Board of Supervisors Agenda: September 15, 2020

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AGENDA Watch SF Cable Channel 26, 78, or 99 (depending on your provider) Watch www.sfgovtv.org PUBLIC COMMENT CALL-IN 1 (415) 655-0001/ Meeting ID: 146 360 9063 # # Tuesday, September 15, 2020 - 2:00 PM Regular Meeting NORMAN YEE, PRESIDENT SANDRA LEE FEWER, MATT HANEY, RAFAEL MANDELMAN, GORDON MAR, AARON PESKIN, DEAN PRESTON, HILLARY RONEN, AHSHA SAFAI, CATHERINE STEFANI, SHAMANN WALTON Angela Calvillo, Clerk of the Board Agendas of the Board of Supervisors are available on the internet at www.sfbos.org BOARD COMMITTEES Committee Membership Meeting Days Budget and Appropriations Committee Wednesday Supervisors Fewer, Walton, Mandelman, Yee, Ronen 1:00 PM Budget and Finance Committee Wednesday Supervisors Fewer, Walton, Mandelman 10:30 AM Government Audit and Oversight Committee 1st and 3rd Thursday Supervisors Mar, Peskin, Haney 10:00 AM Joint City, School District, and City College Select Committee 2nd Friday Supervisors Haney, Fewer, Mar (Alt), Commissioners Moliga, Collins, Cook (Alt), Trustees 10:00 AM Randolph, Williams, Selby (Alt) Monday Land Use and Transportation Committee 1:30 PM Supervisors Peskin, Safai, Preston 2nd and 4th Thursday Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee 10:00 AM Supervisors Mandelman, Stefani, Walton Monday Rules Committee 10:00 AM Supervisors Ronen, Stefani, Mar First-named Supervisor is Chair, Second-named Supervisor is Vice-Chair of the Committee.

Agenda Item Information Each item on the Consent or Regular agenda may include the following documents: 1) Legislation 2) Budget and Legislative Analyst report 3) Department or Agency cover letter and/or report 4) Public correspondence These items will be available for review at City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, Reception Desk. Meeting Procedures The Board of Supervisors is the legislative body of the City and County of San Francisco. The Board has several standing committees where ordinances and resolutions are the subject of hearings at which members of the public are urged to testify. The full Board does not hold a second public hearing on measures which have been heard in committee. Board procedures do not permit: 1) persons in the audience to vocally express support or opposition to statements by Supervisors or by other persons testifying; 2) ringing and use of cell phones, pagers, and similar sound-producing electronic devices; 3) bringing in or displaying signs in the meeting room; and 4) standing in the meeting room. Each member of the public will be allotted the same maximum number of minutes to speak as set by the President or Chair at the beginning of each item or public comment, excluding City representatives, except that public speakers using interpretation assistance will be allowed to testify for twice the amount of the public testimony time limit. If simultaneous interpretation services are used, speakers will be governed by the public testimony time limit applied to speakers not requesting interpretation assistance. Members of the public who want a document displayed should provide in advance of the meeting to the Clerk of the Board (bos.legislation@sfgov.org), clearly state such during testimony, and subsequently request the document be removed when they want the screen to return to live coverage of the meeting. IMPORTANT INFORMATION: The public is encouraged to testify at Committee meetings. Persons unable to attend the meeting may submit to the City, by the time the proceedings begin, written comments regarding the agenda items. These comments will be made a part of the official public record and shall be brought to the attention of the Board of Supervisors. Written communications expected to be made a part of the official file should be submitted to the Clerk of the Board or Clerk of a Committee: 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco, CA 94102. Communications which are not received prior to the hearing may be delivered to the Clerk of the Board or Clerk of the Committee at the hearing and you are encouraged to bring enough copies for distribution to all of its members. COPYRIGHT: All system content that is broadcasted live during public proceedings is secured by High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP), which prevents copyrighted or encrypted content from being displayed or transmitted through unauthorized devices. Members of the public who wish to utilize chamber digital, audio and visual technology may not display copyrighted or encrypted content during public proceedings. AGENDA PACKET: Available on the internet at http://www.sfbos.org/meetings. Meetings are cablecast on SFGovTV, the Government Channel 26. For DVD copies and scheduling call (415) 554-4188. LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS: Language services are available in Spanish, Chinese and Filipino at all regular and special Board and Committee meetings if made at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to help ensure availability. For more information or to request services: Contact Wilson Ng or Arthur Khoo at (415) 554-5184. 所有常規及特別市參事委員會會議（Board meetings）除委員會會議（Committee meetings）將予以提供 西班牙文,菲律賓文,及中文的語言服務,但須在會議前最少48小時作出請求,旨在確保服務屆時可予以提 供。更多資訊或請求有關服務， 請致電 (415) 554-7719聯絡Linda Wong. AVISO EN ESPAÑOL: Los servicios de idiomas están disponibles en español, chino, y filipino en todas las reuniones regulares y reuniones especiales de la Junta, de los Comités, si se solicita por lo menos 48 horas antes de la reunión para ayudar a garantizar su disponibilidad. Para más información o solicitar servicios, por favor contactar a (415) 554-5184.

PAUNAWA: Mayroong serbisyong pang-wika sa Espanyol, Tsino at Pilipino para sa lahat ng mga regular at espesyal na pagpupulong ng Board, at Komite ng Board. Sa kasalukuyan, mayroong serbisyo sa wikang Pilipino na maaaring hilingin, 48 oras (o mas maaga) bago ng pagpupulong upang matiyak na matutugunan ang inyong kahilingan. Para sa karagdagang impormasyon o para humiling ng serbisyo pang-wika, tawagan lamang ang (415) 554-5184. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) The ADA is a civil rights law that protects people with different types of disabilities from discrimination in all aspects of social life. More specifically, Title II of the ADA requires that all programs offered through the state and local government such as the City and County of San Francisco must be accessible and usable to people with disabilities. The ADA and City policy require that people with disabilities have equal access to all City services, activities, and benefits. People with disabilities must have an equal opportunity to participate in the programs and services offered through the City and County of San Francisco. If you believe your rights under the ADA are violated, contact the ADA Coordinator. Ordinance 90-10 added Section 2A.22.3 to the Administrative Code, which adopted a Citywide Americans with Disabilities Act Reasonable Modification Policy that requires City departments to: (1) provide notice to the public of the right to request reasonable modification; (2) respond promptly to such requests; (3) provide appropriate auxiliary aids and services to people with disabilities to ensure effective communication; and (4) train staff to respond to requests from the public for reasonable modification, and that requires the Mayor's Office on Disability to provide technical assistance to City departments responding to requests from the public for reasonable modifications. The Board of Supervisors and Office of the Clerk of the Board support the Mayor’s Office on Disability to help make San Francisco a city where all people enjoy equal rights, equal opportunity, and freedom from illegal discrimination under disability rights laws. Meetings are real-time captioned and are cablecast open-captioned on SFGovTV, the Government Channel 26. Board and Committee meeting agendas and minutes are available on the Board’s website (www.sfbos.org) and adhere to web development guidelines based upon the Federal Access Board’s Section 508 Guidelines. To request sign language interpreters, readers, large print agendas or other accommodations, please contact (415) 554-5184 or (415) 554-5227 (TTY). Requests made at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting will help to ensure availability. If further assistance is needed, please contact Wilson Ng at (415) 554-5184 (wilson.l.ng@sfgov.org). Know Your Rights Under The Sunshine Ordinance Government's duty is to serve the public, reaching its decision in full view of the public. Commissions, boards, councils, and other agencies of the City and County exist to conduct the people's business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and that City operations are open to the people's review. For information on your rights under the Sunshine Ordinance (San Francisco Administrative Code, Chapter 67) or to report a violation of the ordinance, contact by mail Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco CA 94102; phone at (415) 554-7724; fax at (415) 554-5163; or by email at sotf@sfgov.org. Citizens may obtain a free company of the Sunshine Ordinance by printing the San Francisco Administrative Code, Chapter 67, on the Internet at http://www.sfbos.org/sunshine. Ethics Requirements Individuals and entities that influence or attempt to influence local legislative or administrative action may be required by the San Francisco Lobbyist Ordinance [SF Campaign & Governmental Conduct Code, Section 2.100] to register and report lobbying activity. For more information about the Lobbyist Ordinance, please contact the San Francisco Ethics Commission at 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220, San Francisco, CA 94102; telephone (415) 252-3100; fax (415) 252-3112; web site http://www.sfgov.org/ethics. Under Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code, Section 1.127, no person or entity with a financial interest in a land use matter pending before the Board of Appeals, Board of Supervisors, Building Inspection Commission, Commission on Community Investment and Infrastructure, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning Commission, Port Commission, or the Treasure Island Development Authority Board of Directors, may make a campaign contribution to a member of the Board of Supervisors, the Mayor, the City Attorney, or a candidate for any of those offices, from the date the land use matter commenced until 12 months after the board or commission has made a final decision, or any appeal to another City agency from that decision has been resolved. For more information about this restriction, visit sfethics.org.

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 Remote Access to Information and Participation In accordance with Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No. N-33-20 declaring a State of Emergency regarding the COVID-19 outbreak and Mayor London N. Breed’s Proclamation declaring a Local Emergency issued on February 25, 2020, including the guidance for gatherings issued by the San Francisco Department of Public Health Officer, aggressive directives were issued to reduce the spread of COVID-19. On March 17, 2020, the Board of Supervisors authorized their Board and Committee meetings to convene remotely (via Microsoft Teams) and will allow remote public comment via teleconference. Visit the SFGovTV website at (www.sfgovtv.org) to stream the live meetings, or to watch meetings on demand. Members of the public are encouraged to participate remotely via detailed instructions on participating via teleconference available at: https://sfbos.org/remote-meeting-call. Members of the public may participate by phone or may submit their comments by email to: bos@sfgov.org; all comments received will be made a part of the official record. Board of Supervisors Regular Meetings begin at 2:00 p.m. on Tuesdays. Board Agendas and their associated documents are available at https://sfbos.org/meetings/42. PUBLIC COMMENT CALL-IN 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 360 9063 # # As the COVID-19 disease progresses, please visit the Board’s website (www.sfbos.org) regularly to be updated on the current situation as it affects the legislative process. For more information contact the Office of the Clerk of the Board at (415) 554-5184. ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE COMMUNICATIONS APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES Approval of the August 7, 2020, and August 11, 2020, Regular Board Meeting Minutes. AGENDA CHANGES City and County of San Francisco Page 4 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 SPECIAL ORDER 2:00 P.M. - Mayor's Appearance Before The Board Pursuant to Charter Section 3.100(7), the Mayor shall appear, in person, at one regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Supervisors each month to engage in formal policy discussions with members of the Board. This item will be read at the Board Meeting on the second Tuesday of each month, unless rescheduled by the Mayor and the Board President. The Mayor and the Board may not discuss matters that have already been considered in Committee and that are on the Board's Agenda as an action item. By eight (8) votes, the Board of Supervisors may, by oral motion, allow an eligible District Supervisor to ask a question that was not previously posed if the question relates to a sudden or unexpected incident or occurrence raising formal, time-sensitive policy questions that were not anticipated prior to the posting of this agenda. Public comment for this item will take place during general public comment. There were no questions submitted from Supervisors representing Districts 1, 2, 3, or 4. The Mayor may address the Board for up to five minutes. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed hereunder constitute a Consent Agenda, are considered to be routine by the Board of Supervisors and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Board. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the Board so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered as a separate item. Questions on the Consent Agenda are on final passage, first reading, adoption, or approved, as indicated. Items 1 through 23 Recommendations of the Government Audit and Oversight Committee Present: Supervisors Mar, Peskin, Haney 1. 200853 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Bradley Novak - $247,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Bradley Novak against the City and County of San Francisco for $247,000; the lawsuit was filed on February 8, 2019, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC 19-573659; entitled Bradley Novak v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.; the lawsuit involves an employment dispute. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 5 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 2. 200855 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Dennis Caruso - $70,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Dennis Caruso against the City and County of San Francisco for $70,000; the lawsuit was filed on November 8, 2019, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-19-580664; entitled Dennis Caruso v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves an alleged injury when Plaintiff hit a pothole on a City Street and was thrown from his scooter. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 3. 200856 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Thaïs Yafet - $110,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Thaïs Yafet against the City and County of San Francisco for $110,000; the lawsuit was filed on October 29, 2018, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-18-570939; entitled Thaïs Yafet v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves an alleged injury when Plaintiff tripped and fell on a City sidewalk. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 4. 200857 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Chris Tilton and Blane Bachelor - $210,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Chris Tilton and Blane Bachelor against the City and County of San Francisco for $210,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs Chris Tilton and Blane Bachelor, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 5. 200858 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Ho Tan - $295,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Ho Tan against the City and County of San Francisco for $295,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Ho Tan, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 6. 200859 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Peter So and Diane Chung - $235,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Peter So and Diane Chung against the City and County of San Francisco for $235,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs Peter So and Diane Chung, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 6 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 7. 200860 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Victoria Sanchez - $220,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Victoria Sanchez against the City and County of San Francisco for $220,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Victoria Sanchez, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 8. 200861 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Rick Popko and Nancy Huff - $150,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Rick Popko and Nancy Huff against the City and County of San Francisco for $150,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs Rick Popko and Nancy Huff, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 9. 200862 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Donato and Aurora Ponferrada - $257,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Donato and Aurora Ponferrada against the City and County of San Francisco for $257,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs Donato and Aurora Ponferrada, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 10. 200863 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - John and Maria Naniola - $290,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by John and Maria Naniola against the City and County of San Francisco for $290,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs John and Maria Naniola, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 7 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 11. 200864 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Suzanne Houlihan - $250,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Suzanne Houlihan against the City and County of San Francisco for $250,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Suzanne Houlihan, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 12. 200865 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Carlos Gross - $210,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Carlos Gross against the City and County of San Francisco for $210,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Carlos Gross, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 13. 200866 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Susan Garduno - $235,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Susan Garduno against the City and County of San Francisco for $235,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Susan Garduno, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 14. 200867 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Rizadly Gache - $235,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Rizadly Gache against the City and County of San Francisco for $235,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Rizadly Gache, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 8 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 15. 200868 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Ruth Patricia Del Castillo - $150,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Ruth Patricia Del Castillo against the City and County of San Francisco for $150,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Ruth Patricia Del Castillo, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 16. 200869 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - John Clay - $250,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by John Clay against the City and County of San Francisco for $250,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff John Clay, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 17. 200870 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Elaine Choy - $221,150] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Elaine Choy against the City and County of San Francisco for $221,150; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Elaine Choy, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 18. 200871 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Armando and Maria Castillo - $200,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Armando and Maria Castillo against the City and County of San Francisco for $200,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs Armando and Maria Castillo, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 9 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 19. 200872 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Joy Caguimbaga and Zenida C. Restauro - $240,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Joy Caguimbaga and Zenida C. Restauro against the City and County of San Francisco for $240,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs Joy Caguimbaga and Zenida C. Restauro, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 20. 200873 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Sally Seid - $207,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Sally Seid against the City and County of San Francisco for $207,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiff Sally Seid, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 21. 200874 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - Cesar and Fe Ponferrada - $250,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by Cesar and Fe Ponferrada against the City and County of San Francisco for $250,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs Cesar and Fe Ponferrada, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 22. 200875 [Partial Settlement of Lawsuit - David and Jessica Alfaro - $290,000] Ordinance authorizing partial settlement of the lawsuit filed by David and Jessica Alfaro against the City and County of San Francisco for $290,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 20, 2015, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-15-547492; entitled David Alfaro, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves inverse condemnation arising out of flooding damage during major rainstorms in December of 2014; this settlement relates only to the diminution of real property value claims of plaintiffs David and Jessica Alfaro, and does not include claims for property loss or for attorney's fees, costs and interest. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 10 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 23. 200895 [Settlement of Unlitigated Claim - Richard I. Klein and Janice T. Low - $103,786.91] Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claim filed by Richard I. Klein and Janice T. Low against the City and County of San Francisco for $103,786.91; the claim was filed on December 21, 2019; the claim involves a cast iron water main break that caused flooding to the property. (City Attorney) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? REGULAR AGENDA NEW BUSINESS Recommendations of the Budget and Appropriations Committee (Pursuant to Mayor London N. Breed’s Seventh Supplement to the Mayoral Proclamation Declaring the Existence of a Local Emergency, dated February 25, 2020, and in accordance with Charter, Section 9.100(b), the Board of Supervisors shall adopt the Budget (Item Nos. 24 through 47) no later than October 1, 2020. The Board of Supervisors may entertain a motion to continue these matters to the Board of Supervisors meeting of September 22, 2020.) Present: Supervisors Fewer, Walton, Mandelman, Yee, Ronen 24. 200567 [Budget and Appropriation Ordinance for Departments - FYs 2020-2021 and 2021-2022] Sponsor: Mayor Budget and Appropriation Ordinance appropriating all estimated receipts and all estimated expenditures for Departments of the City and County of San Francisco as of July 31, 2020, for the Fiscal Years ending June 30, 2021, and June 30, 2022. (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 25. 200568 [Annual Salary Ordinance - FYs 2020-2021 and 2021-2022] Sponsor: Mayor Annual Salary Ordinance enumerating positions in the Annual Budget and Appropriation Ordinance for the Fiscal Years ending June 30, 2021, and June 30, 2022, continuing, creating, or establishing these positions; enumerating and including therein all positions created by Charter or State law for which compensations are paid from City and County funds and appropriated in the Annual Appropriation Ordinance; authorizing appointments or continuation of appointments thereto; specifying and fixing the compensations and work schedules thereof; and authorizing appointments to temporary positions and fixing compensations therefore. (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 11 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 26. 200570 [Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure, Operating as Successor Agency to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency, FY2020-2021 Budget - Bond Issuance Not to Exceed $15,473,823] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution approving the Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Budget of the Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure (“OCII”), operating as the Successor Agency to the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency; and approving the Issuance by OCII of Bonds in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $15,473,823 for the purpose of financing a portion of OCII’s enforceable obligations. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 27. 200831 [Neighborhood Beautification and Graffiti Clean-up Fund Tax Designation Ceiling - 2020] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance adopting the Neighborhood Beautification and Graffiti Clean-up Fund Tax designation ceiling for tax year 2020. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 28. 200832 [Appropriation - Proceeds from Revenue Bonds, State Loans/Grants, Wastewater Revenues/Capacity Fees - $579,185,142; De-Appropriation and Re-Appropriation - Wastewater Capital Improvements - SFPUC - $391,415,748 - FY2020-2021 and FY2021-2022] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance appropriating a total of $579,185,142 of proceeds from revenue bonds, State of California Water Resources Control Board’s revolving loan funds (State Loan Funds) or grant funds (State Grant Funds), wastewater revenue and capacity fees for the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) Wastewater Enterprise’s Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-2021 at $170,869,066 and for FY2021-2022 at $408,316,076, de-appropriating and re-appropriating $391,415,748, and placing $349,919,252 in Revenue Bonds or State Loan or Grant Funds by project on Controller’s Reserve subject to the Controller's certification of funds availability, including proceeds of indebtedness, and for construction related expenditures (excluding program management, planning and design) for these projects, as applicable, is also subject to the prior occurrence of the SFPUC's and the Board of Supervisors' discretionary adoption of California Environmental Quality Act Findings for projects, following review and consideration of completed project related environmental analysis, where required. (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 12 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 29. 200833 [Appropriation - Proceeds from Revenue Bonds, State Loan/Grant Funds, Water Revenues/Capacity Fees - $344,846,164; De- and Re-Appropriation - Capital Improvement Projects - $14,413,167; De-appropriation - Capital Projects - $3,528,113 - FYs 2020-2022] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance appropriating a total of $344,846,164 of proceeds from Revenue Bonds, State of California Water Resources Control Board’s revolving loan funds (State Loan Funds) or grant funds (State Grant Funds), water revenues, and water capacity fees for the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) Water Enterprise’s Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-2021 at $132,133,926 and for FY2021-2022 at $212,712,238; and de-appropriating $3,528,113 Water Capital Project funding to Water’s Fund balance in FY2020-2021; and de-appropriating and re-appropriating Water Capital Project appropriations of $14,413,167 in FY2020-2021 and placing $238,514,485 of Revenue Bond and State Loan Funds or State Grant Funds proceeds by project on Controller’s Reserve subject to the Controller's certification of funds availability, including proceeds of indebtedness, and for construction related expenditures (excluding program management, planning and design) for these projects, as applicable, is also subject to the prior occurrence of the SFPUC's and the Board of Supervisors' discretionary adoption of California Environmental Quality Act findings for projects, following review and consideration of completed project related environmental analysis, where required. (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 30. 200834 [Appropriation - Proceeds from Revenue Bonds, Hetch Hetchy Revenue, Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Cap and Trade Allowance - $260,351,806; De- and Re-Appropriation - Capital Projects - Hetch Hetchy Water/Power Capital Improvements - $341,001 - FYs 2020-2022] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance appropriating a total of $260,351,806 of Hetch Hetchy revenue, Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Cap and Trade Revenue and Power and Water Revenue Bonds for the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) Hetch Hetchy Capital Improvement Program for Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-2021 at $94,380,451 and for FY2021-2022 at $165,971,355; and placing $142,970,073 of Power Bonds and $108,626,733 of Water Bonds by project on Controller’s Reserve subject to the Controller's certification of funds availability, including proceeds of indebtedness, and for construction related expenditures (excluding program management, planning and design) for these projects, as applicable, is also subject to the prior occurrence of the SFPUC's and the Board of Supervisors' discretionary adoption of California Environmental Quality Act findings for projects, following review and consideration of completed project related environmental analysis, where required. (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 13 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 31. 200835 [Appropriation - Proceeds from CleanPowerSF Revenue - CleanPowerSF Capital Improvements - $4,331,326 - FY2020-2021 and FY2021-2022] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance appropriating $4,331,326 CleanPowerSF revenue for the CleanPowerSF Capital Improvement Program for FY2020-2021 at $1,898,497 and for FY2021-2022 at $2,432,829. (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 32. 200836 [San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Power Revenue Bond Issuance - Various Capital Projects Benefitting the Power Enterprise - Not to Exceed $142,970,073] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance authorizing the issuance and sale of tax-exempt or taxable Power Revenue Bonds and other forms of indebtedness by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $142,970,073 to finance the costs of various capital projects benefitting the Power Enterprise pursuant to Charter, Sections 9.107(6) and 9.107(8); authorization to issue Refunding Power Revenue Bonds and the retirement of outstanding Power Enterprise Commercial Paper; declaring the Official Intent of the Commission to Reimburse Itself with one or more issues of tax-exempt bonds; and ratifying previous actions taken in connection therewith, as defined herein. (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 33. 200837 [San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Wastewater Revenue Bond Issuance - Various Capital Wastewater Projects Benefitting the Wastewater Enterprise - Not to Exceed $349,919,252] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance authorizing the issuance and sale of tax-exempt or taxable Wastewater Revenue Bonds and other forms of indebtedness, as defined herein, by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (Commission) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $349,919,252 to finance the costs of various capital wastewater projects benefitting the Wastewater Enterprise pursuant to amendments to the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco enacted by the voters on November 5, 2002, as Proposition E; authorizing the issuance of Wastewater Revenue Refunding Bonds and the retirement of outstanding Wastewater Enterprise Commercial Paper; declaring the Official Intent of the Commission to reimburse Itself with one or more issues of tax-exempt bonds or other forms of indebtedness, as defined herein; and ratifying previous actions taken in connection therewith, as defined herein. (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 14 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 34. 200838 [San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Water Revenue Bond and Other Forms of Indebtedness Issuance - Various Capital Water Projects Benefitting the Water Enterprise - Not to Exceed $347,141,218] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance authorizing the issuance and sale of tax-exempt or taxable Water Revenue Bonds and other forms of indebtedness, as defined herein, by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (Commission) in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $347,141,218 to finance the costs of various capital water projects benefitting the Water Enterprise pursuant to amendments to the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco enacted by the voters on November 5, 2002, as Proposition E; authorizing the issuance of Water Revenue Refunding Bonds and the retirement of outstanding Water Enterprise Commercial Paper; declaring the Official Intent of the Commission to reimburse itself with one or more issues of tax-exempt bonds or other forms of indebtedness, as defined herein; and ratifying previous actions taken in connection therewith, as defined herein. (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? Recommendation of the Budget and Finance Committee Present: Supervisors Fewer, Walton, Mandelman 35. 200839 [Administrative Code - Medical Examiner Fees] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to adjust fees of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner to include post-mortem investigation services, remove references to obsolete services, and update fee amounts; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? Recommendations of the Budget and Appropriations Committee Present: Supervisors Fewer, Walton, Mandelman, Yee, Ronen 36. 200840 [Administrative Code - Reproduction and Notary Fees - Department of Administrative Services] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to authorize the Department of Administrative Services to impose a fee for reproduction and notary services provided to the public. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 15 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 37. 200841 [Authorizing Refunding Certificates of Participation - Multiple Capital Improvement Projects - Not to Exceed $97,500,000] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance authorizing the execution and delivery of Certificates of Participation, in one or more series from time to time, evidencing and representing an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $97,500,000 (“Certificates”) to prepay certain certificates of participation that financed and refinanced various capital improvement projects; approving the form of a Fourth Supplement to Trust Agreement between the City and County of San Francisco (“City”) and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee (“Trustee”) (including certain indemnities contained therein); approving respective forms of a Fourth Supplement to Property Lease and a Fourth Supplement to Project Lease, each between the City and the Trustee, for the lease and lease back of all or a portion of certain real property and improvements owned by the City and located at 375 Laguna Honda Boulevard within the City and at 1 Moreland Drive, San Bruno, California, or other property as determined by the Director of Public Finance; approving the form of Escrow Agreement (including certain indemnities contained therein), between the City and U.S. Bank National Association, as escrow agent (“Escrow Agent”); approving the form of an Official Notice of Sale and a Notice of Intention to Sell the Certificates; approving the form of an Official Statement in preliminary and final form; approving the form of a purchase contract between the City and one or more initial purchasers of the Certificates; approving the form of a Continuing Disclosure Certificate; granting general authority to City officials to take necessary actions in connection with the authorization, sale, execution and delivery of the Certificates; approving modifications to documents; and ratifying previous actions taken in connection therewith, as defined herein. (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 38. 200842 [Deappropriation - Series 2010A Refunding Certificates of Participation - $4,636,200; Appropriation - Including Deappropriated Funds $102,136,200 and Certificates of Participation Refunding Proceeds $97,500,000 - FY2020-2021] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance deappropriating $4,636,200 of Series 2010A Refunding Certificates of Participation prior reserve funds and appropriating $102,136,200 of Refunding Certificates of Participation Series 2020-R1, including deappropriated funds and $97,500,000 of one or more series of Refunding Certificates of Participation proceeds for Fiscal Year 2020-2021. (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 39. 200843 [Administrative Code - County Clerk Fee Amounts; Digital Signature Fee] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to update County Clerk fees to current amounts; and to authorize the County Clerk to impose a digital signature fee. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 16 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 40. 200844 [Health Code - Patient Rates for FYs 2020-2021 and 2021-2022] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Health Code to set patient rates and rates for other services provided by the Department of Public Health, for Fiscal Years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022, starting July 1, 2020, through June 30, 2022. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 41. 200845 [Administrative Code - Budget Savings Incentive Fund Expenditures] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to suspend the restrictions on expenditure of monies in the Budget Savings Incentive Fund during Fiscal Year (FY) 2020-2021 and FY2021-2022, and to authorize the use of monies in that Fund during those fiscal years for any purpose related to the City’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic or the pandemic’s economic impacts. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 42. 200846 [Homelessness and Supportive Housing Fund - FYs 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 Expenditure Plan] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution approving the Fiscal Years 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 Expenditure Plan for the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing Fund. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 43. 200847 [Access Line Tax Adjustment - Consumer Price Index of 2020] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution concurring with the Controller’s establishment of the Consumer Price Index for 2020, and adjusting the Access Line Tax by the same rate. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? Present: Supervisors Fewer, Mandelman, Yee, Ronen 44. 200848 [Proposition J Contract Certification - Contracted-Out Department Services Previously Approved] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution concurring with the Controller's certification that department services previously approved can be performed by a private contractor for a lower cost than similar work performed by City and County employees, for the following services: budget and legislative analyst (Board of Supervisors); citywide custodial services (excluding City Hall), citywide security services, fleet security, convention facilities management (General Services Agency-City Administrator); mainframe system support (General Services Agency-Technology); security services (Public Works); security services (Human Services Agency); security services (Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing); food services for jail inmates (Sheriff's Department); assembly of vote-by-mail envelopes (Department of Elections); security services (Public Utilities Commission); security, information and guest services, parking operations, shuttle bus services (Airport); citations, paratransit, parking meter collections, security, towing, transit shelter cleaning services (Municipal Transportation Agency); and custodial and security services (Port). Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 17 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 45. 200849 [Proposition J Contract Certification - Contracted-Out Department Services for the General Services Agency, Human Services Agency, and Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution concurring with the Controller's certification that department services can be performed by a private contractor for a lower cost than similar work performed by City and County employees, for the following services: security services (Human Services Agency), security services (General Services Agency-City Administrator); security services (Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development). Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? Present: Supervisors Fewer, Walton, Mandelman, Yee, Ronen 46. 200850 [Accept and Expend Grant - Friends of San Francisco Public Library - Annual Grant Award, FY2020-2021 - Up to $809,400 of In-Kind Gifts, Services, and Cash Monies] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution authorizing the San Francisco Public Library to accept and expend a grant in the amount of up to $809,400 of in-kind gifts, services, and cash monies from the Friends of the San Francisco Public Library for direct support for a variety of public programs and services in Fiscal Year 2020-2021. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 47. 200917 [Suspension of Financial Policy - Authorizing Spending of Selected Nonrecurring Revenues on Recurring Expenditures - FY2021-2022] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution suspending the City’s financial policy in Administrative Code, Section 10.61, for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 to authorize the City to spend selected nonrecurring revenues described in that policy on recurring expenditures. (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 18 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 Recommendations of the Budget and Finance Committee Present: Supervisors Fewer, Walton, Mandelman 48. 200766 [Loan Documents - 270 Turk Street - Acquisition and Preservation Programs - Up to $31,870,000] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution approving and authorizing the Director of the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (“MOHCD”) to execute documents relating to loans for the acquisition, rehabilitation, or permanent financing of at-risk housing located at 270 Turk Street (“Project”) pursuant to MOHCD’s acquisition and preservation programs, including the Preservation and Seismic Safety Program, the Downtown Neighborhoods Preservation Fund, and the Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund for a total loan amount not to exceed $31,870,000; confirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and finding that the Project loans are consistent with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 49. 200767 [Contract - Next Generation Customer Information System - New Real-Time Vehicle Arrival and Service Update System - Not to Exceed $88,980,877] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution approving Municipal Transportation Agency Contract No. 2019-01: Next Generation Customer Information System, with Cubic Transportation Systems, Inc. to develop, implement, and maintain a new real-time vehicle arrival and service update system for Muni in an amount not to exceed $88,980,877 for an initial term of six years with two optional five-year terms to cover software subscriptions and equipment lifecycle maintenance, to commence following Board approval. (Municipal Transportation Agency) (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 50. 200781 [Lease of Real Property - Speyer and Schwartz - 1663 Mission Street - $208,551 Per Year in Base Rent] Resolution approving and authorizing the Director of Property, on behalf of the City’s Department of Emergency Management, to lease real property located at 1663 Mission Street from Speyer and Schwartz, at a rent of $208,551 per year with 3% annual increases for an initial term of ten years, with an anticipated commencement date of November 1, 2020, and two five-year options to extend; authorizing the Director of Property to execute documents, make certain modifications and take certain actions in furtherance of the Lease and this Resolution; finding the proposed transaction is in conformance with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and adopting findings under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Real Estate Department) (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 19 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 51. 200818 [Accept and Expend Grant - Retroactive - Health Resources and Services Administration - Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part A COVID-19 Response - $488,185] Sponsors: Mayor; Mandelman Resolution retroactively authorizing the Department of Public Health to accept and expend a grant in the amount of $488,185 from the Health Resources and Services Administration for participation in a program, entitled “Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program Part A Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Response,” for the period of April 1, 2020, through March 31, 2021. (Public Health Department) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 52. 200897 [Grant Agreement Amendment - Retroactive - Self-Help for the Elderly - Nutrition Programs Services - Not to Exceed $11,318,142] Resolution retroactively approving an expedited grant amendment between the City and County of San Francisco and Self-Help for the Elderly, for the administration of nutrition programs, to extend the grant agreement to December 31, 2020, and to increase the grant amount by $1,625,577 for a total not to exceed amount of $11,318,142 to commence on July 1, 2020. (Human Services Agency) (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 53. 200898 [Grant Agreement Amendment - Retroactive - Meals on Wheels of San Francisco - Nutrition Programs Services - Not to Exceed $28,675,035] Resolution retroactively approving an expedited grant amendment between the City and County of San Francisco and Meals on Wheels of San Francisco, for the administration of nutrition programs, to extend the grant agreement to December 31, 2020, and to increase the grant amount by $2,447,467 for a total not to exceed amount of $28,675,035 to commence on July 1, 2020. (Human Services Agency) (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 54. 200916 [Accept and Expend Grant - Retroactive - California Complete Count Census 2020 Grant Supplemental - $259,232] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution retroactively authorizing the Office of Civic Engagement and Immigrant Affairs to accept and expend a supplemental grant in the amount of $259,232 from the California Complete Count Census 2020 to support San Francisco’s Census 2020 outreach, education and motivation campaign, focusing on Hard to Count communities and populations for the period of March 1, 2019, through December 31, 2020. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 20 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 55. 200921 [Issuance and Sale of Revenue Obligations - California Enterprise Development Authority - San Francisco Friends School - Not to Exceed $25,000,000] Sponsor: Mandelman Resolution approving for purposes of Internal Revenue Code, Section 147(f), the Issuance and Sale of Revenue Obligations by the California Enterprise Development Authority in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $25,000,000 to finance or refinance the acquisition, construction, renovation, rehabilitation, improvement and/or equipping of educational and related facilities to be owned and operated by San Francisco Friends School, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 56. 200952 [Amend Expenditure Schedule - Retroactive - U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development - Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Program - HOPWA-CV - $118,179] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution retroactively amending the CARES Act Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Coronavirus (HOPWA-CV) Program Expenditure Plan from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development to expend the amount of $118,179 for the period of March 15, 2020, through June 30, 2023. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? Recommendations of the Government Audit and Oversight Committee Present: Supervisors Mar, Peskin, Haney 57. 200959 [Resolution of Intention - Renewal and Expansion - Fisherman’s Wharf Portside Community Benefit District] Sponsor: Peskin Resolution declaring the intention of the Board of Supervisors to renew and expand a business-based business improvement district known as the “Fisherman’s Wharf Portside Community Benefit District” and levy a multi-year assessment on identified businesses in the district; approving the management district plan and proposed boundaries map for the district; ordering and setting a time and place for a public hearing of the Board of Supervisors, sitting as a Committee of the Whole, on November 17, 2020, at 3:00 p.m.; approving the form of the Notice of Public Hearing and Assessment Ballots; directing environmental findings; and directing the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to give notice of the public hearing as required by law. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 21 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 58. 200587 [Fisherman's Wharf Landside Community Benefit District and Fisherman's Wharf Portside Community Benefit District - Annual Report for FY2018-2019] Sponsor: Peskin Resolution receiving and approving the annual report for the Fisherman's Wharf Community Benefit District and Fisherman's Wharf Portside Community Benefit District for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, submitted as required by the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 (California Streets and Highways Code, Sections 36600 et seq.), Section 36650, and the Districts' management agreements with the City, Section 3.4. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? Present: Supervisors Mar, Haney 59. 200588 [Greater Union Square Business Improvement District - Annual Report for FY2018-2019] Sponsor: Peskin Resolution receiving and approving annual report for the Greater Union Square Business Improvement District for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, submitted as required by the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 (California Streets and Highways Code, Sections 36600, et seq.), Section 36650, and the District’s management agreement with the City, Section 3.4. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 60. 200612 [Tourism Improvement District and Moscone Expansion District - Annual Report - FY2018-2019] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution receiving and approving the annual report for the Tourism Improvement District and Moscone Expansion District for Fiscal Year 2018-2019, submitted as required by the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994 (California Streets and Highways Code, Sections 36600, et seq.), Section 36650, and the District’s management agreement with the City, Section 3.4. (Department of Economic and Workforce Development) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? Recommendations of the Rules Committee Present: Supervisors Ronen, Stefani, Mar 61. 200922 [Use Agreement - Big Fish Entertainment LLC - Development of Documentary Series “Live Rescue” with San Francisco Animal Care and Control] Sponsor: Ronen Resolution authorizing San Francisco Animal Care and Control (“SFACC”) to enter into a Use Agreement with Big Fish Entertainment LLC to develop and produce a documentary series “Live Rescue” about SFACC’s animal emergency rescue calls and Animal Control Officers; and grant all necessary trademark licenses and the exclusive right for one year, to traditional and digital networks. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 22 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 62. 200974 [Appointment, Bicycle Advisory Committee - Sarah Boudreau] Motion appointing Sarah Boudreau, term ending November 19, 2022, to the Bicycle Advisory Committee. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 63. 200985 [Reappointment, Commission on the Aging Advisory Council - Allen Cooper] Motion reappointing Allen Cooper, term ending March 31, 2022, to the Commission on the Aging Advisory Council. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? SPECIAL ORDER 2:30 P.M. - Recognition of Commendations In accordance with the "Declaration of Local Health Emergency Regarding Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)," special commendations have been suspended. City and County of San Francisco Page 23 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. APPEAL PROCEDURES Board Rule 4.18 provides that public hearings on appeals shall be scheduled for 3:00 p.m. If more than one public hearing is scheduled, then the Clerk, in consultation with the President, may determine the order in which the appeals will be scheduled. Second and later appeals may be scheduled at specified times later than 3:00 p.m. An appeal shall not be heard prior to its scheduled time on the calendar, and it may not be called until the Board's consideration of appeals scheduled earlier on the calendar is completed. It is the policy of the Clerk of the Board to schedule multiple appeals in the following order at 3:00 p.m: 1. Appeals where all parties have agreed to request a continuance or a tabling of the appeal. 2. Continued appeals from previous Board meetings (continued appeals will be listed in order of those closest to deadlines for Board decision). 3. Appeals appearing on the calendar for the first time, in chronological order of receipt by the Clerk. 4. Multiple appeals appearing on the calendar may be staggered at times specific, beginning at 3:00 p.m. 5. Appeals involving participants who have ADA considerations may be set for specific times beginning at 3:00 p.m. (Hearing continued from August 25, 2020.) PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 360 9063 # # 64. 200754 [Hearing - Appeal of Determination of Exemption From Environmental Review - 66 Mountain Spring Avenue] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the determination of exemption from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act issued as a Categorical Exemption by the Planning Department on February 12, 2019, for the proposed project at 66 Mountain Spring Avenue, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 2706, Lot No. 025; to demolish an existing two-story, one-family house and construct a new three-story single-family house within the RH-1(D) (Residential House, One-Family-Detached) Zoning District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District. (District 7) (Appellants: Gloria Smith of Law Offices of Gloria D. Smith, on behalf of Margaret Niver, Ronald Niver, and Rosemarie MacGuiness) (Filed March 23, 2020) (Clerk of the Board) 08/25/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. City and County of San Francisco Page 24 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 65. 200755 [Affirming the Categorical Exemption Determination - 66 Mountain Spring Avenue] Motion affirming the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 66 Mountain Spring Avenue is categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) 08/25/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 66. 200756 [Conditionally Reversing the Categorical Exemption Determination - 66 Mountain Spring Avenue] Motion conditionally reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 66 Mountain Spring Avenue is categorically exempt from further environmental review, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) 08/25/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 67. 200757 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Categorical Exemption Determination - 66 Mountain Spring Avenue] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 66 Mountain Spring Avenue is categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) 08/25/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 25 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. (Hearing continued from August 11, 2020, and September 1, 2020.) PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 360 9063 # # 68. 200800 [Hearing - Appeal of Revised Final Mitigated Negative Declaration - Proposed 3516 and 3526 Folsom Street Project] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the approval of a Revised Final Mitigated Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act for the 3516 and 3526 Folsom Street Project, identified in Planning Case No. 2013.1383ENV, and issued by the Planning Department on March 25, 2020. (District 9) (Appellant: Kathleen Angus, on behalf of the Bernal Heights South Slope Organization) (Filed April 24, 2020) (Clerk of the Board) 08/11/2020; CONTINUED. 09/01/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 69. 200801 [Affirming the Revised Mitigated Negative Declaration - Proposed 3516 and 3526 Folsom Street Project] Motion affirming the Revised Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared by the Planning Department under the California Environmental Quality Act for the proposed project located at 3516 and 3526 Folsom Street. (Clerk of the Board) 08/11/2020; CONTINUED. 09/01/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 70. 200802 [Conditionally Reversing the Revised Mitigated Negative Declaration - Proposed 3516 and 3526 Folsom Street Project] Motion conditionally reversing the Revised Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared by the Planning Department under the California Environmental Quality Act for the proposed project located at 3516 and 3526 Folsom Street, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) 08/11/2020; CONTINUED. 09/01/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 26 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 71. 200803 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Revised Final Mitigated Negative Declaration - Proposed 3516 and 3526 Folsom Street Project] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the Planning Department’s preparation of a Revised Mitigated Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act for the proposed project located at 3516 and 3526 Folsom Street. (Clerk of the Board) 08/11/2020; CONTINUED. 09/01/2020; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 360 9063 # # 72. 200887 [Hearing - Appeal of Determination of Exemption From Environmental Review - Proposed 178 Seacliff Avenue Project] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the determination of exemption from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act issued as a Categorical Exemption by the Planning Department on November 20, 2019, for the proposed project at 178 Seacliff Avenue, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 1306, Lot No. 017; to demolish an existing three-story single family residence with a detached garage and to construct a new three-story over basement single family residence with a two-car garage at the basement level within the RH-1(D) (Residential House, One-Family-Detached) Zoning District and a 40-X Height and Bulk District. (District 2) (Appellant: Alicia Guerra of Buchalter, on behalf of Mountain Lake Properties, LLC) (Filed June 26, 2020) (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 73. 200888 [Affirming the Categorical Exemption Determination - 178 Seacliff Avenue] Motion affirming the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 178 Seacliff Avenue is categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 27 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 74. 200889 [Conditionally Reversing the Categorical Exemption Determination - 178 Seacliff Avenue] Motion conditionally reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 178 Seacliff Avenue is categorically exempt from further environmental review, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 75. 200890 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Categorical Exemption Determination - 178 Seacliff Avenue] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 178 Seacliff Avenue is categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? COMMITTEE REPORTS Reports from committees, if any, recommending emergency or urgent measures. The following items will be considered by the Land Use and Transportation Committee at a Regular Meeting on Monday, September 14, 2020, at 1:30 p.m. The Chair intends to request the Committee to send the following items as Committee Reports on Tuesday, September 15, 2020. 76. 200673 [Planning Code - Conversion of Certain Limited Restaurants to Restaurants - North Beach Neighborhood Special Use District] Sponsor: Peskin Ordinance amending the Planning Code to allow certain Limited Restaurants in the North Beach Special Use District to convert to Restaurants that may apply for liquor licenses; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan and the eight priority policies of Planning Code Section 101.1. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 77. 200785 [Existing Building Code - Mandatory Earthquake Retrofit - Compliance Deadline] Sponsor: Mandelman Ordinance amending the Existing Building Code to extend the date for completion of work for the seismic retrofitting of Tier IV wood-frame buildings to September 15, 2021. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 28 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 78. 200852 [Planning Code, Zoning Map - Rezone Certain Industrial Parcels] Ordinance amending the Planning Code and Zoning Map to rezone certain parcels in Industrial Use Districts to Production, Distribution, and Repair and other Use Districts; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302. (Planning Department) (Pending Review Economic Impact) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 79. ROLL CALL FOR INTRODUCTIONS Roll call for introduction of ordinances, resolutions, charter amendments, requests for hearings, letters of inquiry, letters of request to the City Attorney and Board Members' reports on their regional body activities. 80. PUBLIC COMMENT An opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board, including items being considered today which have not been considered by a Board committee and excluding items which have been considered by a Board committee. Members of the public may address the Board for up to three minutes. Each member of the public will be allotted the same number of minutes to speak, except that public speakers using translation assistance will be allowed to testify for twice the amount of the public testimony time limit. If simultaneous translation services are used, speakers will be governed by the public testimony time limit applied to speakers not requesting translation assistance. The President or the Board may limit the total testimony to 30 minutes. Members of the public who want a visual displayed should provide in advance of the meeting to the Clerk of the Board (bos.legislation@sfgov.org), clearly state such during testimony, and subsequently request the document be removed when they want the screen to return to live coverage of the meeting. PUBLIC COMMENT CALL-IN 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 360 9063 # # City and County of San Francisco Page 29 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE These measures were introduced for adoption without committee reference. A unanimous vote is required for adoption of these resolutions today. Any Supervisor may require any resolution to go to committee. Questions on the For Adoption Without Committee Reference Agenda are on for adoption, or approved, as indicated. (PUBLIC COMMENT for Items 81 through 86 will be taken during Item 80 - General Public Comment.) Items 81 through 86 81. 201012 [Supporting Guaranteed Income and Direct Cash Payments] Sponsor: Haney Resolution supporting ongoing, direct cash payments to residents throughout the pandemic and until our economy recovers, and for the Board of Supervisors to support launching local guaranteed income programs. 09/01/2020; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 82. 201014 [Supporting California State Assembly Bill No. 1185 (McCarty) - Sheriff Oversight] Sponsors: Walton; Fewer, Peskin, Yee, Preston, Haney and Safai Resolution supporting California State Assembly Bill No. (AB) 1185, authored by Assembly Member Kevin McCarty, and co-authored by Senator Holly Mitchell, Assembly Members Autumn Burke, Mike Gipson, and Christopher Holden, to authorize each county to establish a sheriff oversight board and urging Governor Gavin Newsom to sign AB 1185. 09/01/2020; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 83. 201015 [Supporting the Creation of a K-12 Black Studies Curriculum] Sponsors: Walton; Ronen, Fewer, Preston, Haney and Safai Resolution supporting the creation of a K-12 Black Studies curriculum that honors Black lives, fully represents the contributions of Black people in the global society, and advances the ideology of Black liberation for Black scholars in the San Francisco Unified School District. 09/01/2020; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 30 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 84. 201018 [Concurring in Actions to Meet Local Emergency - Coronavirus Response - Twenty-Sixth Supplement] Sponsor: Yee Motion concurring in actions taken by the Mayor in the Twenty-Sixth Supplement to the Proclamation of Emergency to meet the ongoing local emergency related to the novel coronavirus COVID-19 pandemic. 09/01/2020; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 85. 201019 [Findings Reversing the Community Plan Evaluation - 2300 Harrison Street] Motion adopting findings to reverse the determination by the Planning Department that a proposed project at 2300 Harrison Street is exempt from further environmental review under a Community Plan Evaluation. (Clerk of the Board) 09/01/2020; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 86. 201021 [Committee of the Whole - Update on Findings and Recommendations Regarding Law Enforcement Practices - October 20, 2020, at 3:00 p.m.] Sponsor: Fewer Motion directing the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to reschedule the Committee of the Whole hearing to October 20, 2020, at 3:00 p.m. for the Members of the Board of Supervisors to hear and receive updates on the progress and implementation status of the Unites States Department of Justice recommendations regarding reforms within the Police Department; and rescinding and replacing Motion No. 20-085, which was approved to schedule the Committee of the Whole for the same purpose on September 22, 2020. 09/09/2020; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 87. IMPERATIVE AGENDA Resolution(s), if any, to be adopted within limits imposed by the Sunshine Ordinance and the Ralph M. Brown Act, introduced today, not on the printed agenda. For such resolutions to be considered, the Board must first adopt the Serious Injury Finding or the Purely Commendatory Finding and the Brown Act Finding. Each motion requires eight (8) votes or a unanimous six (6) or seven (7). A unanimous vote is required for the resolution(s). [Serious Injury Finding] Motion that the Board find that for the resolution(s) being considered at this time "the need to take action is so imperative as to threaten serious injury to the public interest if action is deferred to a later meeting." [Purely Commendatory Finding] Motion that the Board find that the resolution(s) being considered at this time are purely commendatory. City and County of San Francisco Page 31 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 [Brown Act Finding] Motion that the Board find by roll call vote that, for the resolution(s) being considered at this time, there is a need to take immediate action. The need to take action came to the attention of the City and County of San Francisco after the agenda was posted. (PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN on any Imperative Agenda item introduced.) 1 (415) 655-0001 / Meeting ID: 146 360 9063 # # LEGISLATION INTRODUCED AT ROLL CALL Introduced by a Supervisor or the Mayor Pursuant to Charter, Section 2.105, an Ordinance or Resolution may be introduced before the Board of Supervisors by a Member of the Board, a Committee of the Board, or the Mayor and shall be referred to and reported upon by an appropriate Committee of the Board. Legislation Introduced will appear on the Final Minutes for this meeting. Once the Legislation Introduced is approved, it will be available on http://www.sfbos.org/legislation_introduced. Introduced at the Request of a Department Pursuant to Rules of Order of the Board of Supervisors, Section 2.7.1, Department Heads may submit proposed legislation to the Clerk of the Board, in which case titles of the legislation will be printed at the rear of the next available agenda of the Board. PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS 201016 [Modification of Easement Deed - Koret Foundation - SFPUC Parcel 22 - Located in South San Francisco, California] Resolution approving First Amendment to Easement Deed between the Koret Foundation and the City and County of San Francisco, acting by and through its San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC), for the purpose of clarifying and amending the respective rights of the parties to the Grant Deed dated April 6, 1907 (Original Deed) with respect to SFPUC Parcel 22 located between West Orange Avenue and Southwood Drive in South San Francisco, California; and authorizing the Director of Property and/or the SFPUC’s General Manager to execute documents, make certain modifications, and take certain actions in furtherance of this Resolution, as defined herein. (Public Utilities Commission) 09/04/2020; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 09/15/2020; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Budget and Finance Committee. City and County of San Francisco Page 32 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 201017 [Quitclaim Deed for Transfer of Existing Street, Sunnyvale, California - City of Sunnyvale - $0] Resolution authorizing the Director of Property to execute a Quitclaim Deed for the conveyance of real property by the City and County of San Francisco to the City of Sunnyvale, commonly known as a portion of Manzano Way, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 104-28-069 (the Existing Street) free of charge; adopting findings under the California Environmental Quality Act; adopting findings that the conveyance is consistent with the General Plan, and the priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; adopting findings declaring that real property is “exempt surplus land;” and authorizing the Director of Property to execute any documents, make certain modifications, and take certain actions in furtherance of this Resolution, as defined herein. (Public Utilities Commission) 09/04/2020; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 09/15/2020; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Budget and Finance Committee. City and County of San Francisco Page 33 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 200902 [Petitions and Communications] Petitions and Communications received from August 27, 2020, through September 9, 2020, for reference by the President to Committee considering related matters, or to be ordered filed by the Clerk on September 15, 2020. Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information will not be redacted. From the Office of the Mayor, pursuant to Charter, Section 3.100(18), making the following appointments: Copy: Each Supervisor. (1) · Everett Hewlett Jr. - Airport Commission - term ending August 31, 2024 · Dr. Eurania Lopez - Library Commission - term ending January 15, 2022 From the Department of Public Health, issuing Directives of the Health Officer Nos. 2020-25, 2020-26 and 2020-27. Copy: Each Supervisor. (2) From the Department of Public Health, issuing Orders of the Heath Officer Nos. C19-01c, C19-03b, C19-09b. Copy: Each Supervisor. (3) From the Office of the Controller’s City Services Auditor, submitting the Whistleblower Program Annual Report and Quarter 4 Results, July 1, 2019 through June 30, 2020. Copy: Each Supervisor. (4) From the Office of the Controller’s City Services Auditor, submitting the Quarterly Review of the Schedule of Cash, Investments, and Accrued Interest Receivable as of March 31, 2020. Copy: Each Supervisor. (5) From the Office of the Controller, submitting the City and County of San Francisco’s Give2SF COVID-19 Response and Recovery Fund monthly report, dated August 31, 2020. Copy: Each Supervisor: (6) From the Public Utilities Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. 227-18, submitting their quarterly report on the Status of Applications to PG&E for Electric Service. Copy: Each Supervisor: (7) From the Recreation and Park Department, pursuant to Park Code, Section 3.21(f), submitting their annual Park Hour Report. Copy: Each Supervisor: (8) From California Fish and Game Commission, submitting a Notice of Findings regarding the petition to list the Pacific leatherback sea turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) as endangered under the California Endangered Species Act. Copy: Each Supervisor: (9) From California Fish and Game Commission, pursuant to Government Code, Section 11346.1(a)(1), submitting notice of proposed emergency action with regards to the Purple Sea Urchin. Copy: Each Supervisor: (10) From the California Office of Historic Preservation, pursuant to Federal Regulations 36 CFR Part 60.6(c), regarding the National Register of Historic Places Nomination for Mission Culture Center (Latinos in Twentieth Century California MPS. Copy: Each Supervisor: (11) From concerned citizens, regarding the proposed Budget and Appropriation Ordinance for Departments - FYs 2020-2021 and 2021-2022 and the proposed Annual Salary Ordinance - FYs 2020-2021 and 2021-2022. File Nos. 200567 and 200568. 42 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (12) City and County of San Francisco Page 34 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 From concerned citizens, regarding the Hearing for the Appeal of Revised Final Mitigated Negative Declaration - Proposed 3516 and 3526 Folsom Street Project. File No. 200800. 2 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (13) From concerned citizens, regarding the Hearing for the Appeal of Statutory Exemption From Environmental Review - MTA - Slow Streets, Phase 1. File No. 200883. 7 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (14) From YIMBY Action, regarding the Hearing for the Appeal of Determination of Community Plan Evaluation - Proposed 1088 Howard Street Project. File No. 200891. Copy: Each Supervisor. (15) From Nancy Wuerfel, regarding proposed Ordinance - Administrative Code - Department of Public Health - Providing Staff for the Behavioral Health Commission. File No. 200951. Copy: Each Supervisor. (16) From concerned citizens, regarding proposed Resolution - Urging the Association of Bay Area Governments in the Regional Housing Needs Allocation Process to Focus on Unmet Needs for Affordable Housing. File No. 200955. 4 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (17) From concerned citizens, regarding the Hearing for the Appeal of Determination of Exemption from Environmental Review - Proposed 2001-37th Avenue Project; and Hearing - Appeal of Conditional Use Authorization - 2001-37th Avenue. File Nos. 200992 and 200996. 4 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (18) From Ahimsa Porter Sumchai MD, regarding updated mapping radioactive elements - known radionuclides of concern. Copy: Each Supervisor. (19) From Janey Youngblom, regarding amendments to the General Obligation Bond Pass Throughs. Copy: Each Supervisor. (20) From anonymous, regarding crime. Copy: Each Supervisor. (21) From Jamey Frank, regarding public transportation and congestion pricing. Copy: Each Supervisor. (22) From concerned citizens, regarding releasing restrictions on businesses and schools due to COVID-19. 11 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (23) From concerned citizens, regarding homelessness in San Francisco. 6 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (24) From BC, regarding weekly street cleaning in San Francisco. Copy: Each Supervisor. (25) From Morley M. Singer M.D., regarding functions of the Vector Control and Healthy Housing Department. Copy: Each Supervisor. (26) From San Francisco Deputy Sheriffs’ Association, regarding a proposal to replace Police Officers at the San Francisco International Airport with Deputy Sheriffs. Copy: Each Supervisor. (27) From Peggy Fahnestock, regarding an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project. Copy: Each Supervisor. (28) From Terry, regarding a racist banner at the Bernal Heights library. Copy: Each Supervisor. (29) City and County of San Francisco Page 35 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 15, 2020 From National Lawyers Guild San Francisco Bay Area Chapter, regarding a request for reconsideration of approval and/or major mitigation of India Basin Mixed-Use Project and the Significant ongoing and harmful air pollution it would cause in Bayview Hunters Point. Copy: Each Supervisor. (30) From RJ Sloan, regarding various topics. 11 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (31) From Elizabeth Stahl, regarding San Francisco Police Department delaying the 272 reform recommendations issued by the US Department of Justice in 2016. Reform. Copy: Each Supervisor. (32) From concerned citizens, regarding a request for clarity around preschool guidance for their Fall operations. Copy: Each Supervisor. (33) From Coalition for San Francisco Neighborhoods, regarding strongly urging Governor Newsom to veto Assembly Bill 725 (Wicks). Copy: Each Supervisor. (34) From Aaron Goodman, regarding taxing vehicles used by on-demand delivery companies on the streets. Copy: Each Supervisor. (35) From the Coalition for San Francisco, regarding their Treasure Island Building Moratorium Resolution. Copy: Each Supervisor. (36) From Chaitanya Diwadkar, regarding the removal of the Wawona hens. Copy: Each Supervisor. (37) From John Smith, regarding tax dollars and the current condition of San Francisco. Copy: Each Supervisor. (38) From Aaron Goodman, regarding restricting auto use during spare the air days. Copy: Each Supervisor. (39) From Eden Niemela, regarding a sheltered tenant falsely claiming disability. Copy: Each Supervisor. (40) ADJOURNMENT City and County of San Francisco Page 36 Printed at 11:02 pm on 9/10/20