# Board of Supervisors Minutes: December 7, 2021 - Meeting date: 2021-12-07 - Document type: minutes - Source format: PDF - Extracted pages: 25 - [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/810/2021-12-07-minutes) - [Authoritative City source](https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=M&ID=910327&GUID=77D88CD9-19AE-4D32-B028-1B0F43A3E27F) > This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City source is the authoritative public record. ## Structured legislative records ### File 210381: Planning Code - Massage Establishment Zoning Controls - Pages: 16-17 - Sponsors: Ronen; Mandelman and Preston - Vote 1: first-reading - Action: ner Massage Establishments to the definition of Health Services in Articles 1 and 8 and remove it from the definition of Massage Establishments; 2) regulate Massage Establishments generally consistent with Health Services, with some exceptions; 3) eliminate the three-month period to establish abandonment of certain nonconforming Massage Establishment uses; 4) prohibit Personal Services uses for three years at any location where a Massage Establishment use was closed due to a violation of the Planning Code or Health Code; 5) eliminate the exception from the conditional use authorization requirement for massage uses accessory to a dwelling unit; 6) rename Medical Services to Health Services in Article 8 and make other conforming amendments; and 7) delete related provisions that have expired through the passage of time; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1, and public necessity, convenience, and general welfare findings pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton - Excused: Melgar ### File 201132: Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code - Behested Payments - Pages: 17 - Sponsors: Haney; Peskin, Chan, Walton, Preston and Mar - Vote 1: amendment - Action: influence City officers and employees, registered contact lobbyists, permit consultants, and to prohibit elected officials, department heads, commissioners, and designated employees from soliciting behested payments from interested parties. (Meet and confer obligations met.) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Anne Pearson (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisors Preston and Mar requested to be added as co-sponsors. Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Chan, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE, on Page 3, Lines 4-5, by adding ‘except for any person providing a grant to the City or City department’, Lines 11-13, by changing ‘or (2) if the person does not have a financial interest in the matter that is the subject of the person’s speech’ to ‘(2) speaking at a public forum or rally, or (3) communications made via email, petition or social media’; on Page 4, Lines 1-2, by striking ‘For the purpose of subsection (c) only, ‘interested party” shall not include a person providing a grant to the City or a City department.’ The motion carried by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton - Excused: Melgar - Vote 2: first-reading - Action: (Meet and confer obligations met.) PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton - Excused: Melgar ## Extracted text ### [Page 17](https://sfbos.info/documents/810/2021-12-07-minutes#page-17) Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 12/7/2021 Recommendation of the Rules Committee 201132 [Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code - Behested Payments] Sponsors: Haney; Peskin, Chan, Walton, Preston and Mar Ordinance amending the Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code to expand the definition of interested party to include City contractors, persons seeking to influence City officers and employees, registered contact lobbyists, permit consultants, and to prohibit elected officials, department heads, commissioners, and designated employees from soliciting behested payments from interested parties. (Meet and confer obligations met.) Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Anne Pearson (Office of the City Attorney) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisors Preston and Mar requested to be added as co-sponsors. Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Chan, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE, on Page 3, Lines 4-5, by adding ‘except for any person providing a grant to the City or City department’, Lines 11-13, by changing ‘or (2) if the person does not have a financial interest in the matter that is the subject of the person’s speech’ to ‘(2) speaking at a public forum or rally, or (3) communications made via email, petition or social media’; on Page 4, Lines 1-2, by striking ‘For the purpose of subsection (c) only, ‘interested party” shall not include a person providing a grant to the City or a City department.’ The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: 10 - Chan, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton Excused: 1 - Melgar (Meet and confer obligations met.) PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote: Ayes: 10 - Chan, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton Excused: 1 - Melgar ROLL CALL FOR INTRODUCTIONS See Legislation Introduced below. PUBLIC COMMENT Anonymous; shared a document and expressed concerns regarding text messages between Department staff and the subsequent Sunshine Ordinance Task Force determination regarding their disclosure. Chris Former; expressed support for safe injection sites and shared concerns regarding the furtherance of this program. Speaker; shared concerns regarding unhoused individuals and the funding that should be allocated to services and programs. Speaker; expressed concerns regarding the location of safe injections sites and where they are actually needed. City and County of San Francisco Page 974 Printed at 9:14 pm on 1/10/22