# Board of Supervisors Minutes: October 2, 2012 - Meeting date: 2012-10-02 - Document type: minutes - Pages in official PDF: 19 - [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/62/2012-10-02-minutes) - [Authoritative City PDF](https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=M&ID=210745&GUID=8839921D-020A-4C7D-A66C-A79E65176173) > This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City PDF is the authoritative public record. ## Structured legislative records ### File 120773: Planning Code - Reinstating Liquor License Controls and Establishing Conditional Use Requirement for Limited Restaurants - Union Street Neighborhood Commercial District - Pages: 2-3 ### File 120854: Settlement of Lawsuit - Brock Rasmussen - $175,000 - Pages: 3 ### File 120897: Settlement of Claim - Laurel Dawn Teixeira - $80,000 - Pages: 3-4 - Vote 1: adoption, likely final - Action: 120897 [Settlement of Claim - Laurel Dawn Teixeira - $80,000] Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claim filed by Laurel Dawn Teixeira against the City and County of San Francisco for $80,000; claim was filed on November 7, 2011. (City Attorney) Resolution No. 360-12 ADOPTED The foregoing items were acted upon by the following vote: - Ayes: Avalos, Campos, Chiu, Chu, Cohen, Elsbernd, Kim, Mar, Olague, Wiener - Excused: Farrell ### File 120898: Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency - Pages: 4-5 - Vote 1: final-passage, likely final - Action: classifications, and who continued in those R classifications through the effective date of AB 1484, shall continue to be Successor Agency employees; 4) creating the Successor Agency Commission as the policy body of the Successor Agency and delegating to it the authority to act in place of the former Redevelopment Agency Commission to implement the surviving redevelopment projects, the replacement housing obligations and other enforceable obligations and the authority to take actions that the State redevelopment dissolution law requires or allows on behalf of the Successor Agency; 5) establishing the composition and terms of the members of the Successor Agency Commission, setting forth voting requirements and providing for the Successor Agency Commission to appoint an Executive Director of the Successor Agency; 6) authorizing the Successor Agency to retain the City Attorney as its legal counsel; 7) ratifying prior acts; and 8) authorizing and directing the Successor Agency Commission to take all appropriate steps to effectuate the purpose of this ordinance consistent with the State redevelopment dissolution law. Ordinance No. 215-12 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote: play video - Ayes: Avalos, Chiu, Chu, Cohen, Elsbernd, Kim, Mar, Olague, Wiener - Noes: Campos - Excused: Farrell ## Extracted text ### [Page 3](https://sfbos.info/documents/62/2012-10-02-minutes#page-3) Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 10/2/2012 Recommendations of the Rules Committee 120854 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Brock Rasmussen - $175,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Brock Rasmussen against the City and County of San Francisco for $175,000; the lawsuit was filed on January 11, 2010, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-10-495963; entitled Brock Rasmussen v. City and County of San Francisco, et al. (City Attorney) PASSED ON FIRST READING 120897 [Settlement of Claim - Laurel Dawn Teixeira - $80,000] Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claim filed by Laurel Dawn Teixeira against the City and County of San Francisco for $80,000; claim was filed on November 7, 2011. (City Attorney) Resolution No. 360-12 ADOPTED The foregoing items were acted upon by the following vote: Ayes: 10 - Avalos, Campos, Chiu, Chu, Cohen, Elsbernd, Kim, Mar, Olague, Wiener Excused: 1 - Farrell City and County of San Francisco Page 690 Printed at 3:41 pm on 11/6/12 ### [Page 4](https://sfbos.info/documents/62/2012-10-02-minutes#page-4) Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 10/2/2012 REGULAR AGENDA UNFINISHED BUSINESS From the Board 120898 [Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency] Sponsors: Mayor; Kim, Cohen and Olague Ordinance of the Successor Agency to the former Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco implementing the State redevelopment dissolution law known as AB X1 26 (2011) in furtherance of the recently adopted amendments to that law known as AB 1484 and of previously adopted City policies, by: 1) acknowledging that AB 1484 provides that the Successor Agency is a separate legal entity from the City, with the Successor Agency holding all of the transferred assets and obligations of the former Redevelopment Agency (other than the affordable housing assets ) distinct from the City, and with the Oversight Board performing specific functions set forth in the State redevelopment dissolution law; 2) officially naming the Successor Agency as the "Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco;" 3) acknowledging that former Redevelopment Agency employees who became Successor Agency employees by operation of AB 26 and were assigned to R classifications, and who continued in those R classifications through the effective date of AB 1484, shall continue to be Successor Agency employees; 4) creating the Successor Agency Commission as the policy body of the Successor Agency and delegating to it the authority to act in place of the former Redevelopment Agency Commission to implement the surviving redevelopment projects, the replacement housing obligations and other enforceable obligations and the authority to take actions that the State redevelopment dissolution law requires or allows on behalf of the Successor Agency; 5) establishing the composition and terms of the members of the Successor Agency Commission, setting forth voting requirements and providing for the Successor Agency Commission to appoint an Executive Director of the Successor Agency; 6) authorizing the Successor Agency to retain the City Attorney as its legal counsel; 7) ratifying prior acts; and 8) authorizing and directing the Successor Agency Commission to take all appropriate steps to effectuate the purpose of this ordinance consistent with the State redevelopment dissolution law. Ordinance No. 215-12 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote: play video Ayes: 9 - Avalos, Chiu, Chu, Cohen, Elsbernd, Kim, Mar, Olague, Wiener Noes: 1 - Campos Excused: 1 - Farrell City and County of San Francisco Page 691 Printed at 3:41 pm on 11/6/12