# Board of Supervisors Minutes: December 10, 2019 - Meeting date: 2019-12-10 - Document type: minutes - Pages in official PDF: 44 - [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/636/2019-12-10-minutes) - [Authoritative City PDF](https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=M&ID=748671&GUID=BC99DE7D-DEF4-4C37-BFA6-490BC9D8AC69) > This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City PDF is the authoritative public record. ## Structured legislative records ### File 191061: Settlement of Lawsuit - Pacific Bell Telephone Company - $124,500 - Pages: 4-5 ### File 191063: Settlement of Unlitigated Claim - 220 Golden Gate Associates, L.P. - $262,184.16 Plus Interest - Pages: 5 ### File 190756: Police Code - Cannabis Retailers at Permitted Cannabis Events - Pages: 5-6 - Vote 1: final-passage, likely final - Action: itted Cannabis Events] Sponsors: Mandelman; Walton and Brown Ordinance amending the Police Code to require that cannabis retailers at permitted events hold Cannabis Business Permits issued by the City, that applicants for Cannabis Event Permits identify the retailers that will be selling cannabis goods at such events and affirm that said retailers hold City-issued Cannabis Business Permits, and that recipients of Cannabis Event Permits take steps to reasonably ensure that only said retailers will sell cannabis goods at such events; to require that Cannabis Event Permit applicants commit to specific actions to support the City's equity goals as a condition of permit issuance; and to provide that a material false statement made in connection with an application for a Cannabis Event Permit may be subject to administrative penalty, cause for denial of a pending or future application for a Cannabis Business Permit, and cause for suspension or revocation of an existing Cannabis Business Permit; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. Ordinance No. 284-19 FINALLY PASSED The foregoing items were acted upon by the following vote: - Ayes: Brown, Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee ### File 191013: Transportation Code - Mobility Device Permit Requirement - Pages: 6 - Vote 1: first-reading - Action: 191013 [Transportation Code - Mobility Device Permit Requirement] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Transportation Code to establish a violation for operating a Shared Mobility Device Service without a permit or other authorization from the Municipal Transportation Agency, and to repeal certain parking restrictions related to stationless bicycle share programs and powered scooter share programs; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote: - Ayes: Brown, Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee ### File 191033: Administrative, Public Works, Police Codes - Establishing Office of Emerging Technology - Requiring Permits for Using Emerging Technology Devices on Public Right-of-Ways - Pages: 6-7 - Vote 1: amendment - Action: ee; Fewer, Peskin, Walton, Safai, Ronen, Brown, Stefani, Mar and Mandelman Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to create an Office of Emerging Technology within Public Works; amending the Public Works Code to require a permit to obstruct the public right-of-way within Public Works’ jurisdiction; amending the Administrative Code to codify the Public Works Director’s authority to take official actions, as defined herein, including adopting regulations for the pilot operation of emerging technology devices; amending the Public Works Code and Police Code to provide for administrative, civil, and criminal penalties for unlawful obstruction of the public right-of-way, including operation of emerging technology devices without a required permit; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Fiscal Impact) Supervisors Safai, Ronen, Brown, Stefani, Mar, and Mandelman requested to be added as co-sponsors. Supervisor Yee, seconded by Supervisor Mandelman, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE, on Page 8, Line 1, by striking the duplicate ‘OET’. The motion carried by the following vote: - Ayes: Brown, Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee - Vote 2: first-reading - Action: (Fiscal Impact) PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote: - Ayes: Brown, Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee ## Extracted text ### [Page 5](https://sfbos.info/documents/636/2019-12-10-minutes#page-5) Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 12/10/2019 191063 [Settlement of Unlitigated Claim - 220 Golden Gate Associates, L.P. - $262,184.16 Plus Interest] Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claim filed by 220 Golden Gate Associates, L.P. against the City and County of San Francisco for $262,184.16 plus statutory interest; the claim was filed on July 15, 2019; the claim involves an alleged overpayment of property taxes. (City Attorney) Resolution No. 524-19 ADOPTED Recommendation of the Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee 190756 [Police Code - Cannabis Retailers at Permitted Cannabis Events] Sponsors: Mandelman; Walton and Brown Ordinance amending the Police Code to require that cannabis retailers at permitted events hold Cannabis Business Permits issued by the City, that applicants for Cannabis Event Permits identify the retailers that will be selling cannabis goods at such events and affirm that said retailers hold City-issued Cannabis Business Permits, and that recipients of Cannabis Event Permits take steps to reasonably ensure that only said retailers will sell cannabis goods at such events; to require that Cannabis Event Permit applicants commit to specific actions to support the City's equity goals as a condition of permit issuance; and to provide that a material false statement made in connection with an application for a Cannabis Event Permit may be subject to administrative penalty, cause for denial of a pending or future application for a Cannabis Business Permit, and cause for suspension or revocation of an existing Cannabis Business Permit; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. Ordinance No. 284-19 FINALLY PASSED The foregoing items were acted upon by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Brown, Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee City and County of San Francisco Page 1010 Printed at 5:39 pm on 1/23/20 ### [Page 6](https://sfbos.info/documents/636/2019-12-10-minutes#page-6) Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 12/10/2019 REGULAR AGENDA NEW BUSINESS Recommendations of the Budget and Finance Committee 191013 [Transportation Code - Mobility Device Permit Requirement] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance amending the Transportation Code to establish a violation for operating a Shared Mobility Device Service without a permit or other authorization from the Municipal Transportation Agency, and to repeal certain parking restrictions related to stationless bicycle share programs and powered scooter share programs; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Brown, Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee 191033 [Administrative, Public Works, Police Codes - Establishing Office of Emerging Technology - Requiring Permits for Using Emerging Technology Devices on Public Right-of-Ways] Sponsors: Yee; Fewer, Peskin, Walton, Safai, Ronen, Brown, Stefani, Mar and Mandelman Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to create an Office of Emerging Technology within Public Works; amending the Public Works Code to require a permit to obstruct the public right-of-way within Public Works’ jurisdiction; amending the Administrative Code to codify the Public Works Director’s authority to take official actions, as defined herein, including adopting regulations for the pilot operation of emerging technology devices; amending the Public Works Code and Police Code to provide for administrative, civil, and criminal penalties for unlawful obstruction of the public right-of-way, including operation of emerging technology devices without a required permit; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Fiscal Impact) Supervisors Safai, Ronen, Brown, Stefani, Mar, and Mandelman requested to be added as co-sponsors. Supervisor Yee, seconded by Supervisor Mandelman, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE, on Page 8, Line 1, by striking the duplicate ‘OET’. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Brown, Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee (Fiscal Impact) PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Brown, Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Mar, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee City and County of San Francisco Page 1011 Printed at 5:39 pm on 1/23/20