SUPERVISOR PROFILE AND RECORDED ROLL-CALL EVIDENCE
Bilal Mahmood
These are recorded positions on specific actions. A No is not automatically opposition to a project, and an Aye is not automatically support. Read the action and cited minutes.
- District
- 5 (Haight-Ashbury, Lower Haight, Fillmore, Western Addition, North of Panhandle, Japantown, Hayes Valley, Tenderloin, Civic Center)
- MahmoodStaff@sfgov.org
- Phone
- (415) 554-7630
- Office
- 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, City Hall
San Francisco, CA 94102 - Base salary
- $180,128 per year
FY 2026–27 · effective July 1, 2026
Civil Service Commission report ↗ - Official page
- Board of Supervisors profile ↗
MOST RECENT 250 · NO
NO positions
File 251003: Administrative Code - Expanding Drug-Free Permanent Supportive Housing
Source texteet the demand of people experiencing homelessness who prefer such a residential option; require that City funding for new Site-Based PSH for people experiencing homelessness be used for Drug-Free PSH except where operation of the housing as Drug-Free PSH would conflict with standards imposed by law or by a condition of other funding, where the funding is for new construction, or the Board of Supervisors has waived the funding requirement based on specific findings; require the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (“HSH”) to survey residents of Site-Based PSH to assess their interest in living in either Drug-Tolerant PSH or Drug-Free PSH and report on the survey findings and HSH’s strategies to meet PSH residents’ demands; and require HSH to adopt rules and regulations establishing standards and protocols for evictions from City-funded Drug-Free Housing. (Racial Equity Impact) Supervisor Fielder, seconded by Supervisor Melgar, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED on Page 4, Lines 18-19, by striking ‘or shelter’; on Page 8, Line 12, by adding ‘comparable’, Lines 12-13, by striking ‘or shelter’, and Line 19, by striking ‘shelter’. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 250701: Planning, Business and Tax Regulations Codes - Family Zoning Plan
LLM summaryAn ordinance related to the Family Zoning Plan was passed on first reading.
Source textn Francisco Program and other associated changes in the City’s Coastal Zone, and directing the Planning Director to transmit the Ordinance to the Coastal Commission upon enactment; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302. (Economic Impact) (Supervisors Chan, Chen, Fielder, and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Lisa Chen (Planning Department) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Chan, seconded by Supervisor Walton, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE, on Page 13, Line 10, by striking ‘more than two’ so that it reads ‘(9) is not located on a site containing residential units where the project would require the demolition of residential uses that are subject to the rent increase limitations set forth in Chapter 37 of the Administrative Code; and’. The motion failed by the following vote:
File 250808: Planning Code; Administrative Code - Legacy Businesses in Neighborhood Commercial Districts
LLM summaryA proposed amendment to the Planning Code regarding legacy businesses in neighborhood commercial districts was not passed on the first reading.
Source textNOT PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
File 251022: Appointment, Homelessness Oversight Commission - Thomas James Rocca
LLM summaryThomas James Rocca was appointed to the Homelessness Oversight Commission with a term ending May 1, 2029.
Source text251022 [Appointment, Homelessness Oversight Commission - Thomas James Rocca] Motion appointing Thomas James Rocca, term ending May 1, 2029, to the Homelessness Oversight Commission. (Rules Committee) Motion No. M25-111 APPROVED by the following vote:
File 250682: Planning Code; Zoning Map - Consolidating the North Beach Special Use and Neighborhood Commercial Districts and Expanding Allowable Uses and Use Size Limits in Certain Zoning Districts
LLM summaryA motion to divide and re-refer an ordinance regarding zoning districts back to committee failed, and the ordinance passed on the first reading.
Source text responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Chan requested that the question be DIVIDED to consider the references to the North Beach Neighborhood Commercial District, the North Beach Special Use District, and Jackson Square Special Use District separately. Supervisor Chan, seconded by Supervisor Walton, moved that the Divided Question be RE-REFERRED back to the Land Use and Transportation Committee. Deputy City Attorney Russi reported that, due to the complexity of the request to Divide, the determination on whether both the Divided Question and remaining balance could each stand alone and be considered separately, as required by Board Rule 5.30, could not be made today and a continuance would be in order. Before the vote was taken, Supervisor Chan rescinded her request to DIVIDE the question and her motion to re-refer the divided question back to committee. Supervisor Walton rescinded his second. Supervisor Chan requested this Ordinance be DUPLICATED ON FIRST READING. Supervisor Chan, seconded by Supervisor Walton, moved that the Duplicated Ordinance be RE-REFERRED back to the Land Use and Transportation Committee. The motion failed by the following vote:
File 250634: Planning Code - Use Size Limits
LLM summaryAn ordinance to eliminate limits on non-residential use sizes in certain districts was continued on first reading.
Source texte - Use Size Limits] Sponsors: Melgar; Sherrill, Sauter and Dorsey Ordinance amending the Planning Code to eliminate limits on Non-Residential Use Sizes in the Pacific Avenue Neighborhood Commercial District (NCD), Polk Street NCD, West Portal Avenue NCD, North Beach NCD and North Beach Special Use District, Regional Commercial Districts, and Residential-Commercial District; allow specified Non-Residential Uses that exceed the Use Size limits to divide into smaller spaces that may continue to exceed the Use Size limits, without conditional use authorization; adjust the Use Size limit in all NCDs to a round number; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. (Supervisors Chan and Chen voted No on First Reading.) Supervisor Dorsey requested to be added as a co-sponsor. Supervisor Chan, seconded by Supervisor Chen, moved that this Ordinance be CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. The motion FAILED by the following vote:
File 250727: Opposing California State Senate Bill No. 79 (Wiener) Unless Amended - Housing Development: Transit-Oriented Development
LLM summaryA resolution opposing California State Senate Bill No. 79 was not adopted, citing concerns over local government planning authority.
Source text250727 [Opposing California State Senate Bill No. 79 (Wiener) Unless Amended - Housing Development: Transit-Oriented Development] Sponsors: Chan; Chen, Fielder and Walton Resolution opposing California State Senate Bill No. 79, Housing Development: Transit-Oriented Development, introduced by Senator Scott Wiener, and similar future legislation, unless amended to give Local governments adequate ability to formulate local plans through its local legislative process, in which local governments and residents have adequate review and oversight of community planning, including affordability requirements, and residential and commercial tenant protections. NOT ADOPTED by the following vote:
File 250192: Administrative, Labor and Employment Codes - City Contract Processes and Requirements
LLM summaryAn ordinance was re-referred as amended to the Budget and Finance Committee regarding City contract processes and requirements.
Source textSupervisor Walton, seconded by Supervisor Melgar, moved that this Ordinance be RE-REFERRED AS AMENDED to the Budget and Finance Committee. The motion carried by the following vote:
File 241210: Planning Code - Notice for Housing Element Rezoning
LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed to amend the Planning Code, requiring notice for rezoning to comply with Housing Element law.
Source text241210 [Planning Code - Notice for Housing Element Rezoning] Sponsors: Chan; Fielder, Walton, Chen and Sherrill Ordinance amending the Planning Code to require notice of rezoning intended to comply with Housing Element law; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. (Supervisors Dorsey, Mahmood, and Melgar voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 064-25 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
File 241210: Planning Code - Notice for Housing Element Rezoning
LLM summaryAn ordinance was passed on first reading to amend the Planning Code, requiring notice for rezoning to comply with Housing Element law.
Source text241210 [Planning Code - Notice for Housing Element Rezoning] Sponsors: Chan; Fielder, Walton, Chen and Sherrill Ordinance amending the Planning Code to require notice of rezoning intended to comply with Housing Element law; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. (Supervisors Dorsey, Mahmood, and Melgar voted No on First Reading.) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
