# Board of Supervisors Minutes: July 16, 2019 - Meeting date: 2019-07-16 - Document type: minutes - Source format: PDF - Extracted pages: 35 - [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/606/2019-07-16-minutes) - [Authoritative City source](https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=M&ID=711266&GUID=5282A0CB-235B-4D7A-893E-01688531CE59) > This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City source is the authoritative public record. ## Structured legislative records ### File 190773: Opposing United States Housing & Urban Development Rule Prohibiting Mixed Status Families from Receiving Federal Housing Assistance - Pages: 26-27 - Sponsors: Ronen; Peskin, Walton, Mar, Yee, Haney, Fewer, Safai and Mandelman ### File 190776: Planning Department Report - Interim Zoning Moratorium on Change of Nighttime Entertainment Use - One Maritime Plaza Area - Pages: 27 - Sponsors: Peskin - Vote 1: approval, likely final - Action: 190776 [Planning Department Report - Interim Zoning Moratorium on Change of Nighttime Entertainment Use - One Maritime Plaza Area] Sponsor: Peskin Motion adopting the Planning Department’s report on the interim zoning moratorium on changes of nighttime entertainment use in the One Maritime Plaza area bounded by Jackson Street to the north, Sacramento Street to the south, Drumm Street to the west, and Sansome Street to the east; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. Motion No. M19-114 APPROVED The foregoing items were acted upon by the following vote: - Ayes: Brown, Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee - Excused: Mar ### File 190726: Opposing California Assembly Bill No. 68 (Ting) - Accessory Dwelling Units - Unless Amended - Pages: 27-28 - Sponsors: Peskin - Vote 1: continuance - Action: e” eviction provisions of San Francisco’s Rent Code, Administrative Code Chapter 37, by providing that an Accessory Dwelling Unit must be approved within 60 days even if it causes the partial or full eviction of tenants from the project site; and WHEREAS, AB 68 would impose rigid standards on local jurisdictions and impair the ability of jurisdictions like San Francisco, which have demonstrated leadership and ongoing innovation in the provision of this important infill housing; and’; on Page 3, Line 2, by changing ‘should’ to ‘need’, Lines 6-10, by adding ‘and WHEREAS, San Francisco continues to take steps to liberalize the construction of Accessory Dwelling Units, expedite their approval, and facilitate their financing, while ensuring that existing tenants are protected and that Accessory Dwelling Units are subject to rent control’, and Lines 16-19, by adding ‘FURTHER RESOLVED, That, specifically, AB 68 should be amended to allow San Francisco to apply waivable standards to Accessory Dwelling Units in order to subject them to rent control, and to ensure that San Francisco’s rigorous just cause eviction protections remain enforceable; and’. The motion carried by the following vote: - Ayes: Brown, Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee - Excused: Mar - Vote 2: adoption, likely final - Action: City and County of San Francisco Page 638 Printed at 2:40 pm on 8/20/19 Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 7/16/2019 Resolution opposing California State Assembly Bill No. 68, authored by Assembly Member Phil Ting, unless amended, to allow the City and County of San Francisco and other early adopters of permissive Accessory Dwelling Unit regulations to ensure the enforceability of San Francisco's just cause eviction protections and to continue subjecting Accessory Dwelling Units to rent control. Resolution No. 334-19 ADOPTED AS AMENDED by the following vote: - Ayes: Brown, Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee - Excused: Mar ## Extracted text ### [Page 27](https://sfbos.info/documents/606/2019-07-16-minutes#page-27) Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 7/16/2019 190776 [Planning Department Report - Interim Zoning Moratorium on Change of Nighttime Entertainment Use - One Maritime Plaza Area] Sponsor: Peskin Motion adopting the Planning Department’s report on the interim zoning moratorium on changes of nighttime entertainment use in the One Maritime Plaza area bounded by Jackson Street to the north, Sacramento Street to the south, Drumm Street to the west, and Sansome Street to the east; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. Motion No. M19-114 APPROVED The foregoing items were acted upon by the following vote: Ayes: 10 - Brown, Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee Excused: 1 - Mar Severed from the For Adoption Without Committee Reference Agenda Supervisor Peskin requested that File Nos. 190726 and 190748 be severed so that they may be considered separately. 190726 [Opposing California Assembly Bill No. 68 (Ting) - Accessory Dwelling Units - Unless Amended] Sponsor: Peskin Resolution opposing California State Assembly Bill No. 68, authored by Assembly Member Phil Ting, unless amended, to provide jurisdictional deference to the City and County of San Francisco and other early adopters of permissive Accessory Dwelling Unit regulations. Supervisor Peskin, seconded by Supervisor Ronen, moved that this Resolution be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE, on Page 1, Line 4, by changing ‘provide jurisdictional deference to’ to ‘allow’, and Lines 5-7, by adding ‘to ensure the enforceability of San Francisco’s just cause eviction protections and to continue subjecting Accessory Dwelling Units to rent control’; on Page 2, Line 3-7, by adding ‘WHEREAS, A core innovative component of San Francisco’s Citywide Accessory Dwelling Unit Program is the ability to impose certain standards on Accessory Dwelling Units that are subject to administrative waiver in consideration of subjecting the proposed Accessory Dwelling Unit(s) to rent control via so-called “Costa Hawkins Regulatory Agreements”; and’, and Lines 17-25, by adding ‘WHEREAS, Specifically, AB 68 would undermine the “just cause” eviction provisions of San Francisco’s Rent Code, Administrative Code Chapter 37, by providing that an Accessory Dwelling Unit must be approved within 60 days even if it causes the partial or full eviction of tenants from the project site; and WHEREAS, AB 68 would impose rigid standards on local jurisdictions and impair the ability of jurisdictions like San Francisco, which have demonstrated leadership and ongoing innovation in the provision of this important infill housing; and’; on Page 3, Line 2, by changing ‘should’ to ‘need’, Lines 6-10, by adding ‘and WHEREAS, San Francisco continues to take steps to liberalize the construction of Accessory Dwelling Units, expedite their approval, and facilitate their financing, while ensuring that existing tenants are protected and that Accessory Dwelling Units are subject to rent control’, and Lines 16-19, by adding ‘FURTHER RESOLVED, That, specifically, AB 68 should be amended to allow San Francisco to apply waivable standards to Accessory Dwelling Units in order to subject them to rent control, and to ensure that San Francisco’s rigorous just cause eviction protections remain enforceable; and’. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: 10 - Brown, Fewer, Haney, Mandelman, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Stefani, Walton, Yee Excused: 1 - Mar City and County of San Francisco Page 638 Printed at 2:40 pm on 8/20/19