams, Julia D'Antonio and William Lemon, terms ending April 22, 2027, to the Our City, Our Home Oversight Committee. (Rules Committee) Supervisor Fielder requested that the question be DIVIDED to consider the appointment of William Lemon separately. The question to consider the appointment of William Lemon was APPROVED AS DIVIDED by the following vote:

File 251022: Appointment, Homelessness Oversight Commission - Thomas James Rocca

LLM summaryThomas James Rocca was appointed to the Homelessness Oversight Commission with a term ending May 1, 2029.

Source text251022 [Appointment, Homelessness Oversight Commission - Thomas James Rocca] Motion appointing Thomas James Rocca, term ending May 1, 2029, to the Homelessness Oversight Commission. (Rules Committee) Motion No. M25-111 APPROVED by the following vote:

File 251038: Behested Payment Waiver - Fundraising for Services Related to Immigration, LGBTQ+ Rights, Environmental Protection, Reproductive Rights, and Racial Equity

LLM summaryA resolution authorizing solicitation of donations for various social causes was adopted.

Source textors: Mandelman; Dorsey and Sauter Resolution authorizing the Assessor Recorder, the Deputy Assessors, and Director of Policy and Government Affairs in the Assessor-Recorder’s Office to solicit donations from various private, nonprofit, philanthropic, and other entities to support 1) the urgent provision of legal services related to the creation and enforcement of immigration laws, regulations, and policies, including litigation and regulatory reform efforts at the local, state, and federal level and non-legal services and support for the City’s immigrant communities, 2) goods and services, including legal services, related to defending and supporting LGBTQ+ rights, 3) goods and services, including legal services, related to defending and supporting reproductive rights, 4) goods and services, including legal services, related to defending existing environmental protection laws and promoting environmental protection efforts, and 5) goods and services, including legal services, related to racial equity initiatives, all notwithstanding the Behested Payment Ordinance. Supervisors Dorsey and Sauter requested to be added as co-sponsors. Resolution No. 529-25 ADOPTED by the following vote:

File 250891: Business and Tax Regulations Code - Tax Exclusion for Low-Income Housing Partnerships; Commercial Vacancy Tax Exemption

LLM summaryAn ordinance providing tax exclusions for low-income housing partnerships and exemptions from the commercial vacancy tax finally passed.

Source textsing Partnerships; Commercial Vacancy Tax Exemption] Sponsors: Mayor; Dorsey and Chan Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code to exclude from gross receipts tax the gross receipts of low-income housing partnerships received from the lease of residential real estate beginning with the 2026 tax year; suspend the business registration certificate and fee requirements for those partnerships beginning with the registration year commencing April 1, 2026; exempt the City from the commercial vacancy tax retroactive to January 1, 2025; and exempt persons holding property to be used for City-sponsored affordable housing projects from the commercial vacancy tax retroactive to January 1, 2022, and refund commercial vacancy taxes paid by exempt persons. (In accordance with Section 2811 of Article 28 of the Business and Tax Regulations Code and Section 2909 of Article 29 of the Business and Tax Regulations Code, passage of this ordinance by the Board of Supervisors requires an affirmative vote of two-thirds (8 votes) of the Board of Supervisors.) (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 209-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250890: Business and Tax Regulations Code - Transfer Tax Exemption for Affordable Housing

LLM summaryAn ordinance temporarily exempting certain affordable housing transfers from the real property transfer tax finally passed.

Source text250890 [Business and Tax Regulations Code - Transfer Tax Exemption for Affordable Housing] Sponsors: Mayor; Mahmood, Dorsey, Chan and Mandelman Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code to temporarily exempt transfers of certain rent-restricted affordable housing from the real property transfer tax, retroactive to transfers on or after April 12, 2024; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 208-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250891: Business and Tax Regulations Code - Tax Exclusion for Low-Income Housing Partnerships; Commercial Vacancy Tax Exemption

LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to amend tax regulations for low-income housing partnerships and exempt certain properties from commercial vacancy tax.

Source textw-Income Housing Partnerships; Commercial Vacancy Tax Exemption] Sponsors: Mayor; Dorsey and Chan Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code to exclude from gross receipts tax the gross receipts of low-income housing partnerships received from the lease of residential real estate beginning with the 2026 tax year; suspend the business registration certificate and fee requirements for those partnerships beginning with the registration year commencing April 1, 2026; exempt the City from the commercial vacancy tax retroactive to January 1, 2025; and exempt persons holding property to be used for City-sponsored affordable housing projects from the commercial vacancy tax retroactive to January 1, 2022, and refund commercial vacancy taxes paid by exempt persons. (In accordance with Section 2811 of Article 28 of the Business and Tax Regulations Code and Section 2909 of Article 29 of the Business and Tax Regulations Code, passage of this ordinance by the Board of Supervisors requires an affirmative vote of two-thirds (8 votes) of the Board of Supervisors.) (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250890: Business and Tax Regulations Code - Transfer Tax Exemption for Affordable Housing

LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to temporarily exempt certain affordable housing transfers from real property transfer tax, effective retroactively from April 12, 2024.

Source text250890 [Business and Tax Regulations Code - Transfer Tax Exemption for Affordable Housing] Sponsors: Mayor; Mahmood, Dorsey, Chan and Mandelman Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code to temporarily exempt transfers of certain rent-restricted affordable housing from the real property transfer tax, retroactive to transfers on or after April 12, 2024; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Supervisor Mandelman requested to be added as a co-sponsor. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250657: Building and Planning Codes - Development Impact Fees for Residential Development Projects

LLM summaryAn ordinance was finally passed to postpone the collection of development impact fees for residential projects until the first occupancy certificate is issued.

Source text250657 [Building and Planning Codes - Development Impact Fees for Residential Development Projects] Sponsors: Mahmood; Dorsey, Mandelman and Sherrill Ordinance amending the Building and Planning Codes to comply with California Government Code, Section 66007, by postponing the collection of development impact fees for designated residential development projects to the date of first certificate of occupancy or first temporary certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. (Supervisor Fielder voted No on First Reading.) Supervisors Mandelman and Sherrill requested to be added as co-sponsors. Ordinance No. 196-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250657: Building and Planning Codes - Development Impact Fees for Residential Development Projects

LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to amend the Building and Planning Codes regarding the collection of development impact fees for residential projects.

Source text250657 [Building and Planning Codes - Development Impact Fees for Residential Development Projects] Sponsors: Mahmood; Dorsey, Mandelman and Sherrill Ordinance amending the Building and Planning Codes to comply with California Government Code, Section 66007, by postponing the collection of development impact fees for designated residential development projects to the date of first certificate of occupancy or first temporary certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. (Supervisor Fielder voted No on First Reading.) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Tate Hanna (Department of Building Inspection) and Brad Russi (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250680: Planning Code - Waiving Certain Development Impact Fees in the Market and Octavia Area Plan

LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed to waive certain development impact fees in the Market and Octavia Area Plan and amend related planning provisions.

Source text Plan] Sponsors: Mayor; Dorsey, Mahmood and Mandelman Ordinance amending the Planning Code to waive certain development impact fees in the Market and Octavia Area Plan (the Market and Octavia Area Plan and Upper Market Neighborhood Commercial District Affordable Housing Fee, the Market and Octavia Community Improvements Fund, the Van Ness & Market Affordable Housing and Neighborhood Infrastructure Fee, and the Van Ness & Market Community Facilities Fee), to amend the Van Ness & Market Residential Special Use District, to provide that the Market and Octavia Community Advisory Committee shall sunset six months after the effective date of this Ordinance, and to make conforming amendments to some of the definitions in Planning Code, Section 401; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 188-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250680: Planning Code - Waiving Certain Development Impact Fees in the Market and Octavia Area Plan

LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to waive certain development impact fees in the Market and Octavia Area Plan.

Source textOctavia Area Plan] Sponsors: Mayor; Dorsey, Mahmood and Mandelman Ordinance amending the Planning Code to waive certain development impact fees in the Market and Octavia Area Plan (the Market and Octavia Area Plan and Upper Market Neighborhood Commercial District Affordable Housing Fee, the Market and Octavia Community Improvements Fund, the Van Ness & Market Affordable Housing and Neighborhood Infrastructure Fee, and the Van Ness & Market Community Facilities Fee), to amend the Van Ness & Market Residential Special Use District, to provide that the Market and Octavia Community Advisory Committee shall sunset six months after the effective date of this Ordinance, and to make conforming amendments to some of the definitions in Planning Code, Section 401; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250723: Accept and Expend In-Kind Gift - Retroactive - San Francisco Police Community Foundation - Fiber Internet Service, Drones, Data Software, Parking Fees - Estimated Market Value of $7,250,028 and Future Gifts to Support the Real Time Investigation Center

LLM summaryThe Police Department was authorized to accept and expend a retroactive in-kind gift valued at approximately $7,250,028 to support the Real Time Investigation Center.

Source text250723 [Accept and Expend In-Kind Gift - Retroactive - San Francisco Police Community Foundation - Fiber Internet Service, Drones, Data Software, Parking Fees - Estimated Market Value of $7,250,028 and Future Gifts to Support the Real Time Investigation Center] Sponsors: Mayor; Mandelman and Sauter Resolution retroactively authorizing the Police Department to accept and expend gifts of equipment, services, and funds totaling approximately $7,250,028 to support the Police Department’s Real Time Investigation Center (RTIC), for the installation of fiber internet service, purchase of 12 docks and drones, related software and services, data integration software, and employee parking fees, with a start date of April 30, 2025; and authorizing the Police Department to accept and expend future gifts from San Francisco Police Community Foundation for support of the RTIC. (Police Department) Resolution No. 388-25 ADOPTED by the following vote:

File 250722: Accept and Expend In-Kind Gift - Retroactive - Ripple Labs, Inc. - Office Space - Estimated Market Value of $2,131,543

LLM summaryA retroactive resolution was adopted allowing the Police Department to accept and expend an in-kind gift of office space valued at approximately $2,131,543.

Source text250722 [Accept and Expend In-Kind Gift - Retroactive - Ripple Labs, Inc. - Office Space - Estimated Market Value of $2,131,543] Sponsors: Mayor; Mandelman and Sauter Resolution retroactively authorizing the Police Department to accept and expend an in-kind gift of office space from Ripple Labs, Inc. for the Police Department’s Real Time Investigation Center, valued at approximately $2,131,543 for the period of May 22, 2025, through December 31, 2026. (Police Department) Resolution No. 387-25 ADOPTED by the following vote:

File 250715: Administrative Code - Regional Vehicle Interdiction Desk Grant Program - Waiving Competitive Solicitation Requirements for Procurements Using Grant Funds

LLM summaryAn ordinance waiving competitive solicitation requirements for the Police Department's procurement using grant funds for the Regional Vehicle Interdiction Desk was finally passed.

Source text250715 [Administrative Code - Regional Vehicle Interdiction Desk Grant Program - Waiving Competitive Solicitation Requirements for Procurements Using Grant Funds] Sponsors: Mayor; Mandelman Ordinance waiving the competitive solicitation requirements under Chapter 21 of the Administrative Code for the Police Department’s procurement of equipment, technology, and services for the Regional Vehicle Interdiction Desk using grant funds from the United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance. (Police Department) (Supervisor Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 167-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250699: Administrative Code - Real Time Investigation Center - Waiving Solicitation Requirements For Procurements Using Gift Funds From San Francisco Police Community Foundation

LLM summaryAn ordinance waiving solicitation requirements for the Police Department's Real Time Investigation Center using gift funds was finally passed.

Source text250699 [Administrative Code - Real Time Investigation Center - Waiving Solicitation Requirements For Procurements Using Gift Funds From San Francisco Police Community Foundation] Sponsors: Mayor; Engardio, Dorsey, Sherrill and Mandelman Ordinance waiving the competitive solicitation requirements under Chapter 21 of the Administrative Code for the Police Department’s procurement of equipment, technology, and services to support the Department’s Real Time Investigation Center, using gift funds received from the San Francisco Police Community Foundation. (Supervisor Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 165-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250655: Various Codes - Large and Commercial Vehicle Parking Restrictions - Hours and Exceptions

LLM summaryLegislation was finally passed to modify parking restrictions for large and commercial vehicles on city streets and park properties.

Source textce the time that large vehicles may be parked on City streets from overnight to two hours, and modify the time that commercial vehicles may be parked on City streets; 2) amending the Administrative Code to require City departments, including but not limited to the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing, the Department of Emergency Management, and the Police Department, to assist the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) with administering a Large Vehicle Refuge Permit Program that exempts certain large vehicles from the two-hour parking restriction under certain conditions; 3) urging SFMTA to develop a fair review process and to develop further exceptions to the two-hour restriction as may be needed to support the public interest; 4) amending the Park Code to impose a two-hour parking limit on large vehicles on park property; 5) amending the Port Code to impose two-hour parking limits on large vehicles on Port property; and 6) affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 122-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250609: Funding Reallocation - Our City, Our Home Homelessness Gross Receipts Tax - Services to Address Homelessness - $34,777,000 Plus Up to $19,100,000 of Future Revenue - Through FY 2026-2027

LLM summaryAn ordinance reallocating funding for homelessness services was passed on first reading, including future revenue considerations.

Source textusiness and Tax Regulations Code, Section 2810, without regard to the expenditure percentages in that section; temporarily suspending the limit on funding for short-term rental subsidies; and finding that these reallocations are necessary to achieve the purposes of the Our City, Our Home Fund pursuant to Business and Tax Regulations Code, Section 2811. (Pursuant to Business and Tax Regulations Code, Section 2811, amendments of Article 28 of the Business and Tax Regulations Code, requires approval by a supermajority vote of at least eight members of the Board of Supervisors.) (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Chen, Fielder, and Walton, voted No on First Reading on the divided question for 'Section 4' of the Ordinance (Page 5, Line 22, through Page 6, Line 6), receiving enough votes to be Passed on First Reading and included back into the Ordinance as a whole.) Supervisor Fielder requested that the question to pass this Ordinance on Final Reading be DIVIDED to consider ‘Section 4’ (Page 5, Line 22, through Page 6, Line 6) separately. Ordinance No. 143-25 The divided question on 'Section 4' of the Ordinance (Page 5, Line 22, through Page 6, Line 6) was FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250605: Park Code - Recreation Program Fees

LLM summaryAn ordinance was finally passed allowing the Recreation and Park Department to set fees for recreation programs based on operating costs.

Source text250605 [Park Code - Recreation Program Fees] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Park Code to allow the Recreation and Park Department to set fees for recreation programs based on the Department’s operating costs for those programs and various other factors, including whether the program is designated for youth, seniors, or persons with disabilities, subject to approval of the Recreation and Park Commission; directing the Commission to update its scholarship policy to provide for further discounts for recreation programs based on financial need; making certain clarifying changes; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Supervisor Fielder voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 139-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250603: Park Code - Court Reservations

LLM summaryAn ordinance was finally passed to authorize the Recreation and Park Department to charge fees for reserving tennis and pickleball courts.

Source text250603 [Park Code - Court Reservations] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Park Code to authorize the Recreation and Park Department to charge fees for reserving tennis/pickleball courts at locations other than the Golden Gate Park Tennis Center; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Supervisor Fielder voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 137-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250599: Administrative Code - Vehicle Registration Fees and Police Fingerprint Identification Fund

LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed to amend the Administrative Code, establishing vehicle registration fees to fund law enforcement fingerprint identification programs.

Source text250599 [Administrative Code - Vehicle Registration Fees and Police Fingerprint Identification Fund] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to authorize fees for vehicles registered to a San Francisco address to fund law enforcement programs related to fingerprint identification of persons involved in crimes committed while operating motor vehicles, in accordance with California State law, and to establish the Police Fingerprint Identification Fund to receive the fee revenue. (Supervisor Fielder voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 133-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250589: Budget and Appropriation Ordinance for Departments - FYs 2025-2026 and 2026-2027

LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed to appropriate estimated receipts and expenditures for City departments for Fiscal Years 2025-2026 and 2026-2027.

Source text250589 [Budget and Appropriation Ordinance for Departments - FYs 2025-2026 and 2026-2027] Sponsor: Mayor Budget and Appropriation Ordinance appropriating all estimated receipts and all estimated expenditures for Departments of the City and County of San Francisco as of May 30, 2025, for the Fiscal Years (FYs) ending June 30, 2026, and June 30, 2027. (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisor Fielder voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 119-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250655: Various Codes - Large and Commercial Vehicle Parking Restrictions - Hours and Exceptions

LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to modify parking restrictions for large and commercial vehicles on city streets.

Source textCode to reduce the time that large vehicles may be parked on City streets from overnight to two hours, and modify the time that commercial vehicles may be parked on City streets; 2) amending the Administrative Code to require City departments, including but not limited to the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing, the Department of Emergency Management, and the Police Department, to assist the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) with administering a Large Vehicle Refuge Permit Program that exempts certain large vehicles from the two-hour parking restriction under certain conditions; 3) urging SFMTA to develop a fair review process and to develop further exceptions to the two-hour restriction as may be needed to support the public interest; 4) amending the Park Code to impose a two-hour parking limit on large vehicles on park property; 5) amending the Port Code to impose two-hour parking limits on large vehicles on Port property; and 6) affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250609: Funding Reallocation - Our City, Our Home Homelessness Gross Receipts Tax - Services to Address Homelessness - $34,777,000 Plus Up to $19,100,000 of Future Revenue - Through FY 2026-2027

LLM summaryFunding reallocations for homelessness services were passed on first reading, including a temporary suspension of funding limits for short-term rental subsidies.

Source textscribed in Business and Tax Regulations Code, Section 2810, without regard to the expenditure percentages in that section; temporarily suspending the limit on funding for short-term rental subsidies; and finding that these reallocations are necessary to achieve the purposes of the Our City, Our Home Fund pursuant to Business and Tax Regulations Code, Section 2811. (Pursuant to Business and Tax Regulations Code, Section 2811, amendments of Article 28 of the Business and Tax Regulations Code, requires approval by a supermajority vote of at least eight members of the Board of Supervisors.) (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Chen, Fielder, and Walton, voted No on First Reading on the divided question for 'Section 4' of the Ordinance (Page 5, Line 22, through Page 6, Line 6), receiving enough votes to be Passed on First Reading and included back into the Ordinance as a whole.) Supervisor Fielder requested that the question to pass this Ordinance on First Reading be DIVIDED to consider ‘Section 4’ (Page 5, Line 22, through Page 6, Line 6) separately. The divided question on 'Section 4' of the Ordinance (Page 5, Line 22, through Page 6, Line 6) was PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250617: Authorizing Paid Parking in Golden Gate Park

LLM summaryA resolution was adopted to authorize the Municipal Transportation Agency to set parking rates in Golden Gate Park.

Source text250617 [Authorizing Paid Parking in Golden Gate Park] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution authorizing the Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) to set parking rates in Golden Gate Park in accordance with Park Code provisions that authorize SFMTA rate-setting on park property; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. Resolution No. 327-25 ADOPTED by the following vote:

File 250605: Park Code - Recreation Program Fees

LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to allow the Recreation and Park Department to set fees for recreation programs based on operating costs.

Source text250605 [Park Code - Recreation Program Fees] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Park Code to allow the Recreation and Park Department to set fees for recreation programs based on the Department’s operating costs for those programs and various other factors, including whether the program is designated for youth, seniors, or persons with disabilities, subject to approval of the Recreation and Park Commission; directing the Commission to update its scholarship policy to provide for further discounts for recreation programs based on financial need; making certain clarifying changes; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Supervisor Fielder voted No on First Reading.) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250603: Park Code - Court Reservations

LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to authorize fees for reserving tennis and pickleball courts outside the Golden Gate Park Tennis Center.

Source text250603 [Park Code - Court Reservations] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Park Code to authorize the Recreation and Park Department to charge fees for reserving tennis/pickleball courts at locations other than the Golden Gate Park Tennis Center; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Supervisor Fielder voted No on First Reading.) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250599: Administrative Code - Vehicle Registration Fees and Police Fingerprint Identification Fund

LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to establish vehicle registration fees to fund law enforcement programs related to fingerprint identification.

Source text250599 [Administrative Code - Vehicle Registration Fees and Police Fingerprint Identification Fund] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to authorize fees for vehicles registered to a San Francisco address to fund law enforcement programs related to fingerprint identification of persons involved in crimes committed while operating motor vehicles, in accordance with California State law, and to establish the Police Fingerprint Identification Fund to receive the fee revenue. (Supervisor Fielder voted No on First Reading.) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250589: Budget and Appropriation Ordinance for Departments - FYs 2025-2026 and 2026-2027

LLM summaryThe Budget and Appropriation Ordinance for FYs 2025-2026 and 2026-2027 passed on first reading as amended.

Source text(Fiscal Impact) (Supervisor Fielder voted No on First Reading.) PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:

File 250185: De-Appropriation - Salaries/Benefits/Vehicles, Various Projects - Police and Sheriff’s Department - $86,310,081 - Appropriation - General Fund - $5,739,919 - Overtime/Building and Structure Improvement Projects/Repair - POL/SHF - $92,050,000 - FY2024-2025

LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed to de-appropriate funds from various projects and reallocate them to support increased overtime in the Police and Sheriff’s Departments.

Source text250185 [De-Appropriation - Salaries/Benefits/Vehicles, Various Projects - Police and Sheriff’s Department - $86,310,081 - Appropriation - General Fund - $5,739,919 - Overtime/Building and Structure Improvement Projects/Repair - POL/SHF - $92,050,000 - FY2024-2025] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance appropriating $5,428,603 from the General Reserve and $311,316 of Boarding of Prisoners revenue, de-appropriating $86,310,081 from salaries, mandatory fringe benefits, vehicles, programmatic projects, capital renewal projects, and building and structure improvement projects and appropriating $61,000,000 to overtime in the Police Department and $30,000,000 to overtime in the Sheriff’s Department in order to support the Departments’ projected increases in overtime as required per Administrative Code Section 3.17, and $1,050,000 to building and structure improvement projects and building repair in the Sheriff’s Department. (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 074-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250185: De-Appropriation - Salaries/Benefits/Vehicles, Various Projects - Police and Sheriff’s Department - $86,310,081 - Appropriation - General Fund - $5,739,919 - Overtime/Building and Structure Improvement Projects/Repair - POL/SHF - $92,050,000 - FY2024-2025

LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to de-appropriate funds from various police and sheriff projects while reallocating funds for overtime and building improvements.

Source textand Structure Improvement Projects/Repair - POL/SHF - $92,050,000 - FY2024-2025] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance appropriating $5,428,603 from the General Reserve and $311,316 of Boarding of Prisoners revenue, de-appropriating $86,310,081 from salaries, mandatory fringe benefits, vehicles, programmatic projects, capital renewal projects, and building and structure improvement projects and appropriating $61,000,000 to overtime in the Police Department and $30,000,000 to overtime in the Sheriff’s Department in order to support the Departments’ projected increases in overtime as required per Administrative Code Section 3.17, and $1,050,000 to building and structure improvement projects and building repair in the Sheriff’s Department. (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Ardis Graham (Department of Human Resources); Assistant Chief David Lazar and Catherine McGuire (San Francisco Police Department); Greg Wagner, Controller (Office of the City Controller); and Brad Russi (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250017: Military Equipment Use Policy and Additional Equipment Approval - 2024 Annual Report

LLM summaryA resolution was adopted accepting the San Francisco Sheriff Office’s Military Equipment Use Policy 2024 Annual Report and approving additional equipment purchases.

Source text250017 [Military Equipment Use Policy and Additional Equipment Approval - 2024 Annual Report] Resolution accepting the San Francisco Sheriff Office’s Military Equipment Use Policy 2024 Annual Report and Inventory; and approving the request for purchase and use of additional equipment, consistent with the criteria set forth in state law. (Sheriff) Resolution No. 151-25 ADOPTED by the following vote:

File 250197: Urging Implementation of Drug Market Intervention (DMI) Strategy in San Francisco

LLM summaryThe resolution urging the implementation of a drug market intervention strategy in San Francisco was adopted as amended.

Source textResolution No. 128-25 ADOPTED AS AMENDED by the following vote:

File 250001: Business and Tax Regulations Code - Empty Homes Tax Suspension Pending Litigation

LLM summaryAn ordinance suspending the Empty Homes Tax pending litigation was finally passed.

Source text250001 [Business and Tax Regulations Code - Empty Homes Tax Suspension Pending Litigation] Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code to suspend the Empty Homes Tax pending a final decision in Eric Debbane, et al. v. City & County of San Francisco, et al., San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-23-604600, retroactive to January 1, 2024, and to reinstate that tax so that the tax first applies in the tax year immediately following the calendar year of that final decision. (Treasurer-Tax Collector) (In accordance with Section 2961 of Article 29A of the Business and Tax Regulations Code, passage of this ordinance by the Board of Supervisors requires an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Board of Supervisors.) (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 041-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250001: Business and Tax Regulations Code - Empty Homes Tax Suspension Pending Litigation

LLM summaryAn ordinance suspending the Empty Homes Tax pending litigation was passed on first reading.

Source text250001 [Business and Tax Regulations Code - Empty Homes Tax Suspension Pending Litigation] Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code to suspend the Empty Homes Tax pending a final decision in Eric Debbane, et al. v. City & County of San Francisco, et al., San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CGC-23-604600, retroactive to January 1, 2024, and to reinstate that tax so that the tax first applies in the tax year immediately following the calendar year of that final decision. (Treasurer-Tax Collector) (In accordance with Section 2961 of Article 29A of the Business and Tax Regulations Code, passage of this ordinance by the Board of Supervisors requires an affirmative vote of two-thirds of the Board of Supervisors.) (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Amanda Kahn Fried (Office of the Treasurer-Tax Collector) and Greg Wagner, Controller (Office of the City Controller), who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250130: Removal of Max Carter-Oberstone from the Police Commission

LLM summaryA motion was approved to consent to the Mayor’s removal of Max Carter-Oberstone from the Police Commission.

Source textMotion consenting to the Mayor’s removal of Max Carter-Oberstone from the Police Commission. (Clerk of the Board) Motion No. M25-014 APPROVED AS AMENDED by the following vote:

File 250130: Removal of Max Carter-Oberstone from the Police Commission

LLM summaryA motion was amended and approved regarding the Mayor’s removal of Max Carter-Oberstone from the Police Commission.

Source text250130 [Removal of Max Carter-Oberstone from the Police Commission] Motion consenting/dissenting the Mayor’s removal of Max Carter-Oberstone from the Police Commission. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Dorsey, seconded by Supervisor Sherrill, moved that this Motion be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE, on Page 1, Line 3, by changing 'consenting/dissenting' to 'consenting to', and Line 18, by striking 'consents/dissents' to 'consent to'. The motion carried by the following vote:

File 240927: Planning Code - Development Impact Fees and Requirements for Non-Residential to Residential Conversion Projects

LLM summaryThe Planning Code was amended regarding development impact fees and requirements for converting non-residential properties to residential use, passing on first reading.

Source text(Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted "No" on First Reading.) PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote: