# Board of Supervisors Minutes: February 10, 2026

- Meeting date: 2026-02-10
- Document type: minutes
- Pages in official PDF: 31
- [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/1134/2026-02-10-minutes)
- [Authoritative City PDF](https://sfbos.archive.sf.gov/sites/default/files/bag021026_minutes.pdf)

> This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City PDF is the authoritative public record.

## Structured legislative records

### File 251099: Planning Code - Corrections and Clarifications

- Pages: 4-5
- Vote 1: final-passage, likely final
  - Action: 251099 [Planning Code - Corrections and Clarifications] Ordinance amending the Planning Code to make various clarifying and typographical changes, and prohibit massage establishments and massage sole practitioner uses as accessory uses to residential uses; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. (Planning Commission) Ordinance No. 013-26 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton, Wong

### File 251100: Planning Code - Landmark District Designation - Chula-Abbey Early Residential Historic District

- Pages: 5
- Vote 1: final-passage, likely final
  - Action: 251100 [Planning Code - Landmark District Designation - Chula-Abbey Early Residential Historic District] Sponsor: Mandelman Ordinance amending the Planning Code to add a new Appendix P to Article 10, Preservation of Historical, Architectural, and Aesthetic Landmarks, to create the Chula-Abbey Early Residential Historic District; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Historic Preservation Commission) Ordinance No. 014-26 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton, Wong

### File 251101: Planning Code - Landmark District Designation - Alert Alley Early Residential Historic District

- Pages: 5-6
- Vote 1: final-passage, likely final
  - Action: 251101 [Planning Code - Landmark District Designation - Alert Alley Early Residential Historic District] Sponsor: Mandelman Ordinance amending the Planning Code to add a new Appendix Q to Article 10, Preservation of Historical, Architectural, and Aesthetic Landmarks, to create the Alert Alley Early Residential Historic District; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Historic Preservation Commission) Ordinance No. 015-26 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton, Wong

### File 251251: Police Code - Tenderloin and South of Market Retail Hours Restriction Pilot Program

- Pages: 6
- Vote 1: final-passage, likely final
  - Action: 251251 [Police Code - Tenderloin and South of Market Retail Hours Restriction Pilot Program] Sponsors: Dorsey; Mahmood and Wong Ordinance amending the Police Code to expand the current Tenderloin retail hours restriction pilot program, under which retail food and tobacco establishments in the restricted area are prohibited from being open to the public from 12:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m., or from 2:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. if subject to regulation by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, to encompass a high-crime area across the Tenderloin and South of Market neighborhoods; and to extend the duration of the pilot program, currently set to expire in July 2026, to instead expire 18 months from the effective date of this Ordinance. (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) Ordinance No. 024-26 FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Wong
  - Noes: Fielder, Walton

### File 251165: Police Code - Refunds of Police Emergency Alarm Fees

- Pages: 6
- Vote 1: first-reading
  - Action: 251165 [Police Code - Refunds of Police Emergency Alarm Fees] Ordinance amending the Police Code to revise the procedures for alarm companies and alarm users to claim refunds or credits of overpaid alarm fees under the Police Emergency Alarm Ordinance. (Treasurer-Tax Collector) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton, Wong

### File 251255: De-Appropriation and Appropriation - District 10 General City Responsibility - District 10 Projects - Department of Children, Youth and Their Families - Participatory Budgeting - $250,000 - FY2025-2026

- Pages: 6-7
- Vote 1: first-reading
  - Action: 251255 [De-Appropriation and Appropriation - District 10 General City Responsibility - District 10 Projects - Department of Children, Youth and Their Families - Participatory Budgeting - $250,000 - FY2025-2026] Sponsor: Walton Ordinance de-appropriating $250,000 from General City Responsibility (GEN) and appropriating $250,000 to Department of Children, Youth and Their Families (CHF) to support the District 10 safety plan, including services at the Hope SF sites, violence prevention events, safe passages, response to schools, and as needed support to the youth and residents most impacted by violence in Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026. (Fiscal Impact) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
  - Ayes: Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton, Wong

## Extracted text

### [Page 5](https://sfbos.info/documents/1134/2026-02-10-minutes#page-5)

Board of Supervisors                             Meeting Minutes                                              2/10/2026



            President Mandelman requested File Nos. 251100 and 251101 be called together.


251100 [Planning Code - Landmark District Designation - Chula-Abbey Early Residential
       Historic District]
            Sponsor: Mandelman
            Ordinance amending the Planning Code to add a new Appendix P to Article 10, Preservation of
            Historical, Architectural, and Aesthetic Landmarks, to create the Chula-Abbey Early Residential
            Historic District; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California
            Environmental Quality Act; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under
            Planning Code, Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority
            policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Historic Preservation Commission)
            Ordinance No. 014-26
            FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
                 Ayes: 11 - Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton,
                 Wong


251101 [Planning Code - Landmark District Designation - Alert Alley Early Residential
       Historic District]
            Sponsor: Mandelman
            Ordinance amending the Planning Code to add a new Appendix Q to Article 10, Preservation of
            Historical, Architectural, and Aesthetic Landmarks, to create the Alert Alley Early Residential
            Historic District; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California
            Environmental Quality Act; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under
            Planning Code, Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority
            policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Historic Preservation Commission)
            Ordinance No. 015-26
            FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
                 Ayes: 11 - Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton,
                 Wong




City and County of San Francisco                       Page 116                             Printed at 4:52 pm on 3/13/26

### [Page 6](https://sfbos.info/documents/1134/2026-02-10-minutes#page-6)

Board of Supervisors                              Meeting Minutes                                               2/10/2026




Recommendation of the Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee


251251 [Police Code - Tenderloin and South of Market Retail Hours Restriction Pilot
       Program]
            Sponsors: Dorsey; Mahmood and Wong
            Ordinance amending the Police Code to expand the current Tenderloin retail hours restriction pilot
            program, under which retail food and tobacco establishments in the restricted area are prohibited
            from being open to the public from 12:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m., or from 2:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. if subject
            to regulation by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, to encompass a high-crime
            area across the Tenderloin and South of Market neighborhoods; and to extend the duration of the
            pilot program, currently set to expire in July 2026, to instead expire 18 months from the effective date
            of this Ordinance.
            (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.)
            Ordinance No. 024-26
            FINALLY PASSED by the following vote:
                 Ayes: 9 - Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Wong
                 Noes: 2 - Fielder, Walton



NEW BUSINESS


Recommendations of the Budget and Finance Committee


251165 [Police Code - Refunds of Police Emergency Alarm Fees]
            Ordinance amending the Police Code to revise the procedures for alarm companies and alarm users
            to claim refunds or credits of overpaid alarm fees under the Police Emergency Alarm Ordinance.
            (Treasurer-Tax Collector)
            PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
                 Ayes: 11 - Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton,
                 Wong


251255 [De-Appropriation and Appropriation - District 10 General City Responsibility -
       District 10 Projects - Department of Children, Youth and Their Families -
       Participatory Budgeting - $250,000 - FY2025-2026]
            Sponsor: Walton
            Ordinance de-appropriating $250,000 from General City Responsibility (GEN) and appropriating
            $250,000 to Department of Children, Youth and Their Families (CHF) to support the District 10 safety
            plan, including services at the Hope SF sites, violence prevention events, safe passages, response to
            schools, and as needed support to the youth and residents most impacted by violence in Fiscal Year
            (FY) 2025-2026.
            (Fiscal Impact)
            PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote:
                 Ayes: 11 - Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton,
                 Wong

City and County of San Francisco                        Page 117                              Printed at 4:52 pm on 3/13/26
