# Board of Supervisors Minutes: May 11, 2010

- Meeting date: 2010-05-11
- Document type: minutes
- Source format: PDF
- Extracted pages: 27
- [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/1998/2010-05-11-minutes)
- [Authoritative City source](https://sfbos.archive.sf.gov/ftp/meetingarchive/full_board/ftp/uploadedfiles/bdsupvrs/bosagendas/minutes/2010/m051110.pdf)

> This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City source is the authoritative public record.

## Structured legislative records

### File 091251: Development Fee Collection Procedure; Administrative Fee

- Pages: 6-7
- Sponsors: Mayor; Dufty, Daly, Mirkarimi and Chu
- Vote 1: first-reading
  - Action: sued, the first addendum authorizing construction of the project, with a temporary option for the project sponsor to defer payment of 85 percent of the total amount of fees due, or 80 percent of the total amount of fees due if the project is subject to payment of a neighborhood infrastructure impact development fee, to prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy upon agreeing to pay a deferral surcharge on the amount owed, to require that any in-kind public benefits required in lieu of payment of development fees are implemented prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the project, to require DBI to generate a Project Development Fee Report prior to issuance of the building or site permit for the project listing all fees due with the opportunity for an appeal of technical errors to the Board of Appeals, to establish a Development Fee Collection Unit within DBI and a fee for administering the program; providing that the ordinance's operative date is July 1, 2010; and adopting findings, including environmental findings. (Economic Impact.) Supervisors Daly and Mirkarimi requested to be added as co-sponsors. PASSED, ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Alioto-Pier, Avalos, Campos, Chiu, Chu, Daly, Dufty, Elsbernd, Mar, Maxwell, Mirkarimi

### File 091275: Development Impact and In-Lieu Fees

- Pages: 7
- Sponsors: Mayor; Dufty and Chu
- Vote 1: first-reading
  - Action: d prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy; to allow a project sponsor to defer payment of a development fee upon agreeing to pay a deferral surcharge (Fee Deferral Program), which option shall expire after three years unless further extended; to require the Planning Commission to hold a hearing prior to expiration of the Fee Deferral Program to review its effectiveness and make recommendations to the Board of Supervisors; to add introductory sections to Article 4 for standard definitions and procedures, delete duplicative code provisions and use consistent definitions, language and organization throughout; to require annual Citywide development fee reports and fee adjustments, and development fee evaluations every five years; to provide that the ordinance's operative date is July 1, 2010; and to instruct the publisher to put a note at the original location of the renumbered sections stating that the text of those sections has been moved and providing the new section number; adopting findings, including Section 302, environmental findings, and findings of consistency with the General Plan and Planning Code Section 101.1. PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Alioto-Pier, Avalos, Campos, Chiu, Chu, Dufty, Elsbernd, Mar, Maxwell, Mirkarimi
  - Noes: Daly

### File 100048: Amendment to Solar Energy Incentive Program

- Pages: 7
- Sponsors: Daly; Mirkarimi and Mar
- Vote 1: first-reading
  - Action: 100048 [Amendment to Solar Energy Incentive Program] Sponsors: Daly; Mirkarimi and Mar Ordinance amending the San Francisco Environment Code Sections 18.2, 18.4, 18.7-2, and 18.7-4, to: (1) require all systems receiving City incentives be installed by an individual, firm or organization qualified as a workforce development installer by the Office of Economic & Workforce Development, unless specified exceptions apply, and (2) eliminate increased incentives for residential properties in the case of systems installed by individuals trained under the City workforce development program. Supervisor Mar requested to be added as a co-sponsor. PASSED, ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Alioto-Pier, Avalos, Campos, Chiu, Chu, Daly, Dufty, Elsbernd, Mar, Maxwell, Mirkarimi

### File 100492: Supplemental Agreement to Install an Additional Water Pipeline Over Union Pacific Railroad Company Property in Stanislaus County

- Pages: 7-8
- Vote 1: adoption, likely final
  - Action: 100492 [Supplemental Agreement to Install an Additional Water Pipeline Over Union Pacific Railroad Company Property in Stanislaus County] Resolution approving and authorizing a Supplemental Agreement with Union Pacific Railroad Company to install an additional water pipeline within an existing easement area over Railroad property near the City of Oakdale in Stanislaus County required for the San Joaquin Pipeline System Project No. CUW37301 for a fee of $2,500; adopting findings under the California Environmental Quality Act; adopting findings that the conveyance is consistent with the City’s General Plan and Eight Priority Policies of City Planning Code Section 101.1; and authorizing the Director of Property to execute documents, make certain modifications and take certain actions in furtherance of this resolution. (Real Estate Department) ADOPTED by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Alioto-Pier, Avalos, Campos, Chiu, Chu, Daly, Dufty, Elsbernd, Mar, Maxwell, Mirkarimi

## Extracted text

### [Page 7](https://sfbos.info/documents/1998/2010-05-11-minutes#page-7)

Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes - Final 5/11/2010

091275 [Development Impact and In-Lieu Fees]
 Sponsors: Mayor; Dufty and Chu
 Ordinance amending the San Francisco Planning Code to create Article 4 for development impact
 fees and requirements, move Planning Code Sections 135(j), 135.3(d), 135.3(e), 139, 143, 149, a
 portion of 249.33, 313-313.15, 314-314.8, 315-315.9, 318-318.9, 319-319.7, 326-326.8, 327-327.6,
 and 331-331.6 and Chapter 38 of the San Francisco Administrative Code (Transit Impact
 Development Fee) to Article 4, and renumber and amend the sections; to provide that the
 Department of Building Inspection will collect the development fees prior to issuance of the first
 building permit or other document authorizing project construction and verify that any in-kind public
 improvements required in-lieu of a development fee are implemented prior to issuance of the first
 certificate of occupancy; to allow a project sponsor to defer payment of a development fee upon
 agreeing to pay a deferral surcharge (Fee Deferral Program), which option shall expire after three
 years unless further extended; to require the Planning Commission to hold a hearing prior to
 expiration of the Fee Deferral Program to review its effectiveness and make recommendations to
 the Board of Supervisors; to add introductory sections to Article 4 for standard definitions and
 procedures, delete duplicative code provisions and use consistent definitions, language and
 organization throughout; to require annual Citywide development fee reports and fee adjustments,
 and development fee evaluations every five years; to provide that the ordinance's operative date is
 July 1, 2010; and to instruct the publisher to put a note at the original location of the renumbered
 sections stating that the text of those sections has been moved and providing the new section
 number; adopting findings, including Section 302, environmental findings, and findings of
 consistency with the General Plan and Planning Code Section 101.1.
 PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
 Ayes: 10 - Alioto-Pier, Avalos, Campos, Chiu, Chu, Dufty, Elsbernd, Mar, Maxwell, Mirkarimi
 Noes: 1 - Daly

100048 [Amendment to Solar Energy Incentive Program]
 Sponsors: Daly; Mirkarimi and Mar
 Ordinance amending the San Francisco Environment Code Sections 18.2, 18.4, 18.7-2, and
 18.7-4, to: (1) require all systems receiving City incentives be installed by an individual, firm or
 organization qualified as a workforce development installer by the Office of Economic & Workforce
 Development, unless specified exceptions apply, and (2) eliminate increased incentives for
 residential properties in the case of systems installed by individuals trained under the City
 workforce development program.
 Supervisor Mar requested to be added as a co-sponsor.
 PASSED, ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
 Ayes: 11 - Alioto-Pier, Avalos, Campos, Chiu, Chu, Daly, Dufty, Elsbernd, Mar, Maxwell, Mirkarimi

100492 [Supplemental Agreement to Install an Additional Water Pipeline Over Union
 Pacific Railroad Company Property in Stanislaus County]
 Resolution approving and authorizing a Supplemental Agreement with Union Pacific Railroad
 Company to install an additional water pipeline within an existing easement area over Railroad
 property near the City of Oakdale in Stanislaus County required for the San Joaquin Pipeline
 System Project No. CUW37301 for a fee of $2,500; adopting findings under the California
 Environmental Quality Act; adopting findings that the conveyance is consistent with the City’s
 General Plan and Eight Priority Policies of City Planning Code Section 101.1; and authorizing the
 Director of Property to execute documents, make certain modifications and take certain actions in
 furtherance of this resolution. (Real Estate Department)
 ADOPTED by the following vote:
 Ayes: 11 - Alioto-Pier, Avalos, Campos, Chiu, Chu, Daly, Dufty, Elsbernd, Mar, Maxwell, Mirkarimi

City and County of San Francisco Page 405 Printed at 9:48 am on 6/16/10