# Board of Supervisors Minutes: February 25, 2020 - Meeting date: 2020-02-25 - Document type: minutes - Source format: PDF - Extracted pages: 27 - [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/652/2020-02-25-minutes) - [Authoritative City source](https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=M&ID=764394&GUID=18F2DF97-311E-4BED-B009-1C0DEFCB9255) > This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City source is the authoritative public record. ## Structured legislative records ### File 191281: Administrative Code - Tenant Buyout Agreements - Pages: 3-4 - Sponsors: Ronen; Preston, Fewer, Haney, Peskin, Walton and Mandelman - Vote 1: final-passage, likely final - Action: 191281 [Administrative Code - Tenant Buyout Agreements] Sponsors: Ronen; Preston, Fewer, Haney, Peskin, Walton and Mandelman Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to (1) classify certain types of unlawful detainer settlement agreements as “Buyout Agreements,” (2) require the Rent Board to provide more information on the disclosure form that landlords must give to tenants before buyout negotiations commence, (3) require landlords to give the disclosure form to tenants a certain number of days before the Buyout Agreement is executed and to verify to the Rent Board that the disclosures were provided, (4) require landlords to include in the final Buyout Agreement identifying information about the location of the unit, and (5) allow a tenant to invalidate any provision of the Buyout Agreement in which the tenant waived their rights if the landlord did not timely file the Buyout Agreement with the Rent Board. Ordinance No. 036-20 FINALLY PASSED The foregoing items were acted upon by the following vote: - Ayes: Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee ### File 190973: Health Code - Approving a New Location for a Permittee’s Medical Cannabis Dispensary Permit - Pages: 4-5 - Sponsors: Haney - Vote 1: amendment - Action: t or been notified by the landlord that the lease would be terminated or not renewed, the new location has an existing authorization for Medical Cannabis Dispensary Use, the permittee has complied with all requirements of Article 33 of the Health Code (the Medical Cannabis Act) with respect to the new location, and the permittee satisfies the provisions of Article 33 regarding authorization by the Office of Cannabis to sell Adult Use Cannabis; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. Supervisor Haney, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE, on Page 1, Lines 12-14, by adding ‘the Director has not been notified of any court judgement finding that the owner of the new location has wrongfully evicted another permittee from the new location,’; on Page 3, Lines 15-17, by adding ‘(F) The Director has not been notified of any court judgment finding that the owner of the New Location has wrongfully evicted another Grandfathered MCD Permittee from the New Location.’; and making other clarifying and conforming changes. The motion carried by the following vote: - Ayes: Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee - Vote 2: first-reading - Action: annabis as an Equity Applicant under the Police Code, the permittee, if a natural person, or a natural person who is a verified Equity Applicant, was identified as an applicant or as a person who would be “engaged in the management of the medical cannabis dispensary,” on the original Article 33 permit application submitted on or before January 5, 2018, the permittee has been evicted from the location associated with the permit or been notified by the landlord that the lease would be terminated or not renewed, the new location has an existing authorization for Medical Cannabis Dispensary Use, the Director has not been notified of any court judgment finding that the owner of the new location has wrongfully evicted another permittee from the new location, the permittee has complied with all requirements of Article 33 of the Health Code (the Medical Cannabis Act) with respect to the new location, and the permittee satisfies the provisions of Article 33 regarding authorization by the Office of Cannabis to sell Adult Use Cannabis; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote: - Ayes: Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Walton - Noes: Stefani, Yee ### File 191181: Street Vacation - Vallejo Street and Davis Street Right-of-Ways - Teatro ZinZanni Development Project - Pages: 5 - Sponsors: Mayor - Vote 1: final-passage, likely final - Action: 191181 [Street Vacation - Vallejo Street and Davis Street Right-of-Ways - Teatro ZinZanni Development Project] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance ordering the vacation of streets on a portion of the Vallejo Street right-of-way, generally bounded by Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0138, Lot No. 001, and Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0139, Lot No. 002, between Davis Street and The Embarcadero and a portion of the Davis Street right-of-way as part of improvements for the Teatro ZinZanni hotel, entertainment venue, and public open space project; making findings about the Mitigated Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act; adopting findings that the actions contemplated in this Ordinance are consistent with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and authorizing official acts in connection with this Ordinance, as defined herein. Ordinance No. 037-20 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote: - Ayes: Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee ### File 191258: Administrative Code - Hotel Conversion Ordinance - Pages: 5-6 - Sponsors: Peskin - Vote 1: first-reading - Action: 191258 [Administrative Code - Hotel Conversion Ordinance] Sponsor: Peskin Ordinance repealing Ordinance Nos. 38-17 and 102-19, and reenacting certain provisions by amending the Administrative Code to update the Hotel Conversion Ordinance, including: adding or refining definitions of comparable unit, conversion, and low-income household; revising procedures for permits to convert residential units; harmonizing fees and penalty provisions with the Building Code; eliminating seasonal short-term rentals for residential hotels that have violated provisions of the Hotel Conversion Ordinance in the previous year; authorizing the Department of Building Inspection to issue administrative subpoenas; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Fewer, moved that this Ordinance be CONTINUED ON FIRST READING to the Board of Supervisors meeting of March 24, 2020. The motion carried by the following vote: - Ayes: Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee ## Extracted text ### [Page 4](https://sfbos.info/documents/652/2020-02-25-minutes#page-4) Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 2/25/2020 REGULAR AGENDA UNFINISHED BUSINESS Recommendation of the Land Use and Transportation Committee 190973 [Health Code - Approving a New Location for a Permittee’s Medical Cannabis Dispensary Permit] Sponsor: Haney Ordinance amending the Health Code to authorize the Director of the Department of Public Health to allow an existing Medical Cannabis Dispensary permittee to operate under that permit at a new location, provided the permittee has been verified by the Office of Cannabis as an Equity Applicant under the Police Code, the permittee, if a natural person, or a natural person who is a verified Equity Applicant, was identified as an applicant or as a person who would be “engaged in the management of the medical cannabis dispensary,” on the original Article 33 permit application submitted on or before January 5, 2018, the permittee has been evicted from the location associated with the permit or been notified by the landlord that the lease would be terminated or not renewed, the new location has an existing authorization for Medical Cannabis Dispensary Use, the permittee has complied with all requirements of Article 33 of the Health Code (the Medical Cannabis Act) with respect to the new location, and the permittee satisfies the provisions of Article 33 regarding authorization by the Office of Cannabis to sell Adult Use Cannabis; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. Supervisor Haney, seconded by Supervisor Peskin, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE, on Page 1, Lines 12-14, by adding ‘the Director has not been notified of any court judgement finding that the owner of the new location has wrongfully evicted another permittee from the new location,’; on Page 3, Lines 15-17, by adding ‘(F) The Director has not been notified of any court judgment finding that the owner of the New Location has wrongfully evicted another Grandfathered MCD Permittee from the New Location.’; and making other clarifying and conforming changes. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee Ordinance amending the Health Code to authorize the Director of the Department of Public Health to allow an existing Medical Cannabis Dispensary permittee to operate under that permit at a new location, provided the permittee has been verified by the Office of Cannabis as an Equity Applicant under the Police Code, the permittee, if a natural person, or a natural person who is a verified Equity Applicant, was identified as an applicant or as a person who would be “engaged in the management of the medical cannabis dispensary,” on the original Article 33 permit application submitted on or before January 5, 2018, the permittee has been evicted from the location associated with the permit or been notified by the landlord that the lease would be terminated or not renewed, the new location has an existing authorization for Medical Cannabis Dispensary Use, the Director has not been notified of any court judgment finding that the owner of the new location has wrongfully evicted another permittee from the new location, the permittee has complied with all requirements of Article 33 of the Health Code (the Medical Cannabis Act) with respect to the new location, and the permittee satisfies the provisions of Article 33 regarding authorization by the Office of Cannabis to sell Adult Use Cannabis; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote: Ayes: 9 - Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Walton Noes: 2 - Stefani, Yee City and County of San Francisco Page 129 Printed at 9:34 pm on 4/9/20 ### [Page 5](https://sfbos.info/documents/652/2020-02-25-minutes#page-5) Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 2/25/2020 Referred Without Recommendation from the Land Use and Transportation Committee 191181 [Street Vacation - Vallejo Street and Davis Street Right-of-Ways - Teatro ZinZanni Development Project] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance ordering the vacation of streets on a portion of the Vallejo Street right-of-way, generally bounded by Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0138, Lot No. 001, and Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0139, Lot No. 002, between Davis Street and The Embarcadero and a portion of the Davis Street right-of-way as part of improvements for the Teatro ZinZanni hotel, entertainment venue, and public open space project; making findings about the Mitigated Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act; adopting findings that the actions contemplated in this Ordinance are consistent with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and authorizing official acts in connection with this Ordinance, as defined herein. Ordinance No. 037-20 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee Recommendation of the Rules Committee 191258 [Administrative Code - Hotel Conversion Ordinance] Sponsor: Peskin Ordinance repealing Ordinance Nos. 38-17 and 102-19, and reenacting certain provisions by amending the Administrative Code to update the Hotel Conversion Ordinance, including: adding or refining definitions of comparable unit, conversion, and low-income household; revising procedures for permits to convert residential units; harmonizing fees and penalty provisions with the Building Code; eliminating seasonal short-term rentals for residential hotels that have violated provisions of the Hotel Conversion Ordinance in the previous year; authorizing the Department of Building Inspection to issue administrative subpoenas; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Fewer, moved that this Ordinance be CONTINUED ON FIRST READING to the Board of Supervisors meeting of March 24, 2020. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Preston, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee City and County of San Francisco Page 130 Printed at 9:34 pm on 4/9/20