# Board of Supervisors Minutes: December 14, 2010

- Meeting date: 2010-12-14
- Document type: minutes
- Source format: PDF
- Extracted pages: 33
- [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/2043/2010-12-14-minutes)
- [Authoritative City source](https://sfbos.archive.sf.gov/ftp/meetingarchive/full_board/ftp/uploadedfiles/bdsupvrs/bosagendas/minutes/2010/m121410.pdf)

> This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City source is the authoritative public record.

## Structured legislative records

### File 101419: Environment Code - Cell Phones; Retailers' Duty to Disclose Specific Absorption Rate Values

- Pages: 19-20
- Sponsors: Mar
- Vote 1: first-reading
  - Action: 101419 [Environment Code - Cell Phones; Retailers' Duty to Disclose Specific Absorption Rate Values] Sponsor: Mar Ordinance amending the San Francisco Environment Code by amending Sections 1103 and 1105, to require cell phone retailers to provide customers upon request with factsheets regarding Specific Absorption Rate values for cell phones and the use of cell phones, and to delay the enforcement date for certain provisions of the Chapter 11, the "Cell Phone Right-to-Know Ordinance," and making environmental findings. PASSED, ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Alioto-Pier, Avalos, Campos, Chiu, Chu, Daly, Dufty, Elsbernd, Mar, Maxwell, Mirkarimi

### File 101463: Settlement of Lawsuit - Lexington Insurance - City to Receive $2,750,000; Appropriating Settlement Proceeds

- Pages: 20
- Vote 1: first-reading
  - Action: ject Specific Professional Liability and Pollution Liability Policy issued by Lexington Insurance Company (Lexington) to the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission for the period February 1, 2002, to February 1, 2006, policy number 1152114 (Lexington Policy), calling for payment of $2,750,000 from Lexington to the City and County of San Francisco and including other material terms of said settlement: (1) Lexington will have no further obligations under the Lexington Policy and said policy shall be considered null and void and of no further force and effect; (2) San Francisco will defend and hold harmless and indemnify Lexington from and against any demand against Lexington made under the Lexington Policy; (3) all parties will execute a mutual release; (4) San Francisco will execute and file a dismissal of all claims with prejudice; (5) the City and Lexington each shall bear its own legal costs and fees arising from this action; and appropriating the full proceeds from the settlement to fund the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission's attorney fees and legal expenses related to certain pending litigation matters. (City Attorney) PASSED, ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Alioto-Pier, Avalos, Campos, Chiu, Chu, Daly, Dufty, Elsbernd, Mar, Maxwell, Mirkarimi

### File 101259: 34th America's Cup Host City Agreement and Finding of Fiscal Feasibility

- Pages: 20-21
- Sponsors: Mayor; Chiu, Mirkarimi, Alioto-Pier, Chu, Dufty and Maxwell
- Vote 1: adoption, likely final
  - Action: 101259 [34th America's Cup Host City Agreement and Finding of Fiscal Feasibility] Sponsors: Mayor; Chiu, Mirkarimi, Alioto-Pier, Chu, Dufty and Maxwell Resolution approving a Host City and Venue Agreement among the City, the America's Cup Event Authority and the San Francisco America's Cup Organizing Committee; authorizing the Mayor or his designee and the Port to execute the Host City and Venue Agreement; authorizing and urging the Mayor, Office of Economic and Workforce Development, Port and such other City Officials as appropriate to take such steps and execute such additional agreements as are consistent with the Host City and Venue Agreement and this Resolution to bring the 34th America's Cup to the San Francisco Bay; and finding that the proposed Event is fiscally feasible as set forth in Administrative Code Chapter 29. (Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact.) Privilege of the floor was granted to Brad Benson (Port Commission) who provided details on the amended Host and Venue Agreement and responded to questions raised throughout the discussion regarding File No. 101259. Resolution No. 585-10 ADOPTED by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Alioto-Pier, Avalos, Campos, Chiu, Chu, Daly, Dufty, Elsbernd, Mar, Maxwell, Mirkarimi

## Extracted text

### [Page 20](https://sfbos.info/documents/2043/2010-12-14-minutes#page-20)

Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 12/14/2010

Recommendations of the Budget and Finance Committee

101463 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Lexington Insurance - City to Receive $2,750,000;
 Appropriating Settlement Proceeds]
 Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit entitled City and County of San Francisco v.
 Lexington Insurance Company, San Francisco County Superior Court Case No: CGC-10-498967
 (Action), removed to United States District Court, N.D. Cal., Case No: 3:10-CV1-02188-SI, arising
 from an insurance coverage dispute involving a claims-made Designers and Construction (i.e.,
 professional liability) Project Specific Professional Liability and Pollution Liability Policy issued by
 Lexington Insurance Company (Lexington) to the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission for the
 period February 1, 2002, to February 1, 2006, policy number 1152114 (Lexington Policy), calling for
 payment of $2,750,000 from Lexington to the City and County of San Francisco and including other
 material terms of said settlement: (1) Lexington will have no further obligations under the Lexington
 Policy and said policy shall be considered null and void and of no further force and effect; (2) San
 Francisco will defend and hold harmless and indemnify Lexington from and against any demand
 against Lexington made under the Lexington Policy; (3) all parties will execute a mutual release; (4)
 San Francisco will execute and file a dismissal of all claims with prejudice; (5) the City and
 Lexington each shall bear its own legal costs and fees arising from this action; and appropriating
 the full proceeds from the settlement to fund the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission's
 attorney fees and legal expenses related to certain pending litigation matters. (City Attorney)
 PASSED, ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
 Ayes: 11 - Alioto-Pier, Avalos, Campos, Chiu, Chu, Daly, Dufty, Elsbernd, Mar, Maxwell, Mirkarimi

101259 [34th America's Cup Host City Agreement and Finding of Fiscal Feasibility]
 Sponsors: Mayor; Chiu, Mirkarimi, Alioto-Pier, Chu, Dufty and Maxwell
 Resolution approving a Host City and Venue Agreement among the City, the America's Cup Event
 Authority and the San Francisco America's Cup Organizing Committee; authorizing the Mayor or
 his designee and the Port to execute the Host City and Venue Agreement; authorizing and urging
 the Mayor, Office of Economic and Workforce Development, Port and such other City Officials as
 appropriate to take such steps and execute such additional agreements as are consistent with the
 Host City and Venue Agreement and this Resolution to bring the 34th America's Cup to the San
 Francisco Bay; and finding that the proposed Event is fiscally feasible as set forth in Administrative
 Code Chapter 29.
 (Economic Impact, Fiscal Impact.)
 Privilege of the floor was granted to Brad Benson (Port Commission) who provided details on the
 amended Host and Venue Agreement and responded to questions raised throughout the
 discussion regarding File No. 101259.
 Resolution No. 585-10
 ADOPTED by the following vote:
 Ayes: 11 - Alioto-Pier, Avalos, Campos, Chiu, Chu, Daly, Dufty, Elsbernd, Mar, Maxwell, Mirkarimi

City and County of San Francisco Page 1117 Printed at 1:33 pm on 1/6/11
