# Board of Supervisors Minutes: September 20, 2022 - Meeting date: 2022-09-20 - Document type: minutes - Source format: PDF - Extracted pages: 25 - [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/872/2022-09-20-minutes) - [Authoritative City source](https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=M&ID=999231&GUID=D6FBFDD4-CB37-415C-8276-D1155ADAEFAF) > This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City source is the authoritative public record. ## Structured legislative records ### File 220654: Planning Code - Landmark Designation - City Cemetery - Pages: 7-8 - Sponsors: Chan; Melgar, Peskin and Mar - Vote 1: amendment - Action: amending the Planning Code to designate City Cemetery, the majority of Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 1313, Lot No. 029, located in Lincoln Park on the north side of Clement Street, to the east of the San Francisco Veteran Affairs Medical Center (formerly the Fort Miley Military Reservation), to the east and south of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, and to the west of Assessor’s Parcel Block Nos. 1312, 1392, and 1401, as a Landmark consistent with the standards set forth in Article 10 of the Planning Code; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Historic Preservation Commission) Supervisor Mar requested to be added as a co-sponsor. Supervisor Chan, seconded by Supervisor Ronen, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE on Page 7, Line 11, by correcting ‘with’, and Line 14, by changing ‘as directed by’ to ‘in coordination with’. The motion carried by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Dorsey, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton - Vote 2: first-reading - Action: PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Dorsey, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton ### File 220895: Interim Zoning Controls - Extending and Modifying Requirements for Large Residential Projects in RC, RM, and RTO Districts - Pages: 8 - Sponsors: Peskin; Chan - Vote 1: adoption, likely final - Action: 220895 [Interim Zoning Controls - Extending and Modifying Requirements for Large Residential Projects in RC, RM, and RTO Districts] Sponsors: Peskin; Chan Resolution extending and modifying interim zoning controls enacted in Resolution No. 10-21 for parcels in Residential-Commercial Combined (RC), Residential-Mixed (RM) and Residential-Transit Oriented (RTO) districts, requiring Conditional Use Authorization for certain residential developments that do not maximize the number of units allowed by applicable density restrictions; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. Resolution No. 404-22 ADOPTED by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Dorsey, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton ### File 220427: Administrative Code - County Veterans Service Officer Role and Duties - Pages: 8 - Sponsors: Safai - Vote 1: first-reading - Action: 220427 [Administrative Code - County Veterans Service Officer Role and Duties] Sponsor: Safai Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to place the County Veterans Service Officer (“Officer”) under the Department of Disability and Aging Services (DAS) rather than the Department of Administrative Services; give the Director of the DAS authority to nominate the Officer; update annual reporting requirements of the Officer to the Board of Supervisors and Mayor; and provide administrative support to the Veterans’ Affairs Commission. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Dorsey, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton ### File 220606: Administrative Code - Surveillance Technology Policy for Police Department Use of Non-City Entity Surveillance Cameras - Pages: 8-9 - Sponsors: Mayor; Mandelman and Safai - Vote 1: amendment - Action: 220606 [Administrative Code - Surveillance Technology Policy for Police Department Use of Non-City Entity Surveillance Cameras] Sponsors: Mayor; Mandelman and Safai Ordinance approving Surveillance Technology Policy for Police Department use of non-City entity surveillance cameras and establishing a sunset date fifteen months after the effective date of the ordinance. (Supervisor Chan dissented in Committee.) Supervisors Safai and Mandelman requested to be added as co-sponsors. Supervisor Ronen, seconded by Supervisor Chan, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE. The motion FAILED by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Preston, Ronen, Walton - Noes: Dorsey, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Safai, Stefani - Vote 2: amendment - Action: inted at 8:09 pm on 3/7/24 Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 9/20/2022 Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Mandelman, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE. Before the vote was taken, Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Mandelman, withdrew this motion to amend. Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Ronen, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE, on Page 5, Lines 19-20, by adding ‘For live monitoring requests’; on Page 5, Line 23, through Page 6, Line 1, by adding ‘the total costs to the Department, including any staff time and other costs, associated with the request and usage; criminal incidents in a one block radius of the location of the camera for the month prior to the live monitoring as well as the month following the live monitoring;’; and on Page 6, Lines 5-8, by adding 'The Department understands that the Board of Supervisors intends to direct the Budget and Legislative Analyst to evaluate the efficacy of the Policy based on a review of the SFPD’s quarterly reports and any other information relevant to making such an evaluation.' The motion carried by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Dorsey, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton - Vote 3: first-reading - Action: (Supervisor Chan dissented in Committee.) PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote: - Ayes: Dorsey, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Safai, Stefani - Noes: Chan, Preston, Ronen, Walton ### File 220877: Administrative Code - Repeal of Legacy Business Registry Fee - Pages: 9-10 - Sponsors: Peskin; Ronen, Chan, Mandelman, Mar, Preston, Stefani, Safai and Dorsey - Vote 1: first-reading - Action: 220877 [Administrative Code - Repeal of Legacy Business Registry Fee] Sponsors: Peskin; Ronen, Chan, Mandelman, Mar, Preston, Stefani, Safai and Dorsey Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to remove the requirement to charge a Legacy Business Registry administrative fee. Supervisors Mar, Preston, Stefani, and Safai requested to be added as co-sponsors. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Dorsey, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton ## Extracted text ### [Page 8](https://sfbos.info/documents/872/2022-09-20-minutes#page-8) Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 9/20/2022 220895 [Interim Zoning Controls - Extending and Modifying Requirements for Large Residential Projects in RC, RM, and RTO Districts] Sponsors: Peskin; Chan Resolution extending and modifying interim zoning controls enacted in Resolution No. 10-21 for parcels in Residential-Commercial Combined (RC), Residential-Mixed (RM) and Residential-Transit Oriented (RTO) districts, requiring Conditional Use Authorization for certain residential developments that do not maximize the number of units allowed by applicable density restrictions; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. Resolution No. 404-22 ADOPTED by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Chan, Dorsey, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton Recommendations of the Rules Committee 220427 [Administrative Code - County Veterans Service Officer Role and Duties] Sponsor: Safai Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to place the County Veterans Service Officer (“Officer”) under the Department of Disability and Aging Services (DAS) rather than the Department of Administrative Services; give the Director of the DAS authority to nominate the Officer; update annual reporting requirements of the Officer to the Board of Supervisors and Mayor; and provide administrative support to the Veterans’ Affairs Commission. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Chan, Dorsey, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton 220606 [Administrative Code - Surveillance Technology Policy for Police Department Use of Non-City Entity Surveillance Cameras] Sponsors: Mayor; Mandelman and Safai Ordinance approving Surveillance Technology Policy for Police Department use of non-City entity surveillance cameras and establishing a sunset date fifteen months after the effective date of the ordinance. (Supervisor Chan dissented in Committee.) Supervisors Safai and Mandelman requested to be added as co-sponsors. Supervisor Ronen, seconded by Supervisor Chan, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE. The motion FAILED by the following vote: Ayes: 4 - Chan, Preston, Ronen, Walton Noes: 7 - Dorsey, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Safai, Stefani City and County of San Francisco Page 807 Printed at 8:09 pm on 3/7/24 ### [Page 9](https://sfbos.info/documents/872/2022-09-20-minutes#page-9) Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 9/20/2022 Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Mandelman, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE. Before the vote was taken, Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Mandelman, withdrew this motion to amend. Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Ronen, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE, on Page 5, Lines 19-20, by adding ‘For live monitoring requests’; on Page 5, Line 23, through Page 6, Line 1, by adding ‘the total costs to the Department, including any staff time and other costs, associated with the request and usage; criminal incidents in a one block radius of the location of the camera for the month prior to the live monitoring as well as the month following the live monitoring;’; and on Page 6, Lines 5-8, by adding 'The Department understands that the Board of Supervisors intends to direct the Budget and Legislative Analyst to evaluate the efficacy of the Policy based on a review of the SFPD’s quarterly reports and any other information relevant to making such an evaluation.' The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Chan, Dorsey, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton (Supervisor Chan dissented in Committee.) PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote: Ayes: 7 - Dorsey, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Safai, Stefani Noes: 4 - Chan, Preston, Ronen, Walton 220877 [Administrative Code - Repeal of Legacy Business Registry Fee] Sponsors: Peskin; Ronen, Chan, Mandelman, Mar, Preston, Stefani, Safai and Dorsey Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to remove the requirement to charge a Legacy Business Registry administrative fee. Supervisors Mar, Preston, Stefani, and Safai requested to be added as co-sponsors. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Chan, Dorsey, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton City and County of San Francisco Page 808 Printed at 8:09 pm on 3/7/24