# Board of Supervisors Agenda: October 8, 2013

- Meeting date: 2013-10-08
- Document type: agenda
- Pages in official PDF: 30
- [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda)
- [Authoritative City PDF](https://sfgov.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=265085&GUID=0AC6312E-15B4-4391-987A-9DD66E80F43F)

> This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City PDF is the authoritative public record.

## Extracted text

### [Page 1](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-1)

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
                                                 AGENDA

                                      Legislative Chamber, Room 250
                                 City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
                                      San Francisco, CA 94102-4689
                                     Tuesday, October 8, 2013 - 2:00 PM
                                                    Regular Meeting

                         DAVID CHIU, PRESIDENT
         JOHN AVALOS, LONDON BREED, DAVID CAMPOS, MALIA COHEN,
MARK FARRELL, JANE KIM, ERIC MAR, KATY TANG, SCOTT WIENER, NORMAN YEE


                                             Angela Calvillo, Clerk of the Board
                         Agendas of the Board of Supervisors are available on the internet at www.sfbos.org

                                              BOARD COMMITTEES
 Committee Membership                                                                                            Meeting Days
 Budget and Finance Committee                                                                                            Wednesday
 Supervisors Farrell, Mar, Avalos                                                                                         10:30 AM

 City and School District Select Committee                                                                             4th Thursday
 Supervisors Kim, Avalos, Farrell, Commissioners Mendoza-McDonnell, Norton, Wynns                                          3:30 PM

 Government Audit and Oversight Committee                                                                       2nd and 4th Thursday
 Supervisors Cohen, Tang, Campos                                                                                           10:00 AM

 Land Use and Economic Development Committee                                                                                Monday
 Supervisors Wiener, Kim, Chiu                                                                                              1:30 PM

 Neighborhood Services and Safety Committee                                                                     1st and 3rd Thursday
 Supervisors Campos, Mar, Yee                                                                                              10:00 AM

 Rules Committee                                                                                                1st and 3rd Thursday
 Supervisors Yee, Breed, Cohen                                                                                               1:30 PM




                     First-named Supervisor is Chair, Second-named Supervisor is Vice-Chair of the Committee.

### [Page 2](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-2)

Agenda Item Information

Each item on the Consent or Regular agenda may include the following documents:
  1) Legislation
  2) Budget and Legislative Analyst report
  3) Department or Agency cover letter and/or report
  4) Public correspondence
These items will be available for review at 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, City Hall, Room 244,
Reception Desk.

                                         Meeting Procedures

The Board of Supervisors is the legislative body of the City and County of San Francisco. The Board
has several standing committees where ordinances and resolutions are the subject of hearings at
which members of the public are urged to testify. The full Board does not hold a second public
hearing on measures which have been heard in committee.

Board procedures do not permit: 1) persons in the audience to vocally express support or opposition
to statements by Supervisors or by other persons testifying; 2) ringing and use of cell phones, pagers,
and similar sound-producing electronic devices; 3) bringing in or displaying signs in the meeting
room; and 4) standing in the meeting room.

Each member of the public will be allotted the same maximum number of minutes to speak as set by
the President or Chair at the beginning of each item or public comment, excluding City
representatives, except that public speakers using translation assistance will be allowed to testify for
twice the amount of the public testimony time limit. If simultaneous translation services are used,
speakers will be governed by the public testimony time limit applied to speakers not requesting
translation assistance. Members of the public who want a document placed on the overhead for
display should clearly state such and subsequently remove the document when they want the screen
to return to live coverage of the meeting.

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: The public is encouraged to testify at Committee meetings. Persons
unable to attend the meeting may submit to the City, by the time the proceedings begin, written
comments regarding the agenda items above. These comments will be made a part of the official
public record and shall be brought to the attention of the Board of Supervisors. Written
communications should be submitted to the Clerk of the Board, Clerk of a Committee or its members:
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco, CA 94102. Communications which are
not received prior to the hearing may be delivered to the Clerk of the Committee at the hearing and
you are encouraged to bring enough copies for distribution.

LAPTOP COMPUTER FOR PRESENTATIONS: Contact City Hall Media Services at (415)
554-7490 to coordinate the use of the laptop computer for presentations. Presenters should arrive 30
minutes prior to the meeting to test their presentations on the computer.

AGENDA PACKET: Available for review in Clerk’s Office, Room 244, City Hall, 1 Dr.Carlton B
Goodlett Place, or on the internet at http://www.sfbos.org/meetings. Meetings are cablecast on SF
Cable 26. For DVD copies and scheduling call (415) 554-4188.

LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS: Requests must be received at least 48 hours in advance of the
meeting to help ensure availability. Contact Madeleine Licavoli at (415) 554-7722. AVISO EN
ESPAÑOL: La solicitud para un traductor debe recibirse antes de mediodía de el viernes anterior a
la reunion. Llame a Derek Evans (415) 554-7702.

### [Page 3](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-3)

Disability Access

The Legislative Chamber (Room 250) and the Committee Room (Room 263) in City Hall are
wheelchair accessible. Meetings are real-time captioned and are cablecast open-captioned on SF
Cable 26. Assistive listening devices for the Legislative Chamber are available upon request at the
Clerk of the Board's Office, Room 244. Assistive listening devices for the Committee Room are
available upon request at the Clerk of the Board's Office, Room 244 or in the Committee Room. To
request sign language interpreters, readers, large print agendas or other accommodations, please
contact Madeleine Licavoli at (415) 554-7722 or (415) 554-5227 (TTY). Requests made at least 48
hours in advance of the meeting will help to ensure availability.

The nearest accessible BART station is Civic Center (Market/Grove/Hyde Streets). Accessible
MUNI Metro lines are the F, J, K, L, M, N, T (exit at Civic Center or Van Ness Stations). MUNI bus
lines also serving the area are the 5, 6, 9, 19, 21, 47, 49, 71, and 71L. For more information about
MUNI accessible services, call (415) 701-4485.

There is accessible parking in the vicinity of City Hall at Civic Center Plaza and adjacent to Davies
Hall and the War Memorial Complex. Accessible curbside parking is available on Dr. Carlton B.
Goodlett Place and Grove Street.

In order to assist the City’s efforts to accommodate persons with severe allergies, environmental
illness, multiple chemical sensitivity or related disabilities, attendees at public meetings are reminded
that other attendees may be sensitive to perfumes and various other chemical-based scented products.
Please help the City to accommodate these individuals.

                        Know Your Rights Under The Sunshine Ordinance

Government's duty is to serve the public, reaching its decision in full view of the public.
Commissions, boards, councils, and other agencies of the City and County exist to conduct the
people's business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and that
City operations are open to the people's review.

For information on your rights under the Sunshine Ordinance (Chapter 67 of the San Francisco
Administrative Code) or to report a violation of the ordinance, contact by mail Sunshine Ordinance
Task Force, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco CA 94102; phone at (415)
554-7724; fax at (415) 554-7854; or by email at sotf@sfgov.org

Citizens may obtain a free copy of the Sunshine Ordinance by printing Chapter 67 of the San
Francisco Administrative Code on the Internet, at http://www.sfbos.org/sunshine

                        Lobbyist Registration and Reporting Requirements

Individuals and entities that influence or attempt to influence local legislative or administrative action
may be required by the San Francisco Lobbyist Ordinance [SF Campaign & Governmental Conduct
Code Sec. 2.100] to register and report lobbying activity. For more information about the Lobbyist
Ordinance, please contact the San Francisco Ethics Commission at 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220,
San Francisco, CA 94102; telephone (415) 252-3100; fax (415) 252-3112; web site
http://www.sfgov.org/ethics

### [Page 4](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-4)

Board of Supervisors                                Meeting Agenda                            Tuesday, October 8, 2013




         ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE


         AGENDA CHANGES


         APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES
                         Approval of the September 3, 2013, Board Meeting Minutes.



         COMMUNICATIONS


         SPECIAL ORDER 2:00 P.M. - Mayor's Appearance Before The Board
         Pursuant to Charter Section 3.100(7), this item will be read at the Board Meeting on the second
         Tuesday of each month, unless rescheduled by the Mayor and the Board President. The Mayor and
         the Board may not discuss matters that have already been considered in Committee and that are on
         the Board's Agenda as an action item.

         By supermajority vote of the Board of Supervisors (8 votes), the Board may, by oral motion, allow an
         eligible District Supervisor to ask a question that was not previously posed if the question relates to a
         sudden or unexpected incident or occurrence raising formal, time-sensitive policy questions that were
         not anticipated prior to the posting of this agenda. Public comment for this item will take place during
         general public comment.




City and County of San Francisco                         Page 4                                Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 5](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-5)

Board of Supervisors                                   Meeting Agenda                           Tuesday, October 8, 2013


1.       130985          [Formal Policy Discussions - October 8, 2013]
                         Pursuant to Charter, Sections 2.103 and 3.100(7), and Administrative Code, Section
                         2.11, the Mayor shall answer the following eligible question submitted from the
                         Supervisor representing District 8. The Mayor may address the Board initially for up to
                         five minutes. Discussion shall not exceed five minutes per Supervisor.

                         1. Mr. Mayor, we recently held a hearing at the Land Use and Economic Development
                         Committee on the issue of illegal double parking in San Francisco - including its impacts
                         on traffic, Muni, cycling, and pedestrians - and the City’s enforcement policies and
                         practices. While some might say that double parking is an innocent infraction, it can
                         create traffic jams and block Muni. On our light rail vehicle lines, a single double parker
                         can effectively shut down the line, since LRVs cannot swerve off of their tracks to get
                         around the double parker. Moreover, double parking often occurs in bike lanes, causing
                         cyclists to have to swerve into traffic, and double parking near crosswalks reduces
                         pedestrian safety by blocking sight lines. While double parking is at times appropriate -
                         for example a delivery truck that has no other option or a paratransit vehicle dropping off
                         its passengers - double parking in San Francisco has become the wild west. All sorts of
                         vehicles - taxis, private autos, delivery trucks - seem to park in the middle of the street
                         whenever they want and even when there is space to pull over.

                         At the hearing, we heard from the Municipal Transportation Agency and the Police
                         Department that double parking enforcement outside of the downtown core is infrequent.
                         For example, on the entirety of 16th Street - which goes through multiple dense
                         commercial areas - on average one double parking citation is issued every other day.
                         On the entirety of Castro and Divisadero Streets, on average one citation is issued each
                         day. At the same time that very few double parking citations are issued outside of the
                         downtown core, MTA is engaging in periodic saturation ticketing in our neighborhoods for
                         minor infractions like not curbing wheels on a slight grade or vehicle protruding an inch
                         onto a sidewalk from a driveway. In other words, MTA is engaging in significant
                         enforcement of minor infractions while not enforcing an infraction - double parking - that
                         has serious impacts in our neighborhoods.

                         Mr. Mayor, what will you do to ensure that double parking enforcement is a priority where
                         it impacts transit riders, pedestrians, and cyclists? What specific goals and metrics do
                         you propose we establish to ensure that the most impactful double parking behavior
                         becomes an enforcement priority for the MTA and the Police Department? Will your
                         office agree to report back in a year on the city’s stepped up enforcement efforts against
                         double parking?
                         Attachments: Board_Packet_100813


                         Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED?




City and County of San Francisco                            Page 5                               Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 6](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-6)

Board of Supervisors                                  Meeting Agenda                          Tuesday, October 8, 2013




         CONSENT AGENDA
         All matters listed hereunder constitute a Consent Agenda, are considered to be routine by the Board of
         Supervisors and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Board. There will be no separate
         discussion of these items unless a member of the Board so requests, in which event the matter shall
         be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered as a separate item.

         Questions on the Consent Agenda are on final passage, first reading, adoption, or approved, as
         indicated.



         Items 2 through 14


         Recommendations of the Land Use and Economic Development Committee
                         Present: Supervisors Wiener, Kim, Chiu


2.       130765          [Health Code - Alternate Water Sources for Non-Potable Applications]
                         Sponsors: Chiu; Mar
                         Ordinance amending the Health Code to establish permitting requirements for two or
                         more parcels that share the use of alternate water sources for non-potable applications;
                         setting permit fees; and making environmental findings.
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                        Leg_Dig_Ver1
                                        Cat_Ex_080913
                                        Comm_Pkt_092313
                                        Board_Pkt_100113
                                        Board_Pkt_100813

                         10/01/2013; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.

                         Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?




City and County of San Francisco                           Page 6                              Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 7](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-7)

Board of Supervisors                                  Meeting Agenda                           Tuesday, October 8, 2013


3.       130785          [Administrative Code - Family Friendly Workplace Ordinance]
                         Sponsors: Chiu; Cohen, Mar, Campos, Yee, Breed, Avalos and Kim
                         Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to allow San Francisco-based employees
                         to request flexible or predictable working arrangements to assist with care giving
                         responsibilities, subject to the employer’s right to deny a request based on business
                         reasons; prohibit adverse employment actions based on caregiver status; prohibit
                         interference with rights or retaliation against employees for exercising rights under the
                         Ordinance; require employers to post a notice informing employees of their rights under
                         the Ordinance; require employers to maintain records regarding compliance with the
                         Ordinance; authorize enforcement by the Office of Labor Standards Enforcement,
                         including the imposition of remedies and penalties for a violation and an appeal process
                         for an employer to an independent hearing officer; authorize waiver of the provisions of
                         the Ordinance in a collective bargaining agreement; and making environmental findings.
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                        Leg_Dig_Ver1
                                        Cat_Ex_090613
                                        Comm_Pkt_092313
                                        Econ_Impact_Rpt_071013
                                        Leg_Ver2
                                        Leg_Dig_Ver2
                                        Board_Pkt_100113
                                        Response_Youth_093013
                                        Board_Pkt_100813

                         10/01/2013; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.

                         Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?




City and County of San Francisco                           Page 7                               Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 8](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-8)

Board of Supervisors                                  Meeting Agenda                           Tuesday, October 8, 2013


4.       130863          [Eliminating Official Sidewalk Width - Renovation of Glen Canyon Park -
                         Portion of Elk Street (Between Chenery and Sussex Streets)]
                         Sponsor: Wiener
                         Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 1061, entitled “Regulating the Width of Sidewalks,”
                         to eliminate the official sidewalk width on a portion of the westerly side of Elk Street,
                         between Chenery and Sussex Streets, for the renovation of Glen Canyon Park; requiring
                         the Recreation and Park Department to address relocation, modification, or both of
                         facilities affected by the sidewalk width change; and making environmental findings, and
                         findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning
                         Code, Section 101.1.
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                        Leg_Dig_Ver1
                                        Cat_Ex_060412
                                        General_Pln_Referral_110512
                                        Drawing_Q-20-727
                                        DPW_Order_181628
                                        Comm_Pkt_092313
                                        Board_Pkt_100113
                                        Board_Pkt_100813

                         10/01/2013; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.

                         Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?



         Recommendations of the Rules Committee
                         Present: Supervisors Yee, Breed, Cohen


5.       130581          [Appointment Process - Road Commissioner]
                         Sponsor: Mayor
                         Ordinance declaring that future appointments done by the City and County of San
                         Francisco for Road Commissioner shall be enacted by Resolution.
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                        Comm_Pkt_091913
                                        Board_Pkt_100113
                                        Board_Pkt_100813

                         10/01/2013; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.

                         Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?




City and County of San Francisco                           Page 8                               Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 9](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-9)

Board of Supervisors                                   Meeting Agenda                           Tuesday, October 8, 2013


6.       130582          [Appointment, Road Commissioner - Mohammed Nuru]
                         Sponsor: Mayor
                         Ordinance appointing Mohammed Nuru, Director of the Department of Public Works, as
                         Road Commissioner for the City and County of San Francisco; repealing Ordinance No.
                         160-10.
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                        Comm_Pkt_091913
                                        Board_Pkt_100113
                                        Board_Pkt_100813

                         10/01/2013; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.

                         Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?


7.       130696          [Settlement of Lawsuit - Jessica Orozco - $50,000]
                         Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Jessica Orozco against the City
                         and County of San Francisco for $50,000; the lawsuit was filed on March 13, 2012, in
                         San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-12-519124; entitled Jessica Orozco v. City
                         and County of San Francisco, et al. (City Attorney's Office)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                        Comm_Pkt_091913
                                        Board_Pkt_100113
                                        Board_Pkt_100813

                         10/01/2013; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.

                         Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?


8.       130697          [Settlement of Lawsuit - Andrew Melomet - $40,000]
                         Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Andrew Melomet against the City
                         and County of San Francisco for $40,000; the lawsuit was filed on February 2, 2012, in
                         California Superior Court, San Francisco Branch, Case No. CGC-12-518471, entitled
                         Andrew Melomet v. City and County of San Francisco Human Services Agency; said
                         lawsuit was removed to United States District Court for the Northern District of California,
                         Case No. C 12-03101 EDL. (City Attorney's Office)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                        Comm_Pkt_091913
                                        Board_Pkt_100113
                                        Board_Pkt_100813

                         10/01/2013; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.

                         Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?




City and County of San Francisco                            Page 9                               Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 10](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-10)

Board of Supervisors                                  Meeting Agenda                           Tuesday, October 8, 2013


9.       130757          [Settlement of Lawsuit - Joseph P. Cuviello, Deniz Bolbol, and Alex Felsinger -
                         $180,000]
                         Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Joseph P. Cuviello, Deniz Bolbol,
                         and Alex Felsinger against the City and County of San Francisco for $180,000 in the
                         United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No.
                         CV-12-3034-EMC; entitled Cuviello et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al. (City
                         Attorney's Office)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                        Comm_Pkt_091913
                                        Board_Pkt_100113
                                        Board_Pkt_100813

                         10/01/2013; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.

                         Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?


10.      130758          [Settlement of Lawsuit - Ana Pichardo - $50,000]
                         Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Ana Pichardo against the City
                         and County of San Francisco for $50,000; the lawsuit was filed on May 9, 2012, in United
                         States District Court, Case No. C12-4042; entitled Ana Pichardo v. City and County of
                         San Francisco, et al. (City Attorney's Office)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                        Comm_Pkt_091913
                                        Board_Pkt_100113
                                        Board_Pkt_100813

                         10/01/2013; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.

                         Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?


11.      130759          [Settlement of Lawsuit - Bank of America N.A. - $975,000]
                         Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Bank of America N.A. against the
                         City and County of San Francisco for $975,000; the lawsuit was filed on September 9,
                         2010, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-10-503389; entitled Bank of
                         America N.A. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al. (City Attorney's Office)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                        Comm_Pkt_091913
                                        Board_Pkt_100113
                                        Board_Pkt_100813

                         10/01/2013; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.

                         Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?




City and County of San Francisco                           Page 10                              Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 11](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-11)

Board of Supervisors                                   Meeting Agenda                           Tuesday, October 8, 2013


12.      130803          [Settlement of Lawsuit - Lloyd O’Neil - $185,000]
                         Ordinance authorizing the settlement of the lawsuit filed by Lloyd O’Neal against the City
                         and County of San Francisco for $185,000; the lawsuit was filed on September 29, 2011,
                         in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC 11-514739; entitled Lloyd O’Neal v. City
                         and County Of San Francisco. (City Attorney's Office)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                        Comm_Pkt_091913
                                        Board_Pkt_100113
                                        Board_Pkt_100813

                         10/01/2013; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.

                         Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?


13.      130854          [Settlement of Lawsuit - Erik Russell - $30,000]
                         Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Erik Russell against the City and
                         County of San Francisco for $30,000; the lawsuit was filed on February 24, 2012, in
                         United States District Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 12-CV-00929 JCS;
                         entitled Erik Russell, et al., v. City and County of San Francisco, et al. (City Attorney's
                         Office)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                        Comm_Pkt_091913
                                        Board_Pkt_100113
                                        Board_Pkt_100813

                         10/01/2013; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.

                         Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?


14.      130855          [Settlement of Lawsuit - E. Lynn Schoenmann - $160,000]
                         Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by E. Lynn Schoenmann against the
                         City and County of San Francisco for $160,000; the lawsuit was filed on December 10,
                         2012, in Bankruptcy Court, Case No. 12-32146-HLB; Adv. Proc. No. 12-03170; entitled
                         E. Lynn Schoenmann, Trustee, et al., v. City and County of San Francisco. (City
                         Attorney's Office)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                        Comm_Pkt_091913
                                        Board_Pkt_100113
                                        Board_Pkt_100813

                         10/01/2013; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.

                         Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?



         REGULAR AGENDA


City and County of San Francisco                           Page 11                               Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 12](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-12)

Board of Supervisors                                 Meeting Agenda                          Tuesday, October 8, 2013




         UNFINISHED BUSINESS


         From the Board

15.      130966          [Adopting Findings Related to Conditional Use Application - 3771 and 3781
                         Cesar Chavez Street]
                         Motion adopting findings related to the appeal of a decision of the Planning Commission,
                         Motion No. 18930, approving Conditional Use Application identified as Planning Case
                         No. 2013.0259CV on property located at 3771 and 3781 Cesar Chavez Street, pursuant
                         to Motion No. M13-11, approved September 17, 2013. (Clerk of the Board)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED?




City and County of San Francisco                          Page 12                             Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 13](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-13)

Board of Supervisors                                 Meeting Agenda                          Tuesday, October 8, 2013




         NEW BUSINESS


         Recommendations of the Budget and Finance Committee
                         Present: Supervisors Farrell, Mar, Avalos


16.      130790          [Business and Tax Regulations, Police Codes - Renting Parking Spaces at
                         Residential Properties to Non-Residents]
                         Sponsor: Wiener
                         Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations and Police Codes to change the
                         limits of Parking Tax Occupancy Simplification for residential properties by increasing,
                         from five to 10, the number of parking spaces residential buildings may rent to
                         non-residents and increasing the gross revenue they may earn from rent from $4,000 to
                         $12,000 per quarter and from $15,000 to $40,000 annually; and making environmental
                         findings.

                         (Supervisor Avalos dissented in Committee.)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       Leg_Dig_Ver1
                                       Response_PC_082813
                                       Leg_Ver2
                                       Leg_Dig_Ver2
                                       Budget_Analysts_Rpt_100213
                                       Comm_Pkt_100213
                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING?




City and County of San Francisco                          Page 13                             Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 14](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-14)

Board of Supervisors                                   Meeting Agenda                           Tuesday, October 8, 2013


17.      130885          [Certificates of Participation - Treasure Island Improvement Project - Not to
                         Exceed $13,500,000]
                         Sponsor: Mayor
                         Resolution authorizing the execution and delivery of not to exceed $13,500,000 of
                         Certificates of Participation (Certificates) or other forms of indebtedness to finance the
                         cost of additions and improvements to the utility infrastructure at Treasure Island;
                         authorizing the Director of Public Finance to cause the preparation of documents
                         necessary for the execution and delivery of the certificates or other forms of
                         indebtedness, including a Trust Agreement, a Property Lease, a Project Lease, Notice of
                         Sale, Official Notice of Sale, an Official Statement and, if required, a Purchase Contract
                         and such other necessary documents; authorizing the Director of Public Finance to
                         cause the issuance of commercial paper certificates in an amount not to exceed
                         $13,500,000 in anticipation of the issuance of the certificates or other forms of
                         indebtedness; granting general authority to City officials to take necessary actions in
                         connection with the authorization, issuance, sale, and delivery of the certificates or other
                         form of indebtedness and the Commercial Paper Certificates; approving modifications to
                         documents and agreements; making California Environmental Quality Act findings, and a
                         General Plan consistency determination; and ratifying previous actions taken in
                         connection therewith.

                         (Fiscal Impact)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                        Budget_Analysts_Rpt_100213
                                        Comm_Pkt_100213
                                        Leg_Ver2
                                        Board_Pkt_100813

                         Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?


18.      130883          [Appropriation - Certificates of Participation - Utility Infrastructure System -
                         Treasure Island - $13,500,000 - FY2013-2014]
                         Sponsor: Mayor
                         Ordinance appropriating $13,500,000 of Certificate of Participation proceeds to finance
                         improvements to the Utility Infrastructure System at Treasure Island beginning in
                         FY2013-2014.

                         (Fiscal Impact)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                        Budget_Analysts_Rpt_100213
                                        Comm_Pkt_100213
                                        Board_Pkt_100813

                         Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING?




City and County of San Francisco                           Page 14                               Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 15](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-15)

Board of Supervisors                                 Meeting Agenda                          Tuesday, October 8, 2013


19.      130884          [Cooperative Agreement Modification - United States Navy - Treasure Island
                         Development Authority]
                         Sponsor: Mayor
                         Resolution retroactively approving and authorizing the Treasure Island Development
                         Authority to enter into a Modification of the Cooperative Agreement with the United
                         States Navy to extend the Cooperative Agreement for the period of October 1, 2013,
                         through September 30, 2014.
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       Cooperative_Agrmt
                                       Budget_Analysts_Rpt_100213
                                       Comm_Pkt_100213
                                       Leg_Ver2
                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?


20.      130886          [Memorandum of Understanding - Treasure Island Development Authority and
                         the Public Utilities Commission - Provision of Utilities Services - Treasure
                         Island and Yerba Buena Island]
                         Sponsor: Mayor
                         Resolution retroactively approving a Memorandum of Understanding between the
                         Treasure Island Development Authority and the Public Utilities Commission for the
                         provision of utilities services including the maintenance and operation of utility
                         infrastructure on Treasure Island and Yerba Buena Island for the period of October 1,
                         2013, through September 30, 2014.

                         (Fiscal Impact)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       MOU
                                       Res_132709
                                       Form 126
                                       Budget_Analysts_Rpt_100213
                                       Comm_Pkt_100213
                                       Leg_Ver2
                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?




City and County of San Francisco                          Page 15                             Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 16](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-16)

Board of Supervisors                                 Meeting Agenda                         Tuesday, October 8, 2013


21.      130810          [Contract Amendment - Cornerstone Technology Partners, JV - $22,820,000]
                         Resolution authorizing the Office of Contract Administration to enter into the Fourth
                         Amendment between the City and Cornerstone Technology Partners, JV (part of the
                         Technology Store procurement vehicle), in which the amendment shall increase the
                         contract limit from $12,490,000 to $22,820,000 for the term ending December 31, 2013.
                         (Office of Contract Administration)

                         (Fiscal Impact)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       Agmt_Amendment_4
                                       Memo_080613
                                       Form_126
                                       Form_126
                                       Support_1
                                       Budget_Analysts_Rpt_100213
                                       Comm_Pkt_100213
                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?


22.      130811          [Contract Amendment - En Pointe Technology Sales, Inc. - $64,810,000]
                         Resolution authorizing the Office of Contract Administration to enter into the Seventh
                         Amendment between the City and En Pointe Technology Sales, Inc. (“En Pointe,” part of
                         the Technology Store procurement vehicle), in which the amendment shall increase the
                         contract limit from $54,640,000 to $64,810,000 for the term ending December 31, 2013.
                         (Office of Contract Administration)

                         (Fiscal Impact)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       Memo_080613
                                       Seventh_Amendment
                                       Agmt_Amendments
                                       Form_126
                                       Budget_Analysts_Rpt_100213
                                       Comm_Pkt_100213
                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?




City and County of San Francisco                         Page 16                             Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 17](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-17)

Board of Supervisors                                 Meeting Agenda                         Tuesday, October 8, 2013


23.      130812          [Contract Amendment - CCT Technologies, Inc., dba ComputerLand of Silicon
                         Valley - $43,850,000]
                         Resolution authorizing the Office of Contract Administration to enter into the Fifth
                         Amendment between the City and CCT Technologies, Inc., dba ComputerLand of Silicon
                         Valley (part of the Technology Store procurement vehicle), in which the amendment shall
                         increase the contract limit from $34,950,000 to $43,850,000 for the term ending
                         December 31, 2013. (Office of Contract Administration)

                         (Fiscal Impact)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       Memo_080613
                                       Fifth_Amendment
                                       Form_126 Mayor
                                       Form_126 BOS
                                       Budget_Analysts_Rpt_100213
                                       Comm_Pkt_100213
                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?


24.      130813          [Contract Amendment - Xtech - $79,830,000]
                         Resolution authorizing the Office of Contract Administration to enter into the Seventh
                         Amendment between the City and Xtech (part of the Technology Store procurement
                         vehicle), in which the amendment shall increase the contract limit from $68,380,000 to
                         $79,830,000 for the term ending December 31, 2013. (Office of Contract Administration)

                         (Fiscal Impact)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       Seventh_Amendment
                                       Memo_080613
                                       Form_126 Mayor
                                       Form_126 BOS
                                       Agmt_Amendment
                                       Budget_Analysts_Rpt_100213
                                       Comm_Pkt_100213
                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?




City and County of San Francisco                         Page 17                             Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 18](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-18)

Board of Supervisors                                 Meeting Agenda                          Tuesday, October 8, 2013


25.      130889          [Application Approval - Comprehensive HIV Prevention Programs -
                         $8,001,007]
                         Sponsor: Wiener
                         Resolution authorizing the Department of Public Health to submit a one-year application
                         for calendar year 2014 to continue receiving funding for the Comprehensive HIV
                         Prevention Programs grant from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and
                         requesting $8,001,007 in HIV prevention funding for San Francisco from January 1,
                         2014, through December 31, 2014.
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       Comm_Pkt_100213
                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?




City and County of San Francisco                          Page 18                             Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 19](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-19)

Board of Supervisors                                 Meeting Agenda                          Tuesday, October 8, 2013




         Recommendations of the Government Audit and Oversight Committee
                         Present: Supervisors Cohen, Tang


26.      130608          [Board Response - Civil Grand Jury Report - Log Cabin Ranch: Planning for
                         the Future, a Continuity Report]
                         Resolution responding to the Presiding Judge of the Superior Court on the findings and
                         recommendations contained in the 2012-2013 Civil Grand Jury Report, entitled “Log
                         Cabin Ranch: Planning for The Future, A Continuity Report;” and urging the Mayor to
                         cause the implementation of accepted findings and recommendations through his/her
                         department heads and through the development of the annual budget. (Government
                         Audit and Oversight Committee)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       CGJ_Report
                                       Memo_COB to BOS
                                       Response_Consolidated
                                       Comm_Pkt_092613
                                       Leg_Ver2
                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?


                         Present: Supervisors Cohen, Tang, Campos


27.      130394          [Follow-Up Board Response - 2011-2012 Civil Grand Jury Report - Deja Vu All
                         Over Again: San Francisco’s City Technology Needs a Culture Shock]
                         Motion responding to the 2012-2013 Civil Grand Jury request to provide a status update
                         on the Board of Supervisors’ responses to the relevant recommendations issued in the
                         2011-2012 Civil Grand Jury Report entitled, “Déjà Vu All Over Again: San Francisco’s
                         City Technology Needs a Culture Shock.” (Government Audit and Oversight Committee)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       Comm_Pkt_092613
                                       Leg_Ver2
                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED?



         Recommendation of the Land Use and Economic Development Committee
                         Present: Supervisors Wiener, Chiu, Breed




City and County of San Francisco                          Page 19                             Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 20](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-20)

Board of Supervisors                                  Meeting Agenda                          Tuesday, October 8, 2013


28.      130877          [Street Encroachment - Operator Convenience Facilities - Terminus of Muni
                         Transit Lines]
                         Resolution granting revocable permission to the Municipal Transportation Agency to
                         occupy portions of the public right-of-way to install and maintain two new operator
                         convenience facilities at the terminus of various Muni bus routes; and making
                         environmental findings, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight
                         priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Public Works Department)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       DPW_Ltr_091013
                                       MTA_Ltr_051412
                                       Street_Encroachment_Agmt
                                       Design_Options
                                       Cat_Ex_100412
                                       General_Pln_Referral_101912
                                       DPW_Order_181381
                                       Response_MTA_092513
                                       Arts_Commission_Minutes_091012
                                       Arts_Commission_Minutes_120312
                                       Comm_Pkt_093013
                                       Leg_Ver2
                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?



         SPECIAL ORDER 2:30 P.M. - Recognition of Commendations




City and County of San Francisco                          Page 20                              Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 21](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-21)

Board of Supervisors                                   Meeting Agenda                              Tuesday, October 8, 2013




         SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M.
         APPEAL PROCEDURES
         Board Rule 4.18 provides that public hearings on appeals shall be scheduled for 3:00 p.m. If more than one
         public hearing is scheduled, then the Clerk, in consultation with the President, may determine the order in which
         the appeals will be scheduled. Second and later appeals may be scheduled at specified times later than 3:00
         p.m. An appeal shall not be heard prior to its scheduled time on the calendar, and it may not be called until the
         Board's consideration of appeals scheduled earlier on the calendar is completed. It is the policy of the Clerk of
         the Board to schedule multiple appeals in the following order at 3:00 p.m:

         1. Appeals where all parties have agreed to request a continuance or a tabling of the appeal.
         2. Continued appeals from previous Board meetings (continued appeals will be listed in order of those closest to
            deadlines for Board decision).
         3. Appeals appearing on the calendar for the first time, in chronological order of receipt by the Clerk.
         4. Multiple appeals appearing on the calendar may be staggered at times specific, beginning at 3:00 p.m.
         5. Appeals involving participants who have ADA considerations may be set for specific times beginning at 3:00
         p.m.



29.      130843          [Public Hearing - Appeal of Final Mitigated Negative Declaration - 480 Potrero
                         Avenue]
                         Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the Planning Commission’s approval of a
                         Final Mitigated Negative Declaration (Case No. 2011.0430E) adopted and issued on
                         August 8, 2013, for the proposed construction of a six-story, 58-foot-tall mixed-use
                         building, which would include residential, ground-floor retail, and parking uses within the
                         UMU (Urban Mixed Use) Zoning District and a 58-X Height and Bulk District, on property
                         located at 480 Potrero Avenue, Assessor's Block No. 3973, Lot No. 002C. (District 10)
                         (Appellants: Jean Bogiages and Juan M. Jayo, on behalf of the Mariposa Utah
                         Neighborhood Association; and Mica I. Ringel) (Filed August 28, 2013). (Clerk of the
                         Board)
                         Attachments: Board_Pkt_100813


                         Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED?
         Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above
         matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
         public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of
         Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or
         prior to, the public hearing.



         (Only one of the following two motions should be approved.)




City and County of San Francisco                            Page 21                                  Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 22](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-22)

Board of Supervisors                                  Meeting Agenda                          Tuesday, October 8, 2013


30.      130844          [Affirming the Approval of a Final Mitigated Negative Declaration - 480 Potrero
                         Avenue]
                         Motion affirming the approval of a Final Mitigated Negative Declaration under the
                         California Environmental Quality Act by the Planning Commission for a project located at
                         480 Potrero Avenue.
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED?


31.      130845          [Reversing the Approval of a Final Mitigated Negative Declaration - 480
                         Potrero Avenue]
                         Motion reversing the approval of a Final Mitigated Negative Declaration under the
                         California Environmental Quality Act by the Planning Commission for a project located at
                         480 Potrero Avenue.
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED?


32.      130846          [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Approval of a Final Mitigated Negative
                         Declaration - 480 Potrero Avenue]
                         Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the approval of a
                         Final Mitigated Negative Declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act by
                         the Planning Commission for a project located at 480 Potrero Avenue.
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED?



33.      ROLL CALL FOR INTRODUCTIONS
         Roll call for introduction of ordinances, resolutions, charter amendments, requests for hearings, letters
         of inquiry, letters of request to the City Attorney and Board Members' reports on their regional body
         activities.




City and County of San Francisco                          Page 22                              Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 23](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-23)

Board of Supervisors                                Meeting Agenda                           Tuesday, October 8, 2013




34.      PUBLIC COMMENT
         An opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Board on items of interest to the public
         that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board, including items being considered today
         which have not been considered by a Board committee and excluding items which have been
         considered by a Board committee. Members of the public may address the Board for up to three
         minutes. Each member of the public will be allotted the same number of minutes to speak, except that
         public speakers using translation assistance will be allowed to testify for twice the amount of the public
         testimony time limit. If simultaneous translation services are used, speakers will be governed by the
         public testimony time limit applied to speakers not requesting translation assistance. The President or
         the Board may limit the total testimony to 30 minutes.

         Members of the public who want a document placed on the overhead for display should clearly state
         such and subsequently remove the document when they want the screen to return to live coverage of
         the meeting.




City and County of San Francisco                         Page 23                              Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 24](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-24)

Board of Supervisors                                 Meeting Agenda                        Tuesday, October 8, 2013




         FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE
         These measures were introduced for adoption without committee reference. A unanimous vote is
         required for adoption of these resolutions today. Any Supervisor may require any resolution to go
         to committee.
         Questions on the For Adoption Without Committee Reference Agenda are on for adoption, or
         approved, as indicated.



         Items 35 through 38

35.      130978          [Domestic Violence Awareness Month - October 2013]
                         Sponsors: Chiu; Tang
                         Resolution declaring October 2013 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month in the City
                         and County of San Francisco.
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         10/01/2013; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT
                         BOARD MEETING.

                         Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?


36.      130963          [Final Map 6945 - Avocet Way]
                         Motion approving Final Map 6945, a three Lot Subdivision being a merger and
                         re-subdivision of Lots Nos. 042 - 059 and Lot O, and an 18 Unit Residential
                         Condominium Project, located at Avocet Way, being a subdivision of Assessor’s Block
                         No. 4591C, Lot Nos. 049 through 067, and adopting findings pursuant to the General
                         Plan and Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Public Works Department)
                         Attachments: 130963

                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         09/26/2013; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT
                         BOARD MEETING.

                         Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED?


37.      130964          [Final Map 6946 - Avocet Way]
                         Motion approving Final Map 6946, a three Lot Subdivision being a merger and
                         re-subdivision of Lots Nos. 080 through 097 and Lot P, and an 18 Unit Residential
                         Condominium Project, located at Avocet Way being a subdivision of Assessor’s Block
                         No. 4591C, Lot Nos. 110 through 128, and adopting findings pursuant to the General
                         Plan and Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Public Works Department)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         09/26/2013; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT
                         BOARD MEETING.

                         Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED?

City and County of San Francisco                         Page 24                            Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 25](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-25)

Board of Supervisors                                 Meeting Agenda                            Tuesday, October 8, 2013


38.      130965          [Final Map 7347 - 2001 Market Street and 38 Dolores Street]
                         Motion approving Final Map 7347, a four Lot Airspace Subdivision and 92 Units
                         Mixed-Use Condominium Project, located at 2001 Market Street and 38 Dolores Street
                         being a subdivision of Assessor’s Block No. 3535, Lot No. 041, and adopting findings
                         pursuant to the General Plan and Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Public Works
                         Department)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                       Board_Pkt_100813

                         09/26/2013; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT
                         BOARD MEETING.

                         Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED?



39.      IMPERATIVE AGENDA
         Resolution(s), if any, to be adopted within limits imposed by the Sunshine Ordinance and the Ralph M.
         Brown Act, introduced today, not on the printed agenda. For such resolutions to be considered, the
         Board must first adopt the Serious Injury Finding or the Purely Commendatory Finding and the Brown
         Act Finding. Each motion requires eight (8) votes or a unanimous six (6) or seven (7). A unanimous
         vote is required for the resolution(s).
         [Serious Injury Finding]
         Motion that the Board find that for the resolution(s) being considered at this time "the need to take
         action is so imperative as to threaten serious injury to the public interest if action is deferred to a
         later meeting."
         [Purely Commendatory Finding]
         Motion that the Board find that the resolution(s) being considered at this time are purely
         commendatory.
         [Brown Act Finding]
         Motion that the Board find by roll call vote that, for the resolution(s) being considered at this time,
         there is a need to take immediate action. The need to take action came to the attention of the City
         and County of San Francisco after the agenda was posted.



         LEGISLATION INTRODUCED AT ROLL CALL


         Introduced by a Supervisor or the Mayor
         Pursuant to Charter, Section 2.105, an Ordinance or Resolution may be introduced before the Board of
         Supervisors by a Member of the Board, a Committee of the Board, or the Mayor and shall be referred
         to and reported upon by an appropriate Committee of the Board.



         Legislation Introduced will appear on the Final Minutes for this meeting. Once the
         Legislation Introduced is approved, it will be available on
         http://www.sfbos.org/legislation_introduced.



City and County of San Francisco                          Page 25                                Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 26](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-26)

Board of Supervisors                                    Meeting Agenda                          Tuesday, October 8, 2013




         Introduced at the Request of a Department
         Pursuant to Rules of Order of the Board of Supervisors, Section 2.7.1, Department Heads may submit
         proposed legislation to the Clerk of the Board, in which case titles of the legislation will be printed at the
         rear of the next available agenda of the Board.



         PROPOSED ORDINANCES

         130955          [Settlement of Administrative Enforcement Action - San Francisco Bay
                         Regional Water Quality Control Board - $608,310]
                         Ordinance authorizing settlement of the unlitigated administrative enforcement action
                         filed by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board against the City
                         and County of San Francisco for $608,310; and appropriating $608,310 for this purpose
                         from the Public Utilities Commission Water Enterprise fund balance. (City Attorney's
                         Office)
                         Attachments: Legislation_Ver1

                         09/27/2013; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT.

                         10/08/2013; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Rules Committee.


         130956          [Settlement of Lawsuit - Carlos Hutcherson, et al. - $125,000]
                         Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Carlos Hutcherson, Tarasa
                         Gates, and Donald Walton against the City and County of San Francisco for $125,000;
                         the lawsuit was filed on December 21, 2012, in United States District Court, Case No.
                         12-cv-6481; entitled Carlos Hutcherson, et al., v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
                         (City Attorney's Office)
                         Attachments: Legislation_Ver1

                         09/27/2013; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT.

                         10/08/2013; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Rules Committee.




         PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS

         130957          [Settlement of Administrative Enforcement Acton - San Francisco Bay
                         Regional Water Quality Control Board - $69,000]
                         Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated administrative enforcement acton
                         filed by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board against San
                         Francisco imposing a penalty of $69,000. (City Attorney's Office)
                         Attachments: Legislation_Ver1

                         09/27/2013; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT.

                         10/08/2013; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Rules Committee.




City and County of San Francisco                            Page 26                              Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 27](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-27)

Board of Supervisors                                    Meeting Agenda                            Tuesday, October 8, 2013


         130958          [Settlement of Administrative Enforcement Action - Central Valley Regional
                         Water Quality Control Board - $1,000,000]
                         Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated administrative enforcement action
                         filed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board against San Francisco
                         imposing a penalty of $1,000,000. (Public Utilities Commission)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                         09/27/2013; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT.

                         10/08/2013; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Rules Committee.


         130959          [Settlement of Claim - Adam Holm - $50,000]
                         Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claim filed by Adam Holm against
                         the City and County of San Francisco for $50,000; claim was filed on March 28, 2013.
                         (City Attorney's Office)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                         09/27/2013; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT.

                         10/08/2013; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Rules Committee.


         130960          [Support Goals for Federal Funding - Community Development Block Grant,
                         Emergency Solutions Grant and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS
                         Programs]
                         Resolution supporting FY2014-2015 Community Development Block Grant, Emergency
                         Solutions Grant, and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Consolidated Plan
                         Goals. (Mayor's Office of Housing)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                         09/24/2013; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT.

                         10/08/2013; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Budget and Finance Committee.




City and County of San Francisco                             Page 27                               Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 28](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-28)

Board of Supervisors                                    Meeting Agenda                            Tuesday, October 8, 2013


         130961          [Acquisition of Discharge Easements - California Water Service Company -
                         Bay Division Pipeline Nos. 3 and 4 Crossovers Project in San Mateo County -
                         $3,640]
                         Resolution approving and authorizing the acquisition of two Discharge Easements from
                         the California Water Service Company, a California Corporation, for $3,640 to be used by
                         the City and County of San Francisco (City) for discharge of pipeline water and
                         groundwater, as needed for the installation, construction, modification, removal,
                         inspection, maintenance, repair, and replacement of the water system infrastructure in
                         the City’s right of way, including without limitation, periodic scheduled maintenance,
                         emergency repairs, and the construction of the project known as the Bay Division
                         Pipeline Nos. 3 and 4 Crossovers Project No. CUW38001; adopting findings under the
                         California Environmental Quality Act; adopting findings that the conveyance is consistent
                         with the City’s General Plan and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section
                         101.1; and authorizing the Director of Property to execute documents, make certain
                         modifications, and take certain actions in furtherance of this Resolution. (Real Estate
                         Department)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                        RealEstate_Ltr_092413
                                        Purchase_Agmt
                                        General_Plan_Referral_Ltr
                                        PUC_Res_09-0071
                                        Form_126

                         09/26/2013; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT.

                         10/08/2013; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Land Use and Economic Development Committee.


         130962          [Contract Modification - S & S Trucking Corporation - Estimated Cumulative
                         Value of $13,500,000]
                         Resolution extending an agreement between the City and County of San Francisco and
                         S & S Trucking Corporation from December 20, 2013, through December 19, 2015, and
                         increasing the estimated cumulative contract amount from $9,000,000 to $13,500,000 for
                         hauling biosolids (sludge) and grit, pursuant to Charter, Section 9.118(b). (Public Utilities
                         Commission)
                         Attachments: Leg_Ver1

                                        Contract
                                        Contract_Extension
                                        Form_126

                         09/30/2013; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT.

                         10/08/2013; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Budget and Finance Committee.




City and County of San Francisco                             Page 28                               Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 29](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-29)

Board of Supervisors                                  Meeting Agenda                          Tuesday, October 8, 2013


         130954          [Petitions and Communications]
                         Petitions and Communications received from September 23, 2013, through September
                         30, 2013, for reference by the President to Committee considering related matters, or to
                         be ordered filed by the Clerk on October 8, 2013.

                         Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is
                         subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco
                         Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information will not be redacted.

                         From Clerk of the Board, reporting the following individuals have submitted Form 700
                         Statements: (1)
                           Ahmad El-Najjar - Legislative Aide - Leaving
                           Lauren Kahn - Legislative Aide - Assuming

                         From Mayor, designating Supervisor Malia Cohen as Acting-Mayor from September 28,
                         2013, until October 1, 2013. Copy: Each Supervisor. (2)

                         From Clerk of the Board, regarding the following appointments by the Mayor: (3)
                           Richard Guggenhime - Airport Commission
                           Marlene Sharon Saritzky - Film Commission
                           Melanie Blum - Film Commission

                         From concerned citizens, submitting signatures for petition regarding fiber broadband.
                         35 signatures. Copy: Each Supervisor. (4)

                         From Mayor, submitting notification that the adopted budget for FYs 2013-2014 and
                         2014-2015 is adequate for the Department to meet service levels. (5)

                         From Clerk of the Board, regarding the following appointment by the Mayor: (6)
                           Al Perez - Entertainment Commission

                         From concerned citizens, regarding the Japantown Cultural Heritage and Economic
                         Sustainability Strategy. File No. 130945. 24 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (7)

                         From concerned citizens, submitting signatures for petition regarding 480 Potrero
                         Avenue project environmental impact report. 102 signatures. File No. 130843. Copy:
                         Each Supervisor. (8)

                         From Ivan Edgar Pratt, regarding volunteer workers at the Folsom Street Festival. Copy:
                         Each Supervisor. (9)

                         From James Chaffee, regarding the Public Library. Copy: Each Supervisor. (10)

                         From Patrick Otellini, regarding Soft Story Retrofit Financing Workshop. Copy: Each
                         Supervisor. (11)

                         From concerned citizens, regarding Masonic Avenue cycle track project. File No.
                         120974. 3 letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (12)

                         From concerned citizens, submitting signatures for petition regarding San Francisco’s
                         Opportunity to Compete campaign. 230 signatures. Copy: Each Supervisor. (13)

                         From Aaron Goodman, regarding 19th Avenue Transit Study meeting. Copy: Each
                         Supervisor. (14)

                         From Paul Nisbett, regarding Ellis Act evictions. Copy: Each Supervisor. (15)

                         From John Barry, regarding America’s Cup. Copy: Each Supervisor. (16)
City and County of San Francisco                          Page 29                              Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13

### [Page 30](https://sfbos.info/documents/139/2013-10-08-agenda#page-30)

Board of Supervisors                                 Meeting Agenda                         Tuesday, October 8, 2013


                         From Howard Wong, regarding Muni. Copy: Each Supervisor. (17)

                         From concerned citizens, regarding the appeal of exemption from environmental review
                         for 435-437 Potrero Avenue project. File No. 130805. 4 letters. Copy: Each
                         Supervisor. (18)

                         *From concerned citizen, regarding air quality. File No. 130805. Copy: Each Supervisor.
                         (19)

                         From Port, submitting annual gift report for FY2012-2013. Copy: Each Supervisor. (20)

                         *(An asterisked item represents the cover sheet to a document that exceeds 25 pages.
                         The complete document is available at the Clerk’s Office, Room 244, City Hall.)
                         Attachments: Board_Pkt_100813




         ADJOURNMENT




City and County of San Francisco                         Page 30                             Printed at 2:12 pm on 10/4/13
