# Board of Supervisors Agenda: February 10, 2026 - Meeting date: 2026-02-10 - Document type: agenda - Pages in official PDF: 27 - [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda) - [Authoritative City PDF](https://sfbos.archive.sf.gov/sites/default/files/bag021026_agenda.pdf) > This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City PDF is the authoritative public record. ## Extracted text ### [Page 1](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-1) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AGENDA Legislative Chamber, Room 250 City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102-4689 Tuesday, February 10, 2026 - 2:00 PM Regular Meeting RAFAEL MANDELMAN, PRESIDENT CONNIE CHAN, CHYANNE CHEN, MATT DORSEY, JACKIE FIELDER, BILAL MAHMOOD, MYRNA MELGAR, DANNY SAUTER, STEPHEN SHERRILL, SHAMANN WALTON, ALAN WONG Angela Calvillo, Clerk of the Board Agendas of the Board of Supervisors are available on the internet at www.sfbos.org BOARD COMMITTEES Committee Membership Meeting Days Budget and Appropriations Committee Wednesday Supervisors Chan, Dorsey, Sauter, Walton, Mandelman 1:30 PM Budget and Finance Committee Wednesday Supervisors Chan, Dorsey, Sauter 10:00 AM Government Audit and Oversight Committee 1st and 3rd Thursday Supervisors Fielder, Sauter, Sherrill 10:00 AM Land Use and Transportation Committee Monday Supervisors Melgar, Chen, Mahmood 1:30 PM Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee 2nd and 4th Thursday Supervisors Dorsey, Mahmood, Wong 10:00 AM Rules Committee Monday Supervisors Walton, Sherrill, Mandelman 10:00 AM First-named Supervisor is Chair, Second-named Supervisor is Vice-Chair of the Committee. ### [Page 2](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-2) The Levine Act Pursuant to California Government Code, Section 84308, Members of the Board who have received campaign contributions totaling more than $500 may be required to disclose that fact on the record of the proceeding. Parties and their paid agents may also be required to disclose on the record any campaign contributions made to a Member of the Board that meets the following qualifications for disclosure. A Member of the Board of Supervisors is disqualified and must recuse themselves on any agenda item involving business, professional, trade, and land use licenses or permits and all other entitlements for use, if they received more than $500 in campaign contributions from the applicant or contractor, an agent of the applicant or contractor, or any financially interested participant within the 12 months prior to the final decision; and for 12 months following the date of the final decision, a Member of the Board shall not accept, solicit, or direct a campaign contribution of $500 or more from the applicant or contractor, an agent of the applicant or contractor, or any financially interested participant. The foregoing statements do not constitute legal advice. Parties, participants, and their agents are urged to consult their own legal counsel regarding the requirements of the law. For more information about these disclosures, visit www.sfethics.org. Agenda Item Information Each item on the Consent or Regular agenda may include the following 1) Legislation; 2) Budget and Legislative Analyst report; 3) Department or Agency cover letter and/or report; 4) Public correspondence. These items are available for review at City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244 or at www.sfbos.org/legislative-research-center-lrc. Meeting Procedures The Board of Supervisors is the legislative body of the City and County of San Francisco. The Board has several standing committees where legislation is the subject of hearings at which members of the public are urged to testify. The full Board does not hold a second public hearing on measures which have been heard in committee. Board procedures do not permit: 1) vocal or audible support or opposition to statements by Supervisors or by other persons testifying; 2) ringing and use of cell phones or electronic devices; 3) bringing in or displaying signs in the meeting room; or 4) standing in the meeting room. Each member of the public will be allotted the same maximum number of minutes to speak as set by the President or Chair at the beginning of each item or public comment, excluding City representatives; except that public speakers using interpretation assistance will be allowed to testify for twice the amount of time. Members of the public who want to display a document should place it on the overhead during their public comment and remove the document when they want the screen to return to live coverage of the meeting. IMPORTANT INFORMATION: The public is encouraged to testify at Board and Committee meetings. Persons unable to attend the meeting may submit to the City, by the time the proceedings begin, written comments regarding agenda items for the official public record. Written communications should be submitted to the Clerk of the Board or the Clerk of the Committee: 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco, CA 94102. Communications not received prior to the hearing may be delivered to the Clerk of the Board or the Clerk of the Committee and will be shared with the Members. COPYRIGHT: All system content that is broadcasted live during public proceedings is secured by High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP), which prevents copyrighted or encrypted content from being displayed or transmitted through unauthorized devices. Members of the public who wish to utilize chamber digital, audio and visual technology may not display copyrighted or encrypted content during public proceedings. AGENDA PACKET: Available at www.sfbos.org/meetings. Meetings are cablecast on SFGovTV, at www.sfgovtv.org or Cable Channels 26, 28, 78 or 99 (depending on your provider). LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS: Language services are available in Spanish, Chinese and Filipino for requests made at least two (2) business days in advance of the meeting, to help ensure availability. For more information or to request services, contact bos@sfgov.org or call (415) 554-5184. ### [Page 3](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-3) 傳譯服務: 所有常規及特別市參事會會議和常務委員會會議將提供西班牙文, 中文以及菲律賓文的傳譯服 務, 但必須在會議前最少兩 (2) 個工作日作出請求, 以確保能獲取到傳譯服務. 將因應請求提供交替傳 譯服務, 以便公眾向有關政府機構發表意見. 如需更多資訊或請求有關服務, 請發電郵至 bos@sfgov.org 或致電 (415) 554-5184 聯絡我們. INTÉRPRETES DE IDIOMAS: Para asegurar la disponibilidad de los servicios de interpretación en chino, filipino y español, presente su petición por lo menos con dos (2) días hábiles de antelación previo a la reunión. Para más información o para solicitar los servicios, envíe su mensaje a bos@sfgov.org o llame al (415) 554-5184. TAGA SALIN-WIKA: Ipaabot sa amin ang mga kahilingan sa pag salin-wika sa Kastila, Tsino at Pilipino ng hindi bababa sa dalawang araw bago ang pulong. Makakatulong ito upang tiyakin na ang mga serbisyo ay nakalaan at nakahanda. Para sa dagdag kaalaman o para humiling ng serbisyo, maki pagugnayan po sa bos@sfgov.org o tumawag sa (415) 554-5184. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Reasonable Accommodations Title II of the ADA requires that all programs offered through the state and local government such as the City and County of San Francisco be accessible and usable to people with disabilities. The ADA and City policy require that people with disabilities have equal access to all City services, activities, and benefits. If you believe your rights under the ADA are violated, contact the ADA Coordinator. Ordinance No. 90-10 added Section 2A.22.3 to the Administrative Code, which adopted a Citywide Americans with Disabilities Act Reasonable Modification Policy. Meetings are real-time captioned and cablecast open-captioned on SFGovTV (www.sfgovtv.org) or Cable Channels 26, 28, 78 or 99 (depending on your provider). Board and Committee meeting agendas and minutes are available on the Board’s website www.sfbos.org and adhere to web development Federal Access Board’s Section 508 Guidelines. For reasonable accommodations, please email Board.of.Supervisors@sfgov.org, or call (415) 554-5184 or (415) 554-5227 (TTY). Board of Supervisors’ Rules of Order 1.3.3 does not permit remote public comment by members of the public at meetings of the Board and its committees, except as legally required to enable people with disabilities to participate in such meetings. If you require remote access as a means of reasonable accommodation under ADA, please contact the Clerk’s Office to request remote access, including a description of the functional limitation(s) that precludes your ability to attend in person. Requests made at least two (2) business days in advance of the meeting will help to ensure availability. For further assistance, please contact Wilson Ng, ADA Coordinator, at Wilson.L.Ng@sfgov.org. Know Your Rights Under The Sunshine Ordinance Commissions, boards, councils, and other agencies of the City and County exist to conduct the people's business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and that City operations are open to the people's review. For information on your rights under the Sunshine Ordinance (San Francisco Administrative Code, Chapter 67) or to report a violation of the ordinance, contact by mail Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco CA 94102; phone at (415) 554-7724; fax at (415) 554-5163; or by email at sotf@sfgov.org. Citizens may obtain a free company of the Sunshine Ordinance by printing the San Francisco Administrative Code, Chapter 67, on the Internet at www.sfbos.org/sunshine. Ethics Requirements Individuals and entities that influence or attempt to influence local legislative or administrative action may be required by the San Francisco Lobbyist Ordinance (Campaign & Governmental Conduct Code, Section 2.100) to register and report lobbying activity. For more information about the Lobbyist Ordinance, please contact the Ethics Commission at 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220, San Francisco, CA 94102; (415) 252-3100; fax (415) 252-3112; website www.sfgov.org/ethics. Under Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code, Section 1.127, no person or entity with a financial interest in a land use matter pending before the Board of Appeals, Board of Supervisors, Building Inspection Commission, Commission on Community Investment and Infrastructure, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning Commission, Port Commission, or the Treasure Island Development Authority Board of Directors, may make a campaign contribution to a member of the Board of Supervisors, the Mayor, the City Attorney, or a candidate for any of those offices, from the date the land use matter commenced until 12 months after the board or commission has made a final decision, or any appeal to another City agency from that decision has been resolved. For more information about this restriction, visit www.sfethics.org. ### [Page 4](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-4) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Pursuant to Board Rule 4.7.1 the President shall present the ancestral homeland acknowledgement of the Ramaytush Ohlone, who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco Peninsula. COMMUNICATIONS APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES Approval of the January 6, 2026, Board Meeting Minutes. AGENDA CHANGES SPECIAL ORDER 2:00 P.M. - Mayor's Appearance Before The Board Pursuant to Charter Section 3.100(7), the Mayor shall appear, in person, at one regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Supervisors each month to engage in formal policy discussions with members of the Board. This item will be read at the Board Meeting on the second Tuesday of each month, unless rescheduled by the Mayor and the Board President. The Mayor and the Board may not discuss matters that have already been considered in Committee and that are on the Board's Agenda as an action item. By eight (8) votes, the Board of Supervisors may, by oral motion, allow an eligible District Supervisor to ask a question that was not previously posed if the question relates to a sudden or unexpected incident or occurrence raising formal, time-sensitive policy questions that were not anticipated prior to the posting of this agenda. Public comment for this item will take place during general public comment. There were no questions submitted from Supervisors representing Districts 1, 2, 3, or 4. The Mayor may address the Board for up to five minutes. City and County of San Francisco Page 4 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 5](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-5) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 REGULAR AGENDA UNFINISHED BUSINESS Recommendations of the Budget and Finance Committee Present: Supervisors Chan, Dorsey, Sauter 1. 251002 [Business and Tax Regulations Code - Application of Access Line Tax to Voice Over Internet Protocol Services] Sponsors: Mayor; Chan Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code to revise how the Access Line Tax (“ALT”) applies to Voice Over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) services to require collection and remittance of the ALT on VoIP services using the lower of the number of telephone numbers provided to a subscriber and the number of calls that the subscriber can make and/or receive at the same time using those telephone numbers. 02/03/2026; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 2. 251226 [Accept and Expend Grant - Retroactive - Bloomberg Philanthropies - Innovation Team Grant and Amendment to the Annual Salary Ordinance for FYs 2025-2026 and 2026-2027 - $7,000,000] Sponsors: Mayor; Mandelman Ordinance authorizing the Mayor’s Office to retroactively accept and expend a grant in the amount of $7,000,000 from Bloomberg Philanthropies to fund the Mayor’s Office of Innovation from January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2028; approving the associated grant agreement under Charter, Section 9.118; and amending Ordinance No. 120-25 (Annual Salary Ordinance, File No. 250590 for Fiscal Years (FYs) 2025-2026 and 2026-2027) to provide for the creation of four grant-funded full-time positions (4.0 FTE) in the Office of the City Administrator, with one position in each of the following classes: Class 0931 (Manager III), Class 1053 (IS Business Analyst - Senior), Class 1054 (IS Business Analyst - Principal), and Class 1043 (IS Engineer - Senior). (Fiscal Impact) 02/03/2026; AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING NEW TITLE. 02/03/2026; PASSED ON FIRST READING AS AMENDED. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 5 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 6](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-6) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 Recommendations of the Land Use and Transportation Committee Present: Supervisors Melgar, Chen, Mahmood 3. 250887 [Planning Code - Permitting Parking in Driveways] Sponsors: Mayor; Chen, Melgar and Wong Ordinance amending the Planning Code to permit parking of up to two operable vehicles, not including boats, trailers, recreational vehicles, mobile homes, or buses, in driveways located in required front setbacks, side yards, or rear yards; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. 02/03/2026; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 4. 251099 [Planning Code - Corrections and Clarifications] Ordinance amending the Planning Code to make various clarifying and typographical changes, and prohibit massage establishments and massage sole practitioner uses as accessory uses to residential uses; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. (Planning Commission) 02/03/2026; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 5. 251100 [Planning Code - Landmark District Designation - Chula-Abbey Early Residential Historic District] Sponsor: Mandelman Ordinance amending the Planning Code to add a new Appendix P to Article 10, Preservation of Historical, Architectural, and Aesthetic Landmarks, to create the Chula-Abbey Early Residential Historic District; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Historic Preservation Commission) 02/03/2026; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 6 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 7](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-7) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 6. 251101 [Planning Code - Landmark District Designation - Alert Alley Early Residential Historic District] Sponsor: Mandelman Ordinance amending the Planning Code to add a new Appendix Q to Article 10, Preservation of Historical, Architectural, and Aesthetic Landmarks, to create the Alert Alley Early Residential Historic District; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Historic Preservation Commission) 02/03/2026; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? Recommendation of the Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee Present: Supervisors Dorsey, Mahmood, Wong 7. 251251 [Police Code - Tenderloin and South of Market Retail Hours Restriction Pilot Program] Sponsors: Dorsey; Mahmood and Wong Ordinance amending the Police Code to expand the current Tenderloin retail hours restriction pilot program, under which retail food and tobacco establishments in the restricted area are prohibited from being open to the public from 12:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m., or from 2:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. if subject to regulation by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, to encompass a high-crime area across the Tenderloin and South of Market neighborhoods; and to extend the duration of the pilot program, currently set to expire in July 2026, to instead expire 18 months from the effective date of this Ordinance. (Supervisors Fielder and Walton voted No on First Reading.) 02/03/2026; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? NEW BUSINESS Recommendations of the Budget and Finance Committee Present: Supervisors Chan, Dorsey, Sauter 8. 251165 [Police Code - Refunds of Police Emergency Alarm Fees] Ordinance amending the Police Code to revise the procedures for alarm companies and alarm users to claim refunds or credits of overpaid alarm fees under the Police Emergency Alarm Ordinance. (Treasurer-Tax Collector) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 7 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 8](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-8) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 9. 251255 [De-Appropriation and Appropriation - District 10 General City Responsibility - District 10 Projects - Department of Children, Youth and Their Families - Participatory Budgeting - $250,000 - FY2025-2026] Sponsor: Walton Ordinance de-appropriating $250,000 from General City Responsibility (GEN) and appropriating $250,000 to Department of Children, Youth and Their Families (CHF) to support the District 10 safety plan, including services at the Hope SF sites, violence prevention events, safe passages, response to schools, and as needed support to the youth and residents most impacted by violence in Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026. (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 10. 260010 [Real Property Acquisition - City of Daly City - License Agreements, Purchase and Sale Agreement - Sale of Easements for Stormwater Facilities at Lake Merced - $96,781] Resolution approving the terms and conditions and authorizing the General Manager of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) and/or City’s Director of Property to execute certain agreements with the City of Daly City, consisting of (i) a License Amendment to extend the term of SFPUC License No. P4703 for Habitat Mitigation, Monitoring, and Facilities by an additional five years, for a total of 10 years and four months, for an additional use fee of $23,503 and a total use fee of $51,015; (ii) a 50-year License Agreement to construct, operate, and maintain SFPUC-owned overflow facilities at Lake Merced for a total use fee of $2,278 on a 9,286-square-foot portion of San Francisco Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 7283, Lot No. 004, designated as SFPUC Parcel No. 55 (Lake Merced Tract); and (iii) a Purchase and Sale Agreement, Quitclaim Deed, and Easement Deed for the quitclaim of two existing SFPUC tunnel easements totaling 46,992 square feet on San Francisco Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 7284, Lot Nos. 001 and 003, and Block No. 7282, Lot Nos. 005 and 006, and the sale of five easements for stormwater facilities totaling approximately 180,010-square-feet on SFPUC Parcel No. 55 for a purchase price of $71,000 pursuant to Charter, Section 9.118, effective on the date the agreements are executed by both parties, for a total combined amount of $96,781; and adopting findings that the conveyance is consistent with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Public Utilities Commission) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 11. 260016 [Public and Sealed Bid Auction - Tax-Defaulted Real Property] Resolution authorizing the Tax Collector to sell certain parcels of tax-defaulted real property at Public Auction and Sealed Bid Auction. (Treasurer-Tax Collector) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 8 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 9](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-9) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 12. 260028 [Professional Services Contract - ConnectionsCA, LLC. - RESET Center - Not to Exceed $14,537,426] Sponsors: Mayor; Dorsey Resolution approving and authorizing the City and County of San Francisco acting through the Sheriff’s Office to enter into a Professional Services Contract with ConnectionsCA, LLC for operating the Rapid Enforcement Support Evaluation and Triage (RESET) Center, a safe alternative to incarceration for individuals brought in by law enforcement for public intoxication or drug use, submitted under Chapter 21B of the Administrative Code as a Core Initiative Contract, for a total not to exceed amount of $14,537,426 with an initial term of two years and two months, commencing on February 1, 2026, through March 31, 2028, with an option to extend for one additional year; authorizing the Sheriff to execute any amendments, make certain modifications and take certain actions that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City, and are necessary or advisable to effectuate the purposes of the contract; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Sheriff) (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 13. 260041 [Accept and Expend Grant - Retroactive - California Department of Justice - 2025 Tobacco Grant Program - $1,119,862] Sponsors: Mayor; Mandelman, Dorsey and Mahmood Resolution retroactively authorizing the Police Department to accept and expend a grant in the amount of $1,119,862 from the California Department of Justice (DOJ) for the 2025 Tobacco Grant Program to fund personnel and operating expenses for the SFPD’s Drug Market Agency Coordination Center (DMACC) with the project period beginning on November 21, 2025, through June 30, 2029. (Police Department) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? Referred Without Recommendation From the Budget and Finance Committee 14. 251246 [Hotel Development Incentive Agreement - Bespoke Hospitality, LLC - Hearst Hotel Development Project - 5 Third Street and 17-29 Third Street - Not to Exceed $40,000,000 in Net Present Value] Sponsors: Mayor; Dorsey Ordinance approving a Hotel Development Incentive Agreement between the City and County of San Francisco and Bespoke Hospitality, LLC for the Hearst Hotel Development Project, to provide financial assistance not to exceed $40,000,000 in net present value over 20 years calculated for measurement purposes only as a percentage of new Transient Occupancy Taxes the City actually receives from occupancy of guest rooms in a proposed new hotel, related to the development and operation of a project on certain real property known as 5 Third Street and 17-29 Third Street; waiving Chapter 21G of the Administrative Code and certain sections of the Labor and Employment Code; ratifying past actions and authorizing future actions in furtherance of this Ordinance; making findings under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 9 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 10](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-10) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 Recommendation of the Land Use and Transportation Committee Present: Supervisors Melgar, Chen, Mahmood 15. 250814 [Planning Code, Zoning Map, Street Vacation - Portions of Moraga and Noriega Avenues and Kensington Way] Sponsor: Melgar Ordinance ordering the summary street vacation of City property on unimproved street areas of Moraga and Noriega Avenues; finding the street vacation area is not necessary for the City’s use; reserving easements related to support for the City-owned retaining wall from the street vacation properties and including other conditions to the street vacation; amending the Planning Code and Zoning Map to rezone the City property identified as Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 2042, Lot No. 039, from P (Public) and RH-2 (Residential Housing Two-Family)/OS (Open Space) to RH-2/40-X and Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 2042, Lot No. 40, from RH-1 (Residential Housing One-Family) and RH-2/OS to RH-2/40-X, and to rezone parcels on Kensington Way adjacent to Vasquez Avenue shown on Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 2923, Lot Nos. 010A and 024-027, from RH-1(D) (Residential Housing One-Family Detached Dwellings)/40-X to Public/Open Space; affirming the Planning Commission’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of the Planning Code, Section 101.1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? Recommendations of the Rules Committee Present: Supervisors Walton, Sherrill, Mandelman 16. 250391 [Administrative Code - Castro Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Cultural District] Sponsors: Mandelman; Chan Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to expand the boundaries of the Castro Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ) Cultural District to include the Duboce Triangle neighborhood; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 17. 251181 [Appointment, Our City, Our Home Oversight Committee - LaShonti Woods] Motion appointing LaShonti Woods, term ending April 22, 2027, to the Our City, Our Home Oversight Committee. (Rules Committee) Applicants considered in committee: Kezia Vilias-Martinis, seat 4 LaShonti Woods, seat 4 Nancy Giothoitho, seat 4 Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 10 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 11](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-11) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 18. 260102 [Appointment, Sunshine Ordinance Task Force - Joseph Sangirardi] Motion appointing Joseph Sangirardi, term ending April 27, 2026, to the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force. (Rules Committee) Applicants considered in committee: Cynthia Dai, seat 10 Honest Charley Bodkin, seat 10 Joseph Sangirardi, seat 10 Kartik Sathappan, seat 10 Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? SPECIAL ORDER 2:30 P.M. - Recognition of Commendations SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. APPEAL PROCEDURES Board Rule 4.18 provides that public hearings on appeals shall be scheduled for 3:00 p.m. If more than one public hearing is scheduled, then the Clerk, in consultation with the President, may determine the order in which the appeals will be scheduled. Second and later appeals may be scheduled at specified times later than 3:00 p.m. An appeal shall not be heard prior to its scheduled time on the calendar, and it may not be called until the Board's consideration of appeals scheduled earlier on the calendar is completed. It is the policy of the Clerk of the Board to schedule multiple appeals in the following order at 3:00 p.m: 1. Appeals where all parties have agreed to request a continuance or a tabling of the appeal. 2. Continued appeals from previous Board meetings (continued appeals will be listed in order of those closest to deadlines for Board decision). 3. Appeals appearing on the calendar for the first time, in chronological order of receipt by the Clerk. 4. Multiple appeals appearing on the calendar may be staggered at times specific, beginning at 3:00 p.m. 5. Appeals involving participants who have ADA considerations may be set for specific times beginning at 3:00 p.m. (Hearing continued open from December 9, 2025.) 19. 251094 [Hearing - Appeal of Determination of Exemption from Environmental Review - Proposed 350 Amber Drive Project] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the determination of exemption from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act issued as a Categorical Exemption by the Planning Department on May 29, 2025, for the proposed project at 350 Amber Drive, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 7521, Lot No. 005, which proposes to install a new AT&T Macro Wireless Telecommunications Facility on an approximately 104 foot tall monopole, consisting of 12 new antennas, and nine new remote radio units and ancillary equipment within the P (Public) Zoning District and OS (Open Space) Height and Bulk District. (District 8) (Appellant: Mitchell M. Tsai of Mitchell M. Tsai Law Firm on behalf of the Diamond Heights Community Association) (Filed October 27, 2025) (Clerk of the Board) 12/09/2025; CONTINUED OPEN. Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? City and County of San Francisco Page 11 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 12](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-12) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 20. 251095 [Affirming the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed 350 Amber Drive Project] Motion affirming the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 350 Amber Drive is categorically exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) 12/09/2025; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 21. 251096 [Conditionally Reversing the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed 350 Amber Drive Project] Motion conditionally reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 350 Amber Drive is categorically exempt from environmental review, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) 12/09/2025; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 22. 251097 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed 350 Amber Drive Project] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at 350 Amber Drive is categorically exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board) 12/09/2025; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 12 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 13](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-13) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. (Hearing continued open from December 9, 2025.) 23. 251098 [Hearing - Appeal of Conditional Use Authorization Approval - 350 Amber Drive] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the approval of a Conditional Use Authorization pursuant to Planning Code, Sections 209.2, 303, and 304 for a proposed project at 350 Amber Drive (Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 7521, Lot No. 005) identified in Planning Case No. 2024-004318CUA, issued by the Planning Commission by Motion No. 21825, dated September 25, 2025, to install a new AT&T Macro Wireless Telecommunications Facility on an approximately 104 foot tall monopole, consisting of 12 new antennas, and nine new remote radio units and ancillary equipment within the P (Public) Zoning District and OS (Open Space) Height and Bulk District. (District 8) (Appellant: Mitchell M. Tsai of Mitchell M. Tsai Law Firm on behalf of the Diamond Heights Community Association) (Filed October 27, 2025) (Clerk of the Board) 12/09/2025; CONTINUED OPEN. Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 24. 251159 [Approving Conditional Use Authorization - 350 Amber Drive] Motion approving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 21825, approving a Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2024-004318CUA, for a proposed project located at 350 Amber Drive; making environmental findings; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Clerk of the Board) 12/09/2025; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 25. 251160 [Disapproving Conditional Use Authorization - 350 Amber Drive] Motion disapproving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 21825, approving a Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2024-004318CUA, for a proposed project at 350 Amber Drive. (Clerk of the Board) (Charter, Section 4.105, and Planning Code, Section 308.1(d), provides that the Board of Supervisors may disapprove the decision of the Planning Commission by a vote of not less than two-thirds (8 votes) of the members of the Board.) 12/09/2025; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 13 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 14](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-14) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 26. 251161 [Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization - 350 Amber Drive] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings in support of the Board of Supervisors' disapproval of the proposed Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2024-004318CUA, for a proposed project at 350 Amber Drive. (Clerk of the Board) 12/09/2025; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. 27. 260021 [Hearing - Appeal of Conditional Use Authorization De Facto Denial - 524-526 Vallejo Street and 4-4A San Antonio Place] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the de facto denial of a Conditional Use Authorization pursuant to Planning Code, Sections 303 and 317, for a proposed project at 524-526 Vallejo Street and 4-4A San Antonio Place (Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0132, Lot No. 009) identified in Planning Case No. 2024-011561CUA, to legalize the merger of three dwelling units on second and third floors into one dwelling unit and to reinstate one dwelling unit on the ground floor within an existing four-unit residential building located within RM-1 (Residential Mixed, Low Density) Zoning District, Telegraph Hill-North Beach Residential SUD (Special Use District), Priority Equity Geographies SUD, and 40-X Height and Bulk District. (District 3) (Appellants: Katelin Holloway and Ben Ramirez) (Filed January 5, 2026) (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 28. 260022 [Denying Conditional Use Authorization - 524-526 Vallejo Street and 4-4A San Antonio Place] Motion approving the decision of the Planning Commission, de facto denying a Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2024-011561CUA, for a proposed project located at 524-526 Vallejo Street and 4-4A San Antonio Place. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 14 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 15](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-15) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 29. 260023 [Approving Conditional Use Authorization - 524-526 Vallejo Street and 4-4A San Antonio Place] Motion disapproving the decision of the Planning Commission de facto denying a Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2024-011561CUA, for a proposed project at 524-526 Vallejo Street and 4-4A San Antonio Place; approving the Conditional Use Authorization for the proposed project; and making environmental findings, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Clerk of the Board) (Charter, Section 4.105, and Planning Code, Section 308.1(d), provides that the Board of Supervisors may disapprove the decision of the Planning Commission by a vote of not less than two-thirds (8 votes) of the members of the Board.) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 30. 260024 [Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization - 524-526 Vallejo Street and 4-4A San Antonio Place] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings in support of the Board of Supervisors' decision concerning the proposed Conditional Use Authorization, Case No. 2024-011561CUA, for a proposed project at 524-526 Vallejo Street and 4-4A San Antonio Place. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? COMMITTEE REPORTS Reports from committees, if any, recommending emergency or urgent measures. The following items will be considered by the Land Use and Transportation Committee at a Regular Meeting on Monday, February 9, 2026, at 1:30 p.m. The Chair intends to request the Committee to send the following items as Committee Reports on Tuesday, February 10, 2026. 31. 251103 [Planning Code - Alcohol Sales in Movie Theaters] Sponsor: Sherrill Ordinance amending the Planning Code to authorize Movie Theaters that also operate as Bona Fide Eating Places to offer entertainment, cultural, artistic, dramatic, musical, or leisure activities, performances or exhibitions, and permit on-site wine, beer, and/or liquor, and make conforming changes in the Planning Code definitions of Bar and Bona Fide Eating Place uses; permitting certain Movie Theaters in the Upper Fillmore Neighborhood Commercial District to sell wine and/or beer without being subject to non-residential use size limits otherwise applicable in the District; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 15 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 16](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-16) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 32. 251218 [Resolution of Intent - Street Vacation - Portions of Christmas Tree Point Road and Twin Peaks Boulevard - Twin Peaks Promenade Project] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution declaring the intention of the Board of Supervisors to order the vacation of the designation of portions of Christmas Tree Point Road and the eastern alignment of Twin Peaks Boulevard, generally bounded by Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 2719C, Lot No. 021, and Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 2643, Lot Nos. 006, 007, 009, and 021 (together, “Eastern Twin Peaks Boulevard”) as public right-of-way for roadway and sidewalk purposes, and to order the re-designation of Eastern Twin Peaks Boulevard as public right-of-way for recreation and park purposes to facilitate the development of the Twin Peaks Promenade Project; and setting a hearing date for the Board of Supervisors to sit as a Committee of the Whole, for all persons interested in the proposed vacation of said street areas. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? The following item will be considered by the Rules Committee at a Regular Meeting on Monday, February 9, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. The Chair intends to request the Committee to send the following item as a Committee Report on Tuesday, February 10, 2026. 33. 251224 [Administrative Code - Restrictions on Use of City Property] Sponsors: Mahmood; Chen, Melgar, Sauter, Fielder and Walton Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to prohibit the use of City property without the City’s authorization, except for uses traditionally available to the public without authorization; prohibit any City official or employee from authorizing the use of City property if that use would disrupt City operations or discourage access to City services, unless the use furthers a City purpose; stating that civil immigration enforcement is not a City purpose; and authorizing the City Attorney to bring a cause of action against anyone that uses City property for an unlawful or unauthorized purpose. (Meet and Confer requirement fulfilled.) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 34. ROLL CALL FOR INTRODUCTIONS Roll call for introduction of ordinances, resolutions, charter amendments, requests for hearings, letters of inquiry, letters of request to the City Attorney and Board Members' reports on their regional body activities. City and County of San Francisco Page 16 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 17](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-17) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 35. PUBLIC COMMENT An opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board, including items being considered today which have not been considered by a Board committee and excluding items which have been considered by a Board committee. Members of the public may address the Board for up to two minutes. Each member of the public will be allotted the same number of minutes to speak, except public speakers using interpretation assistance will be allowed to testify for two minutes and the interpreter will have two minutes for interpretation. If simultaneous interpretation services are used, speakers will be governed by the public testimony time limit applied to speakers not requesting translation assistance. The President or the Board may limit the total testimony to 30 minutes. Members of the public who want a document placed on the overhead for display should clearly state such and subsequently remove the document when they want the screen to return to live coverage of the meeting. FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE These measures were introduced for adoption without committee reference. A unanimous vote is required for adoption of these resolutions today. Any Supervisor may require any resolution to go to committee. Questions on the For Adoption Without Committee Reference Agenda are on for adoption, or approved, as indicated. (PUBLIC COMMENT for Items 36 through 41 will be taken during Item 35 - General Public Comment.) Items 36 through 41 36. 260120 [Day of Solidarity with Ukraine - February 24, 2026 - Holodomor Memorial Day - November 28, 2026] Sponsors: Chan; Mandelman Resolution urging the City and County of San Francisco to commemorate February 24, 2026, as a Day of Solidarity with Ukraine, and to designate November 28, 2026, as Holodomor Memorial Day, in recognition of the historical, cultural, and civic significance of the Holodomor and the ongoing struggle for peace and freedom in Ukraine. 02/04/2026; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 17 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 18](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-18) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 37. 260121 [Lunar New Year 2026] Sponsors: Chen; Chan, Mandelman, Sauter, Melgar, Walton, Dorsey, Mahmood and Wong Resolution celebrating 2026 as the Year of the Horse and recognizing February 17, 2026, as the start of Lunar New Year 4724. 02/03/2026; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 38. 260122 [211 Day - February 11, 2026] Sponsors: Dorsey; Mandelman, Mahmood, Wong and Sauter Resolution declaring February 11, 2026, as 211 Day in the City and County of San Francisco to acknowledge the essential role 211 plays in supporting communities and connecting people to vital resources. 02/03/2026; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 39. 260123 [Protecting the Long-Term Future for a Center for Latino Arts and Culture at 2868 Mission Street] Sponsors: Fielder; Melgar, Chen and Walton Resolution declaring a commitment by the Board of Supervisors and the City and County of San Francisco to protect and preserve the long-term future for a center for Latino arts and culture in the Mission, at 2868 Mission Street. 02/03/2026; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 40. 260124 [Ruth Asawa Day - February 12, 2026] Sponsor: Mandelman Resolution recognizing February 12, 2026, as Ruth Asawa Day in honor of her work as an artist and advocate for arts education in the City and County of San Francisco. 02/03/2026; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 41. 260129 [Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month - February 2026] Sponsors: Walton; Chan, Melgar, Sauter, Mandelman, Mahmood, Wong, Fielder and Dorsey Resolution recognizing the month of February 2026 as "Teen Dating Violence Awareness and Prevention Month" in the City and County of San Francisco. 02/04/2026; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 18 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 19](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-19) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 42. IMPERATIVE AGENDA Resolution(s), if any, to be adopted within limits imposed by the Sunshine Ordinance and the Ralph M. Brown Act, introduced today, not on the printed agenda. For such resolutions to be considered, the Board must first adopt the Serious Injury Finding or the Purely Commendatory Finding and the Brown Act Finding. Each motion requires eight (8) votes or a unanimous six (6) or seven (7). A unanimous vote is required for the resolution(s). [Serious Injury Finding] Motion that the Board find that for the resolution(s) being considered at this time "the need to take action is so imperative as to threaten serious injury to the public interest if action is deferred to a later meeting." [Purely Commendatory Finding] Motion that the Board find that the resolution(s) being considered at this time are purely commendatory. [Brown Act Finding] Motion that the Board find by roll call vote that, for the resolution(s) being considered at this time, there is a need to take immediate action. The need to take action came to the attention of the City and County of San Francisco after the agenda was posted. (PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN on any Imperative Agenda item introduced.) LEGISLATION INTRODUCED AT ROLL CALL Introduced by a Supervisor or the Mayor Pursuant to Charter, Section 2.105, an Ordinance or Resolution may be introduced before the Board of Supervisors by a Member of the Board, a Committee of the Board, or the Mayor and shall be referred to and reported upon by an appropriate Committee of the Board. Legislation Introduced will appear on the Final Minutes for this meeting. Once the Legislation Introduced is approved, it will be available on http://www.sfbos.org/legislation_introduced. City and County of San Francisco Page 19 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 20](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-20) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 Introduced at the Request of a Department Pursuant to Rules of Order of the Board of Supervisors, Section 2.7.1, Department Heads may submit proposed legislation to the Clerk of the Board, in which case titles of the legislation will be printed at the rear of the next available agenda of the Board. PROPOSED ORDINANCES 260107 [Administrative Code - Airport Surveillance Technology Policy] Ordinance approving the Airport Surveillance Technology Policy governing the use of the Transportation Network Company Virtual Queue technology. (Airport Commission) 01/27/2026; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 02/10/2026; ASSIGNED UNDER 30 DAY RULE to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee. 260108 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Alexandra Sandoval - $250,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Alexandra Sandoval against the City and County of San Francisco for $250,000; the lawsuit was filed on March 21, 2023, in Alameda County Superior Court and transferred to San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-24-615405; entitled Alexandra Sandoval v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves an employment dispute. (City Attorney) 01/26/2026; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 02/10/2026; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee. 260109 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Sonia Kominek-Adachi - $750,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Sonia Kominek-Adachi against the City and County of San Francisco and David Serrano Sewell for $750,000; the lawsuit was filed on February 5, 2024, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-24-612139; entitled Sonia Kominek-Adachi v. City and County of San Francisco et al.; the lawsuit involves an employment dispute. (City Attorney) 01/26/2026; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 02/10/2026; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee. 260110 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Taylor Wall - $52,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Taylor Wall against the City and County of San Francisco for $52,000; the lawsuit was filed on September 23, 2024, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-24-618348; entitled Taylor Wall v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves an employment dispute. (City Attorney) 01/30/2026; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 02/10/2026; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee. City and County of San Francisco Page 20 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 21](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-21) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 260112 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Sandra Teixeira - $162,500] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Sandra Teixeira against the City and County of San Francisco for $162,500; the lawsuit was filed on October 26, 2023, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-23-609997; entitled Sandra Teixeira v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.; the lawsuit involves an employment dispute. (City Attorney) 01/30/2026; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 02/10/2026; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee. 260114 [Settlement of Lawsuit - James Williamson - $200,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by James Williamson against the City and County of San Francisco for $200,000; the lawsuit was filed on November 25, 2024, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-24-620091; entitled James Williamson v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves alleged personal injury on a City street. (City Attorney) 01/30/2026; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 02/10/2026; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee. 260115 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Joseph Marenco - $35,001] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Joseph Marenco against the City and County of San Francisco for $35,001; the lawsuit was filed on October 2, 2023, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-23-609444; entitled Joseph Marenco vs. City and County of San Francisco, et al.; the lawsuit involves an employment dispute. (City Attorney) 01/30/2026; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 02/10/2026; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee. 260116 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Alison Jordan Llamas - $30,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Alison Jordan Llamas against the City and County of San Francisco for $30,000; the lawsuit was filed on July 15, 2024, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-24-616420; entitled Alison Jordan Llamas v. City of San Francisco, et al.; the lawsuit involves alleged property damage and personal injuries arising from a vehicle collision. (City Attorney) 02/02/2026; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 02/10/2026; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee. City and County of San Francisco Page 21 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 22](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-22) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS 260111 [Settlement of Unlitigated Claims - Pacific Bell Telephone Company - $2,179,415] Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claims filed by Pacific Bell Telephone Company against the City and County of San Francisco for $2,179,415; the claims were filed on March 7, 2025; the claims involve a refund of gross receipts taxes, homelessness gross receipts taxes, and overpaid executive gross receipts taxes for the 2022 tax year; other material terms of the settlement are the closure of tax years 2023 and 2024 for the gross receipts tax, homelessness gross receipts tax, and overpaid executive gross receipts tax, and that Pacific Bell Telephone Company shall take certain filing positions with respect to its gross receipts taxes and homelessness gross receipts taxes for tax year 2025 and subsequent tax years. (City Attorney) 01/30/2026; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 02/10/2026; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee. 260113 [Settlement of Unlitigated Claim - USAA Insurance - $42,114.27] Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claim filed by USAA Insurance as subrogee of George E. Holt against the City and County of San Francisco for $42,114.27; the claim was filed on October 16, 2024; the claim involves property damage arising from a vehicle collision. (City Attorney) 01/30/2026; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 02/10/2026; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee. 260117 [Settlement of Unlitigated Claim - Marlene Acosta - $70,000] Resolution approving the settlement of the unlitigated claim filed by Marlene Acosta against the City and County of San Francisco for $70,000; the claim was filed on December 2, 2025; the claim involves property damage arising from flooding alleged to have been caused by a water main rupture. (City Attorney) 01/30/2026; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 02/10/2026; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee. City and County of San Francisco Page 22 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 23](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-23) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 260130 [Petitions and Communications] Petitions and Communications received from January 29, 2026, through February 5, 2026, for reference by the President to Committee considering related matters, or to be ordered filed by the Clerk on February 10, 2026. Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information will not be redacted. From the Office of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors (BOS), submitting a memorandum regarding the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) Adoption of CleanPowerSF Mid-Year FY 25/26 Rate Adjustment. Copy: Each Supervisor. (1) From various departments, pursuant to Administrative Code, Section 12B.5-1(d)(1), submitting approved Chapter 12B Waiver Request Forms. 3 Forms. Copy: Each Supervisor. (2) From the Office of Civic Engagement and Immigrant Affairs (OCEIA), submitting the 2026 Language Access Compliance Summary Report. Copy: Each Supervisor. (3) From the Office of the City Administrator (ADM), pursuant to Charter, Section 4.100(d), submitting the Commission Streamlining Task Force Final Report and Supplemental Appendices. 2 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (4) From the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC), pursuant to Charter, Section 8B.125, submitting SFPUC Resolution No. 26-0016: Adopting CleanPowerSF Rates to be effective March 1, 2026. Copy: Each Supervisor. (5) From the Planning Commission (CPC), submitting materials from the Historic Preservation Commission’s recommendations regarding Article 10 landmark designations. Copy: Each Supervisor. (6) From the San Francisco Arts Commission (ART), submitting the Full Arts Commission’s amended meeting agenda for February 2, 2026. Copy: Each Supervisor. (7) From the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD), pursuant to Ordinance No. 298-24, submitting the Semi-Annual 100% Affordable Housing Projects Report for the second half of Calendar Year (CY) 2025.Copy: Each Supervisor. (8) From the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD), submitting a response to a letter of inquiry issued by Supervisor Shamann Walton at the January 6, 2026, Board of Supervisors meeting. Copy: Each Supervisor. (9) From the Rent Board (RNT), submitting a response to a letter of inquiry issued by Supervisor Shamann Walton at the January 6, 2026, Board of Supervisors meeting. Copy: Each Supervisor. (10) From the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA), submitting the Interdepartmental Staff Committee on Traffic and Transportation for Temporary Street Closures (ISCOTT) agenda for the February 12, 2026, ISCOTT meeting. Copy: Each Supervisor. (11) From the Dogpatch & NW Potrero Hill Green Benefit District, submitting the Dogpatch & NW Potrero Hill Green Benefit District Mid-Year Report for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026. Copy: Each Supervisor. (12) City and County of San Francisco Page 23 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 24](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-24) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 From a member of the public, regarding San Francisco Administrative Code, Chapter 67: The San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance of 1999. Copy: Each Supervisor. (13) From Charlie Denny, regarding the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD). Copy: Each Supervisor. (14) From the Alliance for a Better District 6, regarding the Tenderloin Police Station. Copy: Each Supervisor. (15) From Meredith Dodson, regarding the San Francsico Unified School District (SFUSD). Copy: Each Supervisor. (16) From MINACT, Inc., pursuant to California Labor Code, Section 1401, submitting a Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act notice. Copy: Each Supervisor. (17) From Ngoc Luong, regarding the Hearing on the Proposition C (June 2018) reserve fund balance, totaling $572,500,000 at the conclusion of Fiscal Year 2024-2025 according to the Department of Early Childhood, and how the City can use this reserve balance to expand eligibility for child care subsidies to families earning up to 200% area median income; and requesting Department of Early Childhood to report. File No. 251198. Copy: Each Supervisor. (18) From Reuben, Junius & Rose, LLP, regarding the Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the approval of a Conditional Use Authorization pursuant to Planning Code, Sections 210.1 and 303 for a proposed project at 825 Sansome Street (Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0164, Lot No. 003) identified in Planning Case No. 2025-008202CUA, issued by the Planning Commission by Motion No. 21868, dated November 13, 2025, that involves a change of use from the existing Public Parking Garage use with 96 parking spaces and the establishment of a private Fleet Charging use at the upper level (30 private EV chargers), a public Electric Vehicle Charging Location use (principally permitted) at the ground level (18 public EV chargers), and a Private Parking Garage use at the basement level at the subject property, an existing enclosed two-story, multi-level Public Parking Garage with a basement, in the C-2 (Community Business) Zoning District and 65-A Height and Bulk District, Washington-Broadway Special Use District, and Priority Equity Geographies Special Use District; and minor exterior alterations are also included as part of this project. (District 3) (Appellant: Mark Malouf) (Filed December 12, 2025). File No. 251239. Copy: Each Supervisor. (19) From the Theatre District Neighbors, regarding the proposed Ordinance amending the Police Code to expand the current Tenderloin retail hours restriction pilot program, under which retail food and tobacco establishments in the restricted area are prohibited from being open to the public from 12:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m., or from 2:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. if subject to regulation by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, to encompass a high-crime area across the Tenderloin and South of Market neighborhoods; and to extend the duration of the pilot program, currently set to expire in July 2026, to instead expire 18 months from the effective date of this Ordinance. File No. 251251. Copy: Each Supervisor. (20) From the Coalition on Homelessness, regarding the proposed Resolution approving and authorizing the City and County of San Francisco acting through the Sheriff’s Office to enter into a Professional Services Contract with ConnectionsCA, LLC for operating the Rapid Enforcement Support Evaluation and Triage (RESET) Center, a safe alternative to incarceration for individuals brought in by law enforcement for public intoxication or drug use, submitted under Chapter 21B of the Administrative Code as a Core Initiative Contract, for a total not to exceed amount of $14,537,426 with an initial term of two years and two months, commencing on February 1, 2026, through March 31, 2028, with an option to City and County of San Francisco Page 24 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 25](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-25) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 extend for one additional year; authorizing the Sheriff to execute any amendments, make certain modifications and take certain actions that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City, and are necessary or advisable to effectuate the purposes of the contract; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. File No. 260028. Copy: Each Supervisor. (21) From the Tenant Associations Coalition of San Francisco, regarding Parcel K in Hayes Valley and the San Francisco Point-in-Time (PIT) Count for individuals experiencing unsheltered and sheltered homelessness. 2 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (22) From Yolanda Banks-Reed, regarding the Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to establish the Reparations Fund. File No. 240701. Ordinance No. 258-25. Copy: Each Supervisor. (23) From Camille Henry, regarding the Ordinance 1) amending Division I of the Transportation Code to reduce the time that large vehicles may be parked on City streets from overnight to two hours, and modify the time that commercial vehicles may be parked on City streets; 2) amending the Administrative Code to require City departments, including but not limited to the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing, the Department of Emergency Management, and the Police Department, to assist the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) with administering a Large Vehicle Refuge Permit Program that exempts certain large vehicles from the two-hour parking restriction under certain conditions; 3) urging SFMTA to develop a fair review process and to develop further exceptions to the two-hour restriction as may be needed to support the public interest; 4) amending the Park Code to impose a two-hour parking limit on large vehicles on park property; 5) amending the Port Code to impose two-hour parking limits on large vehicles on Port property; and 6) affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. File No. 250655; Ordinance No. 122-25. Copy: Each Supervisor. (24) From Andrew Oglesby, regarding sex work in the Mission. Copy: Each Supervisor. (25) From Bri Chung, regarding 2157 Grove Street. Copy: Each Supervisor. (26) From Jim Reid, regarding Alcatraz Island. Copy: Each Supervisor. (27) From members of the public, regarding a proposed Amazon delivery center at 900 7th Street. 2 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (28) From members of the public, regarding banning plastic cigarette filters. 2 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (29) From members of the public, regarding the Commission Streamlining Task Force. 3 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (30) From members of the public, regarding City contracting processes. 5 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (31) From members of the public, regarding the San Francisco budget. 12 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (32) From members of the public, regarding the Balboa Park Skate Park. 21 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (33) From members of the public, regarding housing reform. 26 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (34) City and County of San Francisco Page 25 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 26](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-26) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 From members of the public, regarding a proposed housing development at 15 Marina Boulevard. 49 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (35) From member of the public, regarding the Hearing on the status and performance of the Central Subway, including ridership, station conditions, train frequencies and reliability, and future plans for extension; and requesting the Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) to report. File No. 250761. Copy: Each Supervisor. (36) From members of the public, regarding the proposed Ordinance amending the Planning Code to permit parking of up to two operable vehicles, not including boats, trailers, recreational vehicles, mobile homes, or buses, in driveways located in required front setbacks, side yards, or rear yards; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. File No. 250887. 2 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (37) From members of the public, regarding Hearing - Appeal of Determination of Exemption from Environmental Review - Proposed 350 Amber Drive Project; Hearing - Appeal of Conditional Use Authorization Approval - 350 Amber Drive. File Nos. 251094; 251098. 6 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (38) From members of the public, regarding the Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the decision of Public Works, dated November 7, 2025, approving a Tentative Parcel Map for a three-lot vertical subdivision, five residential and 10 commercial mixed-use condominium project at 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 5615, Lot Nos. 099, 100, 101. (District 9) (Appellant: Don Lucchesi) (Filed: November 17, 2025). File No. 251138. 13 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (39) From Eileen Boken, regarding General Obligation Bond Election - Earthquake Safety and Emergency Response - Not to Exceed $535,000,000. File No. 251216. Copy: Each Supervisor. (40) From members of the public, regarding the proposed Ordinance repealing the existing San Francisco Fire Code in its entirety and enacting a new San Francisco Fire Code consisting of the 2025 California Fire Code and portions of the 2024 International Fire Code, together with amendments specific to San Francisco, including provisions for fees for permits, inspections, and various City services, with an operative date of January 1, 2026; adopting findings of local conditions pursuant to California Health and Safety Code, Section 17958.7; directing the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to forward San Francisco's amendments to the California Building Standards Commission and State Fire Marshal; and making environmental findings. File No. 251247. 264 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (41) From Kayla Brittingham, regarding the proposed Ordinance amending the Police Code to expand the current Tenderloin retail hours restriction pilot program, under which retail food and tobacco establishments in the restricted area are prohibited from being open to the public from 12:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m., or from 2:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. if subject to regulation by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, to encompass a high-crime area across the Tenderloin and South of Market neighborhoods; and to extend the duration of the pilot program, currently set to expire in July 2026, to instead expire 18 months from the effective date of this Ordinance. File No. 251251. Copy: Each Supervisor. (42) From Shaun Aukland, regarding the proposed Resolution approving and authorizing the City and County of San Francisco acting through the Sheriff’s Office to enter into a Professional Services Contract with ConnectionsCA, LLC for operating the Rapid Enforcement Support Evaluation and Triage (RESET) Center, a safe alternative to incarceration for individuals brought in by law enforcement for public intoxication or drug City and County of San Francisco Page 26 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26 ### [Page 27](https://sfbos.info/documents/1133/2026-02-10-agenda#page-27) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 10, 2026 use, submitted under Chapter 21B of the Administrative Code as a Core Initiative Contract, for a total not to exceed amount of $14,537,426 with an initial term of two years and two months, commencing on February 1, 2026, through March 31, 2028, with an option to extend for one additional year; authorizing the Sheriff to execute any amendments, make certain modifications and take certain actions that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City, and are necessary or advisable to effectuate the purposes of the contract; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. File No. 260028. Copy: Each Supervisor. (43) From Destination Freedom & Destination Freedom Media Group, regarding housing in Bayview-Hunters Point. Copy: Each Supervisor. (44) From the City of Foster City, regarding the Hearing - Appeal of Final Environmental Impact Report Certification - SFO Recommended Airport Development Plan. File No. 251277. Copy: Each Supervisor. (45) From FirstNet Authority, regarding the Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network (NPSBN). Copy: Each Supervisor. (46) ADJOURNMENT City and County of San Francisco Page 27 Printed at 8:53 pm on 2/5/26