# Board of Supervisors Minutes: March 1, 2022 - Meeting date: 2022-03-01 - Document type: minutes - Pages in official PDF: 25 - [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/828/2022-03-01-minutes) - [Authoritative City PDF](https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=M&ID=935988&GUID=F42E7B64-1FD5-469F-905E-32CEA923C9D5) > This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City PDF is the authoritative public record. ## Structured legislative records ### File 211309: Determining Annexation of Property to City and County of San Francisco Community Facilities District No. 2014-1 (Transbay Transit Center) and Determining and Confirming Annexation Process - Pages: 9-10 - Vote 1: adoption, likely final - Action: 211309 [Determining Annexation of Property to City and County of San Francisco Community Facilities District No. 2014-1 (Transbay Transit Center) and Determining and Confirming Annexation Process] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution confirming that property is annexed to the City and County of San Francisco Community Facilities District No. 2014-1 (Transbay Transit Center), and determining and confirming the process for properties to annex into the District. ADOPTED by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton ### File 210116: Planning Code, Zoning Map - Central Neighborhoods Large Residence Special Use District - Pages: 10 - Vote 1: first-reading - Action: hed by Waller Street, Steiner Street, Duboce Avenue, Sanchez Street, 16th Street, Guerrero Street, 20th Street, Valencia Street, Tiffany Avenue, 29th Street, San Jose Avenue, Mission Street, Alemany Boulevard, Tingley Street, Monterey Boulevard, Joost Avenue, Congo Street, Bosworth Street, O’Shaughnessy Boulevard, Portola Drive, Twin Peaks Boulevard, Clayton Street, Ashbury Street, Frederick Street, Buena Vista Avenue West, Haight Street, and Buena Vista Avenue East), to preserve and enhance neighborhood context and affordability by, among other things, requiring Conditional Use authorization for large residential developments in the district and prohibiting new residential development or expansion of an existing Residential Building that would result in any Dwelling Unit exceeding 4,000 square feet of Gross Floor Area in most circumstances; making a determination of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1, and findings of public convenience, necessity, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton ### File 210898: Planning Code - Landmark Designation - One Montgomery Street (aka 1-25 Montgomery Street) (Crocker National Bank Building) - Pages: 10-11 - Vote 1: first-reading - Action: 210898 [Planning Code - Landmark Designation - One Montgomery Street (aka 1-25 Montgomery Street) (Crocker National Bank Building)] Sponsor: Peskin Ordinance amending the Planning Code to designate One Montgomery Street (aka 1-25 Montgomery Street), Crocker National Bank Building, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0292, Lot Nos. 001A and 002, as a Landmark consistent with the standards set forth in Article 10 of the Planning Code; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Historic Preservation Commission) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton ### File 211263: Planning Code - Massage Establishment Zoning Controls - Pages: 11-12 - Vote 1: amendment - Action: n from the conditional use authorization requirement for massage uses accessory to a dwelling unit; 6) rename Medical Services to Health Services in Article 8 and make other conforming amendments; and 7) delete related provisions that have expired through the passage of time’ to ‘including to make Massage Establishments principally permitted if accessory to a Health Service’; and on Page 65, by adding ‘However, this general statement in this subsection (a) is qualified by subsections (b) and (c) below. (b) This ordinance includes certain amendments that were previously approved in Ordinance No. 233-21, with an effective date of January 22, 2022. Except as stated in subsection (c), the Board intends for the amendments in Ordinance No. 233-21 to remain in effect. Except as stated in subsection (c), this Ordinance does not in any way alter Ordinance No. 233-21. (c) Notwithstanding subsection (b), this ordinance does amend Section 711 of the Planning Code as it was amended by Ordinance No. 233-21, to the following extent: in Table 711, in the “Controls by Story” column, 1st Story, the designation “C(13)” is replaced by the designation “P(9).”’. The motion carried by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton - Vote 2: first-reading - Action: Ordinance amending the Planning Code to revise Massage Establishment zoning controls to regulate Massage Establishments generally consistent with regulation of Health Services, with some exceptions, including to make Massage Establishments principally permitted if accessory to a Health Service; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1, and public necessity, convenience, and general welfare findings pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton ## Extracted text ### [Page 10](https://sfbos.info/documents/828/2022-03-01-minutes#page-10) Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes - Draft 3/1/2022 Recommendations of the Land Use and Transportation Committee 210116 [Planning Code, Zoning Map - Central Neighborhoods Large Residence Special Use District] Sponsor: Mandelman Ordinance amending the Planning Code and Zoning Map to create the Central Neighborhoods Large Residence Special Use District (the area within a perimeter established by Waller Street, Steiner Street, Duboce Avenue, Sanchez Street, 16th Street, Guerrero Street, 20th Street, Valencia Street, Tiffany Avenue, 29th Street, San Jose Avenue, Mission Street, Alemany Boulevard, Tingley Street, Monterey Boulevard, Joost Avenue, Congo Street, Bosworth Street, O’Shaughnessy Boulevard, Portola Drive, Twin Peaks Boulevard, Clayton Street, Ashbury Street, Frederick Street, Buena Vista Avenue West, Haight Street, and Buena Vista Avenue East), to preserve and enhance neighborhood context and affordability by, among other things, requiring Conditional Use authorization for large residential developments in the district and prohibiting new residential development or expansion of an existing Residential Building that would result in any Dwelling Unit exceeding 4,000 square feet of Gross Floor Area in most circumstances; making a determination of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1, and findings of public convenience, necessity, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Chan, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton 210898 [Planning Code - Landmark Designation - One Montgomery Street (aka 1-25 Montgomery Street) (Crocker National Bank Building)] Sponsor: Peskin Ordinance amending the Planning Code to designate One Montgomery Street (aka 1-25 Montgomery Street), Crocker National Bank Building, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0292, Lot Nos. 001A and 002, as a Landmark consistent with the standards set forth in Article 10 of the Planning Code; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Historic Preservation Commission) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Chan, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton City and County of San Francisco Page 9 Printed at 5:21 pm on 3/2/22 ### [Page 11](https://sfbos.info/documents/828/2022-03-01-minutes#page-11) Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes - Draft 3/1/2022 211263 [Planning Code - Massage Establishment Zoning Controls] Sponsors: Mandelman; Ronen and Preston Ordinance amending the Planning Code to revise Massage Establishment zoning controls, including, among other things, to 1) add Sole Practitioner Massage Establishments to the definition of Health Services in Articles 1 and 8 and remove it from the definition of Massage Establishments; 2) regulate Massage Establishments generally consistent with Health Services, with some exceptions; 3) eliminate the three-month period to establish abandonment of certain nonconforming Massage Establishment uses; 4) prohibit Personal Services uses for three years at any location where a Massage Establishment use was closed due to a violation of the Planning Code or Health Code; 5) eliminate the exception from the conditional use authorization requirement for massage uses accessory to a dwelling unit; 6) rename Medical Services to Health Services in Article 8 and make other conforming amendments; and 7) delete related provisions that have expired through the passage of time; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1, and public necessity, convenience, and general welfare findings pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Anne Pearson (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Mandelman, seconded by Supervisor Preston, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE, on Page 1, Lines 4-6, by changing ‘including, among other things, to 1) add Sole Practitioner Massage Establishments to the definition of Health Services in Articles 1 and 8 and remove it from the definition of Massage Establishments; 2)’, Line 7, by adding ‘regulation of’, and Lines 10-18, by changing ‘; 3) eliminate the three-month period to establish abandonment of certain nonconforming Massage Establishment uses; 4) prohibit Personal Services uses for three years at any location where a Massage Establishment use was closed due to a violation of the Planning Code or Health Code; 5) eliminate the exception from the conditional use authorization requirement for massage uses accessory to a dwelling unit; 6) rename Medical Services to Health Services in Article 8 and make other conforming amendments; and 7) delete related provisions that have expired through the passage of time’ to ‘including to make Massage Establishments principally permitted if accessory to a Health Service’; and on Page 65, by adding ‘However, this general statement in this subsection (a) is qualified by subsections (b) and (c) below. (b) This ordinance includes certain amendments that were previously approved in Ordinance No. 233-21, with an effective date of January 22, 2022. Except as stated in subsection (c), the Board intends for the amendments in Ordinance No. 233-21 to remain in effect. Except as stated in subsection (c), this Ordinance does not in any way alter Ordinance No. 233-21. (c) Notwithstanding subsection (b), this ordinance does amend Section 711 of the Planning Code as it was amended by Ordinance No. 233-21, to the following extent: in Table 711, in the “Controls by Story” column, 1st Story, the designation “C(13)” is replaced by the designation “P(9).”’. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Chan, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton Ordinance amending the Planning Code to revise Massage Establishment zoning controls to regulate Massage Establishments generally consistent with regulation of Health Services, with some exceptions, including to make Massage Establishments principally permitted if accessory to a Health Service; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1, and public necessity, convenience, and general welfare findings pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Chan, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Melgar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton City and County of San Francisco Page 10 Printed at 5:21 pm on 3/2/22