# Board of Supervisors Minutes: February 10, 2026 - Meeting date: 2026-02-10 - Document type: minutes - Pages in official PDF: 31 - [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/1134/2026-02-10-minutes) - [Authoritative City PDF](https://sfbos.archive.sf.gov/sites/default/files/bag021026_minutes.pdf) > This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City PDF is the authoritative public record. ## Structured legislative records ### File 251159: Approving Conditional Use Authorization - 350 Amber Drive - Pages: 13-14 - Vote 1: tabling - Action: 251159 [Approving Conditional Use Authorization - 350 Amber Drive] Motion approving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 21825, approving a Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2024-004318CUA, for a proposed project located at 350 Amber Drive; making environmental findings; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Clerk of the Board) Supervisor Mandelman, seconded by Supervisor Dorsey, moved that this Motion be TABLED. The motion carried by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton, Wong ### File 251160: Disapproving Conditional Use Authorization - 350 Amber Drive - Pages: 14-15 - Vote 1: other - Action: plete the Project. The completed tree protection plan shall be prepared prior to the Department of Building Inspection’s review of the site permit. Tree protection and risk notes, specifications, and construction details shall be provided to the project’s construction manager, general contractor, and sub-contractors and the selected Arborist shall prepare a schedule of site visits to monitor construction activities and perform post-completion inspections. The Project, including power source and cooling facility, shall be operated at all times within the limits of the San Francisco Noise Control Ordinance. The Project, including power source and any heating/cooling facility, shall not be operated so as to cause the generation of heat that adversely affects a building occupant. FURTHER MOVED, That the disapproval of the Conditional Use Authorization and the approval of the Conditional Use Authorization with different conditions are all subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination.’ The motion City and County of San Francisco Page 125 Printed at 4:52 pm on 3/13/26 Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 2/10/2026 carried by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton, Wong - Vote 2: approval, likely final - Action: (Charter, Section 4.105, and Planning Code, Section 308.1(d), provides that the Board of Supervisors may disapprove the decision of the Planning Commission by a vote of not less than two-thirds (8 votes) of the members of the Board.) Motion No. M26-009 Supervisor Mandelman, seconded by Supervisor Dorsey, moved that this Motion be APPROVED AS AMENDED. The motion carried by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton, Wong ### File 251161: Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization - 350 Amber Drive - Pages: 15 - Vote 1: approval, likely final - Action: 251161 [Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization - 350 Amber Drive] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings in support of the Board of Supervisors' disapproval of the proposed Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2024-004318CUA, for a proposed project at 350 Amber Drive. (Clerk of the Board) Motion No. M26-010 Supervisor Mandelman, seconded by Supervisor Dorsey, moved that this Motion be APPROVED. The motion carried by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton, Wong ### File 260021: Hearing - Appeal of Conditional Use Authorization De Facto Denial - 524-526 Vallejo Street and 4-4A San Antonio Place - Pages: 15-16 - Vote 1: continuance - Action: 24-526 Vallejo Street and 4-4A San Antonio Place (Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0132, Lot No. 009) identified in Planning Case No. 2024-011561CUA, to legalize the merger of three dwelling units on second and third floors into one dwelling unit and to reinstate one dwelling unit on the ground floor within an existing four-unit residential building located within RM-1 (Residential Mixed, Low Density) Zoning District, Telegraph Hill-North Beach Residential SUD (Special Use District), Priority Equity Geographies SUD, and 40-X Height and Bulk District. (District 3) (Appellants: Katelin Holloway and Ben Ramirez) (Filed January 5, 2026) (Clerk of the Board) President Mandelman opened the public hearing and indicated he would be entertaining a motion to continue this appeal hearing and associated motions to a later date. The President then inquired if any individual wished to address the Board on the proposed continuance. There were no speakers. President Mandelman closed public comment on the continuance. Supervisor Sauter, seconded by Supervisor Walton, moved that this Hearing be CONTINUED OPEN to the Board of Supervisors meeting of March 10, 2026. The motion carried by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton, Wong ## Extracted text ### [Page 14](https://sfbos.info/documents/1134/2026-02-10-minutes#page-14) Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 2/10/2026 251160 [Disapproving Conditional Use Authorization - 350 Amber Drive] Motion disapproving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 21825, approving a Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2024-004318CUA, for a proposed project at 350 Amber Drive. (Clerk of the Board) (Charter, Section 4.105, and Planning Code, Section 308.1(d), provides that the Board of Supervisors may disapprove the decision of the Planning Commission by a vote of not less than two-thirds (8 votes) of the members of the Board.) Supervisor Mandelman, seconded by Supervisor Dorsey, moved that this Motion be AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE, on Page 1, Line 1, by adding ‘Conditionally’, Line 3, by adding ‘conditionally’, Lines 5-8, by adding ‘and conditionally approving a Conditional Use Authorization for the same Planning Case and property with additional conditions, subject to the adoption of written findings by the Board in support of this determination’; on Page 1, Line 10, through Page 2, Line 4, by adding ‘WHEREAS, The project (Project) at 350 Amber Drive (Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 7521, Lot No. 005) identified in Planning Case No. 2024-004318CUA, issued by the Planning Commission by Motion No. 21825, dated September 25, 2025, proposes to install a new AT&T Macro Wireless Telecommunications Facility on an approximately 104 foot tall monopole, consisting of 12 new antennas, and nine new remote radio units and ancillary equipment within the P (Public) Zoning District and OS (Open Space) Height and Bulk District; and WHEREAS, The Planning Department analyzed the Project, in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code, Sections 21000 et seq.) (CEQA) and determined that the Project is exempt from further review under CEQA as a Class 3 categorical exemption; and WHEREAS, On September 25, 2025, the Planning Commission found that the Project is consistent with the General Plan, and the eight priority policy findings of the Planning Code, Section 101.1, for the reasons set forth in Planning Commission Motion No. 21825, and the Board hereby incorporates such reasons herein by reference; and WHEREAS, This Board has reviewed and considered the Conditional Use Authorization, the appeal letters, the other written records before the Board of Supervisors including the response to the appeal by the Planning Department, and heard testimony and received public comment regarding the Conditional Use Authorization; now, therefore, be it’; on Page 2, Lines 7-11, by striking ‘to install a new AT&T Macro Wireless Telecommunications Facility on an approximately 104 foot tall monopole, consisting of 12 new antennas, and nine new remote radio units and ancillary equipment within the P (Public) Zoning District, OS Height and Bulk District, Central Neighborhoods Large Residence Special Use District, and Family and Senior Housing Opportunity Special Use District’, Lines 11-12, by changing ‘a proposed project located at: 350 Amber Drive, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 7521, Lot No. 005’ to ‘the Project’; and on Page 2, Line 12, through Page 3, Line 20, by adding ‘and, be it FURTHER MOVED, That the Board hereby approves a Conditional Use Authorization for the same property and Project with all the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission and with the following additional conditions: The Project sponsor shall request that the Fire Department inspect the Project prior to completion and shall complete any reasonable fire safety-related recommendations of the Fire Department. The Project, including power source and cooling facility, shall be operated at all times within state and local fire codes, including the specific requirements for cellular antenna sites and placement of diesel generators. Operational procedures are to be monitored ongoing at the facility as required by the San Francisco Fire and Building Departments. The Project sponsor shall hire an ISA Certified Arborist who is also a Registered Consulting Arborist with the American Society of Consulting Arborists, to prepare a tree protection plan detailing best management practices and protective measures to maintain the viability of the existing trees located at 350 Amber Drive. The tree protection plan shall require the Project sponsor to plant three trees for any tree that is required to be removed to complete the Project. The completed tree protection plan shall be prepared prior to the Department of Building Inspection’s review of the site permit. Tree protection and risk notes, specifications, and construction details shall be provided to the project’s construction manager, general contractor, and sub-contractors and the selected Arborist shall prepare a schedule of site visits to monitor construction activities and perform post-completion inspections. The Project, including power source and cooling facility, shall be operated at all times within the limits of the San Francisco Noise Control Ordinance. The Project, including power source and any heating/cooling facility, shall not be operated so as to cause the generation of heat that adversely affects a building occupant. FURTHER MOVED, That the disapproval of the Conditional Use Authorization and the approval of the Conditional Use Authorization with different conditions are all subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination.’ The motion City and County of San Francisco Page 125 Printed at 4:52 pm on 3/13/26 ### [Page 15](https://sfbos.info/documents/1134/2026-02-10-minutes#page-15) Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 2/10/2026 carried by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton, Wong (Charter, Section 4.105, and Planning Code, Section 308.1(d), provides that the Board of Supervisors may disapprove the decision of the Planning Commission by a vote of not less than two-thirds (8 votes) of the members of the Board.) Motion No. M26-009 Supervisor Mandelman, seconded by Supervisor Dorsey, moved that this Motion be APPROVED AS AMENDED. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton, Wong 251161 [Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization - 350 Amber Drive] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings in support of the Board of Supervisors' disapproval of the proposed Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2024-004318CUA, for a proposed project at 350 Amber Drive. (Clerk of the Board) Motion No. M26-010 Supervisor Mandelman, seconded by Supervisor Dorsey, moved that this Motion be APPROVED. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton, Wong SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. President Mandelman requested File Nos. 260021, 260022, 260023, and 260024 be called together. 260021 [Hearing - Appeal of Conditional Use Authorization De Facto Denial - 524-526 Vallejo Street and 4-4A San Antonio Place] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the de facto denial of a Conditional Use Authorization pursuant to Planning Code, Sections 303 and 317, for a proposed project at 524-526 Vallejo Street and 4-4A San Antonio Place (Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0132, Lot No. 009) identified in Planning Case No. 2024-011561CUA, to legalize the merger of three dwelling units on second and third floors into one dwelling unit and to reinstate one dwelling unit on the ground floor within an existing four-unit residential building located within RM-1 (Residential Mixed, Low Density) Zoning District, Telegraph Hill-North Beach Residential SUD (Special Use District), Priority Equity Geographies SUD, and 40-X Height and Bulk District. (District 3) (Appellants: Katelin Holloway and Ben Ramirez) (Filed January 5, 2026) (Clerk of the Board) President Mandelman opened the public hearing and indicated he would be entertaining a motion to continue this appeal hearing and associated motions to a later date. The President then inquired if any individual wished to address the Board on the proposed continuance. There were no speakers. President Mandelman closed public comment on the continuance. Supervisor Sauter, seconded by Supervisor Walton, moved that this Hearing be CONTINUED OPEN to the Board of Supervisors meeting of March 10, 2026. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: 11 - Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Sherrill, Walton, Wong City and County of San Francisco Page 126 Printed at 4:52 pm on 3/13/26