# Board of Supervisors Minutes: June 26, 2018

- Meeting date: 2018-06-26
- Document type: minutes
- Pages in official PDF: 36
- [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/522/2018-06-26-minutes)
- [Authoritative City PDF](https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=M&ID=612348&GUID=9473432F-6E56-4236-816E-9AE587FF15B9)

> This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City PDF is the authoritative public record.

## Structured legislative records

### File 180669: Committee of the Whole - Hearing - Public Comment on Possible Nominations and Election of Board President - June 26, 2018

- Pages: 24-26

### File 180191: Planning Code - Public Parking Lot as a Permitted Use in the Glen Park Neighborhood Commercial Transit District and Adjoining Locations

- Pages: 26
- Vote 1: amendment
  - Action: the past ten years without the benefit of a permit, and the adjoining RH-2 parcel is no larger than 40 feet by 110 feet; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney) and Audrey Butkus (Planning Department) who responded to questions raised throughout the discussion. Supervisor Sheehy, seconded by Supervisor Ronen, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE, by striking references to a Planning Commission hearing and resolution; adding General Plan findings, Planning Code Section 101.1 findings, and Planning Code Section 302 findings; and on Page 6, Lines 13-16, by adding verbiage regarding the expiration of the note by operation of law 72 months after the effective date, with conditions; and making other clarifying and conforming changes. The motion carried by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Breed, Cohen, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Stefani, Tang, Yee
- Vote 2: first-reading
  - Action: PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Breed, Cohen, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Stefani, Tang, Yee

### File 180475: General Plan Amendments - Candlestick Point and Hunters Point Shipyard Phase 2 Project

- Pages: 26-27
- Vote 1: first-reading
  - Action: 180475 [General Plan Amendments - Candlestick Point and Hunters Point Shipyard Phase 2 Project] Ordinance amending the General Plan in connection with revisions to the Candlestick Point and Hunters Point Shipyard Phase 2 Project in order to facilitate redevelopment; adopting findings under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 340. (Planning Commission) (Economic Impact) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Breed, Cohen, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Stefani, Tang, Yee

## Extracted text

### [Page 26](https://sfbos.info/documents/522/2018-06-26-minutes#page-26)

Board of Supervisors                             Meeting Minutes                                                6/26/2018




COMMITTEE REPORTS


Recommendations of the Land Use and Transportation Committee

180191 [Planning Code - Public Parking Lot as a Permitted Use in the Glen Park
       Neighborhood Commercial Transit District and Adjoining Locations]
            Sponsor: Sheehy
            Ordinance amending the Planning Code to permit as of right Public Parking Lot uses where the
            parcel is located in both the Glen Park Neighborhood Commercial Transit and RH-2 (Residential,
            House Districts, Two-Family) zoning districts, the property has been used as a Public Parking Lot
            for the past ten years without the benefit of a permit, and the adjoining RH-2 parcel is no larger
            than 40 feet by 110 feet; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California
            Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight
            priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity,
            convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302.
            Privilege of the floor was granted unanimously to Jon Givner (Office of the City Attorney) and
            Audrey Butkus (Planning Department) who responded to questions raised throughout the
            discussion.
            Supervisor Sheehy, seconded by Supervisor Ronen, moved that this Ordinance be AMENDED, AN
            AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE, by striking references to a Planning
            Commission hearing and resolution; adding General Plan findings, Planning Code Section 101.1
            findings, and Planning Code Section 302 findings; and on Page 6, Lines 13-16, by adding verbiage
            regarding the expiration of the note by operation of law 72 months after the effective date, with
            conditions; and making other clarifying and conforming changes. The motion carried by the
            following vote:
                 Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Stefani, Tang, Yee
            PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED by the following vote:
                 Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Stefani, Tang, Yee


            President Breed requested File Nos. 180475, 180476 and 180549 be called together.


180475 [General Plan Amendments - Candlestick Point and Hunters Point Shipyard Phase
       2 Project]
            Ordinance amending the General Plan in connection with revisions to the Candlestick Point and
            Hunters Point Shipyard Phase 2 Project in order to facilitate redevelopment; adopting findings
            under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General
            Plan, and eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public
            necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 340. (Planning Commission)
            (Economic Impact)
            PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
                 Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Stefani, Tang, Yee




City and County of San Francisco                        Page 505                             Printed at 12:54 pm on 7/26/18
