# Board of Supervisors Minutes: January 24, 2017

- Meeting date: 2017-01-24
- Document type: minutes
- Source format: PDF
- Extracted pages: 40
- [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/412/2017-01-24-minutes)
- [Authoritative City source](https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=M&ID=529082&GUID=B2DEC4EB-146F-4072-8047-EFFA6D975C9C)

> This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City source is the authoritative public record.

## Structured legislative records

### File 161318: Grant Agreement - Preservation of Affordable Housing Units - Bayside Village Associates, L.P. - Bayside Village Apartments (3 Bayside Village Place) - $21,680,000

- Pages: 8-9
- Sponsors: Mayor; Kim
- Vote 1: adoption, likely final
  - Action: 161318 [Grant Agreement - Preservation of Affordable Housing Units - Bayside Village Associates, L.P. - Bayside Village Apartments (3 Bayside Village Place) - $21,680,000] Sponsors: Mayor; Kim Resolution approving an agreement with Bayside Village Associates, L.P., to preserve 70 affordable housing units at Bayside Village Apartments (3 Bayside Village Place) in an amount not to exceed $21,680,000 and authorizing the Director of the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development to execute the agreement on behalf of the City and County of San Francisco to prevent the displacement of 172 existing low and moderate-income households residing at the Bayside Village Apartments and creating permanent affordability restrictions for 70 of these units to remain affordable to households earning up to 120% of average median income. (Fiscal Impact) Resolution No. 018-17 ADOPTED by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang, Yee

### File 161272: Settlement of Lawsuits and Supplemental Appropriation - Coral Construction, Inc., and Schram Construction, Inc. - $1,432,098 Settlement - $716,049 Appropriation

- Pages: 9
- Vote 1: first-reading
  - Action: 161272 [Settlement of Lawsuits and Supplemental Appropriation - Coral Construction, Inc., and Schram Construction, Inc. - $1,432,098 Settlement - $716,049 Appropriation] Ordinance authorizing settlement of attorneys’ fees claims in the consolidated lawsuits filed by Coral Construction, Inc., and Schram Construction, Inc., against the City and County of San Francisco for $1,432,098; the Coral lawsuit was filed on September 12, 2000, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CPF-01-319549; entitled Coral Construction Inc. v. John L. Martin, et al.; the Schram lawsuit was filed on June 10, 2003, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-03-421249; entitled Schram Construction, Inc. v. City & County of San Francisco, et al.; the lawsuits challenged whether Administrative Code, Chapter 12D.A, complies with the California Constitution; and appropriating $716,049 from the Wastewater Enterprise fund balance for this purpose. (City Attorney) (Supervisor Breed dissented in committee.) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang, Yee
  - Noes: Breed

### File 160656: Planning Code - Medical Service Use - Sacramento Street Neighborhood Commercial District

- Pages: 9-10
- Sponsors: Farrell
- Vote 1: first-reading
  - Action: 160656 [Planning Code - Medical Service Use - Sacramento Street Neighborhood Commercial District] Sponsor: Farrell Ordinance amending the Planning Code to provide that in the Sacramento Street Neighborhood Commercial District a Medical Service use, whether Principal or Accessory, requires a Conditional Use authorization on the ground story and is permitted above the ground story; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1, and findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302. PASSED, ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang, Yee

## Extracted text

### [Page 9](https://sfbos.info/documents/412/2017-01-24-minutes#page-9)

Board of Supervisors                             Meeting Minutes                                              1/24/2017




Recommendation of the Government Audit and Oversight Committee

161272 [Settlement of Lawsuits and Supplemental Appropriation - Coral Construction, Inc.,
       and Schram Construction, Inc. - $1,432,098 Settlement - $716,049 Appropriation]
            Ordinance authorizing settlement of attorneys’ fees claims in the consolidated lawsuits filed by
            Coral Construction, Inc., and Schram Construction, Inc., against the City and County of San
            Francisco for $1,432,098; the Coral lawsuit was filed on September 12, 2000, in San Francisco
            Superior Court, Case No. CPF-01-319549; entitled Coral Construction Inc. v. John L. Martin, et al.;
            the Schram lawsuit was filed on June 10, 2003, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No.
            CGC-03-421249; entitled Schram Construction, Inc. v. City & County of San Francisco, et al.; the
            lawsuits challenged whether Administrative Code, Chapter 12D.A, complies with the California
            Constitution; and appropriating $716,049 from the Wastewater Enterprise fund balance for this
            purpose. (City Attorney)
            (Supervisor Breed dissented in committee.)
            PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
                 Ayes: 10 - Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang, Yee
                 Noes: 1 - Breed



Recommendations of the Land Use and Transportation Committee

160656 [Planning Code - Medical Service Use - Sacramento Street Neighborhood
       Commercial District]
            Sponsor: Farrell
            Ordinance amending the Planning Code to provide that in the Sacramento Street Neighborhood
            Commercial District a Medical Service use, whether Principal or Accessory, requires a Conditional
            Use authorization on the ground story and is permitted above the ground story; affirming the
            Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making
            findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code,
            Section 101.1, and findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code,
            Section 302.
            PASSED, ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
                 Ayes: 11 - Breed, Cohen, Farrell, Fewer, Kim, Peskin, Ronen, Safai, Sheehy, Tang, Yee




City and County of San Francisco                        Page 32                             Printed at 8:34 am on 3/16/17
