Board of Supervisors Agenda: September 25, 2012

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AGENDA Legislative Chamber, Room 250 City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102-4689 Tuesday, September 25, 2012 - 2:00 PM Regular Meeting DAVID CHIU, PRESIDENT JOHN AVALOS, DAVID CAMPOS, CARMEN CHU, MALIA COHEN, SEAN ELSBERND, MARK FARRELL, JANE KIM, ERIC MAR, CHRISTINA OLAGUE, SCOTT WIENER Angela Calvillo, Clerk of the Board Agendas of the Board of Supervisors are available on the internet at www.sfbos.org BOARD COMMITTEES Committee Membership Meeting Days Budget and Finance Committee Wednesday Supervisors Chu, Avalos, Kim 11:00 AM City and School District Select Committee 4th Thursday Supervisors Campos, Olague, Chiu, Commissioners Fewer, Maufas, Mendoza 3:30 PM City Operations and Neighborhood Services Committee 2nd and 4th Monday Supervisors Elsbernd, Chu, Olague 10:00 AM Government Audit and Oversight Committee 2nd and 4th Thursday Supervisors Farrell, Elsbernd, Chiu 1:00 PM Land Use and Economic Development Committee Monday Supervisors Mar, Cohen, Wiener 1:00 PM Public Safety Committee 1st and 3rd Thursday Supervisors Avalos, Olague, Mar 10:30 AM Rules Committee 1st and 3rd Thursday Supervisors Kim, Farrell, Campos 1:30 PM First-named Supervisor is Chair, Second-named Supervisor is Vice-Chair of the Committee.

Agenda Item Information Each item on the Consent or Regular agenda may include the following documents: 1) Legislation 2) Budget and Legislative Analyst report 3) Department or Agency cover letter and/or report 4) Public correspondence These items will be available for review at 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, City Hall, Room 244, Reception Desk. Meeting Procedures The Board of Supervisors is the legislative body of the City and County of San Francisco. The Board has several standing committees where ordinances and resolutions are the subject of hearings at which members of the public are urged to testify. The full Board does not hold a second public hearing on measures which have been heard in committee. Board procedures do not permit: 1) persons in the audience to vocally express support or opposition to statements by Supervisors or by other persons testifying; 2) ringing and use of cell phones, pagers, and similar sound-producing electronic devices; 3) bringing in or displaying signs in the meeting room; and 4) standing in the meeting room. Each member of the public will be allotted the same maximum number of minutes to speak as set by the President or Chair at the beginning of each item or public comment, excluding City representatives, except that public speakers using translation assistance will be allowed to testify for twice the amount of the public testimony time limit. If simultaneous translation services are used, speakers will be governed by the public testimony time limit applied to speakers not requesting translation assistance. Members of the public who want a document placed on the overhead for display should clearly state such and subsequently remove the document when they want the screen to return to live coverage of the meeting. IMPORTANT INFORMATION: The public is encouraged to testify at Committee meetings. Persons unable to attend the meeting may submit to the City, by the time the proceedings begin, written comments regarding the agenda items above. These comments will be made a part of the official public record and shall be brought to the attention of the Board of Supervisors. Written communications should be submitted to the Clerk of the Board, Clerk of a Committee or its members: 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco, CA 94102. Communications which are not received prior to the hearing may be delivered to the Clerk of the Committee at the hearing and you are encouraged to bring enough copies for distribution. LAPTOP COMPUTER FOR PRESENTATIONS: Contact City Hall Media Services at (415) 554-7490 to coordinate the use of the laptop computer for presentations. Presenters should arrive 30 minutes prior to the meeting to test their presentations on the computer. AGENDA PACKET: Available for review in Clerk’s Office, Room 244, City Hall, 1 Dr.Carlton B Goodlett Place, or on the internet at http://www.sfbos.org/meetings. Meetings are cablecast on SF Cable 26. Meetings are broadcast live on KPOO 89.5 FM. For DVD copies and scheduling call (415) 554-4188. LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS: Requests must be received at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to help ensure availability. Contact Madeleine Licavoli at (415) 554-7722. AVISO EN ESPAÑOL: La solicitud para un traductor debe recibirse antes de mediodía de el viernes anterior a la reunion. Llame a Derek Evans (415) 554-7702.

Disability Access The Legislative Chamber (Room 250) and the Committee Room (Room 263) in City Hall are wheelchair accessible. Meetings are real-time captioned and are cablecast open-captioned on SF Cable 26. Assistive listening devices for the Legislative Chamber are available upon request at the Clerk of the Board's Office, Room 244. Assistive listening devices for the Committee Room are available upon request at the Clerk of the Board's Office, Room 244 or in the Committee Room. To request sign language interpreters, readers, large print agendas or other accommodations, please contact Madeleine Licavoli at (415) 554-7722 or (415) 554-5227 (TTY). Requests made at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting will help to ensure availability. The nearest accessible BART station is Civic Center (Market/Grove/Hyde Streets). Accessible MUNI Metro lines are the F, J, K, L, M, N, T (exit at Civic Center or Van Ness Stations). MUNI bus lines also serving the area are the 5, 6, 9, 19, 21, 47, 49, 71, and 71L. For more information about MUNI accessible services, call (415) 701-4485. There is accessible parking in the vicinity of City Hall at Civic Center Plaza and adjacent to Davies Hall and the War Memorial Complex. Accessible curbside parking is available on Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place and Grove Street. In order to assist the City’s efforts to accommodate persons with severe allergies, environmental illness, multiple chemical sensitivity or related disabilities, attendees at public meetings are reminded that other attendees may be sensitive to perfumes and various other chemical-based scented products. Please help the City to accommodate these individuals. Know Your Rights Under The Sunshine Ordinance Government's duty is to serve the public, reaching its decision in full view of the public. Commissions, boards, councils, and other agencies of the City and County exist to conduct the people's business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and that City operations are open to the people's review. For information on your rights under the Sunshine Ordinance (Chapter 67 of the San Francisco Administrative Code) or to report a violation of the ordinance, contact by mail Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco CA 94102; phone at (415) 554-7724; fax at (415) 554-7854; or by email at sotf@sfgov.org Citizens may obtain a free copy of the Sunshine Ordinance by printing Chapter 67 of the San Francisco Administrative Code on the Internet, at http://www.sfbos.org/sunshine Lobbyist Registration and Reporting Requirements Individuals and entities that influence or attempt to influence local legislative or administrative action may be required by the San Francisco Lobbyist Ordinance [SF Campaign & Governmental Conduct Code Sec. 2.100] to register and report lobbying activity. For more information about the Lobbyist Ordinance, please contact the San Francisco Ethics Commission at 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220, San Francisco, CA 94102; telephone (415) 252-3100; fax (415) 252-3112; web site http://www.sfgov.org/ethics

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AGENDA CHANGES COMMUNICATIONS CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed hereunder constitute a Consent Agenda, are considered to be routine by the Board of Supervisors and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Board. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the Board so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered as a separate item. Questions on the Consent Agenda are on final passage, first reading, adoption, or approved, as indicated. Items 1 through 7 Recommendations of the Rules Committee Present: Supervisors Kim, Farrell, Campos 1. 120836 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Saeed Ibrahim - $35,000.00] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Saeed Ibrahim against the City and County of San Francisco for $35,000.00; the lawsuit was filed on February 17, 2011, in U.S. District Court, Case No. CV 11-1695-RS; entitled Saeed Ibrahim v. City and County of San Francisco, et al. (City Attorney) Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Comm_Packet_090612 Board_Packet_091812 Board_Packet_092512 09/18/2012; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 4 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 2. 120837 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Lepakshi Nadh Jilakara - $40,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Lepakshi Nadh Jilakara against the City and County of San Francisco for $40,000; the lawsuit was filed on April 26, 2011, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-11-510513; entitled Lepakshi Nadh Jilakara, et al., v. City and County of San Francisco, et al. (City Attorney) Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Comm_Packet_090612 Board_Packet_091812 Board_Packet_092512 09/18/2012; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 3. 120845 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Brian Navarro - $225,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Brian Navarro against the City and County of San Francisco for $225,000; the lawsuit was filed on March 1, 2011, in Brian Navarro vs. City and County of San Francisco, Case No.CGC-11-508644; entitled Brian Navarro, et al., v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.; other material terms of said settlement are material terms. (City Attorney) Attachments: Comm_Packet_090612 Board_Packet_091812 Board_Packet_092512 09/18/2012; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 4. 120846 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Fred Broussard - $125,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Fred Broussard against the City and County of San Francisco for $125,000; the lawsuit was filed on October 4, 2010, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. CV10-4997 WHA; entitled Fred Broussard, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al. (City Attorney) Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Comm_Packet_090612 Board_Packet_091812 Board_Packet_092512 09/18/2012; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 5 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 5. 120853 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Raymond Quinn - $75,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Raymond Quinn against the City and County of San Francisco for $75,000; the lawsuit was filed on February 16, 2012, in US District Court, Case No. CV-12-0766 DMR; entitled Raymond Quinn v. City and County of San Francisco, et al. (City Attorney) Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Comm_Packet_090612 Board_Packet_091812 Board_Packet_092512 09/18/2012; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 6. 120855 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Yim Bing Kwong - $60,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Yim Bing Kwong against the City and County of San Francisco for $60,000; the lawsuit was filed on October 27, 2010, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. C-10-4860, entitled Yim Bing Kwong v. City and County of San Francisco. (City Attorney) Attachments: Comm_Packet_090612 Board_Packet_091812 Legislation_Ver1 Board_Packet_092512 09/18/2012; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 7. 120856 [Settlement of Lawsuit - James Wilson - $77,072.75] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by James Wilson, against the City and County of San Francisco for $77,072.75; the lawsuit was filed on February 20, 2007, in United States District Court, Case No. C-07-01016 PJH; entitled James Wilson, et al., v. City and County of San Francisco, et al. (City Attorney) Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Comm_Packet_090612 Board_Packet_091812 Board_Packet_092512 09/18/2012; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 6 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 REGULAR AGENDA UNFINISHED BUSINESS Recommendations of the Budget and Finance Committee Present: Supervisors Chu, Avalos, Kim 8. 111371 [Administrative Code - CleanPowerSF Funds and Appropriating $19,500,000 of Available Fund Balance to Support Required Reserves and Creating Special Funds for the CleanPowerSF Program at the Public Utilities Commission] Sponsor: Campos Ordinance appropriating $19,500,000 of Hetch Hetchy fund balance at the Public Utilities Commission to support CleanPowerSF Community Choice Aggregation program consistent with the contractual requirements and budgetary authorizations as approved by the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and the Board of Supervisors, placing the $6,000,000 appropriated for CleanPowerSF sustainability services on Budget and Finance Committee Reserve pending detailed appropriation plans for those sustainability services, and adding Administrative Code Sections 10.100.372 and 10.100.373 to establish the CleanPowerSF Customer Fund and the CleanPowerSF Reserve Fund. (Public Utilities Commission) (Fiscal Impact) Attachments: Legislation_ver1 Leg_Digiest_Ver1 Legislation_ver2 Leg_Digest_Ver2 Comm_Packet_091212 Budget_Analyst_091212.pdf Legislation_Ver3 Leg_Digest_Ver3 Board_Packet_091812 Legislation_Ver4 Board_Packet_092512 09/18/2012; AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE. 09/18/2012; PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 7 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 9. 120631 [Business and Tax Regulations, Police, and Planning Codes - Parking Tax Simplification for Residential Properties] Sponsor: Wiener Ordinance amending the San Francisco Business and Tax Regulations Code by adding Section 609 to establish Parking Tax Simplification for Residential Properties to relieve residential property owners and managers renting five or fewer parking spaces in Parking Stations physically attached to or otherwise associated with the building from the requirement to: 1)(a) obtain a certificate of authority, (b) make monthly tax prepayments, (c) obtain a parking tax bond, and (d) providing amnesty from parking taxes, interest, penalties and fees owed for tax periods ending before April 1, 2011; 2) amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code Section 2219.7 to exempt property owners and managers registered pursuant to Section 609 from the requirement to pay the Revenue Control Equipment compliance fee; 3) amending the Planning Code Section 204.5 to allow as an accessory use up to five dwelling unit parking spaces to be leased to persons living off-site anywhere in the City; 4) making conforming changes to the Planning Code Section 150(d); 5) amending the Police Code Section 1215 to eliminate the requirement to hold a commercial parking permit for property owners and managers registered pursuant to Section 609 of the Business and Tax Regulations Code; and 6) making environmental findings and findings of consistency with the general plan. Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Leg Digest_Ver1 Legislation_Ver2 Leg_Digest_Ver2 Response_PLN_062112 Legislation_Ver3 Leg Digest_Ver3 Response_PLN_081012 Legislation_Ver4 Leg Digest_Ver4 Comm_Packet_091212 Budget_Analyst_091212.pdf Legislation_Ver5 Leg_Digest_Ver5 Board_Packet_091812 Legislation_Ver6 Board_Packet_092512 09/18/2012; AMENDED. 09/18/2012; PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? Recommendations of the Land Use and Economic Development Committee Present: Supervisors Mar, Cohen, Wiener City and County of San Francisco Page 8 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 10. 120353 [Planning Code - Mechanical Car Wash Facilities on 19th Avenue] Sponsors: Olague; Chu and Elsbernd Ordinance amending the San Francisco Planning Code by adding Section 187.2 to permit existing gasoline and service stations located on 19th Avenue to provide a mechanical car wash on the same site; making environmental findings and findings of consistency with the General Plan. Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Leg_Digest_Ver1 Response_PLN_042512 Response_PLN_071612 Legislation_Ver2 Leg_Digest_Ver2 Comm_Packet_091012 Board_Packet_091812 Board_Packet_092512 09/18/2012; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 11. 120819 [Park Code - Petitioning, Leafleting, Picketing, and Soliciting in City Parks] Sponsor: Wiener Ordinance amending the San Francisco Park Code, Section 7.08, to repeal Subsection (d), which prohibits persons from petitioning, leafletting, demonstrating, or soliciting in designated areas of certain City parks while another event is in progress for which a permit has been issued by the Recreation and Park Department. Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Leg_Digest_Ver1 Comm_Packet_091012 Board_Packet_091812 Board_Packet_092512 09/18/2012; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 9 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 12. 120191 [Building Code - Definition of Efficiency Unit] Sponsor: Wiener Ordinance amending the San Francisco Building Code Section 1208.4 to reduce the square footage requirement for Efficiency Dwelling Units in new structures or buildings pursuant to Section 17958.1 of the California Health & Safety Code; and making environmental findings. Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Response_PLN_030512 Comm_Packet_052112 Legislation_Ver2 Comm_Packet_060412 Board_Packet_061212 Board_Packet_071012 Legislation_Ver3 Leg_Digest_Ver3 Board_Packet_072412 Board_Packet_073112 Board_Packet_092512 06/12/2012; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. 07/10/2012; AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE. 07/10/2012; CONTINUED AS AMENDED ON FIRST READING. 07/24/2012; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. 07/31/2012; CONTINUED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? NEW BUSINESS Recommendations of the Budget and Finance Committee Present: Supervisors Chu, Kim City and County of San Francisco Page 10 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 13. 120751 [Appropriating $543,200,000 of Proceeds from the Sale of Bonds for Capital Improvement Projects to the Airport Commission - FY2012-2013] Sponsors: Mayor; Chiu Ordinance appropriating $543,200,000 of proceeds from the sale of bonds for capital improvement projects to the Airport Commission for FY2012-2013, and placing the total appropriation of $543,200,000 on Controller’s Reserve pending sale of the bonds. (Fiscal Impact) Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Comm_Packet_091212 Budget_Analyst_091212.pdf Legislation_Ver2 Budget_Analyst_091912.pdf Comm_Packet_091912 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 14. 120759 [Airport Capital Plan Bonds - $502,200,000] Sponsors: Mayor; Chiu Resolution approving the issuance of up to $502,200,000 aggregate principal amount of San Francisco Airport Commission Capital Plan Bonds; and approving certain related matters. (Fiscal Impact) Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Comm_Packet_091212 Budget_Analyst_091212.pdf Budget_Analyst_091912.pdf Comm_Packet_091912 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 11 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 15. 120822 [Lease Amendment - Union Square Garage - 333 Post Street] Sponsor: Chiu Resolution approving and authorizing an amendment to the Lease of the Union Square Garage at 333 Post Street with the City and County of San Francisco Uptown Parking Corporation to continue the term of the Lease for a period not to exceed 180 days following the retirement of certain parking revenue bonds until the City and the Corporation either execute a new lease to replace the existing Lease, or complete an agreement to terminate the Lease and create a new advisory body in place of the Corporation; and ratifying prior acts. Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Budget_Analyst_091912.pdf Comm_Packet_091912 Legislation_Ver2 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 16. 120823 [Accept and Expend Grant - The Stop Study - $747,833] Sponsor: Wiener Resolution authorizing the San Francisco Department of Public Health to retroactively accept and expend a grant in the amount of $747,833 from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to participate in a program entitled "The Stop Study" for the period of June 15, 2012, through June 14, 2013. Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Comm_Packet_091912 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 17. 120860 [Contract Amendment - En Pointe Technology Sales, Inc. - $54,150,000] Resolution authorizing the Office of Contract Administration to enter into the Fifth Amendment between the City and County of San Francisco and En Pointe Technology Sales, Inc., part of the Technology Store procurement vehicle, in which the amendment shall increase the contract limit from $38,490,000 to $54,150,000, exercise the second of two options to extend the contract by one year through December 31, 2013, and update standard contractual clauses. (Office of Contract Administration) (Fiscal Impact) Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Budget_Analyst_091912.pdf Comm_Packet_091912 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 12 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 18. 120861 [Contract Amendment - Xtech - $67,890,000] Resolution authorizing the Office of Contract Administration to enter into the Fifth Amendment between the City and County of San Francisco and Xtech, part of the Technology Store procurement vehicle, in which the amendment shall increase the contract limit from $51,490,000 to $67,890,000, exercise the second of two options to extend the contract by one year through December 31, 2013, and update standard contractual clauses. (Office of Contract Administration) (Fiscal Impact) Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Budget_Analyst_091912.pdf Comm_Packet_091912 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 19. 120862 [Contract Amendment - CCT Technologies, Inc., dba ComputerLand of Silicon Valley - $34,460,000] Resolution authorizing the Office of Contract Administration to enter into the Third Amendment between the City and CCT Technologies, Inc., dba ComputerLand of Silicon Valley, part of the Technology Store procurement vehicle, in which the amendment shall increase the contract limit from $24,490,000 to $34,460,000, exercise the second of two options to extend the contract by one year through December 31, 2013, and update standard contractual clauses. (Office of Contract Administration) (Fiscal Impact) Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Budget_Analyst_091912.pdf Comm_Packet_091912 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? Recommendations of the Land Use and Economic Development Committee Present: Supervisors Mar, Cohen, Wiener City and County of San Francisco Page 13 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 20. 120142 [Transportation Code - Large Vehicle Parking Restrictions] Sponsors: Chu; Cohen Ordinance amending the San Francisco Transportation Code, Division I, Article 7, by adding Section 7.2.54 to prohibit the on-street parking of any vehicle over 22 feet in length or seven feet in height, camp trailers, fifth-wheel travel trailers, house cars, trailer coaches, mobilehomes, recreational vehicles, or semi-trailers as defined by the California Vehicle Code and Health and Safety Code, between the hours of 12 a.m. and 6 a.m. when Municipal Transportation Agency signs are posted giving notice; and making environmental findings. Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Response_PLN_021412 Response_MTA_022412 Response_PLN_022312 Comm_Packet_091712 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 21. 120318 [Police Code - Additional Penalties for Foreclosed Properties] Sponsor: Cohen Ordinance amending the San Francisco Police Code Article 1 and adding Sections 96 to 96.6 to permit the City and County of San Francisco to: 1) declare that public nuisances occurring at foreclosed properties be considered aggravating factors in imposing civil penalties and injunctive relief; 2) hold individuals and entities who own significant numbers of foreclosed properties to increased civil penalties for failing to maintain the properties; and 3) make environmental findings. Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Leg_Digest_Ver1 Comm_Packet_091712 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 14 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 22. 120773 [Planning Code - Reinstating Liquor License Controls and Establishing Conditional Use Requirement for Limited Restaurants - Union Street Neighborhood Commercial District] Sponsors: Farrell; Wiener Ordinance amending the San Francisco Planning Code Section 725.1 to: 1) reinstate controls to prohibit liquor license types 47 and 49 in the Union Street Neighborhood Commercial District; and 2) requiring conditional use authorization for Limited Restaurants; and making environmental findings and findings of consistency with the General Plan. Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Leg_Digest_Ver1 Response_PLN_072512 Response_PLN_091312 Response_SBC_091212 Comm_Packet_091712 Legislation_Ver2 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. Board of Supervisors Sitting as a Committee of the Whole City and County of San Francisco Page 15 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 23. 120942 [Committee of the Whole - Public Hearing - Ordinance of the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency] Sponsor: Cohen Hearing on Ordinance of the Successor Agency to the former Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco implementing the State redevelopment dissolution law known as AB X1 26 (2011) in furtherance of the recently adopted amendments to that law known as AB 1484 and of previously adopted City policies, by 1) acknowledging that AB 1484 provides that the Successor Agency is a separate legal entity from the City, with the Successor Agency holding all of the transferred assets and obligations of the former Redevelopment Agency (other than the affordable housing assets ) distinct from the City, and with the Oversight Board performing specific functions set forth in the State redevelopment dissolution law; 2) officially naming the Successor Agency as the "Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco"; 3) acknowledging that former Redevelopment Agency employees who became Successor Agency employees by operation of AB 26 and were assigned to R classifications, and who continued in those R classifications through the effective date of AB 1484, shall continue to be Successor Agency employees; 4) creating the Successor Agency Commission as the policy body of the Successor Agency and delegating to it the authority to act in place of the former Redevelopment Agency Commission to implement the surviving redevelopment projects, the replacement housing obligations and other enforceable obligations and the authority to take actions that the State redevelopment dissolution law requires or allows on behalf of the Successor Agency; 5) establishing the composition and terms of the members of the Successor Agency Commission, setting forth voting requirements and providing for the Successor Agency Commission to appoint an Executive Director of the Successor Agency; 6) authorizing the Successor Agency to retain the City Attorney as its legal counsel; 7) ratifying prior acts; and 8) authorizing and directing the Successor Agency Commission to take all appropriate steps to effectuate the purpose of this ordinance consistent with the State redevelopment dissolution law. (File No. 120898) Attachments: Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Committee of the Whole Adjourn and Report City and County of San Francisco Page 16 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 24. 120898 [Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency] Sponsors: Mayor; Kim, Cohen and Olague Ordinance of the Successor Agency to the former Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco implementing the State redevelopment dissolution law known as AB X1 26 (2011) in furtherance of the recently adopted amendments to that law known as AB 1484 and of previously adopted City policies, by 1) acknowledging that AB 1484 provides that the Successor Agency is a separate legal entity from the City, with the Successor Agency holding all of the transferred assets and obligations of the former Redevelopment Agency (other than the affordable housing assets ) distinct from the City, and with the Oversight Board performing specific functions set forth in the State redevelopment dissolution law; 2) officially naming the Successor Agency as the "Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco"; 3) acknowledging that former Redevelopment Agency employees who became Successor Agency employees by operation of AB 26 and were assigned to R classifications, and who continued in those R classifications through the effective date of AB 1484, shall continue to be Successor Agency employees; 4) creating the Successor Agency Commission as the policy body of the Successor Agency and delegating to it the authority to act in place of the former Redevelopment Agency Commission to implement the surviving redevelopment projects, the replacement housing obligations and other enforceable obligations and the authority to take actions that the State redevelopment dissolution law requires or allows on behalf of the Successor Agency; 5) establishing the composition and terms of the members of the Successor Agency Commission, setting forth voting requirements and providing for the Successor Agency Commission to appoint an Executive Director of the Successor Agency; 6) authorizing the Successor Agency to retain the City Attorney as its legal counsel; 7) ratifying prior acts; and 8) authorizing and directing the Successor Agency Commission to take all appropriate steps to effectuate the purpose of this ordinance consistent with the State redevelopment dissolution law. Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Board_Packet_092512 Legislation Digest_Ver1 Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? SPECIAL ORDER 3:30 P.M. - Recognition of Commendations City and County of San Francisco Page 17 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 COMMITTEE REPORTS Reports from committees, if any, recommending emergency or urgent measures. The following item will be considered by the Land Use and Economic Development Committee at a Regular Meeting on September 24, 2012, at 1:00 p.m. The Chair intends to request the Committee to send the following item to the Board as a Committee Report on Tuesday, September 25, 2012. 25. 120928 [Summary Vacation of Public Service Easement; Approval of Sale of Easement Interest - 1407-1435 Market Street] Sponsor: Kim Ordinance ordering the summary vacation of public service easement and approving sale for $77,000 of City's interest in vacated easement over property located at 1407-1435 Market Street; adopting findings pursuant to the California Streets and Highways Code Sections 8330 et seq.; adopting findings pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; adopting findings that the vacation and sale are in conformity with the City’s General Plan and Eight Priority Policies of City Planning Code Section 101.1; and authorizing official acts in furtherance of this Ordinance. Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Leg_Digest_Ver1 Comm_Packet_092412 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? The following items will be considered by the Rules Committee at a Regular Meeting on September 20, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. The Chair intends to request the Committee to send the following item to the Board as a Committee Report on Tuesday, September 25, 2012. 26. 120872 [Reappointment, Public Utilities Commission - Ann Moller Caen] Motion approving/rejecting the Mayor’s reappointment of Ann Moller Caen, to the Public Utilities Commission, Seat No. 3, for the unexpired portion of a four-year term ending August 1, 2016. (Clerk of the Board) Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Legislation_Ver2 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 18 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 27. 120873 [Reappointment, Public Utilities Commission - Francesca Vietor] Motion approving/rejecting the Mayor’s reappointment of Francesca Vietor, to the Public Utilities Commission, Seat No. 1, for the unexpired portion of a four-year term ending August 1, 2016. (Clerk of the Board) Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Legislation_Ver2 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 28. 120874 [Reappointment, Public Utilities Commission - Vince Courtney] Motion approving/rejecting the Mayor’s reappointment of Vince Courtney, to the Public Utilities Commission, Seat No. 5, for the unexpired portion of a four-year term ending August 1, 2016. (Clerk of the Board) Attachments: Legislation_VEr1 Legislation_Ver2 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 19 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 29. ROLL CALL FOR INTRODUCTIONS Roll call for introduction of ordinances, resolutions, charter amendments, requests for hearings, letters of inquiry, letters of request to the City Attorney and Board Members' reports on their regional body activities. 30. PUBLIC COMMENT An opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board, including items being considered today which have not been considered by a Board committee and excluding items which have been considered by a Board committee. Members of the public may address the Board for up to three minutes. Each member of the public will be allotted the same number of minutes to speak, except that public speakers using translation assistance will be allowed to testify for twice the amount of the public testimony time limit. If simultaneous translation services are used, speakers will be governed by the public testimony time limit applied to speakers not requesting translation assistance. The President or the Board may limit the total testimony to 30 minutes. Members of the public who want a document placed on the overhead for display should clearly state such and subsequently remove the document when they want the screen to return to live coverage of the meeting. FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE These measures were introduced for adoption without committee reference. A unanimous vote is required for adoption of these resolutions today. Any Supervisor may require any resolution to go to committee. Questions on the For Adoption Without Committee Reference Agenda are on for adoption, or approved, as indicated. City and County of San Francisco Page 20 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 Items 31 through 36 31. 120941 [Committee of the Whole - Public Hearing - Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency] Sponsor: Cohen Motion scheduling the Board of Supervisors to sit as a Committee of the Whole on September 25, 2012, at 3:00 p.m., to hold a public hearing on the Ordinance of the Successor Agency to the former Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco implementing the State redevelopment dissolution law known as AB X1 26 (2011) in furtherance of the recently adopted amendments to that law known as AB 1484 and of previously adopted City policies, by 1) acknowledging that AB 1484 provides that the Successor Agency is a separate legal entity from the City, with the Successor Agency holding all of the transferred assets and obligations of the former Redevelopment Agency (other than the affordable housing assets ) distinct from the City, and with the Oversight Board performing specific functions set forth in the State redevelopment dissolution law; 2) officially naming the Successor Agency as the "Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco"; 3) acknowledging that former Redevelopment Agency employees who became Successor Agency employees by operation of AB 26 and were assigned to R classifications, and who continued in those R classifications through the effective date of AB 1484, shall continue to be Successor Agency employees; 4) creating the Successor Agency Commission as the policy body of the Successor Agency and delegating to it the authority to act in place of the former Redevelopment Agency Commission to implement the surviving redevelopment projects, the replacement housing obligations and other enforceable obligations and the authority to take actions that the State redevelopment dissolution law requires or allows on behalf of the Successor Agency; 5) establishing the composition and terms of the members of the Successor Agency Commission, setting forth voting requirements and providing for the Successor Agency Commission to appoint an Executive Director of the Successor Agency; 6) authorizing the Successor Agency to retain the City Attorney as its legal counsel; 7) ratifying prior acts; and 8) authorizing and directing the Successor Agency Commission to take all appropriate steps to effectuate the purpose of this ordinance consistent with the State redevelopment dissolution law. Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 32. 120948 [Committee of the Whole - Public Hearing - Charges of Official Misconduct Filed by Mayor Edwin Lee Against Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi] Motion scheduling the Board of Supervisors to sit as a Committee of the Whole for a Special Meeting on October 9, 2012, at 2:00 p.m., to hear the matter related to the charges of official misconduct filed by Mayor Edwin Lee against Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi pursuant to Charter Section 15.105. (Clerk of the Board) Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 21 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 33. 120940 [Welcoming Daw Aung San Suu Kyi] Sponsor: Kim Resolution welcoming Daw Aung San Suu Kyi to the City and County of San Francisco and Honoring our Commitment to Ongoing Human Rights Struggle in Burma Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 34. 120945 [Final Map 6450 - 626-628 Natoma Street] Motion approving Final Map 6450, a Five Unit Residential Condominium Project, located at 626-628 Natoma Street being a subdivision of Lot 048 in Assessors Block No. 3727 and adopting findings pursuant to the General Plan and City Planning Code Section 101.1. Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 35. 120946 [Final Map 7042 - 750-2nd Street] Motion approving Final Map 7042, a One Lot Merger and Resubdivision and a 14 Residential Unit and 1 Commerical Unit Mixed-Use Condominium Project, located at 750-2nd Street being a subdivision of Lot 002A in Assessors Block No. 3794 and adopting findings pursuant to the General Plan and City Planning Code Section 101.1. Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 36. 120947 [Final Map 6431 - 55 Trumbull Street, 4 Craut Street] Motion approving Final Map 6431, a Two Lot Subdivision and 18 Residential Unit and 1 Commercial Unit Mixed-Use Condominium Project, located at 55 Trumbull Street, 4 Craut Street being a subdivision of Lot 006 & 007 in Assessors Block No. 5868, and a portion of Lot 034 in Assessor’s Block No. 5867, and adopting findings pursuant to the General Plan and City Planning Code Section 101.1 Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 Board_Packet_092512 Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 37. IMPERATIVE AGENDA Resolution(s), if any, to be adopted within limits imposed by the Sunshine Ordinance and the Ralph M. Brown Act, introduced today, not on the printed agenda. For such resolutions to be considered, the Board must first adopt the Serious Injury Finding or the Purely Commendatory Finding and the Brown Act Finding. Each motion requires eight (8) votes or a unanimous six (6) or seven (7). A unanimous vote is required for the resolution(s). City and County of San Francisco Page 22 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 [Serious Injury Finding] Motion that the Board find that for the resolution(s) being considered at this time "the need to take action is so imperative as to threaten serious injury to the public interest if action is deferred to a later meeting." [Purely Commendatory Finding] Motion that the Board find that the resolution(s) being considered at this time are purely commendatory. [Brown Act Finding] Motion that the Board find by roll call vote that, for the resolution(s) being considered at this time, there is a need to take immediate action. The need to take action came to the attention of the City and County of San Francisco after the agenda was posted. LEGISLATION INTRODUCED BY THE PRESIDENT AT THE REQUEST OF A DEPARTMENT Pursuant to Section 2.8 of the Rules of Order of the Board of Supervisors, Department Heads may submit proposed legislation to the Clerk of the Board, in which case titles of the legislation will be printed at the rear of the next availiable agenda of the Board and introduced by the President. PROPOSED ORDINANCE Proposed ordinance received from September 11, 2012, to September 17, 2012, for reference by President to appropriate committee on September 25, 2012. 120929 [Settlement of Lawsuit - City and County of San Francisco - $95,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of a lawsuit for breach of contract, declaratory judgment and permanent injunction filed by the City and County of San Francisco against Geary Courtyard Associates, ERP Operating Limited Partnership and Equity Residential, for $95,000; the lawsuit entitled City and County of San Francisco v. Geary Courtyard Associates, et al., Case No. CGC 12-520504, filed May 4, 2012, in San Francisco Superior Court. Attachments: Legislation_Ver1 09/14/2012; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 09/18/2012; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Rules Committee. PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS There are no items. City and County of San Francisco Page 23 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 120930 [Petitions and Communications] Petitions and Communications received from September 10, 2012, through September 17, 2012, for reference by the President to Committee considering related matters, or to be ordered filed by the Clerk on September 25, 2012. Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information will not be redacted. From the Clerk of the Board, individuals who have submitted a Form 700 Statement: (1) Jeremy Pollock - Legislative Aide - Assuming From the Yerba Buena Community Benefit District, submitting their 2011-2012 annual report. (2) From the Controller, regarding an audit of how the OCA and DPH use the City contract with GRM. (3) From the City and County Surveyor, regarding the Monument Preservation Fund annual report. (4) From the Treasurer and Tax Collector, regarding CCSF Investment Report for August 2012. (5) From the Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board, regarding their Statistical Report for 2011-2012. (6) From the Controller, submitting audit memorandum of SFMTA internal controls over the tools used to maintain its motor coach transit fleet. (7) From Labor Standards Enforcement, regarding responses to Civil Grand Jury Report. (8) From Community Youth Center, regarding scam artists. (9) From the Sierra Club, regarding their opposition on the proposed Condominium Conversion Ordinance. File No. 120669. (10) From James Chaffee, regarding repealing outdated code provisions. File No. 120672. (11) From Patrick Monk, regarding Whole Foods Market. (12) From concerned citizens, regarding Prop 37. Copy: Each Supervisor. (13) From Michael Krasnobrod, regarding an audit of CCSF. (14) From Steve Ward, regarding parking of oversized vehicles. File No. 120142. (15) From Terrrie Frye, regarding clean energy. File No. 120099. (16) From concerned citizens, regarding Sheriff Mirkarimi. 8 Letters. (17) From concerned citizens, regarding KPOO Radio. 4 letters. (18) From concerned citizens, regarding the landscape architect Thomas Dolliver Church. 8 letters. (19) City and County of San Francisco Page 24 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12

Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, September 25, 2012 From JoAnn Vail, regarding Beach Chalet Athletic Fields. (20) From Patrick Monette-Shaw, regarding the reappointment of Bruce Wolfe to the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. (21) From Serena Bardell, regarding Rosh Hashanah. (22) From Jannelly D. Sussman, regarding Noe Valley parking meters. (23) From concerned citizen, regarding the SF Muni Code. (24) From S. Gilman, regarding public nudity. (25) From Peter Warfield, regarding a mural at the Bernal Heights Library. (26) *(An asterisked item represents the cover sheet to document that exceeds 25 pages. The complete document is available at the Clerk’s Office, Room 244, City Hall.) ADJOURNMENT City and County of San Francisco Page 25 Printed at 10:22 am on 9/25/12