# Board of Supervisors Minutes: February 3, 2026 - Meeting date: 2026-02-03 - Document type: minutes - Source format: PDF - Extracted pages: 36 - [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/1132/2026-02-03-minutes) - [Authoritative City source](https://sfbos.archive.sf.gov/sites/default/files/bag020326_minutes.pdf) > This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City source is the authoritative public record. ## Structured legislative records ### File 251099: Planning Code - Corrections and Clarifications - Pages: 13-14 - Vote 1: first-reading - Action: 251099 [Planning Code - Corrections and Clarifications] Ordinance amending the Planning Code to make various clarifying and typographical changes, and prohibit massage establishments and massage sole practitioner uses as accessory uses to residential uses; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. (Planning Commission) PASSED ON FIRST READING by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Walton, Wong - Excused: Sherrill ### File 251171: Acceptance and Recording of Avigation Easement - US 180 El Camino Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company - 180 El Camino Real, South San Francisco - Pages: 14-15 - Vote 1: adoption, likely final - Action: 251171 [Acceptance and Recording of Avigation Easement - US 180 El Camino Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company - 180 El Camino Real, South San Francisco] Resolution authorizing the acceptance and recording of an avigation easement by the City and County of San Francisco from US 180 El Camino Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company for the development at 180 El Camino Real in South San Francisco, California, at no cost to the City and County of San Francisco; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and to authorize the Director of Property to enter into amendments or modifications to the grant of avigation easement that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City and are necessary to effectuate the purpose and intent of this Resolution. (Airport Commission) President Mandelman inadvertently called a "same house, same call" vote after Supervisor Chen was noted absent. ADOPTED by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Walton, Wong - Excused: Sherrill - Vote 2: rescission - Action: In order to reverse the "same house, same call" vote, Supervisor Fielder, seconded by Supervisor Melgar, moved to rescind the previous vote. The motion carried by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Walton, Wong - Absent: Chen - Excused: Sherrill - Vote 3: adoption, likely final - Action: Resolution No. 042-26 ADOPTED by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Walton, Wong - Excused: Sherrill ### File 251172: Acceptance and Recording of Avigation Easement - Navdeep Bhakhri - 413 Alida Way, Unincorporated San Mateo County - Pages: 15 - Vote 1: adoption, likely final - Action: 251172 [Acceptance and Recording of Avigation Easement - Navdeep Bhakhri - 413 Alida Way, Unincorporated San Mateo County] Resolution authorizing the acceptance and recording of an avigation easement by the City and County of San Francisco from Navdeep Bhakhri for the development at 413 Alida Way in unincorporated San Mateo County, California, at no cost to the City and County of San Francisco; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and to authorize the Director of Property to enter into amendments or modifications to the grant of avigation easement that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City and are necessary to effectuate the purpose and intent of this Resolution. (Airport Commission) President Mandelman inadvertently called a "same house, same call" vote after Supervisor Chen was noted absent. ADOPTED by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Walton, Wong - Excused: Sherrill - Vote 2: rescission - Action: In order to reverse the "same house, same call" vote, Supervisor Fielder, seconded by Supervisor Melgar, moved to rescind the previous vote. The motion carried by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Walton, Wong - Absent: Chen - Excused: Sherrill - Vote 3: adoption, likely final - Action: Resolution No. 043-26 ADOPTED by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Walton, Wong - Excused: Sherrill ### File 251232: Amending Street Encroachment Permit Terms - Maiden Lane - Pages: 15-16 - Sponsors: Sauter - Vote 1: adoption, likely final - Action: 251232 [Amending Street Encroachment Permit Terms - Maiden Lane] Sponsor: Sauter Resolution amending the street encroachment permit terms for Maiden Lane regarding the designated permittee and permissible activities; amending and rescinding the Board of Supervisors’ authorization for the street closure of Maiden Lane between Stockton and Kearny Streets and urging the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors to modify the street closure hours for such streets; and authorizing the Public Works Director to finalize a modified street encroachment permit for Maiden Lane. Resolution No. 046-26 ADOPTED by the following vote: - Ayes: Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Walton, Wong - Excused: Sherrill ## Extracted text ### [Page 14](https://sfbos.info/documents/1132/2026-02-03-minutes#page-14) Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 2/3/2026 President Mandelman requested File Nos. 251171 and 251172 be called together. Supervisor Chen was noted absent at 5:49 p.m. and present at 5:51 p.m. 251171 [Acceptance and Recording of Avigation Easement - US 180 El Camino Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company - 180 El Camino Real, South San Francisco] Resolution authorizing the acceptance and recording of an avigation easement by the City and County of San Francisco from US 180 El Camino Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company for the development at 180 El Camino Real in South San Francisco, California, at no cost to the City and County of San Francisco; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and to authorize the Director of Property to enter into amendments or modifications to the grant of avigation easement that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City and are necessary to effectuate the purpose and intent of this Resolution. (Airport Commission) President Mandelman inadvertently called a "same house, same call" vote after Supervisor Chen was noted absent. ADOPTED by the following vote: Ayes: 10 - Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Walton, Wong Excused: 1 - Sherrill In order to reverse the "same house, same call" vote, Supervisor Fielder, seconded by Supervisor Melgar, moved to rescind the previous vote. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: 9 - Chan, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Walton, Wong Absent: 1 - Chen Excused: 1 - Sherrill Resolution No. 042-26 ADOPTED by the following vote: Ayes: 10 - Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Walton, Wong Excused: 1 - Sherrill City and County of San Francisco Page 89 Printed at 12:11 pm on 3/10/26 ### [Page 15](https://sfbos.info/documents/1132/2026-02-03-minutes#page-15) Board of Supervisors Meeting Minutes 2/3/2026 251172 [Acceptance and Recording of Avigation Easement - Navdeep Bhakhri - 413 Alida Way, Unincorporated San Mateo County] Resolution authorizing the acceptance and recording of an avigation easement by the City and County of San Francisco from Navdeep Bhakhri for the development at 413 Alida Way in unincorporated San Mateo County, California, at no cost to the City and County of San Francisco; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and to authorize the Director of Property to enter into amendments or modifications to the grant of avigation easement that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City and are necessary to effectuate the purpose and intent of this Resolution. (Airport Commission) President Mandelman inadvertently called a "same house, same call" vote after Supervisor Chen was noted absent. ADOPTED by the following vote: Ayes: 10 - Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Walton, Wong Excused: 1 - Sherrill In order to reverse the "same house, same call" vote, Supervisor Fielder, seconded by Supervisor Melgar, moved to rescind the previous vote. The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: 9 - Chan, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Walton, Wong Absent: 1 - Chen Excused: 1 - Sherrill Resolution No. 043-26 ADOPTED by the following vote: Ayes: 10 - Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Walton, Wong Excused: 1 - Sherrill 251232 [Amending Street Encroachment Permit Terms - Maiden Lane] Sponsor: Sauter Resolution amending the street encroachment permit terms for Maiden Lane regarding the designated permittee and permissible activities; amending and rescinding the Board of Supervisors’ authorization for the street closure of Maiden Lane between Stockton and Kearny Streets and urging the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors to modify the street closure hours for such streets; and authorizing the Public Works Director to finalize a modified street encroachment permit for Maiden Lane. Resolution No. 046-26 ADOPTED by the following vote: Ayes: 10 - Chan, Chen, Dorsey, Fielder, Mahmood, Mandelman, Melgar, Sauter, Walton, Wong Excused: 1 - Sherrill City and County of San Francisco Page 90 Printed at 12:11 pm on 3/10/26