Chyanne Chen

File 251003: Administrative Code - Expanding Drug-Free Permanent Supportive Housing

Source textto state that it is City policy to expand the availability of Site-Based Permanent Supportive Housing (“PSH”) that prohibits on-site illicit drug use among residents (“Drug-Free PSH”) to meet the demand of people experiencing homelessness who prefer such a residential option; require that City funding for new Site-Based PSH for people experiencing homelessness be used for Drug-Free PSH except where operation of the housing as Drug-Free PSH would conflict with standards imposed by law or by a condition of other funding, where the funding is for new construction, or the Board of Supervisors has waived the funding requirement based on specific findings; require the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (“HSH”) to survey residents of Site-Based PSH to assess their interest in living in either Drug-Tolerant PSH or Drug-Free PSH and report on the survey findings and HSH’s strategies to meet PSH residents’ demands; and require HSH to adopt rules and regulations establishing standards and protocols for evictions from City-funded Drug-Free Housing. (Racial Equity Impact) (Supervisors Chan, Chen, Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 260538: Planning, Administrative, Building Codes - Inclusionary Housing Program Updates and Reductions; Development Impact Fee Reductions

Source textrojects under 25 units; 3) allow all projects to dedicate land to the City as an alternative to payment of the Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program fee; 4) adopt a process for projects to request a modification to conditions of approval related to Inclusionary Affordable Housing Program requirements; 5) delete certain Article 4 affordable housing and development impact fees; and 6) adopt conforming amendments to various sections of the Planning Code; amending the Building Code to reduce Planning Code Article 4 development impact fees and allow deferral of payment of such fees; and amending the Administrative Code to adopt conforming amendments to the requirements of the Citywide Affordable Housing Fund; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Chen and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Supervisor Mandelman requested to be added as a co-sponsor. FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 251003: Administrative Code - Expanding Drug-Free Permanent Supportive Housing

Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:

File 260538: Planning, Administrative, Building Codes - Inclusionary Housing Program Updates and Reductions; Development Impact Fee Reductions

Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:

File 260538: Planning, Administrative, Building Codes - Inclusionary Housing Program Updates and Reductions; Development Impact Fee Reductions

Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:

File 260281: Various Codes - Cannabis Cafés

Source textbis cafés from the prohibition on smoking in business establishments; eliminate the prohibition on establishments with a cannabis consumption permit requiring employees to enter a designated smoking room as a condition of employment; exempt cannabis cafés in certain circumstances from the 600-foot buffer rule that applies to cannabis retail establishments; restrict eligibility for cannabis café permits for one year to businesses that currently hold a cannabis storefront retailer permit or that have the same owners as such a business; require Equity Applicants that apply for a cannabis café permit to pay the $2,000 application fee, any permit amendment processing costs, and the $3,000 license fee for the first year of operation, associated with the cannabis café permit; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302. (Supervisors Chan, Chen, Melgar, and Wong voted No on First Reading.) FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 260281: Various Codes - Cannabis Cafés

Source textnly for consumption on the premises of the café; exempt cannabis cafés from the prohibition on smoking in business establishments; eliminate the prohibition on establishments with a cannabis consumption permit requiring employees to enter a designated smoking room as a condition of employment; exempt cannabis cafés in certain circumstances from the 600-foot buffer rule that applies to cannabis retail establishments; restrict eligibility for cannabis café permits for one year to businesses that currently hold a cannabis storefront retailer permit or that have the same owners as such a business; require Equity Applicants that apply for a cannabis café permit to pay the $2,000 application fee, any permit amendment processing costs, and the $3,000 license fee for the first year of operation, associated with the cannabis café permit; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 260217: Various Codes - Boards, Commissions, and Advisory Bodies

Source text state law; 9) add two state-required bodies, the Community Corrections Council and the Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council, to the Administrative Code; 10) make other minor or clarifying changes regarding Commissions and Advisory Bodies; and 11) authorize and direct the City Attorney to make clerical, non-substantive changes to update in the Municipal Code cross-references to renamed bodies and cross-references to section and subsection numbers changed by this Ordinance. (Pursuant to Charter, Section 4.100.1(e), the Streamlining Task Force may introduce ordinances to effectuate its recommendations, and such ordinances shall go into effect 90 days after the introduction is published unless two-thirds of all Members of the Board of Supervisors vote to disapprove the ordinance. Transmittal Date: 3/6/2026) (Pursuant to Administrative Code Section 2A.25-1 the Office of the City Administrator determined that the legislation may have an impact on City procurement process, but the impact is likely to be immaterial and therefore does not need further review.) (Supervisors Chan, Chen, Melgar, and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 099-26 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 260217: Various Codes - Boards, Commissions, and Advisory Bodies

Source texte Community Corrections Council and the Juvenile Justice Coordinating Council, to the Administrative Code; 10) make other minor or clarifying changes regarding Commissions and Advisory Bodies; and 11) authorize and direct the City Attorney to make clerical, non-substantive changes to update in the Municipal Code cross-references to renamed bodies and cross-references to section and subsection numbers changed by this Ordinance. (Pursuant to Charter, Section 4.100.1(e), the Streamlining Task Force may introduce ordinances to effectuate its recommendations, and such ordinances shall go into effect 90 days after the introduction is published unless two-thirds of all Members of the Board of Supervisors vote to disapprove the ordinance. Transmittal Date: 3/6/2026) (Pursuant to Administrative Code Section 2A.25-1 the Office of the City Administrator determined that the legislation may have an impact on City procurement process, but the impact is likely to be immaterial and therefore does not need further review.) (Supervisors Chan, Chen, Melgar, and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Supervisor Mandelman requested to be added as a co-sponsor. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 260024: Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization - 524-526 Vallejo Street and 4-4A San Antonio Place

LLM summaryA motion directs the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings related to a Conditional Use Authorization for a project at Vallejo Street.

Source text260024 [Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization - 524-526 Vallejo Street and 4-4A San Antonio Place] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings in support of the Board of Supervisors' decision concerning the proposed Conditional Use Authorization, Case No. 2024-011561CUA, for a proposed project at 524-526 Vallejo Street and 4-4A San Antonio Place. (Clerk of the Board) At the request of Supervisor Melgar, the question for File No. 260024 was considered first. Supervisor Sauter, seconded by Supervisor Sherrill, moved that this Motion be APPROVED, and further directed the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings that include a three-unit project may be desirable at the project site, if feasible and properly-designed, and that the Board urges the Planning Department and the Planning Commission to thoroughly review a future application for such project, if one is submitted. The motion FAILED by the following vote:

File 251268: Establishing the San Francisco Downtown Revitalization and Economic Recovery Financing District - Approving the Downtown Revitalization Financing Plan and Related Documents and Actions

LLM summaryA resolution was adopted to establish the San Francisco Downtown Revitalization and Economic Recovery Financing District and approve the related financing plan and documents.

Source text251268 [Establishing the San Francisco Downtown Revitalization and Economic Recovery Financing District - Approving the Downtown Revitalization Financing Plan and Related Documents and Actions] Sponsors: Mayor; Sauter, Mahmood, Sherrill, Mandelman and Dorsey Resolution establishing the San Francisco Downtown Revitalization and Economic Recovery Financing District, approving the Downtown Revitalization Financing Plan, including the division of taxes set forth therein, and documents and actions related thereto, and authorizing the filing of a judicial validation action. (Fiscal Impact) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Jacob Bintliff (Mayor’s Office of Economic and Workforce Development) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Resolution No. 038-26 ADOPTED by the following vote:

File 251245: Charter Amendment - Lifetime Term Limits for Mayor and Members of the Board of Supervisors

LLM summaryA charter amendment was ordered submitted to change term limits for the Mayor and Board of Supervisors from consecutive to lifetime limits, to be voted on in June 2026.

Source text251245 [Charter Amendment - Lifetime Term Limits for Mayor and Members of the Board of Supervisors] Sponsors: Mahmood; Melgar, Sherrill, Dorsey, Sauter and Wong Charter Amendment (First Draft) to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to change the current two-term limits for the office of Mayor and the office of Member of the Board of Supervisors from consecutive term limits to lifetime term limits; at an election to be held on June 2, 2026. (Supervisors Chan, Fielder, and Walton voted No to Continue.) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Brad Russi (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. ORDERED SUBMITTED by the following vote:

File 250811: Building Code - Building Permit Expiration Timelines

LLM summaryAn ordinance revising building permit expiration timelines was finally passed.

Source text250811 [Building Code - Building Permit Expiration Timelines] Sponsors: Mahmood; Dorsey Ordinance amending the Building Code to revise the timing of expiration of certain building permits and building permit applications; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Supervisor Chan, Chen, Fielder, Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 259-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250811: Building Code - Building Permit Expiration Timelines

LLM summaryThe Building Code amendment concerning permit expiration timelines was passed on first reading.

Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250811: Building Code - Building Permit Expiration Timelines

LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to amend the Building Code regarding the expiration timelines for certain building permits and applications.

Source text250811 [Building Code - Building Permit Expiration Timelines] Sponsors: Mahmood; Dorsey Ordinance amending the Building Code to revise the timing of expiration of certain building permits and building permit applications; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Supervisor Chan, Chen, Fielder, Walton voted No on First Reading.) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250985: Local Coastal Program Amendment - Family Zoning Plan

LLM summaryA resolution to amend the Local Coastal Program for the Family Zoning Plan was adopted.

Source text250985 [Local Coastal Program Amendment - Family Zoning Plan] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution transmitting to the California Coastal Commission for review and certification an amendment to the Implementation Program and Land Use Plan of the City’s certified Local Coastal Program to implement the Family Zoning Plan; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Supervisor Chen dissented in committee.) Resolution No. 577-25 ADOPTED by the following vote:

File 250701: Planning, Business and Tax Regulations Codes - Family Zoning Plan

LLM summaryAn ordinance amending various codes to implement the Family Zoning Plan was finally passed.

Source texte conforming changes to zoning tables in various Districts, including the Neighborhood Commercial District and Mixed Use Districts, 12) prohibit Lot mergers on Lots with Historic Buildings, subject to certain preservation obligations, and 13) reduce usable open space and bicycle parking requirements for senior housing; amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code regarding the Board of Appeals’ review of permits in the Housing Choice Program Housing Sustainability District; also, amending the Local Coastal Program to implement the Housing Choice-San Francisco Program and other associated changes in the City’s Coastal Zone, and directing the Planning Director to transmit the Ordinance to the Coastal Commission upon enactment; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302. (Economic Impact) (Supervisors Chan, Chen, Fielder, and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 245-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250700: Zoning Map - Family Zoning Plan

LLM summaryAn ordinance to amend the Zoning Map as part of the Family Zoning Plan was finally passed.

Source textistoric districts pursuant to Article 10; 2) change the height limits on certain lots in the R-4 Height and Bulk District; and 3) designating various parcels to be included in the Non-Contiguous San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Sites Special Use District (SFMTA SUD); amending the Local Coastal Program to: 1) reclassify all properties in the Coastal Zone to R-4 Height and Bulk District; 2) reclassify certain properties to RTO-C and Neighborhood Commercial District; 3) designate one parcel as part of the SFMTA SUD; and 4) directing the Planning Director to transmit the Ordinance to the Coastal Commission upon enactment; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings under the City’s Local Coastal Program and the California Coastal Act of 1976. (Economic Impact) (Supervisors Chan, Chen, Fielder, and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 244-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250966: General Plan Amendments - Family Zoning Plan

LLM summaryAn ordinance for General Plan amendments related to the Family Zoning Plan was finally passed.

Source textly Housing Zoning Program, including the Housing Choice-San Francisco Program, by adjusting guidelines regarding building heights, density, design, and other matters; amending the City’s Local Coastal Program to implement the Housing Choice-San Francisco Program and other associated changes in the City’s Coastal Zone, and directing the Planning Director to transmit the Ordinance to the Coastal Commission upon enactment; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 340. (Planning Commission) (Pursuant to Charter, Section 4.105, the Planning Commission recommends General Plan amendments to the Board of Supervisors for approval or rejection. If the Board fails to act within 90 days of receipt, the proposed General Plan amendment shall be deemed approved. Transmittal Date: September 22, 2025) (Supervisors Chan, Chen, Fielder, and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 243-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250701: Planning, Business and Tax Regulations Codes - Family Zoning Plan

LLM summaryThe Family Zoning Plan was passed on first reading.

Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250700: Zoning Map - Family Zoning Plan

LLM summaryAn ordinance designating parcels for the Non-Contiguous SFMTA Sites Special Use District was passed on first reading.

Source textesignating various parcels to be included in the Non-Contiguous San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Sites Special Use District (SFMTA SUD); amending the Local Coastal Program to: 1) reclassify all properties in the Coastal Zone to R-4 Height and Bulk District; 2) reclassify certain properties to RTO-C and Neighborhood Commercial District; 3) designate one parcel as part of the SFMTA SUD; and 4) directing the Planning Director to transmit the Ordinance to the Coastal Commission upon enactment; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings under the City’s Local Coastal Program and the California Coastal Act of 1976. (Economic Impact) (Supervisors Chan, Chen, Fielder, and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Lisa Chen (Planning Department) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250966: General Plan Amendments - Family Zoning Plan

LLM summaryGeneral Plan amendments related to the Family Zoning Plan were passed on first reading.

Source textdensity, design, and other matters; amending the City’s Local Coastal Program to implement the Housing Choice-San Francisco Program and other associated changes in the City’s Coastal Zone, and directing the Planning Director to transmit the Ordinance to the Coastal Commission upon enactment; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 340. (Planning Commission) (Pursuant to Charter, Section 4.105, the Planning Commission recommends General Plan amendments to the Board of Supervisors for approval or rejection. If the Board fails to act within 90 days of receipt, the proposed General Plan amendment shall be deemed approved. Transmittal Date: September 22, 2025) (Supervisors Chan, Chen, Fielder, and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Lisa Chen (Planning Department) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 251023: Appointments, Our City, Our Home Oversight Committee - Shanell Williams, Julia D'Antonio and William Lemon

LLM summaryShanell Williams, Julia D'Antonio, and William Lemon were appointed to the Our City, Our Home Oversight Committee with terms ending April 22, 2027.

Source text251023 [Appointments, Our City, Our Home Oversight Committee - Shanell Williams, Julia D'Antonio and William Lemon] Motion appointing Shanell Williams, Julia D'Antonio and William Lemon, terms ending April 22, 2027, to the Our City, Our Home Oversight Committee. (Rules Committee) Supervisor Fielder requested that the question be DIVIDED to consider the appointment of William Lemon separately. The question to consider the appointment of William Lemon was APPROVED AS DIVIDED by the following vote:

File 250634: Planning Code - Use Size Limits

LLM summaryAn ordinance amending the Planning Code to eliminate non-residential use size limits in certain districts was finally passed.

Source text250634 [Planning Code - Use Size Limits] Sponsors: Melgar; Sherrill, Sauter and Dorsey Ordinance amending the Planning Code to eliminate limits on Non-Residential Use Sizes in the Pacific Avenue Neighborhood Commercial District (NCD), Polk Street NCD, West Portal Avenue NCD, North Beach NCD and North Beach Special Use District, Regional Commercial Districts, and Residential-Commercial District; allow specified Non-Residential Uses that exceed the Use Size limits to divide into smaller spaces that may continue to exceed the Use Size limits, without conditional use authorization; adjust the Use Size limit in all NCDs to a round number; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. (Supervisors Chan and Chen voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 173-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250487: Administrative Code - Equitable Citywide Access to Shelters, Transitional Housing, and Behavioral Health Services

LLM summaryAn ordinance promoting equitable access to shelters and behavioral health services was finally passed.

Source text250487 [Administrative Code - Equitable Citywide Access to Shelters, Transitional Housing, and Behavioral Health Services] Sponsors: Mahmood; Walton, Dorsey, Sauter and Melgar Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to promote equitable access to shelter and behavioral health services by prohibiting the City from siting a new, City-funded homeless shelter, transitional housing facility, or certain behavioral health residential care and treatment facilities (collectively, “Covered Facilities”) in a neighborhood where the neighborhood’s share of the City’s shelter and transitional housing beds exceeds the neighborhood’s share of the City’s unsheltered persons, and prohibiting the City from siting a new City-funded homeless shelter within 300 feet of an existing homeless shelter; and authorizing the Board of Supervisors to waive these prohibitions upon a finding that approving the Covered Facility or homeless shelter at the proposed location is in the public interest; and providing that this ordinance shall sunset on December 31, 2031. (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Chan and Chen voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 172-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250634: Planning Code - Use Size Limits

LLM summaryThe ordinance amending use size limits in the Planning Code was passed on first reading.

Source textPASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250487: Administrative Code - Equitable Citywide Access to Shelters, Transitional Housing, and Behavioral Health Services

LLM summaryAn ordinance promoting equitable access to shelters and behavioral health services was passed on first reading, prohibiting new facilities in certain neighborhoods.

Source text250487 [Administrative Code - Equitable Citywide Access to Shelters, Transitional Housing, and Behavioral Health Services] Sponsors: Mahmood; Walton, Dorsey, Sauter and Melgar Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to promote equitable access to shelter and behavioral health services by prohibiting the City from siting a new, City-funded homeless shelter, transitional housing facility, or certain behavioral health residential care and treatment facilities (collectively, “Covered Facilities”) in a neighborhood where the neighborhood’s share of the City’s shelter and transitional housing beds exceeds the neighborhood’s share of the City’s unsheltered persons, and prohibiting the City from siting a new City-funded homeless shelter within 300 feet of an existing homeless shelter; and authorizing the Board of Supervisors to waive these prohibitions upon a finding that approving the Covered Facility or homeless shelter at the proposed location is in the public interest; and providing that this ordinance shall sunset on December 31, 2031. (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Chan and Chen voted No on First Reading.) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:

File 250609: Funding Reallocation - Our City, Our Home Homelessness Gross Receipts Tax - Services to Address Homelessness - $34,777,000 Plus Up to $19,100,000 of Future Revenue - Through FY 2026-2027

LLM summaryAn ordinance reallocating funding for homelessness services was passed on first reading, including future revenue considerations.

Source textusiness and Tax Regulations Code, Section 2810, without regard to the expenditure percentages in that section; temporarily suspending the limit on funding for short-term rental subsidies; and finding that these reallocations are necessary to achieve the purposes of the Our City, Our Home Fund pursuant to Business and Tax Regulations Code, Section 2811. (Pursuant to Business and Tax Regulations Code, Section 2811, amendments of Article 28 of the Business and Tax Regulations Code, requires approval by a supermajority vote of at least eight members of the Board of Supervisors.) (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Chen, Fielder, and Walton, voted No on First Reading on the divided question for 'Section 4' of the Ordinance (Page 5, Line 22, through Page 6, Line 6), receiving enough votes to be Passed on First Reading and included back into the Ordinance as a whole.) Supervisor Fielder requested that the question to pass this Ordinance on Final Reading be DIVIDED to consider ‘Section 4’ (Page 5, Line 22, through Page 6, Line 6) separately. Ordinance No. 143-25 The divided question on 'Section 4' of the Ordinance (Page 5, Line 22, through Page 6, Line 6) was FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:

File 250609: Funding Reallocation - Our City, Our Home Homelessness Gross Receipts Tax - Services to Address Homelessness - $34,777,000 Plus Up to $19,100,000 of Future Revenue - Through FY 2026-2027

LLM summaryFunding reallocations for homelessness services were passed on first reading, including a temporary suspension of funding limits for short-term rental subsidies.

Source textscribed in Business and Tax Regulations Code, Section 2810, without regard to the expenditure percentages in that section; temporarily suspending the limit on funding for short-term rental subsidies; and finding that these reallocations are necessary to achieve the purposes of the Our City, Our Home Fund pursuant to Business and Tax Regulations Code, Section 2811. (Pursuant to Business and Tax Regulations Code, Section 2811, amendments of Article 28 of the Business and Tax Regulations Code, requires approval by a supermajority vote of at least eight members of the Board of Supervisors.) (Fiscal Impact) (Supervisors Chen, Fielder, and Walton, voted No on First Reading on the divided question for 'Section 4' of the Ordinance (Page 5, Line 22, through Page 6, Line 6), receiving enough votes to be Passed on First Reading and included back into the Ordinance as a whole.) Supervisor Fielder requested that the question to pass this Ordinance on First Reading be DIVIDED to consider ‘Section 4’ (Page 5, Line 22, through Page 6, Line 6) separately. The divided question on 'Section 4' of the Ordinance (Page 5, Line 22, through Page 6, Line 6) was PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote: