# Board of Supervisors Agenda: September 22, 2020 - Meeting date: 2020-09-22 - Document type: agenda - Pages in official PDF: 48 - [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda) - [Authoritative City PDF](https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=806055&GUID=F7DEBEF9-AF77-477B-9B94-6617E27AAC58) > This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City PDF is the authoritative public record. ## Extracted text ### [Page 1](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-1) * * 9/18/2020 Revised to add communication (on Page 45) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AGENDA Watch SF Cable Channel 26, 78, or 99 (depending on your provider) Watch www.sfgovtv.org PUBLIC COMMENT CALL-IN 1 (415) 655-0001/ Meeting ID: 146 750 0645 # # Tuesday, September 22, 2020 - 2:00 PM Regular Meeting NORMAN YEE, PRESIDENT SANDRA LEE FEWER, MATT HANEY, RAFAEL MANDELMAN, GORDON MAR, AARON PESKIN, DEAN PRESTON, HILLARY RONEN, AHSHA SAFAI, CATHERINE STEFANI, SHAMANN WALTON Angela Calvillo, Clerk of the Board Agendas of the Board of Supervisors are available on the internet at www.sfbos.org BOARD COMMITTEES Committee Membership Meeting Days Budget and Appropriations Committee Wednesday Supervisors Fewer, Walton, Mandelman, Yee, Ronen 1:00 PM Budget and Finance Committee Wednesday Supervisors Fewer, Walton, Mandelman 10:30 AM Government Audit and Oversight Committee 1st and 3rd Thursday Supervisors Mar, Peskin, Haney 10:00 AM Joint City, School District, and City College Select Committee 2nd Friday Supervisors Haney, Fewer, Mar (Alt), Commissioners Moliga, Collins, Cook (Alt), 10:00 AM Trustees Randolph, Williams, Selby (Alt) Land Use and Transportation Committee Monday Supervisors Peskin, Safai, Preston 1:30 PM Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee 2nd and 4th Thursday Supervisors Mandelman, Stefani, Walton 10:00 AM Rules Committee Monday Supervisors Ronen, Stefani, Mar 10:00 AM First-named Supervisor is Chair, Second-named Supervisor is Vice-Chair of the Committee. ### [Page 2](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-2) Agenda Item Information Each item on the Consent or Regular agenda may include the following documents: 1) Legislation 2) Budget and Legislative Analyst report 3) Department or Agency cover letter and/or report 4) Public correspondence These items will be available for review at City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, Reception Desk. Meeting Procedures The Board of Supervisors is the legislative body of the City and County of San Francisco. The Board has several standing committees where ordinances and resolutions are the subject of hearings at which members of the public are urged to testify. The full Board does not hold a second public hearing on measures which have been heard in committee. Board procedures do not permit: 1) persons in the audience to vocally express support or opposition to statements by Supervisors or by other persons testifying; 2) ringing and use of cell phones, pagers, and similar sound-producing electronic devices; 3) bringing in or displaying signs in the meeting room; and 4) standing in the meeting room. Each member of the public will be allotted the same maximum number of minutes to speak as set by the President or Chair at the beginning of each item or public comment, excluding City representatives, except that public speakers using interpretation assistance will be allowed to testify for twice the amount of the public testimony time limit. If simultaneous interpretation services are used, speakers will be governed by the public testimony time limit applied to speakers not requesting interpretation assistance. Members of the public who want a document displayed should provide in advance of the meeting to the Clerk of the Board (bos.legislation@sfgov.org), clearly state such during testimony, and subsequently request the document be removed when they want the screen to return to live coverage of the meeting. IMPORTANT INFORMATION: The public is encouraged to testify at Committee meetings. Persons unable to attend the meeting may submit to the City, by the time the proceedings begin, written comments regarding the agenda items. These comments will be made a part of the official public record and shall be brought to the attention of the Board of Supervisors. Written communications expected to be made a part of the official file should be submitted to the Clerk of the Board or Clerk of a Committee: 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco, CA 94102. Communications which are not received prior to the hearing may be delivered to the Clerk of the Board or Clerk of the Committee at the hearing and you are encouraged to bring enough copies for distribution to all of its members. COPYRIGHT: All system content that is broadcasted live during public proceedings is secured by High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP), which prevents copyrighted or encrypted content from being displayed or transmitted through unauthorized devices. Members of the public who wish to utilize chamber digital, audio and visual technology may not display copyrighted or encrypted content during public proceedings. AGENDA PACKET: Available on the internet at http://www.sfbos.org/meetings. Meetings are cablecast on SFGovTV, the Government Channel 26. For DVD copies and scheduling call (415) 554-4188. LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS: Language services are available in Spanish, Chinese and Filipino at all regular and special Board and Committee meetings if made at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to help ensure availability. For more information or to request services: Contact Wilson Ng or Arthur Khoo at (415) 554-5184. 所有常規及特別市參事委員會會議（Board meetings）除委員會會議（Committee meetings）將予以提供 西班牙文,菲律賓文,及中文的語言服務,但須在會議前最少48小時作出請求,旨在確保服務屆時可予以提 供。更多資訊或請求有關服務， 請致電 (415) 554-7719聯絡Linda Wong. AVISO EN ESPAÑOL: Los servicios de idiomas están disponibles en español, chino, y filipino en todas las reuniones regulares y reuniones especiales de la Junta, de los Comités, si se solicita por lo menos 48 horas antes de la reunión para ayudar a garantizar su disponibilidad. Para más información o solicitar servicios, por favor contactar a (415) 554-5184. ### [Page 3](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-3) PAUNAWA: Mayroong serbisyong pang-wika sa Espanyol, Tsino at Pilipino para sa lahat ng mga regular at espesyal na pagpupulong ng Board, at Komite ng Board. Sa kasalukuyan, mayroong serbisyo sa wikang Pilipino na maaaring hilingin, 48 oras (o mas maaga) bago ng pagpupulong upang matiyak na matutugunan ang inyong kahilingan. Para sa karagdagang impormasyon o para humiling ng serbisyo pang-wika, tawagan lamang ang (415) 554-5184. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) The ADA is a civil rights law that protects people with different types of disabilities from discrimination in all aspects of social life. More specifically, Title II of the ADA requires that all programs offered through the state and local government such as the City and County of San Francisco must be accessible and usable to people with disabilities. The ADA and City policy require that people with disabilities have equal access to all City services, activities, and benefits. People with disabilities must have an equal opportunity to participate in the programs and services offered through the City and County of San Francisco. If you believe your rights under the ADA are violated, contact the ADA Coordinator. Ordinance 90-10 added Section 2A.22.3 to the Administrative Code, which adopted a Citywide Americans with Disabilities Act Reasonable Modification Policy that requires City departments to: (1) provide notice to the public of the right to request reasonable modification; (2) respond promptly to such requests; (3) provide appropriate auxiliary aids and services to people with disabilities to ensure effective communication; and (4) train staff to respond to requests from the public for reasonable modification, and that requires the Mayor's Office on Disability to provide technical assistance to City departments responding to requests from the public for reasonable modifications. The Board of Supervisors and Office of the Clerk of the Board support the Mayor’s Office on Disability to help make San Francisco a city where all people enjoy equal rights, equal opportunity, and freedom from illegal discrimination under disability rights laws. Meetings are real-time captioned and are cablecast open-captioned on SFGovTV, the Government Channel 26. Board and Committee meeting agendas and minutes are available on the Board’s website (www.sfbos.org) and adhere to web development guidelines based upon the Federal Access Board’s Section 508 Guidelines. To request sign language interpreters, readers, large print agendas or other accommodations, please contact (415) 554-5184 or (415) 554-5227 (TTY). Requests made at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting will help to ensure availability. If further assistance is needed, please contact Wilson Ng at (415) 554-5184 (wilson.l.ng@sfgov.org). Know Your Rights Under The Sunshine Ordinance Government's duty is to serve the public, reaching its decision in full view of the public. Commissions, boards, councils, and other agencies of the City and County exist to conduct the people's business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and that City operations are open to the people's review. For information on your rights under the Sunshine Ordinance (San Francisco Administrative Code, Chapter 67) or to report a violation of the ordinance, contact by mail Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco CA 94102; phone at (415) 554-7724; fax at (415) 554-5163; or by email at sotf@sfgov.org. Citizens may obtain a free company of the Sunshine Ordinance by printing the San Francisco Administrative Code, Chapter 67, on the Internet at http://www.sfbos.org/sunshine. Ethics Requirements Individuals and entities that influence or attempt to influence local legislative or administrative action may be required by the San Francisco Lobbyist Ordinance [SF Campaign & Governmental Conduct Code, Section 2.100] to register and report lobbying activity. For more information about the Lobbyist Ordinance, please contact the San Francisco Ethics Commission at 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220, San Francisco, CA 94102; telephone (415) 252-3100; fax (415) 252-3112; web site http://www.sfgov.org/ethics. Under Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code, Section 1.127, no person or entity with a financial interest in a land use matter pending before the Board of Appeals, Board of Supervisors, Building Inspection Commission, Commission on Community Investment and Infrastructure, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning Commission, Port Commission, or the Treasure Island Development Authority Board of Directors, may make a campaign contribution to a member of the Board of Supervisors, the Mayor, the City Attorney, or a candidate for any of those offices, from the date the land use matter commenced until 12 months after the board or commission has made a final decision, or any appeal to another City agency from that decision has been resolved. For more information about this restriction, visit sfethics.org. ### [Page 4](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-4) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 Remote Access to Information and Participation In accordance with Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No. N-33-20 declaring a State of Emergency regarding the COVID-19 outbreak and Mayor London N. Breed’s Proclamation declaring a Local Emergency issued on February 25, 2020, including the guidance for gatherings issued by the San Francisco Department of Public Health Officer, aggressive directives were issued to reduce the spread of COVID-19. On March 17, 2020, the Board of Supervisors authorized their Board and Committee meetings to convene remotely (via Microsoft Teams) and will allow remote public comment via teleconference. Visit the SFGovTV website at (www.sfgovtv.org) to stream the live meetings, or to watch meetings on demand. Members of the public are encouraged to participate remotely via detailed instructions on participating via teleconference available at: https://sfbos.org/remote-meeting-call. Members of the public may participate by phone or may submit their comments by email to: bos@sfgov.org; all comments received will be made a part of the official record. Board of Supervisors Regular Meetings begin at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesdays. Board Agendas and their associated documents are available at https://sfbos.org/meetings/42. PUBLIC COMMENT CALL-IN 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 750 0645 # # As the COVID-19 disease progresses, please visit the Board’s website (www.sfbos.org) regularly to be updated on the current situation as it affects the legislative process. For more information contact the Office of the Clerk of the Board at (415) 554-5184. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE COMMUNICATIONS APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES Approval of the August 12, 2020, Special Meeting Minutes at the Rescheduled Budget and Appropriations Committee Meeting; and the August 13, 2020, and August 14, 2020, Special Meeting Minutes at Special Budget and Appropriations Committee Meetings, which constituted quorums of the Board of Supervisors. AGENDA CHANGES City and County of San Francisco Page 4 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 5](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-5) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed hereunder constitute a Consent Agenda, are considered to be routine by the Board of Supervisors and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Board. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the Board so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered as a separate item. Questions on the Consent Agenda are on final passage, first reading, adoption, or approved, as indicated. Items 1 through 25 Recommendations of the Government Audit and Oversight Committee Present: Supervisors Mar, Peskin, Haney 1. 200853 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Bradley Novak - $247,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Bradley Novak against the City and County of San Francisco for $247,000; the lawsuit was filed on February 8, 2019, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC 19-573659; entitled Bradley Novak v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.; the lawsuit involves an employment dispute. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 2. 200855 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Dennis Caruso - $70,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Dennis Caruso against the City and County of San Francisco for $70,000; the lawsuit was filed on November 8, 2019, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-19-580664; entitled Dennis Caruso v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves an alleged injury when Plaintiff hit a pothole on a City Street and was thrown from his scooter. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 3. 200856 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Thaïs Yafet - $110,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Thaïs Yafet against the City and County of San Francisco for $110,000; the lawsuit was filed on October 29, 2018, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-18-570939; entitled Thaïs Yafet v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves an alleged injury when Plaintiff tripped and fell on a City sidewalk. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 5 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 6](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-6) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 4. 200857 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Chris Tilton and Blane Bachelor - $210,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Chris Tilton and Blane Bachelor against the City and County of San Francisco for $210,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs Chris Tilton and Blane Bachelor, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 5. 200858 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Ho Tan - $295,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Ho Tan against the City and County of San Francisco for $295,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Ho Tan, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 6. 200859 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Peter So and Diane Chung - $235,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Peter So and Diane Chung against the City and County of San Francisco for $235,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs Peter So and Diane Chung, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 7. 200860 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Victoria Sanchez - $220,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Victoria Sanchez against the City and County of San Francisco for $220,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Victoria Sanchez, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 6 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 7](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-7) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 8. 200861 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Rick Popko and Nancy Huff - $150,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Rick Popko and Nancy Huff against the City and County of San Francisco for $150,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs Rick Popko and Nancy Huff, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 9. 200862 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Donato and Aurora Ponferrada - $257,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Donato and Aurora Ponferrada against the City and County of San Francisco for $257,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs Donato and Aurora Ponferrada, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 10. 200863 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - John and Maria Naniola - $290,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by John and Maria Naniola against the City and County of San Francisco for $290,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs John and Maria Naniola, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 11. 200864 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Suzanne Houlihan - $250,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Suzanne Houlihan against the City and County of San Francisco for $250,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Suzanne Houlihan, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 7 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 8](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-8) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 12. 200865 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Carlos Gross - $210,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Carlos Gross against the City and County of San Francisco for $210,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Carlos Gross, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 13. 200866 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Susan Garduno - $235,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Susan Garduno against the City and County of San Francisco for $235,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Susan Garduno, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 14. 200867 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Rizadly Gache - $235,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Rizadly Gache against the City and County of San Francisco for $235,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Rizadly Gache, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 15. 200868 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Ruth Patricia Del Castillo - $150,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Ruth Patricia Del Castillo against the City and County of San Francisco for $150,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Ruth Patricia Del Castillo, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 8 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 9](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-9) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 16. 200869 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - John Clay - $250,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by John Clay against the City and County of San Francisco for $250,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff John Clay, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 17. 200870 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Elaine Choy - $221,150] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Elaine Choy against the City and County of San Francisco for $221,150; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Elaine Choy, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 18. 200871 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Armando and Maria Castillo - $200,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Armando and Maria Castillo against the City and County of San Francisco for $200,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs Armando and Maria Castillo, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 19. 200872 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Joy Caguimbaga and Zenida C. Restauro - $240,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Joy Caguimbaga and Zenida C. Restauro against the City and County of San Francisco for $240,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs Joy Caguimbaga and Zenida C. Restauro, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 9 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 10](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-10) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 20. 200873 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Sally Seid - $207,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Sally Seid against the City and County of San Francisco for $207,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Sally Seid, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 21. 200874 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Cesar and Fe Ponferrada - $250,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Cesar and Fe Ponferrada against the City and County of San Francisco for $250,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs Cesar and Fe Ponferrada, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 22. 200875 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - David and Jessica Alfaro - $290,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by David and Jessica Alfaro against the City and County of San Francisco for $290,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs David and Jessica Alfaro, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 10 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 11](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-11) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 Recommendations of the Land Use and Transportation Committee Present: Supervisors Peskin, Safai, Preston 23. 200673 [Planning Code - Conversion of Certain Limited Restaurants to Restaurants - North Beach Neighborhood Special Use District] Sponsor: Peskin Ordinance amending the Planning Code to allow certain Limited Restaurants in the North Beach Special Use District to convert to Restaurants that may apply for liquor licenses; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan and the eight priority policies of Planning Code Section 101.1. 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 24. 200785 [Existing Building Code - Mandatory Earthquake Retrofit - Compliance Deadline] Sponsors: Mandelman; Peskin Ordinance amending the Existing Building Code to extend the date for completion of work for the seismic retrofitting of Tier IV wood-frame buildings to September 15, 2021. 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 25. 200852 [Planning Code, Zoning Map - Rezone Certain Industrial Parcels] Ordinance amending the Planning Code and Zoning Map to rezone certain parcels in Industrial Use Districts to Production, Distribution, and Repair and other Use Districts; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302. (Planning Department) 09/15/2020; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 11 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 12](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-12) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 REGULAR AGENDA UNFINISHED BUSINESS From the Board (The public comment requirement was satisfied for File Nos. 200888, 200889, and 200890 during the Board of Supervisors hearing on September 15, 2020 (File No. 200887), that was heard and filed.) (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 26. 200888 [Affirming the Categorical Exemption Determination - 178 Seacliff Avenue] Motion affirming the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 178 Seacliff Avenue is categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) 09/15/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 27. 200889 [Conditionally Reversing the Categorical Exemption Determination - 178 Seacliff Avenue] Motion conditionally reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 178 Seacliff Avenue is categorically exempt from further environmental review, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) 09/15/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 28. 200890 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Categorical Exemption Determination - 178 Seacliff Avenue] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 178 Seacliff Avenue is categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) 09/15/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 12 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 13](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-13) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 Recommendations of the Budget and Appropriations Committee (Pursuant to Mayor London N. Breed’s Seventh Supplement to the Mayoral Proclamation Declaring the Existence of a Local Emergency, dated February 25, 2020, and in accordance with Charter, Section 9.100(b), the Board of Supervisors shall adopt the Budget (Item Nos. 29 through 52) no later than October 1, 2020.) Present: Supervisors Fewer, Walton, Mandelman, Yee, Ronen 29. 200567 [Budget and Appropriation Ordinance for Departments - FYs 2020-2021 and 2021-2022] Sponsor: Mayor Budget and Appropriation Ordinance appropriating all estimated receipts and all estimated expenditures for Departments of the City and County of San Francisco as of July 31, 2020, for the Fiscal Years ending June 30, 2021, and June 30, 2022. (Fiscal Impact) 09/15/2020; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 30. 200568 [Annual Salary Ordinance - FYs 2020-2021 and 2021-2022] Sponsor: Mayor Annual Salary Ordinance enumerating positions in the Annual Budget and Appropriation Ordinance for the Fiscal Years ending June 30, 2021, and June 30, 2022, continuing, creating, or establishing these positions; enumerating and including therein all positions created by Charter or State law for which compensations are paid from City and County funds and appropriated in the Annual Appropriation Ordinance; authorizing appointments or continuation of appointments thereto; specifying and fixing the compensations and work schedules thereof; and authorizing appointments to temporary positions and fixing compensations therefore. (Fiscal Impact) 09/15/2020; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 31. 200570 [Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure, Operating as Successor Agency to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, FY2020-2021 Budget - Bond Issuance Not to Exceed $15,473,823] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Budget of the Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure (“OCII”), operating as the Successor Agency to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency; and approving the Issuance by OCII of Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $15,473,823 for the purpose of financing a portion of OCII’s enforceable obligations. 09/15/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 13 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 14](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-14) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 32. 200831 [Neighborhood Beautification and Graffiti Clean-up Fund Tax Designation Ceiling - 2020] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance adopting the Neighborhood Beautification and Graffiti Clean-up Fund Tax designation ceiling for tax year 2020. 09/15/2020; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 33. 200832 [Appropriation - Proceeds from Revenue Bonds, State Loans/Grants, Wastewater Revenues/Capacity Fees - $579,185,142; De-Appropriation and Re-Appropriation - Wastewater Capital Improvements - SFPUC - $391,415,748 - FY2020-2021 and FY2021-2022] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance appropriating a total of $579,185,142 of proceeds from revenue bonds, State of California Water Resources Control Board’s revolving loan funds (State Loan Funds) or grant funds (State Grant Funds), wastewater revenue and capacity fees for the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) Wastewater Enterprise’s Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-2021 at $170,869,066 and for FY2021-2022 at $408,316,076, de-appropriating and re-appropriating $391,415,748, and placing $349,919,252 in Revenue Bonds or State Loan or Grant Funds by project on Controller’s Reserve subject to the Controller's certification of funds availability, including proceeds of indebtedness, and for construction related expenditures (excluding program management, planning and design) for these projects, as applicable, is also subject to the prior occurrence of the SFPUC's and the Board of Supervisors' discretionary adoption of California Environmental Quality Act Findings for projects, following review and consideration of completed project related environmental analysis, where required. (Fiscal Impact) 09/15/2020; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 14 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 15](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-15) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 34. 200833 [Appropriation - Proceeds from Revenue Bonds, State Loan/Grant Funds, Water Revenues/Capacity Fees - $344,846,164; De- and Re-Appropriation - Capital Improvement Projects - $14,413,167; De-appropriation - Capital Projects - $3,528,113 - FYs 2020-2022] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance appropriating a total of $344,846,164 of proceeds from Revenue Bonds, State of California Water Resources Control Board’s revolving loan funds (State Loan Funds) or grant funds (State Grant Funds), water revenues, and water capacity fees for the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) Water Enterprise’s Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-2021 at $132,133,926 and for FY2021-2022 at $212,712,238; and de-appropriating $3,528,113 Water Capital Project funding to Water’s Fund balance in FY2020-2021; and de-appropriating and re-appropriating Water Capital Project appropriations of $14,413,167 in FY2020-2021 and placing $238,514,485 of Revenue Bond and State Loan Funds or State Grant Funds proceeds by project on Controller’s Reserve subject to the Controller's certification of funds availability, including proceeds of indebtedness, and for construction related expenditures (excluding program management, planning and design) for these projects, as applicable, is also subject to the prior occurrence of the SFPUC's and the Board of Supervisors' discretionary adoption of California Environmental Quality Act findings for projects, following review and consideration of completed project related environmental analysis, where required. (Fiscal Impact) 09/15/2020; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 35. 200834 [Appropriation - Proceeds from Revenue Bonds, Hetch Hetchy Revenue, Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Cap and Trade Allowance - $260,351,806; De- and Re-Appropriation - Capital Projects - Hetch Hetchy Water/Power Capital Improvements - $341,001 - FYs 2020-2022] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance appropriating a total of $260,351,806 of Hetch Hetchy revenue, Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Cap and Trade Revenue and Power and Water Revenue Bonds for the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) Hetch Hetchy Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-2021 at $94,380,451 and for FY2021-2022 at $165,971,355; and placing $142,970,073 of Power Bonds and $108,626,733 of Water Bonds by project on Controller’s Reserve subject to the Controller's certification of funds availability, including proceeds of indebtedness, and for construction related expenditures (excluding program management, planning and design) for these projects, as applicable, is also subject to the prior occurrence of the SFPUC's and the Board of Supervisors' discretionary adoption of California Environmental Quality Act findings for projects, following review and consideration of completed project related environmental analysis, where required. (Fiscal Impact) 09/15/2020; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 15 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 16](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-16) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 36. 200835 [Appropriation - Proceeds from CleanPowerSF Revenue - CleanPowerSF Capital Improvements - $4,331,326 - FY2020-2021 and FY2021-2022] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance appropriating $4,331,326 CleanPowerSF revenue for the CleanPowerSF Capital Improvement Program for FY2020-2021 at $1,898,497 and for FY2021-2022 at $2,432,829. (Fiscal Impact) 09/15/2020; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 37. 200836 [San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Power Revenue Bond Issuance - Various Capital Projects Benefitting the Power Enterprise - Not to Exceed $142,970,073] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance authorizing the issuance and sale of tax-exempt or taxable Power Revenue Bonds and other forms of indebtedness by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $142,970,073 to finance the costs of various capital projects benefitting the Power Enterprise pursuant to Charter, Sections 9.107(6) and 9.107(8); authorization to issue Refunding Power Revenue Bonds and the retirement of outstanding Power Enterprise Commercial Paper; declaring the Official Intent of the Commission to Reimburse Itself with one or more issues of tax-exempt bonds; and ratifying previous actions taken in connection therewith, as defined herein. (Fiscal Impact) 09/15/2020; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 38. 200837 [San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Wastewater Revenue Bond Issuance - Various Capital Wastewater Projects Benefitting the Wastewater Enterprise - Not to Exceed $349,919,252] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance authorizing the issuance and sale of tax-exempt or taxable Wastewater Revenue Bonds and other forms of indebtedness, as defined herein, by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (Commission) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $349,919,252 to finance the costs of various capital wastewater projects benefitting the Wastewater Enterprise pursuant to amendments to the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco enacted by the voters on November 5, 2002, as Proposition E; authorizing the issuance of Wastewater Revenue Refunding Bonds and the retirement of outstanding Wastewater Enterprise Commercial Paper; declaring the Official Intent of the Commission to reimburse Itself with one or more issues of tax-exempt bonds or other forms of indebtedness, as defined herein; and ratifying previous actions taken in connection therewith, as defined herein. (Fiscal Impact) 09/15/2020; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 16 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 17](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-17) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 39. 200838 [San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Water Revenue Bond and Other Forms of Indebtedness Issuance - Various Capital Water Projects Benefitting the Water Enterprise - Not to Exceed $347,141,218] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance authorizing the issuance and sale of tax-exempt or taxable Water Revenue Bonds and other forms of indebtedness, as defined herein, by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (Commission) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $347,141,218 to finance the costs of various capital water projects benefitting the Water Enterprise pursuant to amendments to the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco enacted by the voters on November 5, 2002, as Proposition E; authorizing the issuance of Water Revenue Refunding Bonds and the retirement of outstanding Water Enterprise Commercial Paper; declaring the Official Intent of the Commission to reimburse itself with one or more issues of tax-exempt bonds or other forms of indebtedness, as defined herein; and ratifying previous actions taken in connection therewith, as defined herein. (Fiscal Impact) 09/15/2020; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? Recommendation of the Budget and Finance Committee Present: Supervisors Fewer, Walton, Mandelman 40. 200839 [Administrative Code - Medical Examiner Fees] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to adjust fees of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner to include post-mortem investigation services, remove references to obsolete services, and update fee amounts; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. 09/15/2020; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? Recommendations of the Budget and Appropriations Committee Present: Supervisors Fewer, Walton, Mandelman, Yee, Ronen 41. 200840 [Administrative Code - Reproduction and Notary Fees - Department of Administrative Services] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to authorize the Department of Administrative Services to impose a fee for reproduction and notary services provided to the public. 09/15/2020; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 17 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 18](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-18) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 42. 200841 [Authorizing Refunding Certificates of Participation - Multiple Capital Improvement Projects - Not to Exceed $97,500,000] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance authorizing the execution and delivery of Certificates of Participation, in one or more series from time to time, evidencing and representing an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $97,500,000 (“Certificates”) to prepay certain certificates of participation that financed and refinanced various capital improvement projects; approving the form of a Fourth Supplement to Trust Agreement between the City and County of San Francisco (“City”) and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (“Trustee”) (including certain indemnities contained therein); approving respective forms of a Fourth Supplement to Property Lease and a Fourth Supplement to Project Lease, each between the City and the Trustee, for the lease and lease back of all or a portion of certain real property and improvements owned by the City and located at 375 Laguna Honda Boulevard within the City and at 1 Moreland Drive, San Bruno, California, or other property as determined by the Director of Public Finance; approving the form of Escrow Agreement (including certain indemnities contained therein), between the City and U.S. Bank National Association, as escrow agent (“Escrow Agent”); approving the form of an Official Notice of Sale and a Notice of Intention to Sell the Certificates; approving the form of an Official Statement in preliminary and final form; approving the form of a purchase contract between the City and one or more initial purchasers of the Certificates; approving the form of a Continuing Disclosure Certificate; granting general authority to City officials to take necessary actions in connection with the authorization, sale, execution and delivery of the Certificates; approving modifications to documents; and ratifying previous actions taken in connection therewith, as defined herein. (Fiscal Impact) 09/15/2020; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 43. 200842 [Deappropriation - Series 2010A Refunding Certificates of Participation - $4,636,200; Appropriation - Including Deappropriated Funds $102,136,200 and Certificates of Participation Refunding Proceeds $97,500,000 - FY2020-2021] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance deappropriating $4,636,200 of Series 2010A Refunding Certificates of Participation prior reserve funds and appropriating $102,136,200 of Refunding Certificates of Participation Series 2020-R1, including deappropriated funds and $97,500,000 of one or more series of Refunding Certificates of Participation proceeds for Fiscal Year 2020-2021. (Fiscal Impact) 09/15/2020; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 44. 200843 [Administrative Code - County Clerk Fee Amounts; Digital Signature Fee] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to update County Clerk fees to current amounts; and to authorize the County Clerk to impose a digital signature fee. 09/15/2020; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 18 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 19](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-19) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 45. 200844 [Health Code - Patient Rates for FYs 2020-2021 and 2021-2022] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Health Code to set patient rates and rates for other services provided by the Department of Public Health, for Fiscal Years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, starting July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2022. 09/15/2020; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 46. 200845 [Administrative Code - Budget Savings Incentive Fund Expenditures] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to suspend the restrictions on expenditure of monies in the Budget Savings Incentive Fund during Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-2021 and FY2021-2022, and to authorize the use of monies in that Fund during those fiscal years for any purpose related to the City’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic or the pandemic’s economic impacts. 09/15/2020; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 47. 200846 [Homelessness and Supportive Housing Fund - FYs 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 Expenditure Plan] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution approving the Fiscal Years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 Expenditure Plan for the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing Fund. 09/15/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 48. 200847 [Access Line Tax Adjustment - Consumer Price Index of 2020] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution concurring with the Controller’s establishment of the Consumer Price Index for 2020, and adjusting the Access Line Tax by the same rate. 09/15/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 19 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 20](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-20) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 Present: Supervisors Fewer, Mandelman, Yee, Ronen 49. 200848 [Proposition J Contract Certification - Contracted-Out Department Services Previously Approved] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution concurring with the Controller's certification that department services previously approved can be performed by a private contractor for a lower cost than similar work performed by City and County employees, for the following services: budget and legislative analyst (Board of Supervisors); citywide custodial services (excluding City Hall), citywide security services, fleet security, convention facilities management (General Services Agency-City Administrator); mainframe system support (General Services Agency-Technology); security services (Public Works); security services (Human Services Agency); security services (Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing); food services for jail inmates (Sheriff's Department); assembly of vote-by-mail envelopes (Department of Elections); security services (Public Utilities Commission); security, information and guest services, parking operations, shuttle bus services (Airport); citations, paratransit, parking meter collections, security, towing, transit shelter cleaning services (Municipal Transportation Agency); and custodial and security services (Port). 09/15/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 50. 200849 [Proposition J Contract Certification - Contracted-Out Department Services for the General Services Agency, Human Services Agency, and Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution concurring with the Controller's certification that department services can be performed by a private contractor for a lower cost than similar work performed by City and County employees, for the following services: security services (Human Services Agency), security services (General Services Agency-City Administrator); security services (Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development). 09/15/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? Present: Supervisors Fewer, Walton, Mandelman, Yee, Ronen 51. 200850 [Accept and Expend Grant - Friends of San Francisco Public Library - Annual Grant Award, FY2020-2021 - Up to $809,400 of In-Kind Gifts, Services, and Cash Monies] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution authorizing the San Francisco Public Library to accept and expend a grant in the amount of up to $809,400 of in-kind gifts, services, and cash monies from the Friends of the San Francisco Public Library for direct support for a variety of public programs and services in Fiscal Year 2020-2021. 09/15/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 20 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 21](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-21) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 52. 200917 [Suspension of Financial Policy - Authorizing Spending of Selected Nonrecurring Revenues on Recurring Expenditures - FY2021-2022] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution suspending the City’s financial policy in Administrative Code, Section 10.61, for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 to authorize the City to spend selected nonrecurring revenues described in that policy on recurring expenditures. (Fiscal Impact) 09/15/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? NEW BUSINESS Recommendations of the Budget and Finance Committee Present: Supervisors Fewer, Walton, Mandelman 53. 200759 [Business and Tax Regulations Code - Tax Penalties and Interest; Administration of Cannabis Business Tax] Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code to amend the penalties, and the provisions for waiver of penalties and interest, relating to taxes that are subject to the common administrative provisions of that Code, and to add provisions for administering the Cannabis Business Tax. (Treasurer-Tax Collector) (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 54. 200445 [Lease Agreement - MRG San Francisco Terminal 3, LLC - Terminal 3 Boarding Area F News and Multi-Concept Retail Store Lease - $750,000 Minimum Annual Guarantee] Resolution approving the Terminal 3 Boarding Area F News and Multi-Concept Retail Store Lease No. 19-0246, between MRG San Francisco Terminal 3, LLC, as tenant, and the City and County of San Francisco, acting by and through its Airport Commission, for a term of seven years with two one-year options to extend, and a minimum annual guarantee of $750,000 for the first year of the Lease, to commence following Board approval. (Airport Commission) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 55. 200669 [Mental Health Services Act - Three-Year Program and Expenditure Plan - FYs 2020-2023] Resolution authorizing adoption of the San Francisco Mental Health Services Act Three-Year Program and Expenditure (Integrated Plan) for Fiscal Years 2020-2023. (Public Health Department) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 21 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 22](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-22) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 56. 200975 [Multifamily Housing Revenue Note - 681 Florida Street - Not to Exceed $50,000,000] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution authorizing the execution and delivery of a multifamily housing revenue note in one or more series in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $50,000,000 for the purpose of providing financing for the construction of a 130-unit multifamily rental housing project known as “681 Florida Street;” approving the form of and authorizing the execution of a funding loan agreement; providing the terms and conditions of the loan from the funding lender to the City, and the execution and delivery of the note; approving the form of and authorizing the execution of a project loan agreement providing the terms and conditions of the loan from the City to the borrower; approving the form of and authorizing the execution of a regulatory agreement and declaration of restrictive covenants; authorizing the collection of certain fees; approving modifications, changes, and additions to the documents; ratifying and approving any action heretofore taken in connection with the back-to-back loans, the note and the project; granting general authority to City officials to take actions necessary to implement this Resolution, as defined herein; and related matters, as defined herein. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 57. 200976 [Loan Agreement and Ground Lease - 681 Florida Housing Associates, L.P. - 100% Affordable Housing - 681 Florida Street - Loan Not to Exceed $35,076,507 - Annual Ground Lease Base Rent of $15,000] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution approving and authorizing an Amended and Restated Loan Agreement in an amount not to exceed $35,076,507 for a minimum loan term of 57 years (“Loan Agreement”) to finance the construction of a 100% affordable, 130-unit multifamily rental housing development (plus one staff unit) at 681 Florida Street (the “Property”) for low income households with space for Production, Design and Repair uses (“Project”); approving and authorizing a Ground Lease to 681 Florida Housing Associates, L.P., a California limited partnership, for a lease term of 75 years and one 24-year option to extend, with an estimated commencement date in October 2020, and an annual base rent of $15,000 in order to construct and operate the Project; adopting findings that the Loan Agreement and Ground Lease are consistent with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and authorizing the Director of Property to execute the Ground Lease, and authorize the Director of Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development to execute the Loan Agreement, make certain modifications to such agreements, and take certain actions in furtherance of this Resolution, as defined herein. (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 58. 200977 [Annexation of Property - Community Facilities District No. 2016-1 (Treasure Island) as Improvement Area No. 2] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution confirming that property is annexed to the City and County of San Francisco Community Facilities District No. 2016-1 (Treasure Island) as Improvement Area No. 2 of the City and County of San Francisco Community Facilities District No. 2016-1 (Treasure Island); and determining other matters in connection therewith, as defined herein. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 22 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 23](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-23) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 59. 200978 [Authorizing the Issuance of Special Tax Bonds - Improvement Area No. 1 of the City and County of San Francisco Community Facilities District No. 2016-1 (Treasure Island) - Not to Exceed Aggregate Principal Amount of $17,990,000] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution supplementing Resolution No. 12-17 authorizing the issuance and sale of one or more series of Special Tax Bonds for City and County of San Francisco Community Facilities District No. 2016-1 (Treasure Island) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $17,990,000; approving related documents, including an Official Statement, Fiscal Agent Agreement, Bond Purchase Agreement and Continuing Disclosure Certificate; clarifying certain terms of the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax; and determining other matters in connection therewith, as defined herein. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 60. 201010 [Certificates of Participation - Animal Care & Control Project - Official Statement] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution approving the form of and authorizing the distribution of a preliminary Official Statement relating to the execution and delivery of City and County of San Francisco Certificates of Participation for the Animal Care & Control Project, and authorizing the preparation, execution and delivery of a final Official Statement; and modifying and ratifying the approvals and terms and conditions of a previous Resolution, and related matters, as defined herein. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 61. 201011 [Setting Property Tax Rate and Establishing Pass-Through Rate for Residential Tenants - FY2020-2021] Sponsor: Fewer Resolution levying property taxes at a combined rate of $1.19846368 on each $100 valuation of taxable property for the City and County of San Francisco, San Francisco Unified School District, San Francisco County Office of Education, San Francisco Community College District, Bay Area Rapid Transit District, and Bay Area Air Quality Management District; and establishing a pass-through rate of $0.0756 per $100 of assessed value for residential tenants pursuant to Administrative Code, Chapter 37, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2021. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 62. 201013 [Issuance and Sale of Revenue Obligations - California Enterprise Development Authority - San Francisco Day School - Not to Exceed $20,000,000] Sponsor: Preston Resolution approving for purposes of Internal Revenue Code, Section 147(f), the Issuance and Sale of Revenue Obligations by the California Enterprise Development Authority in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $20,000,000 to finance the acquisition, construction, renovation, rehabilitation, improvement and/or equipping of educational and related facilities to be owned and operated by San Francisco Day School, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 23 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 24](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-24) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 Recommendations of the Land Use and Transportation Committee Present: Supervisors Peskin, Safai, Preston (The noticed public hearing and public comment requirements were satisfied for File No. 190971 during the Committee of the Whole hearing (File No. 190970) at the Board of Supervisors meeting on December 10, 2019, that was heard and filed.) 63. 190971 [Street Vacation and Conveyance - India Basin Project] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance ordering the vacation of streets in the India Basin Project site, located generally at Innes Avenue between Griffith Street and Earl Street, along the India Basin shoreline; reserving temporary public utility and access rights in favor of the City and temporary easement rights for existing Pacific, Gas and Electric (PG&E) gas and overhead electrical facilities; authorizing the City to quitclaim its interest in approximately 3.8 acres within Earl Street, Hudson Avenue, and Arelious Walker Drive to India Basin Investment LLC; authorizing the City to transfer approximately 1.1 acres within Arelious Walker Drive, Hudson Avenue, Earl Street, and Galvez Avenue to the State for purposes of having such property reconveyed to the City to be held by the Port, in trust, through implementation of the India Basin Public Trust Exchange; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; adopting findings that the actions contemplated in this Ordinance are consistent with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and authorizing official acts in connection with this Ordinance, as defined herein, including transmittal of the Ordinance by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to the Assessor Recorder for recording. 12/10/2019; RE-REFERRED to the Land Use and Transportation Committee. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 64. 200764 [Health Code - Cleaning and Disease Prevention Standards in Tourist Hotels and Large Commercial Office Buildings] Sponsors: Peskin; Safai and Preston Ordinance amending the Health Code to establish cleaning and disease prevention standards and practices in tourist hotels and large commercial office buildings to help contain COVID-19, or other contagious public health threats; to require training related to these standards for employees, provide certain protections to employees as they perform cleaning duties, and prohibit retaliation against employees for refusing to perform work under conditions they believe may be unsafe or for reporting such conditions or exercising rights protected by the Ordinance; authorizing the Office of Labor Standards Enforcement to enforce the employee rights and protections under the Ordinance; and to provide for administrative enforcement by the Department of Public Health, and for financial penalties and civil actions as authorized by City and state law. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 24 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 25](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-25) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 Recommendations of the Rules Committee Present: Supervisors Ronen, Stefani, Mar 65. 200913 [Administrative Code - Street-Level Drug Distribution Task Force] Sponsor: Haney Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to extend by five months, to August 31, 2020, the deadline for the Street-Level Drug Distribution Task Force to submit its initial report to the Board of Supervisors and Mayor, and to revise the contents of that report, and subsequent reports issued every three months, to require a summary of the progress of the Task Force and its plans for the next three-month period. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 66. 200706 [Nomination of County Veterans Service Officer - Alfred Sims] Sponsors: Mayor; Stefani Resolution confirming the nomination of Alfred Sims as the County Veterans Service Officer for the City and County of San Francisco. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 67. 200972 [Appointments, Sunshine Ordinance Task Force - Dean Schmidt, Lila LaHood, and Jennifer Wong] Motion appointing Dean Schmidt, Lila LaHood, and Jennifer Wong, terms ending April 27, 2022, to the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. (Rules Committee) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 68. 201029 [Appointments, Food Security Task Force - Cissie Bonini and Emma Steinberg] Motion appointing Cissie Bonini and Emma Steinberg, for an indefinite term, to the Food Security Task Force. (Rules Committee) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? SPECIAL ORDER 2:30 P.M. - Recognition of Commendations In accordance with the "Declaration of Local Health Emergency Regarding Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)," special commendations have been suspended. City and County of San Francisco Page 25 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 26](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-26) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. Board of Supervisors Sitting as a Committee of the Whole (Hearing scheduled pursuant to Motion No. M20-102 (File No. 200813), approved on August 11, 2020.) PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 750 0645 # # 69. 200814 [Hearing - Committee of the Whole - Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project, Block 1 - September 22, 2020, at 3:00 p.m.] Hearing of the Board of Supervisors sitting as a Committee of the Whole on September 22, 2020, at 3:00 p.m., to hold a public hearing to consider the Ordinance approving an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project, which modifies the maximum number of hotel rooms permitted on Block 1 (also known as the site of the SOMA Hotel) at the intersection of Third Street and Channel Street; directing the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to transmit a copy of this Ordinance upon its enactment to the Successor Agency; making findings under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1(b).; scheduled pursuant to Motion No. M20-102 (File No. 200813) approved on August 11, 2020. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Committee of the Whole Adjourn and Report 70. 200815 [Redevelopment Plan Amendment - Mission Bay South Block 1 Hotel] Sponsor: Haney Ordinance approving an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project, which modifies the maximum number of hotel rooms permitted on Block 1 (also known as the site of the SOMA Hotel) at the intersection of Third Street and Channel Street; directing the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to transmit a copy of this Ordinance upon its enactment to the Successor Agency; making findings under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1(b). Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 26 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 27](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-27) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. The President is anticipated to request all appeal hearings and associated Motions (File Nos. 200942-200945 (552-554 Hill Street CU Appeal); 200992-200995 (2001-37th Avenue CEQA Appeal); 200996-200999 (2001-37th Avenue CU Appeal); 200908-200911 (1776 Green CEQA Appeal); 200137-200140 (2417 Green CEQA Appeal); 200903-200906 (MTA Emergency Transit Lanes CEQA Appeal); 200987-200990 (MTA Panhandle Project CEQA Appeal); 201000-201003 (MTA DOC Program CEQA Appeal); and 201024-201027 (MTA Slow Streets CEQA Appeal)) be called together and will entertain a motion to continue these matters to specified future Board of Supervisors meetings.) APPEAL PROCEDURES Board Rule 4.18 provides that public hearings on appeals shall be scheduled for 3:00 p.m. If more than one public hearing is scheduled, then the Clerk, in consultation with the President, may determine the order in which the appeals will be scheduled. Second and later appeals may be scheduled at specified times later than 3:00 p.m. An appeal shall not be heard prior to its scheduled time on the calendar, and it may not be called until the Board's consideration of appeals scheduled earlier on the calendar is completed. It is the policy of the Clerk of the Board to schedule multiple appeals in the following order at 3:00 p.m: 1. Appeals where all parties have agreed to request a continuance or a tabling of the appeal. 2. Continued appeals from previous Board meetings (continued appeals will be listed in order of those closest to deadlines for Board decision). 3. Appeals appearing on the calendar for the first time, in chronological order of receipt by the Clerk. 4. Multiple appeals appearing on the calendar may be staggered at times specific, beginning at 3:00 p.m. 5. Appeals involving participants who have ADA considerations may be set for specific times beginning at 3:00 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN ON THE CONTINUANCE 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 750 0645 # # (The President may entertain a motion to continue this Hearing and associated Motions to the Board of Supervisors meeting on October 6, 2020.) 71. 200942 [Hearing - Appeal of Conditional Use Authorization - 552-554 Hill Street] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the disapproval of a Conditional Use Authorization pursuant to Sections 209.1, 303, and 317 of the Planning Code, for a proposed project at 552-554 Hill Street, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 3622, Lot No. 065, identified in Planning Case No. 2019-000013CUA, issued by the Planning Commission by Motion No. 20756, dated July 9, 2020, to allow the legalization of a dwelling unit merger of two residential flats and unauthorized removal and relocation of one dwelling unit to basement level within the RH-2 (Residential, House, Two-Family) Zoning District and the 40-X Height and Bulk District. (District 8) (Appellant: Sarah Hoffman of Zacks, Freedman & Patterson, PC, on behalf of Robert Roddick) (Filed August 10, 2020) (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. City and County of San Francisco Page 27 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 28](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-28) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 72. 200943 [Approving the Decision of the Planning Commission and Disapproving Conditional Use Authorization - 552-554 Hill Street] Motion approving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 20756, disapproving a Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2019-000013CUA, for a proposed project located at 552-554 Hill Street; and making environmental findings, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 73. 200944 [Conditionally Disapproving Decision of the Planning Commission and Approving the Conditional Use Authorization - 552-554 Hill Street] Motion conditionally disapproving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 20756, and approving a Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2019-000013CUA, for a proposed project at 552-554 Hill Street, subject to the adoption of written findings by the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) (Charter, Section 4.105, and Planning Code, Section 308.1(d), provides that the Board of Supervisors may disapprove the decision of the Planning Commission by a vote of not less than two-thirds (8 votes) of the members of the Board.) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 74. 200945 [Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization - 552-554 Hill Street] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings in support of the Board of Supervisors' decision to approve the proposed Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2019-000013CUA, for a proposed project at 552-554 Hill Street. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 28 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 29](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-29) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN ON THE CONTINUANCE 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 750 0645 # # (The President may entertain a motion to continue this Hearing and associated Motions to the Board of Supervisors meeting on October 6, 2020.) 75. 200992 [Hearing - Appeal of Determination of Exemption From Environmental Review - Proposed 2001-37th Avenue Project] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the determination of exemption from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act issued as a Categorical Exemption by the Planning Department, for the proposed project at 2001-37th Avenue, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 2094, Lot No. 006; to permit the addition of new stadium lights on an existing football field at St. Ignatius College Preparatory, to propose a lighting system at the J.B. Murphy Field Athletic Stadium to allow for evening use and a Verizon macro wireless telecommunications services (WTS) facility consisting of nine panel antennas that will be screened; to construct four 90 foot tall poles with LED light fixtures and the north-west pole would include the WTS facility and ancillary equipment with installation of each pole requiring up to approximately 30 feet of excavation below ground surface, resulting in a total of approximately 60 cubic yards of soil disturbance. (District 4) (Appellants: Michael Graf of Michael W. Graf Law Offices, on behalf of Saint Ignatius Neighborhood Association (SINA)) (Filed August 24, 2020) (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 76. 200993 [Affirming the Categorical Exemption Determination - 2001-37th Avenue] Motion affirming the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 2001-37th Avenue is categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 77. 200994 [Conditionally Reversing the Exemption Determination - 2001-37th Avenue] Motion conditionally reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 2001-37th Avenue is exempt from further environmental review, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 29 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 30](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-30) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 78. 200995 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Exemption Determination - 2001-37th Avenue] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 2001-37th Avenue is exempt from further environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN ON THE CONTINUANCE 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 750 0645 # # (The President may entertain a motion to continue this Hearing and associated Motions to the Board of Supervisors meeting on October 6, 2020.) 79. 200996 [Hearing - Appeal of Conditional Use Authorization - 2001-37th Avenue] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the approval of a Conditional Use Authorization pursuant to Sections 209.1, 303, and 304 of the Planning Code, for the proposed project at 2001-37th Avenue, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 2094, Lot No. 006, to amend an existing planned unit development and allow a modification to the requirements for rear yard for the expansion of a private secondary school through the addition of four 90-foot tall light standards to the J.B. Murphy Field Athletic Stadium and to install a new Verizon macro wireless telecommunications service facility attached to the northwest light standard within the RH-1 (Residential-House, One Family) Zoning District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District. (District 4) (Appellant: Deborah Brown, on behalf of Saint Ignatius Neighborhood Association (SINA)) (Filed August 21, 2020) (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 80. 200997 [Approving Conditional Use Authorization - 2001-37th Avenue] Motion approving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 20769, approving a Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2018-012648CUA, for a proposed project located at 2001-37th Avenue; and making environmental findings, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 30 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 31](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-31) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 81. 200998 [Conditionally Disapproving Conditional Use Authorization - 2001-37th Avenue] Motion conditionally disapproving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 20769, approving a Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2018-012648CUA, for a proposed project located at 2001-37th Avenue, subject to the adoption of written findings by the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) (Charter, Section 4.105, and Planning Code, Section 308.1(d), provides that the Board of Supervisors may disapprove the decision of the Planning Commission by a vote of not less than two-thirds (8 votes) of the members of the Board.) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 82. 200999 [Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization Appeal - 2001-37th Avenue] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings in support of the Board of Supervisors' disapproval of the proposed Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2018-012648CUA, for a proposed project at 2001-37th Avenue. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN ON THE CONTINUANCE 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 750 0645 # # (The President may entertain a motion to continue this Hearing and associated Motions to the Board of Supervisors meeting on October 20, 2020.) 83. 200908 [Hearing - Appeal of Determination of Exemption From Environmental Review - Proposed Department of Public Health - Local Oversight Program Site No. 12076 Investigation/Remediation Project (1776 Green Street)] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the determination of exemption from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act issued as a Common Sense Exemption by the Planning Department on June 16, 2019, for the proposed Department of Public Health - Local Oversight Program Site No. 12076 Investigation/Remediation project located beneath the sidewalk in front of 1776 Green Street. (District 2) (Appellant: Richard Drury of Lozeau Drury LLP, on behalf of The Hollow Revolution) (Filed July 17, 2020) (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. City and County of San Francisco Page 31 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 32](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-32) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 84. 200909 [Affirming the Exemption Determination - Department of Public Health - Local Oversight Program Site No. 12076 Investigation/Remediation Project - 1776 Green Street] Motion affirming the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed Department of Public Health - Local Oversight Program Site No. 12076 Investigation/Remediation project located beneath the sidewalk in front of 1776 Green Street is exempt from further environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 85. 200910 [Conditionally Reversing the Exemption Determination - Department of Public Health - Local Oversight Program Site No. 12076 Investigation/Remediation Project - 1776 Green Street] Motion conditionally reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed Department of Public Health - Local Oversight Program Site No. 12076 Investigation/Remediation project located beneath the sidewalk in front of 1776 Green Street is exempt from further environmental review, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 86. 200911 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Exemption Determination - Department of Public Health - Local Oversight Program Site No. 12076 Investigation/Remediation Project - 1776 Green Street] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed Department of Public Health - Local Oversight Program Site No. 12076 Investigation/Remediation project located beneath the sidewalk in front of 1776 Green Street, is exempt from further environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 32 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 33](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-33) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN ON THE CONTINUANCE 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 750 0645 # # (The President may entertain a motion to continue this Hearing and associated Motions to the Board of Supervisors meeting on October 20, 2020.) 87. 200137 [Hearing - Appeal of Final Mitigated Negative Declaration - Proposed Project at 2417 Green Street] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the approval of a Final Mitigated Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act for the proposed project at 2417 Green Street, identified in Planning Case No. 2017-002545ENV, affirmed on appeal by the Planning Commission and issued on July 16, 2020. (District 2) (Appellant: Richard Drury of Lozeau Drury LLP, on behalf of Philip Kaufman) (Filed August 7, 2020) (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 88. 200138 [Affirming the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration - Proposed Project at 2417 Green Street] Motion affirming the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared by the Planning Department under the California Environmental Quality Act for the proposed project located at 2417 Green Street. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 89. 200139 [Conditionally Reversing the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration - Proposed Project at 2417 Green Street] Motion conditionally reversing the Final Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared by the Planning Department under the California Environmental Quality Act for the proposed project located at 2417 Green Street, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 90. 200140 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Revised Mitigated Negative Declaration - Proposed Project at 2417 Street] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the Planning Department’s preparation of a Final Mitigated Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act for the proposed project located at 2417 Green Street. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 33 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 34](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-34) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN ON THE CONTINUANCE 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 750 0645 # # (The President may entertain a motion to continue this Hearing and associated Motions to the Board of Supervisors meeting on September 29, 2020.) 91. 200903 [Hearing - Appeal of Determination of Exemption From Environmental Review - Proposed MTA’s Transportation Recovery Plan: COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Transit Lanes and Bikeways Project] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the determination of exemption from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act issued as a Statutory and Categorical Exemption by the Planning Department on June 10, 2020, for the proposed Municipal Transportation Agency’s Transportation Recovery Plan: COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Transit Lanes and Bikeways project. (Appellants: David Pilpel; Mary Miles, on behalf of the Coalition for Adequate Review) (Filed July 30, 2020) (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 92. 200904 [Affirming the Statutory and Categorical Exemption Determination - MTA’s Transportation Recovery Plan: COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Transit Lanes and Bikeways Project] Motion affirming the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed Municipal Transportation Agency's Transportation Recovery Plan: COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Transit Lanes and Bikeways Project is statutorily and categorically exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 93. 200905 [Conditionally Reversing the Statutory and Categorical Exemption Determination - MTA’s Transportation Recovery Plan: COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Transit Lanes and Bikeways Project] Motion conditionally reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed Municipal Transportation Agency's Transportation Recovery Plan: COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Transit Lanes and Bikeways Project is statutorily and categorically exempt from environmental review, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 34 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 35](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-35) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 94. 200906 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Statutory and Categorical Exemption Determination - MTA’s Transportation Recovery Plan: COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Transit Lanes and Bikeways Project] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed Municipal Transportation Agency's Transportation Recovery Plan: COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Transit Lanes and Bikeways Project is statutorily and categorically exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN ON THE CONTINUANCE 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 750 0645 # # (The President may entertain a motion to continue this Hearing and associated Motions to the Board of Supervisors meeting on September 29, 2020.) 95. 200987 [Hearing - Appeal of Determination of Statutory Exemption From Environmental Review - Proposed MTA’s Panhandle Social Distancing and Safety Project] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the determination by the Planning Department on July 16, 2020, that the proposed Municipal Transportation Agency’s Panhandle Social Distancing and Safety project is statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. (District 5) (Appellant: Mary Miles, on behalf of Coalition for Adequate Review) (Filed August 14, 2020) (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 96. 200988 [Affirming the Statutory Exemption Determination - MTA’s Panhandle Social Distancing and Safety Project] Motion affirming the determination by the Planning Department that the Municipal Transportation Agency's Panhandle Social Distancing and Safety Project is statutorily exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 35 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 36](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-36) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 97. 200989 [Conditionally Reversing the Statutory Exemption Determination - MTA’s Panhandle Social Distancing and Safety Project] Motion conditionally reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed Municipal Transportation Agency's Panhandle Social Distancing and Safety Project is statutorily exempt from environmental review, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 98. 200990 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Statutory Exemption Determination - MTA’s Panhandle Social Distancing and Safety Project] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed Municipal Transportation Agency's Panhandle Social Distancing and Safety Project is statutorily exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN ON THE CONTINUANCE 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 750 0645 # # (The President may entertain a motion to continue this Hearing and associated Motions to the Board of Supervisors meeting on September 29, 2020.) 99. 201000 [Hearing - Appeal of Statutory Exemption From Environmental Review - MTA Department Operations Center (DOC) COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Street Changes Program] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the determination of statutory exemption from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act, by the Planning Department on July 15, 2020, for the proposed Municipal Transportation Agency’s Department Operations Center (DOC) COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Street Changes Program. (Appellant: David Pilpel) (Filed: August 20, 2020) (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. City and County of San Francisco Page 36 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 37](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-37) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 100. 201001 [Affirming the Statutory Exemption Determination - MTA’s Department Operations Center (DOC) COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Street Changes Program] Motion affirming the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed Municipal Transportation Agency's Department Operations Center (DOC) COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Street Changes Program is statutorily exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 101. 201002 [Conditionally Reversing the Statutory Exemption Determination - MTA’s Department Operations Center (DOC) COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Street Changes Program] Motion conditionally reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed Municipal Transportation Agency's Department Operations Center (DOC) COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Street Changes Program is statutorily exempt from environmental review, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 102. 201003 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Statutory Exemption Determination - MTA’s Department Operations Center (DOC) COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Street Changes Program] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed Municipal Transportation Agency's Department Operations Center (DOC) COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Street Changes Program is statutorily exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN ON THE CONTINUANCE 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 750 0645 # # (The President may entertain a motion to continue this Hearing and associated Motions to the Board of Supervisors meeting on September 29, 2020.) 103. 201024 [Hearing - Appeal of Statutory and Categorical Exemption From Environmental Review - MTA Slow Streets, Phase 3] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the determination of exemption from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act issued a Statutory and Categorical Exemption by the Planning Department on July 1, 2020, for the proposed Municipal Transportation Agency’s Slow Streets, Phase 3 project. (Appellant: Mary Miles, on behalf of the Coalition for Adequate Review) (Filed: August 20, 2020) (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? City and County of San Francisco Page 37 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 38](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-38) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 104. 201025 [Affirming the Statutory and Categorical Exemption Determination - MTA’s Slow Streets Phase 3] Motion affirming the determination by the Planning Department that the Municipal Transportation Agency's Slow Streets Phase 3 Project is statutorily and categorically exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 105. 201026 [Conditionally Reversing the Statutory and Categorical Exemption Determination - MTA’s Slow Streets Phase 3] Motion conditionally reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed Municipal Transportation Agency's Slow Streets Phase 3 Project is statutorily and categorically exempt from environmental review, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 106. 201027 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Statutory and Categorical Exemption Determination - MTA’s Slow Streets Phase 3] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed Municipal Transportation Agency's Slow Streets Phase 3 Project is statutorily and categorically exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? COMMITTEE REPORTS Reports from committees, if any, recommending emergency or urgent measures. The following items will be considered by the Government Audit and Oversight Committee at a Regular Meeting on Thursday, September 17, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. The Chair intends to request the Committee to send the following items as Committee Reports on Tuesday, September 22, 2020. 107. 200919 [Supporting University of San Francisco Workers United During COVID-19] Sponsors: Haney; Walton Resolution supporting USF Workers United, a broad coalition of workers and faculty members at the University of San Francisco, drastically affected by furloughs, cuts in healthcare and employment benefits, and lack of safety protocols during COVID-19. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 38 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 39](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-39) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 108. 200955 [Urging the Association of Bay Area Governments in the Regional Housing Needs Allocation Process to Focus on Unmet Needs for Affordable Housing] Sponsors: Mar; Ronen, Walton, Preston, Fewer, Mandelman and Peskin Resolution urging the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) in its upcoming Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) Process to focus on San Francisco’s unmet needs for housing affordable to low- and moderate-income residents, counteract the displacement of low- and moderate-income communities of color in core urban cities like San Francisco and Oakland, prioritize increases to the region’s above-moderate RHNA allocation in high resource and high opportunity jurisdictions, and limit increases in above-moderate RHNA allocations to Bay Area cities with concentrations of Sensitive Communities. 08/25/2020; CONTINUED. 09/01/2020; AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE. 09/01/2020; RE-REFERRED AS AMENDED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 109. ROLL CALL FOR INTRODUCTIONS Roll call for introduction of ordinances, resolutions, charter amendments, requests for hearings, letters of inquiry, letters of request to the City Attorney and Board Members' reports on their regional body activities. 110. PUBLIC COMMENT An opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board, including items being considered today which have not been considered by a Board committee and excluding items which have been considered by a Board committee. Members of the public may address the Board for up to three minutes. Each member of the public will be allotted the same number of minutes to speak, except that public speakers using translation assistance will be allowed to testify for twice the amount of the public testimony time limit. If simultaneous translation services are used, speakers will be governed by the public testimony time limit applied to speakers not requesting translation assistance. The President or the Board may limit the total testimony to 30 minutes. Members of the public who want a visual displayed should provide in advance of the meeting to the Clerk of the Board (bos.legislation@sfgov.org), clearly state such during testimony, and subsequently request the document be removed when they want the screen to return to live coverage of the meeting. PUBLIC COMMENT CALL-IN 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 750 0645 # # City and County of San Francisco Page 39 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 40](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-40) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE These measures were introduced for adoption without committee reference. A unanimous vote is required for adoption of these resolutions today. Any Supervisor may require any resolution to go to committee. Questions on the For Adoption Without Committee Reference Agenda are on for adoption, or approved, as indicated. (PUBLIC COMMENT for Items 111 through 119 will be taken during Item 110 - General Public Comment.) Items 111 through 119 111. 201067 [Urging Governor’s Office to Extend Eviction Protections and Financial Support for Small Businesses and Their Employees] Sponsors: Peskin; Preston and Yee Resolution urging the Office of the Governor of the State of California to extend eviction protections and financial support for small businesses and their employees beyond September 30, 2020, to facilitate a healthier economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. 09/15/2020; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 112. 201068 [Urging the Full Pardon of Charles Joseph] Sponsors: Preston; Haney, Ronen, Fewer, Walton, Mandelman, Stefani, Mar, Peskin and Yee Resolution urging the Honorable Gavin Newsom, Governor of California, to grant Charles Joseph a full pardon to allow him to remain in the United States with his family and to continue contributing to his community. 09/15/2020; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 113. 201070 [National Week of Remembrance for Those We’ve Lost to COVID-19 - October 4 through October 11, 2020] Sponsors: Ronen; Mandelman and Yee Resolution recognizing October 4, 2020, through October 11, 2020, in the City and County of San Francisco, as a week dedicated to remembering and honoring the lives of the thousands of Americans lost to COVID-19; and committing to take action to combat this ongoing health crisis. 09/15/2020; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 40 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 41](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-41) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 114. 201071 [Urging City Attorney and District Attorney to Investigate the Burning Man Party at Ocean Beach] Sponsors: Stefani; Fewer Resolution urging the City Attorney and the District Attorney to investigate the Burning Man Party at Ocean Beach; and to file charges against organizers for violating applicable health orders. 09/15/2020; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 115. 201072 [Condemning Antisemitic and Homophobic Attacks on Senator Scott Wiener] Sponsors: Stefani; Fewer, Mar and Yee Resolution condemning the antisemitic and homophobic attacks on Senator Scott Wiener; and urging social media platforms to protect their users from hate speech. 09/15/2020; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 116. 201073 [Recognition of Alma Robinson] Sponsors: Walton; Haney Resolution recognizing and congratulating Alma Robinson on her career and leadership. 09/15/2020; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 117. 201074 [Hunger Action Month - September 2020] Sponsors: Walton; Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Yee and Stefani Resolution declaring September 2020 as Hunger Action Month in the City and County of San Francisco. 09/15/2020; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 118. 201075 [Consolidation of Elections Scheduled for November 3, 2020] Sponsor: Yee Resolution consolidating the following elections, all of which will be held on November 3, 2020: the State of California General Election; the City and County of San Francisco Municipal Election; the City and County of San Francisco Special Bond Election; the Bay Area Rapid Transit District Election; the San Francisco Unified School District Board of Education Election; the San Francisco Community College Board of Trustees Election; and Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board District Special Tax Election; and providing that the election precincts, voting places, and officers for these elections shall be the same as for the State General Election. 09/15/2020; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 41 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 42](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-42) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 119. 201076 [Findings Reversing the Categorical Exemption Determination - 2651-2653 Octavia Street] Motion adopting findings to reverse the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 2651-2653 Octavia Street is categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) 09/15/2020; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 120. IMPERATIVE AGENDA Resolution(s), if any, to be adopted within limits imposed by the Sunshine Ordinance and the Ralph M. Brown Act, introduced today, not on the printed agenda. For such resolutions to be considered, the Board must first adopt the Serious Injury Finding or the Purely Commendatory Finding and the Brown Act Finding. Each motion requires eight (8) votes or a unanimous six (6) or seven (7). A unanimous vote is required for the resolution(s). [Serious Injury Finding] Motion that the Board find that for the resolution(s) being considered at this time "the need to take action is so imperative as to threaten serious injury to the public interest if action is deferred to a later meeting." [Purely Commendatory Finding] Motion that the Board find that the resolution(s) being considered at this time are purely commendatory. [Brown Act Finding] Motion that the Board find by roll call vote that, for the resolution(s) being considered at this time, there is a need to take immediate action. The need to take action came to the attention of the City and County of San Francisco after the agenda was posted. (PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN on any Imperative Agenda item introduced.) 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 750 0645 # # LEGISLATION INTRODUCED AT ROLL CALL Introduced by a Supervisor or the Mayor Pursuant to Charter, Section 2.105, an Ordinance or Resolution may be introduced before the Board of Supervisors by a Member of the Board, a Committee of the Board, or the Mayor and shall be referred to and reported upon by an appropriate Committee of the Board. Legislation Introduced will appear on the Final Minutes for this meeting. Once the Legislation Introduced is approved, it will be available on http://www.sfbos.org/legislation_introduced. City and County of San Francisco Page 42 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 43](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-43) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 Introduced at the Request of a Department Pursuant to Rules of Order of the Board of Supervisors, Section 2.7.1, Department Heads may submit proposed legislation to the Clerk of the Board, in which case titles of the legislation will be printed at the rear of the next available agenda of the Board. PROPOSED ORDINANCES 201023 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Federal Insurance Company, as Subrogee of CCT Enterprises LLC - $90,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Federal Insurance Company, as subrogee of CCT Enterprises LLC against the City and County of San Francisco for $90,000; the lawsuit was filed on September 12, 2019, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-19-579231; entitled Federal Insurance Company, as subrogee of CCT Enterprises LLC v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.; the lawsuit involves alleged property damage due to a ruptured water service lateral. (City Attorney) 09/10/2020; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 09/22/2020; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee. 201028 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Federal Insurance Company, as Subrogee of GSFC LLC, GSMT LLC, SKS Survivor LLC - $375,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Federal Insurance Company, as subrogee of GSFC LLC, GSMT LLC, SKS Survivor LLC against the City and County of San Francisco for $375,000; the lawsuit was filed on September 12, 2019, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-19-579235; entitled Federal Insurance Company, as subrogee of GSFC LLC, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.; the lawsuit involves alleged property damage due to a ruptured water service lateral. (City Attorney) 09/10/2020; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 09/22/2020; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee. 201033 [Planning Code - Landmark Designation - “History of Medicine in California” Frescoes - Toland Hall Auditorium in UC Hall, 533 Parnassus Avenue] Ordinance amending the Planning Code to designate the “History of Medicine in California” frescoes in Toland Hall auditorium in UC Hall, 533 Parnassus Avenue (“History of Medicine in California” frescoes), Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 2634A, Lot No. 011, as a Landmark consistent with the standards set forth in Article 10 of the Planning Code; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Historic Preservation Commission) 09/04/2020; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 09/22/2020; ASSIGNED UNDER 30 DAY RULE to the Land Use and Transportation Committee. City and County of San Francisco Page 43 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 44](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-44) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 201034 [Planning Code - Landmark Designation - 4767-4773 Mission Street (aka the Royal Baking Company Building)] Ordinance amending the Planning Code to designate 4767-4773 Mission Street (Royal Baking Company), Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 6084, Lot No. 021, as a Landmark under Article 10 of the Planning Code; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302; and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Historic Preservation Commission) 09/11/2020; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 09/22/2020; ASSIGNED UNDER 30 DAY RULE to the Land Use and Transportation Committee. PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS 201035 [Acquisition of Real Property - 444 Sixth Street - Myung Chun - Justice Facilities Improvement Program - $4,500,000] Resolution authorizing the Director of Property to acquire real property located at 444 Sixth Street from Myung Chun for the purchase price of $4,500,000; authorizing the Director of Property to execute documents, make certain modifications and take certain actions in furtherance of the Purchase Agreement and this Resolution, as defined herein; adopting the Planning Department’s findings under the California Environmental Quality Act; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination that the conveyance is consistent with the General Plan, and eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Real Estate Department) 09/14/2020; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 09/22/2020; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Budget and Finance Committee. 201036 [Lease Amendment - WCPI Commercial LLC - 1449 Webster Street - $139,170 Annual Base Rent] Resolution approving and authorizing the Director of Property, on behalf of the Office of Economic and Workforce Development and WCPI Commercial LLC, to amend the lease of real of property located at 1449 Webster Street at a base rent of $139,170 per year with annual rent increases based upon the Consumer Price Index (CPI) between 2% and 5%, for an extended term commencing upon approval of this Resolution and expiring on August 31, 2023, plus one three-year option to extend; and authorizing the Director of Property to execute documents, make certain modifications, and take certain actions in furtherance of the First Amendment, the Lease and this Resolution, as defined herein. (Real Estate Department) 09/14/2020; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 09/22/2020; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Budget and Finance Committee. City and County of San Francisco Page 44 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 45](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-45) * * 9/18/2020 Revised to add communications Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 201032 [Petitions and Communications] Petitions and Communications received from September 10, 2020, through September 17, 2020, for reference by the President to Committee considering related matters, or to be ordered filed by the Clerk on September 22, 2020. Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information will not be redacted. From the Office of the Mayor, pursuant to Charter, Section 3.100(18), making the following (re)appointment / (re)nomination: Copy: Each Supervisor (1) To the Human Rights Commission, pursuant to Charter, Section 3.100(18): · Jason Pellegrini - term ending September 2, 2024 (reappointment) To Our City Our Home Oversight Committee, pursuant to Charter, Section 3.100(18): · Shaun Haines - term ending April 22, 2022 To the Treasure Island Development Authority Board of Directions, pursuant to Treasure Island Development Authority Bylaws Article V, Section 7: · Mark Dunlop - term ending February 26, 2024 (renomination) · Julia Prochnik - term ending February 26, 2021 * * To the Public Utilities Commission, pursuant to Charter, Section 4.112: · Ed Harrington - term ending August 1, 2024 · Tim Paulson - term ending August 1, 2024 * * To the Port Commission, pursuant to Charter Section 4.114: · John L. Burton - term ending May 1, 2024 From the Office of the Mayor, Executive Order Extending Commercial Eviction Moratorium. Copy: Each Supervisor (2) From the Planning Department, submitting a Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and Notice of Public Scoping Meeting for Ocean Beach Climate Change Adaption Project, Case No. 2019-02115ENV. Copy: Each Supervisor (3) From the Department of Elections, regarding the beginning of logic and accuracy testing of the voting equipment for the November 3, 2020 election. Copy: Each Supervisor (4) From the City Administrator, pursuant to Administrative Code, Section 3.21, submitting items to be considered by the Board of Supervisors regarding Department of Public Health Certificates of Participation; Public Health & Safety General Obligation Bonds, 2016; Affordable Housing General Obligation Bonds, 2016; and Affordable Housing General Obligation Bonds, 2019. Copy: Each Supervisor (5) From the Ethics Commission, submitting their 2019-2020 Ethics Commission Annual Report, adopted September 11, 2020. Copy: Each Supervisor (6) From the Police Department, regarding San Francisco Police Department Bicycle and Pedestrian Enforcement Operations Plan for September. Copy: Each Supervisor (7) From the Municipal Transportation Agency, regarding the redesign and expansion of the Transit Information Program. Copy: Each Supervisor (8) From the Public Defender, regarding a pardon for Charles Joseph. Copy: Each Supervisor (9) City and County of San Francisco Page 45 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 46](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-46) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 From the California Public Utilities Commission, submitting notice of a project from Verizon Wireless. Copy: Each Supervisor (10) From California Fish and Game Commission, pursuant to the authority vested by Fish and Game Code, Sections 200, 205, 260, 265, 399, 5520, 5521 and 7149.9, proposed to amend Section 29.15, Title 14, California Code of Regulations, relating to recreation al abalone closure. Copy: Each Supervisor (11) From the Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Historic Preservation, pursuant to Federal Regulations 36 CFR Part 60.6(c), regarding the National Register of Historic Places Nomination for Buon Gusto Sausage Factory. Copy: Each Supervisor (12) From the Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency, regarding the residency waiver associated with the reappointment of Christina Tang to the Public Utilities Revenue Bond Oversight Committee. Copy: Each Supervisor (13) From the Law Offices of Daniel F. Reidy, APC, regarding the California Public Utilities Commission application of Blue & Gold Fleet, L.P., for authorization to discontinue scheduled passenger transport service between San Francisco and Tiburon. Copy: Each Supervisor (14) From concerned citizens, regarding proposed Ordinance - Administrative Code - Rent Control at Midtown Park Apartments. File No. 200518. 2 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor (15) From concerned citizens, regarding the proposed Budget and Appropriation Ordinance for Departments - FYs 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 and the proposed Annual Salary Ordinance - FYs 2020-2021 and 2021-2022. File Nos. 200567 and 200568. 279 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor (16) From Wynship Hillier, regarding proposed Resolution - Mental Health Services Act - Three-Year Program and Expenditure Plan - FYs 2020-2023. File No. 200669. Copy: Each Supervisor (17) From concerned citizens, regarding proposed Ordinance - Building Code - Mandating New Construction Be All-Electric. File No. 200701. 17 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor (18) From concerned citizens, regarding the Hearing for the Appeal of Revised Final Mitigated Negative Declaration - Proposed 3516 and 3526 Folsom Street Project. File No. 200800. 5 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor (19) From concerned citizens, regarding the Liquor License Transfer - 1351 Grant Avenue - Sotto Casa. File No. 200808. 4 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor (20) From concerned citizens, regarding the Hearing - Appeal of Determination of Exemption from Environmental Review - Proposed 178 Seacliff Avenue Project. File No. 200887. Copy: Each Supervisor (21) From concerned citizens, regarding the Hearing - Appeal of Determination of Exemption From Environmental Review - Proposed MTA’s Transportation Recovery Plan: COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Transit Lanes and Bikeways Project; and Hearing - Appeal of Statutory Exemption From Environmental Review - MTA Department Operations Center (DOC) COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Street Changes Program. File Nos. 200903 & 201000. 6 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor (22) From concerned citizens, regarding the Hearing - Appeal of Determination of Exemption from Environmental Review - Proposed Department of Public Health - Local Oversight City and County of San Francisco Page 46 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 47](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-47) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 Program Site No. 12076 Investigation/Remediation Project (1776 Green Street). File No. 200908. 9 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor (23) From concerned citizens, regarding the proposed Resolution - Urging the Association of Bay Area Governments in the Regional Housing Needs Allocation Process to Focus on Unmet Needs for Affordable Housing. File No. 200955. Copy: Each Supervisor (24) From Hamasaki Law, regarding Appointments, Sunshine Ordinance Task Force - Jennifer Wong. File No. 200972. Copy: Each Supervisor (25) From concerned citizens, regarding the Hearing - Appeal of Determination of Exemption from Environmental Review - Proposed 2001 37th Avenue Project; and Hearing - Appeal of Conditional Use Authorization - 2001 37th Avenue. File Nos. 200992 & 200996. 63 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor (26) From concerned citizens, regarding the Hearing - Appeal of Statutory and Categorical Exemption from Environmental Review - MTA Slow Streets, Phase 3. File No. 201024. 2 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor (27) From Francesca Vietor, submitting a letter of resignation from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission. Copy: Each Supervisor (28) From concerned citizens, regarding a pardon for Charles Joseph. 4 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor (29) From Kate Donald, regarding the property located at 663 21st Avenue. Copy: Each Supervisor (30) From Jaine Gilbert, regarding the process for appealing projects in San Francisco. Copy: Each Supervisor (31) From San Francisco State University students and residents, regarding suggestions for the community. 3 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor (32) From Cliff, regarding the improvements on the intersection of Stanyan and Haight Streets. Copy: Each Supervisor (33) From concerned citizens, regarding reopening businesses and schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor (34) From Eileen Boken, regarding various topics. File No. 200786. 2 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor (35) From concerned citizens, regarding homelessness and drug addiction in San Francisco. 2 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor (36) From Chris Ward Kline, regarding electronic surveillance. Copy: Each Supervisor (37) From Nick Van, regarding Supervisor Fewer and the Police Officers Association. Copy: Each Supervisor (38). From RJ Sloan, regarding various issues. 2 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor (39) From concerned citizens, regarding Senior housing in San Francisco. Copy: Each Supervisor (40) From Nils Hellmer, regarding Mission Bay water shutoff. Copy: Each Supervisor (41) From Randall Kovar, regarding Proposition G on the November 3, 2020 election, City and County of San Francisco Page 47 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20 ### [Page 48](https://sfbos.info/documents/710/2020-09-22-agenda#page-48) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 22, 2020 authorizing youth aged 16 and 17 to vote in municipal elections. Copy: Each Supervisor (42) From Steve Ward, regarding California State Assembly Bills AB 725 (Wicks) and AB 2345 (Gonzalez). Copy: Each Supervisor (43) From Patrick Monette-Shaw, regarding District 7 candidates and a housing proposal for Laguna Honda Hospital’s campus. Copy: Each Supervisor (44) ADJOURNMENT City and County of San Francisco Page 48 Printed at 9:41 pm on 9/17/20