# Board of Supervisors Agenda: February 3, 2026 - Meeting date: 2026-02-03 - Document type: agenda - Pages in official PDF: 29 - [Canonical HTML transcript](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda) - [Authoritative City PDF](https://sfbos.archive.sf.gov/sites/default/files/bag020326_agenda.pdf) > This text was extracted for search and accessibility. The linked City PDF is the authoritative public record. ## Extracted text ### [Page 1](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-1) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AGENDA Legislative Chamber, Room 250 City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place San Francisco, CA 94102-4689 Tuesday, February 3, 2026 - 2:00 PM Regular Meeting RAFAEL MANDELMAN, PRESIDENT CONNIE CHAN, CHYANNE CHEN, MATT DORSEY, JACKIE FIELDER, BILAL MAHMOOD, MYRNA MELGAR, DANNY SAUTER, STEPHEN SHERRILL, SHAMANN WALTON, ALAN WONG Angela Calvillo, Clerk of the Board Agendas of the Board of Supervisors are available on the internet at www.sfbos.org BOARD COMMITTEES Committee Membership Meeting Days Budget and Appropriations Committee Wednesday Supervisors Chan, Dorsey, Sauter, Walton, Mandelman 1:30 PM Budget and Finance Committee Wednesday Supervisors Chan, Dorsey, Sauter 10:00 AM Government Audit and Oversight Committee 1st and 3rd Thursday Supervisors Fielder, Sauter, Sherrill 10:00 AM Land Use and Transportation Committee Monday Supervisors Melgar, Chen, Mahmood 1:30 PM Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee 2nd and 4th Thursday Supervisors Dorsey, Mahmood, Wong 10:00 AM Rules Committee Monday Supervisors Walton, Sherrill, Mandelman 10:00 AM First-named Supervisor is Chair, Second-named Supervisor is Vice-Chair of the Committee. ### [Page 2](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-2) The Levine Act Pursuant to California Government Code, Section 84308, Members of the Board who have received campaign contributions totaling more than $500 may be required to disclose that fact on the record of the proceeding. Parties and their paid agents may also be required to disclose on the record any campaign contributions made to a Member of the Board that meets the following qualifications for disclosure. A Member of the Board of Supervisors is disqualified and must recuse themselves on any agenda item involving business, professional, trade, and land use licenses or permits and all other entitlements for use, if they received more than $500 in campaign contributions from the applicant or contractor, an agent of the applicant or contractor, or any financially interested participant within the 12 months prior to the final decision; and for 12 months following the date of the final decision, a Member of the Board shall not accept, solicit, or direct a campaign contribution of $500 or more from the applicant or contractor, an agent of the applicant or contractor, or any financially interested participant. The foregoing statements do not constitute legal advice. Parties, participants, and their agents are urged to consult their own legal counsel regarding the requirements of the law. For more information about these disclosures, visit www.sfethics.org. Agenda Item Information Each item on the Consent or Regular agenda may include the following 1) Legislation; 2) Budget and Legislative Analyst report; 3) Department or Agency cover letter and/or report; 4) Public correspondence. These items are available for review at City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244 or at www.sfbos.org/legislative-research-center-lrc. Meeting Procedures The Board of Supervisors is the legislative body of the City and County of San Francisco. The Board has several standing committees where legislation is the subject of hearings at which members of the public are urged to testify. The full Board does not hold a second public hearing on measures which have been heard in committee. Board procedures do not permit: 1) vocal or audible support or opposition to statements by Supervisors or by other persons testifying; 2) ringing and use of cell phones or electronic devices; 3) bringing in or displaying signs in the meeting room; or 4) standing in the meeting room. Each member of the public will be allotted the same maximum number of minutes to speak as set by the President or Chair at the beginning of each item or public comment, excluding City representatives; except that public speakers using interpretation assistance will be allowed to testify for twice the amount of time. Members of the public who want to display a document should place it on the overhead during their public comment and remove the document when they want the screen to return to live coverage of the meeting. IMPORTANT INFORMATION: The public is encouraged to testify at Board and Committee meetings. Persons unable to attend the meeting may submit to the City, by the time the proceedings begin, written comments regarding agenda items for the official public record. Written communications should be submitted to the Clerk of the Board or the Clerk of the Committee: 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco, CA 94102. Communications not received prior to the hearing may be delivered to the Clerk of the Board or the Clerk of the Committee and will be shared with the Members. COPYRIGHT: All system content that is broadcasted live during public proceedings is secured by High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP), which prevents copyrighted or encrypted content from being displayed or transmitted through unauthorized devices. Members of the public who wish to utilize chamber digital, audio and visual technology may not display copyrighted or encrypted content during public proceedings. AGENDA PACKET: Available at www.sfbos.org/meetings. Meetings are cablecast on SFGovTV, at www.sfgovtv.org or Cable Channels 26, 28, 78 or 99 (depending on your provider). LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS: Language services are available in Spanish, Chinese and Filipino for requests made at least two (2) business days in advance of the meeting, to help ensure availability. For more information or to request services, contact bos@sfgov.org or call (415) 554-5184. ### [Page 3](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-3) 傳譯服務: 所有常規及特別市參事會會議和常務委員會會議將提供西班牙文, 中文以及菲律賓文的傳譯服 務, 但必須在會議前最少兩 (2) 個工作日作出請求, 以確保能獲取到傳譯服務. 將因應請求提供交替傳 譯服務, 以便公眾向有關政府機構發表意見. 如需更多資訊或請求有關服務, 請發電郵至 bos@sfgov.org 或致電 (415) 554-5184 聯絡我們. INTÉRPRETES DE IDIOMAS: Para asegurar la disponibilidad de los servicios de interpretación en chino, filipino y español, presente su petición por lo menos con dos (2) días hábiles de antelación previo a la reunión. Para más información o para solicitar los servicios, envíe su mensaje a bos@sfgov.org o llame al (415) 554-5184. TAGA SALIN-WIKA: Ipaabot sa amin ang mga kahilingan sa pag salin-wika sa Kastila, Tsino at Pilipino ng hindi bababa sa dalawang araw bago ang pulong. Makakatulong ito upang tiyakin na ang mga serbisyo ay nakalaan at nakahanda. Para sa dagdag kaalaman o para humiling ng serbisyo, maki pagugnayan po sa bos@sfgov.org o tumawag sa (415) 554-5184. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Reasonable Accommodations Title II of the ADA requires that all programs offered through the state and local government such as the City and County of San Francisco be accessible and usable to people with disabilities. The ADA and City policy require that people with disabilities have equal access to all City services, activities, and benefits. If you believe your rights under the ADA are violated, contact the ADA Coordinator. Ordinance No. 90-10 added Section 2A.22.3 to the Administrative Code, which adopted a Citywide Americans with Disabilities Act Reasonable Modification Policy. Meetings are real-time captioned and cablecast open-captioned on SFGovTV (www.sfgovtv.org) or Cable Channels 26, 28, 78 or 99 (depending on your provider). Board and Committee meeting agendas and minutes are available on the Board’s website www.sfbos.org and adhere to web development Federal Access Board’s Section 508 Guidelines. For reasonable accommodations, please email Board.of.Supervisors@sfgov.org, or call (415) 554-5184 or (415) 554-5227 (TTY). Board of Supervisors’ Rules of Order 1.3.3 does not permit remote public comment by members of the public at meetings of the Board and its committees, except as legally required to enable people with disabilities to participate in such meetings. If you require remote access as a means of reasonable accommodation under ADA, please contact the Clerk’s Office to request remote access, including a description of the functional limitation(s) that precludes your ability to attend in person. Requests made at least two (2) business days in advance of the meeting will help to ensure availability. For further assistance, please contact Wilson Ng, ADA Coordinator, at Wilson.L.Ng@sfgov.org. Know Your Rights Under The Sunshine Ordinance Commissions, boards, councils, and other agencies of the City and County exist to conduct the people's business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and that City operations are open to the people's review. For information on your rights under the Sunshine Ordinance (San Francisco Administrative Code, Chapter 67) or to report a violation of the ordinance, contact by mail Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco CA 94102; phone at (415) 554-7724; fax at (415) 554-5163; or by email at sotf@sfgov.org. Citizens may obtain a free company of the Sunshine Ordinance by printing the San Francisco Administrative Code, Chapter 67, on the Internet at www.sfbos.org/sunshine. Ethics Requirements Individuals and entities that influence or attempt to influence local legislative or administrative action may be required by the San Francisco Lobbyist Ordinance (Campaign & Governmental Conduct Code, Section 2.100) to register and report lobbying activity. For more information about the Lobbyist Ordinance, please contact the Ethics Commission at 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220, San Francisco, CA 94102; (415) 252-3100; fax (415) 252-3112; website www.sfgov.org/ethics. Under Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code, Section 1.127, no person or entity with a financial interest in a land use matter pending before the Board of Appeals, Board of Supervisors, Building Inspection Commission, Commission on Community Investment and Infrastructure, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning Commission, Port Commission, or the Treasure Island Development Authority Board of Directors, may make a campaign contribution to a member of the Board of Supervisors, the Mayor, the City Attorney, or a candidate for any of those offices, from the date the land use matter commenced until 12 months after the board or commission has made a final decision, or any appeal to another City agency from that decision has been resolved. For more information about this restriction, visit www.sfethics.org. ### [Page 4](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-4) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Pursuant to Board Rule 4.7.1 the President shall present the ancestral homeland acknowledgement of the Ramaytush Ohlone, who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco Peninsula. COMMUNICATIONS AGENDA CHANGES CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed hereunder constitute a Consent Agenda, are considered to be routine by the Board of Supervisors and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Board. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the Board so requests, in which event the matter shall be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered as a separate item. Questions on the Consent Agenda are on final passage, first reading, adoption, or approved, as indicated. Items 1 through 8 Referred to the Board of Supervisors 1. 251223 [Redevelopment Plan Amendment - Mission Bay South Block 4 East] Sponsor: Dorsey Ordinance approving amendments to the Redevelopment Plan for the Mission Bay South Redevelopment Project to increase the maximum building height from 160 feet to 250 feet and to increase the number of dwelling units permitted on the northern one-half of Block 4 East (Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 8711, Lot No. 029B) for the development of an affordable housing project; making findings under the California Environmental Quality Act; directing the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to transmit a copy of this Ordinance upon its enactment to the Successor Agency; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. 01/27/2026; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 4 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 5](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-5) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 Recommendations of the Budget and Finance Committee Present: Supervisors Chan, Dorsey, Sauter 2. 251180 [Appropriation - Revenue Bonds Proceeds - Capital Improvement Projects - Airport Commission - $9,016,051,176 - FY2025-2026] Ordinance appropriating $9,016,051,176 of proceeds from the sale of revenue bonds or commercial paper for capital improvement projects to the Airport Commission for FY2025-2026; and placing $9,016,051,176 on Controller's Reserve pending receipt of proceeds of indebtedness. (Airport Commission) (Fiscal Impact) 01/27/2026; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 3. 251225 [Administrative Code - Film Commission Programs] Sponsors: Mandelman; Chan, Walton, Dorsey, Sauter, Sherrill and Chen Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to expand the definition of tax exempt entities for use fees, updating the process for notification guidelines concerning film production activities that may cause parking or traffic obstructions, updating definitions for the film rebate program, updating the film rebate amounts, and authorizing the Executive Director to enter into licensing agreements for the use of the Film SF logo and other Film Commission trademarks on merchandise. (Fiscal Impact) 01/27/2026; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? Recommendations of the Government Audit and Oversight Committee Present: Supervisors Fielder, Sauter, Sherrill 4. 251163 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Stephanie York, James Edward Brown, and Kayla Briers - $6,030,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Stephanie York, James Edward Brown, and Kayla Briers against the City and County of San Francisco for $6,030,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 4, 2023, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-23-608132; entitled Stephanie York, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.; the lawsuit involves alleged personal injury and wrongful death caused by a City tree. (City Attorney) 01/27/2026; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 5 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 6](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-6) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 5. 251164 [Settlement of Lawsuit - General Motors Company - $71,125,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by General Motors Company against the City and County of San Francisco for $71,125,000; the lawsuit was filed on November 21, 2022, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-22-602951; entitled General Motors Company v. City and County of San Francisco; the lawsuit involves a claim for refund of gross receipts taxes, homelessness gross receipts taxes, overpaid executive gross receipts taxes, penalties, and interest; other material terms of the settlement relate to General Motors Company’s filing position with respect to City taxes. (City Attorney) 01/27/2026; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 6. 251177 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Edwin Jesus Rementeria Hidalgo - $70,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Edwin Jesus Rementeria Hidalgo against the City and County of San Francisco for $70,000; the lawsuit was filed on September 9, 2024, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-24-617912; entitled Edwin Jesus Rementeria Hidalgo v. City and County of San Francisco and Drew Raymond Jackson; the lawsuit involves alleged personal injury from a vehicle collision. (City Attorney) 01/27/2026; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 7. 251178 [Settlement of Lawsuit - R.C. - $900,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by R.C. against the City and County of San Francisco for $900,000; the lawsuit was filed on January 5, 2022, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-22-597432; entitled R.C. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.); the lawsuit involves an alleged sexual assault by a City employee. (City Attorney) 01/27/2026; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? 8. 251179 [Settlement of Lawsuits - Microsoft Corporation and Subsidiaries - $6,500,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuits filed by Microsoft Corporation and Subsidiaries against the City and County of San Francisco for $6,500,000; the lawsuits were filed on February 26, 2021, April 23, 2021, and June 3, 2025, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case Nos. CGC-21-590032, CGC-21-591004, and CGC-25-625880; entitled Microsoft Corporation and Subsidiaries. v. City and County of San Francisco et al.; the lawsuits involve a refund of gross receipts and homelessness gross receipts taxes; other material terms of the settlement relate to Microsoft Corporation’s filing position with respect to City taxes. (City Attorney) 01/27/2026; PASSED, ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 6 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 7](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-7) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 REGULAR AGENDA UNFINISHED BUSINESS Recommendations of the Budget and Finance Committee Present: Supervisors Chan, Dorsey, Sauter 9. 251214 [Administrative Code - Amending Capital Expenditure Plan Reporting Requirement] Sponsors: Mayor; Wong, Sauter, Sherrill, Mandelman, Chan, Dorsey and Chen Ordinance amending the Administrative Code by changing the reporting requirement for Capital Expenditure Plans from odd years to even years, with the next report due March 1, 2028. 01/27/2026; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 7 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 8](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-8) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 10. 251216 [General Obligation Bond Election - Earthquake Safety and Emergency Response - Not to Exceed $535,000,000] Sponsors: Mayor; Mandelman, Dorsey, Wong, Mahmood, Sauter, Chen, Chan, Sherrill and Melgar Ordinance calling and providing for a special election to be held in the City and County of San Francisco on Tuesday, June 2, 2026, for the purpose of submitting to San Francisco voters a proposition to incur bonded indebtedness of up to $535,000,000 to finance the construction, acquisition, improvement, rehabilitation, renovation, expansion, and seismic retrofitting of the Emergency Firefighting Water System, Firefighting Facilities and Infrastructure, Police Facilities and Infrastructure, transportation facilities for the Municipal Railway Bus Storage and Maintenance Facility at Potrero Yard, and other Public Safety Facilities and Infrastructure for earthquake and public safety and related costs necessary or convenient for the foregoing purposes (collectively, the “ESER Facilities”); authorizing landlords to pass-through 50% of the resulting property tax increase, if any, to residential tenants in accordance with Chapter 37 of the Administrative Code; finding that the estimated cost of such proposed ESER Facilities is and will be too great to be paid out of the ordinary annual income and revenue of the City and County and will require expenditures greater than the amount allowed therefor by the annual tax levy; reciting the estimated cost of such proposed ESER Facilities; fixing the date of election and the manner of holding such election and the procedure for voting for or against the proposition; fixing the maximum rate of interest on such bonds and providing for the levy and collection of taxes to pay both principal and interest; prescribing notice to be given of such election; finding that portions of the bond proposal are not a “project” under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and adopting findings under CEQA for the remaining portion of the bond proposal; finding that the bond proposal is in conformity with the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1(b) and is consistent with the General Plan; consolidating the special election with the general election; establishing the election precincts, voting places, and officers for the election; waiving the word limitation on ballot propositions imposed by Municipal Elections Code, Section 510; complying with the restrictions on the use of bond proceeds specified in Section 53410 of the California Government Code; incorporating the provisions of the Administrative Code, Sections 5.30-5.36; and waiving the time requirements specified in Section 2.34 of the Administrative Code. (Pursuant to California Government Code, Sections 43607 and 43608, this matter shall require a vote of two-thirds (8 votes) of all members of the Board of Supervisors to approve passage of this Ordinance.) (Fiscal Impact) 01/27/2026; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? City and County of San Francisco Page 8 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 9](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-9) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 Recommendation of the Land Use and Transportation Committee 11. 251024 [Building Code - Hydrogen-Fueling Station Equipment] Ordinance amending the Building Code to create a permit and permitting process for Hydrogen-Fueling Station Equipment installation; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. (Building Inspection Commission) (Supervisors Chan and Fielder voted No on First Reading.) 01/27/2026; PASSED ON FIRST READING. Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED? Referred Without Recommendation From the Rules Committee Present: Supervisors Walton, Sherrill, Mandelman 12. 251245 [Charter Amendment - Lifetime Term Limits for Mayor and Members of the Board of Supervisors] Sponsors: Mahmood; Melgar, Sherrill, Dorsey, Sauter and Wong Charter Amendment (First Draft) to amend the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco to change the current two-term limits for the office of Mayor and the office of Member of the Board of Supervisors from consecutive term limits to lifetime term limits; at an election to be held on June 2, 2026. (Supervisors Chan, Fielder, and Walton voted No to Continue.) 01/27/2026; NOT AMENDED. 01/27/2026; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Charter Amendment be SUBMITTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 9 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 10](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-10) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 NEW BUSINESS Recommendations of the Budget and Finance Committee Present: Supervisors Chan, Dorsey, Sauter 13. 251002 [Business and Tax Regulations Code - Application of Access Line Tax to Voice Over Internet Protocol Services] Sponsors: Mayor; Chan Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code to revise how the Access Line Tax (“ALT”) applies to Voice Over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) services to require collection and remittance of the ALT on VoIP services using the lower of the number of telephone numbers provided to a subscriber and the number of calls that the subscriber can make and/or receive at the same time using those telephone numbers. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 14. 251226 [Accept and Expend Grant - Bloomberg Philanthropies - Innovation Team Grant and Amendment to the Annual Salary Ordinance for FYs 2025-2026 and 2026-2027 - $7,000,000] Sponsor: Mayor Ordinance authorizing the Mayor’s Office to accept and expend a grant in the amount of $7,000,000 from Bloomberg Philanthropies to fund the Mayor’s Office of Innovation from January 1, 2026, through December 31, 2028; approving the associated grant agreement under Charter, Section 9.118; and amending Ordinance No. 120-25 (Annual Salary Ordinance, File No. 250590 for Fiscal Years (FYs) 2025-2026 and 2026-2027) to provide for the creation of four grant-funded full-time positions (4.0 FTE) in the Office of the City Administrator, with one position in each of the following classes: Class 0931 (Manager III), Class 1053 (IS Business Analyst - Senior), Class 1054 (IS Business Analyst - Principal), and Class 1043 (IS Engineer - Senior). (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 15. 260029 [Accept and Expend Grant - Retroactively - Tipping Point Community - Director of Strategic Partnerships Grant - $700,000] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution retroactively authorizing the Mayor’s Office to accept and expend a grant in the amount of $700,000 from Tipping Point Community for the establishment of a Director of Strategic Partnerships to advance public-private partnership initiatives aligned with Mayoral priorities for the period of January 20, 2026, through July 1, 2028. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 10 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 11](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-11) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 16. 251148 [Accept and Expend Grant - Retroactive - San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority Measure AA Grant - India Basin Shoreline Park Project - $1,150,000] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution retroactively authorizing the Recreation and Park Department to accept and expend a grant in the amount of $1,150,000 from the San Francisco Bay Restoration Authority Measure AA Grant for the India Basin Shoreline Park Project; to enter into the associated grant agreement (as required by Charter, Section 9.118(a)) that requires the continued operation of the property for public recreation for a period of 20-years upon project completion; and to enter into modifications and amendments to the grant agreement that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City and are necessary to effectuate the purposes of the agreement or this Resolution. (Recreation and Park Department) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 17. 251149 [Accept and Expend Grant - Retroactive - United States Environmental Protection Agency - Brownfield Cleanup Grant - India Basin Shoreline Park - $2,000,000] Sponsor: Mayor Resolution retroactively authorizing the San Francisco Recreation and Park Department to accept and expend a grant in the amount of $2,000,000 from the United States Environmental Protection Agency for the Brownfield Cleanup Program to support environmental remediation and park redevelopment at India Basin Shoreline Park (Project) for a term of October 1, 2025, through to estimated end date of October 31, 2029; approving the associated grant agreement; and authorizing the Recreation and Park Department General Manager acting in consultation with the City Attorney to enter into modifications and amendments to the agreement that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities of the City and are necessary to effectuate the purposes of the Project or this Resolution. (Recreation and Park Department) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 18. 260040 [Accept and Expend Grant - California State Coastal Conservancy - India Basin Shoreline Park Redevelopment Project - $8,591,148] Sponsors: Mayor; Walton and Mandelman Resolution authorizing the Recreation and Park Department to accept and expend a grant increase in the amount of $3,091,148 for a total grant amount of $8,591,148 from California State Coastal Conservancy for the India Basin Shoreline Park Redevelopment Project; and approving an amendment to the existing grant agreement to require a contract performance period that will remain in effect through December 31, 2048. (Recreation and Park Department) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 11 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 12](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-12) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 19. 251206 [Contract Amendment - TEGSCO, LLC - Vehicle Towing, Storage, and Disposal Services for Abandoned and Illegally Parked Vehicles - Not to Exceed $158,800,000] Resolution approving the 10th Amendment to the contract between the Municipal Transportation Agency and TEGSCO, LLC, for services related to the towing, storage, and disposal of abandoned and illegally parked vehicles, to increase the contract amount by $22,100,000 for a total contract amount not to exceed $158,800,000; and to extend the contract term by nine months with up to six additional one-month extensions, for a potential new term of April 1, 2016, through June 30, 2027, effective upon approval of this Resolution. (Municipal Transportation Agency) (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 20. 251268 [Establishing the San Francisco Downtown Revitalization and Economic Recovery Financing District - Approving the Downtown Revitalization Financing Plan and Related Documents and Actions] Sponsors: Mayor; Sauter, Mahmood, Sherrill, Mandelman and Dorsey Resolution establishing the San Francisco Downtown Revitalization and Economic Recovery Financing District, approving the Downtown Revitalization Financing Plan, including the division of taxes set forth therein, and documents and actions related thereto, and authorizing the filing of a judicial validation action. (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 21. 260005 [Contract Amendment - HealthRight 360 - Withdrawal Management and Residential Treatment Services - Not to Exceed $38,566,219] Resolution approving Amendment No. 1 to the agreement between the City, acting by and through, the Department of Public Health (DPH), and HealthRight 360, to provide withdrawal management and residential treatment services, to extend the term by two years from June 30, 2026, for a new term of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2028, and to increase the amount by $28,600,872 for a new total not to exceed amount of $38,566,219; and to authorize DPH to enter into amendments or modifications to the agreement that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City and are necessary to effectuate the purposes of the agreement or this Resolution. (Public Health Department) (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 12 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 13](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-13) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 22. 260008 [Award of Professional Services Agreement - Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc - Waterfront Resilience Program - Not to Exceed $40,000,000] Resolution approving the Award of Professional Services Agreement for program advisory services related to the Waterfront Resilience Program between Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., and the City and County of San Francisco, acting by and through its Port Commission, in an amount not to exceed $40,000,000 for a term of five years, commencing on March 2, 2026, through March 1, 2031, with a single option to extend for five additional years, exercisable at the sole discretion of the Port Commission, pursuant to Charter, Section 9.118(b). (Port) (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 23. 260009 [Emergency Declaration - Stabilize Dry Dock No. 2 at Pier 68 - Not to Exceed $10,000,000] Resolution approving an emergency declaration of the Port of San Francisco, pursuant to Administrative Code, Section 6.60, to provide immediate emergency repairs to stabilize Dry Dock No. 2 at Pier 68 for a total estimated not to exceed cost of $10,000,000 and adopting environmental findings. (Port) (Fiscal Impact) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 24. 260027 [Accept and Expend Grant - California Department of Housing and Community Development - Prohousing Incentive Program - $1,500,000] Sponsors: Mayor; Mandelman and Dorsey Resolution authorizing the City and County of San Francisco (“City”), acting by and through the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (“MOHCD”), to execute a Standard Agreement with the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”) for a grant awarded in the amount of $1,500,000 under HCD’s Prohousing Incentive Program (“PIP”); accept and expend anticipated revenue of PIP grant funds in the amount of $1,500,000, for the period effective upon the execution date of the Standard Agreement through June 30, 2029; and authorizing MOHCD to enter into any additions, amendments, or other modifications to the Standard Agreement and any PIP documents that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities of the City or materially decrease the benefits to the City. (Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 13 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 14](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-14) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 Recommendations of the Land Use and Transportation Committee Present: Supervisors Melgar, Chen, Mahmood 25. 250887 [Planning Code - Permitting Parking in Driveways] Sponsors: Mayor; Chen, Melgar and Wong Ordinance amending the Planning Code to permit parking of up to two operable vehicles, not including boats, trailers, recreational vehicles, mobile homes, or buses, in driveways located in required front setbacks, side yards, or rear yards; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 26. 251099 [Planning Code - Corrections and Clarifications] Ordinance amending the Planning Code to make various clarifying and typographical changes, and prohibit massage establishments and massage sole practitioner uses as accessory uses to residential uses; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. (Planning Commission) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 27. 251171 [Acceptance and Recording of Avigation Easement - US 180 El Camino Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company - 180 El Camino Real, South San Francisco] Resolution authorizing the acceptance and recording of an avigation easement by the City and County of San Francisco from US 180 El Camino Owner, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company for the development at 180 El Camino Real in South San Francisco, California, at no cost to the City and County of San Francisco; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and to authorize the Director of Property to enter into amendments or modifications to the grant of avigation easement that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City and are necessary to effectuate the purpose and intent of this Resolution. (Airport Commission) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 14 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 15](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-15) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 28. 251172 [Acceptance and Recording of Avigation Easement - Navdeep Bhakhri - 413 Alida Way, Unincorporated San Mateo County] Resolution authorizing the acceptance and recording of an avigation easement by the City and County of San Francisco from Navdeep Bhakhri for the development at 413 Alida Way in unincorporated San Mateo County, California, at no cost to the City and County of San Francisco; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and to authorize the Director of Property to enter into amendments or modifications to the grant of avigation easement that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City and are necessary to effectuate the purpose and intent of this Resolution. (Airport Commission) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 29. 251232 [Amending Street Encroachment Permit Terms - Maiden Lane] Sponsor: Sauter Resolution amending the street encroachment permit terms for Maiden Lane regarding the designated permittee and permissible activities; amending and rescinding the Board of Supervisors’ authorization for the street closure of Maiden Lane between Stockton and Kearny Streets and urging the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Board of Directors to modify the street closure hours for such streets; and authorizing the Public Works Director to finalize a modified street encroachment permit for Maiden Lane. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 30. 251270 [Commemorative Street Name Designation - Eddy Street from Jones Street to Taylor Street - “Stephen Tennis Way”] Sponsor: Mahmood Resolution adding the commemorative street name “Stephen Tennis Way” to the 200 block of Eddy Street, in recognition of Stephen Tennis’s decades of service, stewardship, leadership, and community-building in the Tenderloin neighborhood of San Francisco. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? Recommendations of the Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee Present: Supervisors Dorsey, Mahmood, Wong 31. 251251 [Police Code - Tenderloin and South of Market Retail Hours Restriction Pilot Program] Sponsors: Dorsey; Mahmood and Wong Ordinance amending the Police Code to expand the current Tenderloin retail hours restriction pilot program, under which retail food and tobacco establishments in the restricted area are prohibited from being open to the public from 12:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m., or from 2:00 a.m. to 5:00 a.m. if subject to regulation by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, to encompass a high-crime area across the Tenderloin and South of Market neighborhoods; and to extend the duration of the pilot program, currently set to expire in July 2026, to instead expire 18 months from the effective date of this Ordinance. Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? City and County of San Francisco Page 15 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 16](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-16) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 32. 251021 [Liquor License Transfer - 1416 Haight Street - Amal's Market] Resolution determining that the person-to-person, premise-to-premise transfer of a Type-21 off-sale general beer, wine, and distilled spirits liquor license to Amal's Market, located at 1416 Haight Street (District 5), will serve the public convenience or necessity of the City and County of San Francisco, in accordance with California Business and Professions Code, Section 23958.4; and requesting that the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control impose conditions on the issuance of the license. (Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee) Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? SPECIAL ORDER 2:30 P.M. - Recognition of Commendations SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. APPEAL PROCEDURES Board Rule 4.18 provides that public hearings on appeals shall be scheduled for 3:00 p.m. If more than one public hearing is scheduled, then the Clerk, in consultation with the President, may determine the order in which the appeals will be scheduled. Second and later appeals may be scheduled at specified times later than 3:00 p.m. An appeal shall not be heard prior to its scheduled time on the calendar, and it may not be called until the Board's consideration of appeals scheduled earlier on the calendar is completed. It is the policy of the Clerk of the Board to schedule multiple appeals in the following order at 3:00 p.m: 1. Appeals where all parties have agreed to request a continuance or a tabling of the appeal. 2. Continued appeals from previous Board meetings (continued appeals will be listed in order of those closest to deadlines for Board decision). 3. Appeals appearing on the calendar for the first time, in chronological order of receipt by the Clerk. 4. Multiple appeals appearing on the calendar may be staggered at times specific, beginning at 3:00 p.m. 5. Appeals involving participants who have ADA considerations may be set for specific times beginning at 3:00 p.m. (Hearing continued open from December 16, 2025.) 33. 251138 [Hearing - Appeal of Tentative Parcel Map Approval - 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the decision of Public Works, dated November 7, 2025, approving a Tentative Parcel Map for a three-lot vertical subdivision, five residential and 10 commercial mixed-use condominium project at 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 5615, Lot Nos. 099, 100, 101. (District 9) (Appellant: Don Lucchesi) (Filed: November 17, 2025) (Clerk of the Board) 12/16/2025; CONTINUED OPEN. Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. City and County of San Francisco Page 16 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 17](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-17) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 34. 251139 [Approving Decision of Public Works and Approving Tentative Parcel Map - 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street] Motion approving the decision of Public Works and approving the Tentative Parcel Map for a three-lot subdivision, five residential and 10 commercial mixed-use condominium project at 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 5615, Lot Nos. 099, 100, 101; and making environmental findings, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Clerk of the Board) 12/16/2025; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 35. 251140 [Conditionally Disapproving Decision of Public Works and Disapproving Tentative Parcel Map - 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street] Motion conditionally disapproving the decision of Public Works and disapproving the Tentative Parcel Map for a three-lot subdivision, five residential and 10 commercial mixed-use condominium project at 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 5615, Lot Nos. 099, 100, 101, subject to the Board of Supervisors’ adoption of written findings in support of the disapproval. (Clerk of the Board) 12/16/2025; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 36. 251141 [Preparation of Findings Related to Tentative Parcel Map - 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings relating to the Board of Supervisors' decision to disapprove the Tentative Parcel Map for a three-lot subdivision, five residential and 10 commercial mixed-use condominium project at 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 5615, Lot Nos. 099, 100, 101. (Clerk of the Board) 12/16/2025; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 17 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 18](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-18) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. 37. 251277 [Hearing - Appeal of Final Environmental Impact Report Certification - SFO Recommended Airport Development Plan] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the certification of a Final Environmental Impact Report for the proposed SFO Recommended Airport Development Plan (RADP), identified in Planning Case No. 2017-007468ENV, issued by the Planning Commission through Motion No. 21870, dated November 20, 2025; the proposed project would implement the RADP, which involves a long-range plan to guide the San Francisco International Airport’s (SFO) development; the San Francisco Airport Commission operates and manages the airport as a department of the City and County of San Francisco; the RADP serves as a framework for future development at SFO and identifies various projects, including the improvement and development of terminal facilities, modification of certain non-movement areas of the airfield, and improvements to landside facilities to accommodate long-term aircraft operations and passenger activity levels at the airport; the RADP provides for long-range development to accommodate activity levels forecast to reach approximately 506,000 annual aircraft operations, which is the estimated annual practical capacity of the existing runways regardless of whether the RADP is implemented; passenger aircraft operations represent the largest portion of the 506,000 annual aircraft operations, which are forecast to accommodate approximately 71,100,000 annual passengers considering the forecast passenger aircraft fleet mix; implementation of the RADP would not induce passenger demand, nor would the RADP increase the capacity of the airfield, change the configuration of the existing runways, change the number of aircraft operations or aircraft types operating at the airport (including cargo, private jets, and helicopters), or change the volume of annual passengers that choose to fly into and out of SFO. (Appellant: Rick Jarvis of Jarvis Fay LLP, on behalf of the City of Palo Alto) (Filed: December 19, 2025) (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 38. 251278 [Affirming the Final Environmental Impact Report Certification - SFO Recommended Airport Development Plan] Motion affirming the Planning Commission’s certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared for the proposed SFO Recommended Airport Development Plan project. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 18 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 19](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-19) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 39. 251279 [Conditionally Reversing the Final Environmental Impact Report Certification - SFO Recommended Airport Development Plan] Motion conditionally reversing the Planning Commission’s certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared for the proposed SFO Recommended Airport Development Plan project, subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board of Supervisors in support of this determination. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 40. 251280 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Final Environmental Impact Report Certification - SFO Recommended Airport Development Plan] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings related to reversing the Planning Commission’s certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared for the proposed SFO Recommended Airport Development Plan project. (Clerk of the Board) Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M. (Hearing continued open from January 13, 2026.) 41. 251239 [Hearing - Appeal of Conditional Use Authorization Approval - 825 Sansome Street] Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the approval of a Conditional Use Authorization pursuant to Planning Code, Sections 210.1 and 303 for a proposed project at 825 Sansome Street (Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0164, Lot No. 003) identified in Planning Case No. 2025-008202CUA, issued by the Planning Commission by Motion No. 21868, dated November 13, 2025, that involves a change of use from the existing Public Parking Garage use with 96 parking spaces and the establishment of a private Fleet Charging use at the upper level (30 private EV chargers), a public Electric Vehicle Charging Location use (principally permitted) at the ground level (18 public EV chargers), and a Private Parking Garage use at the basement level at the subject property, an existing enclosed two-story, multi-level Public Parking Garage with a basement, in the C-2 (Community Business) Zoning District and 65-A Height and Bulk District, Washington-Broadway Special Use District, and Priority Equity Geographies Special Use District; and minor exterior alterations are also included as part of this project. (District 3) (Appellant: Mark Malouf) (Filed December 12, 2025) (Clerk of the Board) 01/13/2026; CONTINUED OPEN. Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED? Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors, (1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the public hearing. City and County of San Francisco Page 19 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 20](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-20) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 (Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.) 42. 251240 [Approving Conditional Use Authorization - 825 Sansome Street] Motion approving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 21868, approving a Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2025-008202CUA, for a proposed project located at 825 Sansome Street; and making environmental findings, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Clerk of the Board) 01/13/2026; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 43. 251241 [Disapproving Conditional Use Authorization - 825 Sansome Street] Motion disapproving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 21868, approving a Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2025-008202CUA, for a proposed project at 825 Sansome Street. (Clerk of the Board) (Charter, Section 4.105, and Planning Code, Section 308.1(d), provides that the Board of Supervisors may disapprove the decision of the Planning Commission by a vote of not less than two-thirds (8 votes) of the members of the Board.) 01/13/2026; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? 44. 251242 [Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization - 825 Sansome Street] Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings in support of the Board of Supervisors' disapproval of the proposed Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No. 2025-008202CUA for a proposed project at 825 Sansome Street. (Clerk of the Board) 01/13/2026; CONTINUED. Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED? City and County of San Francisco Page 20 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 21](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-21) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 COMMITTEE REPORTS Reports from committees, if any, recommending emergency or urgent measures. The following items will be considered by the Land Use and Transportation Committee at a Regular Meeting on Monday, February 2, 2026, at 1:30 p.m. The Chair intends to request the Committee to send the following items as Committee Reports on Tuesday, February 3, 2026. 45. 251100 [Planning Code - Landmark District Designation - Chula-Abbey Early Residential Historic District] Sponsor: Mandelman Ordinance amending the Planning Code to add a new Appendix P to Article 10, Preservation of Historical, Architectural, and Aesthetic Landmarks, to create the Chula-Abbey Early Residential Historic District; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Historic Preservation Commission) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 46. 251101 [Planning Code - Landmark District Designation - Alert Alley Early Residential Historic District] Sponsor: Mandelman Ordinance amending the Planning Code to add a new Appendix Q to Article 10, Preservation of Historical, Architectural, and Aesthetic Landmarks, to create the Alert Alley Early Residential Historic District; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Historic Preservation Commission) Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING? 47. ROLL CALL FOR INTRODUCTIONS Roll call for introduction of ordinances, resolutions, charter amendments, requests for hearings, letters of inquiry, letters of request to the City Attorney and Board Members' reports on their regional body activities. City and County of San Francisco Page 21 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 22](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-22) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 48. PUBLIC COMMENT An opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board, including items being considered today which have not been considered by a Board committee and excluding items which have been considered by a Board committee. Members of the public may address the Board for up to two minutes. Each member of the public will be allotted the same number of minutes to speak, except public speakers using interpretation assistance will be allowed to testify for two minutes and the interpreter will have two minutes for interpretation. If simultaneous interpretation services are used, speakers will be governed by the public testimony time limit applied to speakers not requesting translation assistance. The President or the Board may limit the total testimony to 30 minutes. Members of the public who want a document placed on the overhead for display should clearly state such and subsequently remove the document when they want the screen to return to live coverage of the meeting. FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE These measures were introduced for adoption without committee reference. A unanimous vote is required for adoption of these resolutions today. Any Supervisor may require any resolution to go to committee. Questions on the For Adoption Without Committee Reference Agenda are on for adoption, or approved, as indicated. (PUBLIC COMMENT for Items 49 through 54 will be taken during Item 48 - General Public Comment.) Items 49 through 54 49. 260092 [Reaffirming San Francisco's Commitment to TGNCl2S Rights and Gender-Affirming Care] Sponsors: Chan; Mandelman, Fielder, Dorsey, Chen and Walton Resolution reaffirming San Francisco's commitment to the rights of its transgender, gender-nonconforming, intersex, and two-spirit (TGNCl2S) residents and employees to obtain gender-affirming care without discrimination; and strongly urging healthcare providers and insurance carriers operating within the city to adhere to state and local laws mandating access to medically necessary healthcare, including gender-affirming care. 01/27/2026; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 22 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 23](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-23) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 50. 260093 [Condemning the Closure of the San Francisco Immigration Court and Urging the Department of Justice to Keep it Open] Sponsors: Chen; Walton, Chan, Fielder, Melgar and Mahmood Resolution condemning the systematic dismantling of the San Francisco immigration court system and urging the Department of Justice to keep the San Francisco Immigration Court open to guarantee due process for all immigrants seeking a path towards citizenship. 01/27/2026; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 51. 260094 [Supporting Fire-Displaced Residents with Extended Aid, Case Management, and Stronger Language Access] Sponsors: Mahmood; Chen, Chan and Dorsey Resolution urging the City of San Francisco to strengthen fire displacement response systems and prevent newly displaced residents from becoming homeless. 01/27/2026; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 52. 260095 [Supporting California State Assembly Bill No. 1633 (Haney) - Private Detention Facility Tax Law] Sponsors: Mahmood; Chen Resolution supporting California State Assembly Bill No. 1633, introduced by Assembly Member Matt Haney, which seeks to establish the Private Detention Facility Tax Law to impose an annual tax on private detention facility operators and direct revenues to the Due Process for All Fund to support immigration-related services, and reaffirming San Francisco’s commitment to immigrant rights, due process, and community well-being. 01/27/2026; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 53. 260097 [Black History Month - February 2026] Sponsors: Walton; Sherrill, Dorsey, Chan, Fielder, Chen, Melgar, Wong, Mandelman, Mahmood and Sauter Resolution recognizing and celebrating Black History Month during the month of February 2026 in the City and County of San Francisco. 01/27/2026; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? City and County of San Francisco Page 23 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 24](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-24) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 54. 260101 [Urging State Leaders to Fully Fund Public Education] Sponsors: Melgar; Chen, Fielder and Wong Resolution supporting the statewide “We Can’t Wait” campaign; supporting the United Educators of San Francisco (UESF) in their right to take collective action; and urging Governor Newsom and the State Legislature to stabilize the funding for public education to ensure full staffing, smaller classroom sizes, fair wages and benefits for educators and staff. 01/28/2026; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD MEETING. Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED? 55. IMPERATIVE AGENDA Resolution(s), if any, to be adopted within limits imposed by the Sunshine Ordinance and the Ralph M. Brown Act, introduced today, not on the printed agenda. For such resolutions to be considered, the Board must first adopt the Serious Injury Finding or the Purely Commendatory Finding and the Brown Act Finding. Each motion requires eight (8) votes or a unanimous six (6) or seven (7). A unanimous vote is required for the resolution(s). [Serious Injury Finding] Motion that the Board find that for the resolution(s) being considered at this time "the need to take action is so imperative as to threaten serious injury to the public interest if action is deferred to a later meeting." [Purely Commendatory Finding] Motion that the Board find that the resolution(s) being considered at this time are purely commendatory. [Brown Act Finding] Motion that the Board find by roll call vote that, for the resolution(s) being considered at this time, there is a need to take immediate action. The need to take action came to the attention of the City and County of San Francisco after the agenda was posted. (PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN on any Imperative Agenda item introduced.) LEGISLATION INTRODUCED AT ROLL CALL Introduced by a Supervisor or the Mayor Pursuant to Charter, Section 2.105, an Ordinance or Resolution may be introduced before the Board of Supervisors by a Member of the Board, a Committee of the Board, or the Mayor and shall be referred to and reported upon by an appropriate Committee of the Board. Legislation Introduced will appear on the Final Minutes for this meeting. Once the Legislation Introduced is approved, it will be available on http://www.sfbos.org/legislation_introduced. City and County of San Francisco Page 24 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 25](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-25) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 Introduced at the Request of a Department Pursuant to Rules of Order of the Board of Supervisors, Section 2.7.1, Department Heads may submit proposed legislation to the Clerk of the Board, in which case titles of the legislation will be printed at the rear of the next available agenda of the Board. PROPOSED ORDINANCE 260080 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Lan Pham, Quyen Jennifer Pham, Mai Pham, Ly Pham Rivera, Henry Pham, And Linda Pham - $500,000] Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Lan Pham, Quyen Jennifer Pham, Mai Pham, Ly Pham Rivera, Henry Pham, and Linda Pham against the City and County of San Francisco for $500,000; the lawsuit was filed on September 28, 2023, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-23-609384; entitled Lan Pham, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.; the lawsuit involves alleged elder abuse, patients’ rights violations, medical negligence, and wrongful death. (City Attorney) 01/20/2026; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 02/03/2026; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee. PROPOSED RESOLUTIONS 260081 [Airport Contract Modification - Hallmark Aviation Services, L.P. - Airport Information and Guest Assistance Services - Not to Exceed $30,403,645] Resolution approving Modification No. 3 to Contract No. 50365 with Hallmark Aviation Services, L.P. for Airport Information and Guest Assistance Services; to extend the term for one year from June 30, 2026, for a total term of July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2027, and to increase the contract amount by $10,402,226 for a new contract amount not to exceed $30,403,645, pursuant to Charter, Section 9.118(b). (Airport Commission) 01/23/2026; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 02/03/2026; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Budget and Finance Committee. 260082 [Acceptance of the 2026 Artificial Intelligence Technology Report] Resolution accepting receipt of the City and County of San Francisco 2026 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technology Report, submitted pursuant to Administrative Code, Chapter 22J. (Department of Technology) 01/26/2026; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT. 02/03/2026; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee. City and County of San Francisco Page 25 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 26](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-26) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 260087 [Petitions and Communications] Petitions and Communications received from January 22, 2026, through January 29, 2026, for reference by the President to Committee considering related matters, or to be ordered filed by the Clerk on February 3, 2026. Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information will not be redacted. From the Office of the Mayor (MYR), pursuant to Charter, Section 3.100, submitting an Acting Mayor Notice designating Board President Rafael Mandelman as Acting Mayor effective Tuesday, January 27, 2026, at 8:30 AM until 11:59 PM; Supervisor Myrna Melgar as Acting Mayor effective Wednesday, January 28, 2026, at 12:00 AM until 11:59 PM; and Supervisor Bilal Mahmood as Acting Mayor effective Thursday, January 29, 2026, at 12:00 AM until Friday, January 30, 2026 at 1:30 AM. Copy: Each Supervisor. (1) From various departments, pursuant to Administrative Code, Section 12B.5-1(d)(1), submitting approved Chapter 12B Waiver Request Forms. 3 Forms. Copy: Each Supervisor. (2) From the San Francisco Arts Commission (ART), submitting the agenda for the January 29, 2026, Civic Design Review Committee meeting. Copy: Each Supervisor. (3) From the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC), submitting a response to a letter of inquiry issued by Supervisors Stephen Sherrill and Danny Sauter at the December 16, 2025, Board of Supervisors meeting. Copy: Each Supervisor. (4) From the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (HSH), pursuant to Administrative Code, Chapter 21B.3; Ordinance Nos. 10-25 and 38-24, submitting Chapter 21B Q2 Report for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026.Copy: Each Supervisor. (5) From the California Fish and Game Commission, submitting notices of proposed changes in regulations to big game and waterfowl hunting. 2 Notices. Copy: Each Supervisor. (6) From The Fillmore Neighborhood Council (TFNC), regarding a proposed housing development at 1335 Webster Street. Copy: Each Supervisor. (7) From Alejandro Chang, regarding traffic safety at Frederick Street. 2 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (8) From members of the public, regarding the Commission Streamlining Task Force. 2 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (9) From the Green Cross, regarding the cannabis industry. Copy: Each Supervisor. (10) From Marcelo Fonseca, regarding the taxi industry. Copy: Each Supervisor. (11) From Thomas Mann, regarding the San Francisco Ballet. Copy: Each Supervisor. (12) From members of the public, regarding the San Francisco budget. 3 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (13) From Mark Baker, regarding Bay Lights 360 Project. Copy: Each Supervisor. (14) From Barbara Bella and Vince Yuen, regarding San Francisco Health Code Article 19Q: City and County of San Francisco Page 26 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 27](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-27) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 Prohibiting the Sale of Flavored Tabacco Products. Copy: Each Supervisor. (15) From members of the public, regarding the Hearing on the status and performance of the Central Subway, including ridership, station conditions, train frequencies and reliability, and future plans for extension; and requesting the Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) to report. File No. 250761. 2 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (16) From Eileen Boken, regarding General Obligation Bond Election - Earthquake Safety and Emergency Response - Not to Exceed $535,000,000. File Nos. 251216 and 251217. 2 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (17) From members of the public, regarding the San Francisco Centre. 2 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (18) From members of the public, regarding banning plastic cigarette filters. 8 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (19) From members of the public, regarding housing reform. 41 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (20) From Allison Arieff, regarding the Resolution urging the Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) to develop and implement a plan for No Turn On Red (NTOR) at every signalized intersection in San Francisco and approve a citywide NTOR policy. File No. 231016; Resolution No. 481-23. Copy: Each Supervisor. (21) From Steve Chan, regarding the proposed Ordinance ordering the summary street vacation of City property on unimproved street areas of Moraga and Noriega Avenues; finding the street vacation area is not necessary for the City’s use; reserving easements related to support for the City-owned retaining wall from the street vacation properties and including other conditions to the street vacation; amending the Planning Code and Zoning Map to rezone the City property identified as Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 2042, Lot Nos. 039-041 from P (Public)/OS (Open Space) to RH-2 (Residential Housing Two-family)/40-X, and to rezone parcels on Kensington Way adjacent to Vasquez Avenue shown on Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 2923, Lot Nos. 010A and 024-027 from RH-1(D)/40-X to Public/Open Space; affirming the Planning Commission’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of the Planning Code, Section 101.1 and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare under Planning Code, Section 302. File No. 250814. Copy: Each Supervisor. (22) From the Theatre District Neighbors, regarding the proposed Ordinance amending the Planning Code to authorize Movie Theaters that also operate as Bona Fide Eating Places to offer entertainment, cultural, artistic, dramatic, musical, or leisure activities, performances or exhibitions, and permit on-site wine, beer, and/or liquor, and make conforming changes in the Planning Code definitions of Bar and Bona Fide Eating Place uses; permitting certain Movie Theaters in the Upper Fillmore Neighborhood Commercial District to sell wine and/or beer without being subject to non-residential use size limits otherwise applicable in the District; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare pursuant to Planning Code, Section 302. File No. 251103. Copy: Each Supervisor. (23) From members of the public, regarding the Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the decision of Public Works, dated November 7, 2025, approving a Tentative Parcel Map for a three-lot vertical subdivision, five residential and 10 commercial mixed-use condominium project at 3333 Mission Street and 190 Coleridge Street, Assessor’s Parcel City and County of San Francisco Page 27 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 28](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-28) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 Block No. 5615, Lot Nos. 099, 100, 101. (District 9) (Appellant: Don Lucchesi) (Filed: November 17, 2025). File No. 251138. 15 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (24) From Shaun Aukland, regarding the proposed Ordinance amending the Public Works Code to allow development projects to satisfy street tree planting requirements through payment of an in lieu fee or providing alternative landscaping; exempt accessory dwelling units from street tree planting requirements; eliminate appeals to the Board of Appeals for tree removals undertaken by City departments and commissions; and update in lieu fee reporting requirements; amending the Administrative Code to create a separate account within the Adopt-A-Tree Fund to receive in lieu fees for street tree requirements; amending the Planning Code to update street tree applicability requirements; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302. File No. 251211. Copy: Each Supervisor. (25) From members of the public, regarding the proposed Ordinance repealing the existing San Francisco Fire Code in its entirety and enacting a new San Francisco Fire Code consisting of the 2025 California Fire Code and portions of the 2024 International Fire Code, together with amendments specific to San Francisco, including provisions for fees for permits, inspections, and various City services, with an operative date of January 1, 2026; adopting findings of local conditions pursuant to California Health and Safety Code, Section 17958.7; directing the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors to forward San Francisco's amendments to the California Building Standards Commission and State Fire Marshal; and making environmental findings. File No. 251247. 40 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (26) From members of the public, regarding the proposed Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to expand the definition of tax exempt entities for use fees, updating the process for notification guidelines concerning film production activities that may cause parking or traffic obstructions, updating definitions for the film rebate program, updating the film rebate amounts, and authorizing the Executive Director to enter into licensing agreements for the use of the Film SF logo and other Film Commission trademarks on merchandise. File No. 251225. 9 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (27) From members of the public, regarding the proposed Resolution adding the commemorative street name “Stephen Tennis Way” to the 200 block of Eddy Street, in recognition of Stephen Tennis’s decades of service, stewardship, leadership, and community-building in the Tenderloin neighborhood of San Francisco. File No. 251270. 2 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (28) From the Aviation-Impacted Communities Alliance (AICA), regarding the Hearing - Appeal of Final Environmental Impact Report Certification - SFO Recommended Airport Development Plan. File No. 251277. Copy: Each Supervisor. (29) From L. Monast, regarding the Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the de facto denial of a Conditional Use Authorization pursuant to Planning Code, Sections 303 and 317, for a proposed project at 524-526 Vallejo Street and 4-4A San Antonio Place (Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 0132, Lot No. 009) identified in Planning Case No. 2024-011561CUA, to legalize the merger of three dwelling units on second and third floors into one dwelling unit and to reinstate one dwelling unit on the ground floor within an existing four-unit residential building located within RM-1 (Residential Mixed, Low Density) Zoning District, Telegraph Hill-North Beach Residential SUD (Special Use District), Priority Equity Geographies SUD, and 40-X Height and Bulk District. (District 3) (Appellants: Katelin Holloway and Ben Ramirez) (Filed January 5, 2026). File No. 260021. Copy: Each Supervisor. (30) From members of the public, regarding the proposed Resolution condemning Immigration City and County of San Francisco Page 28 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26 ### [Page 29](https://sfbos.info/documents/1131/2026-02-03-agenda#page-29) Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, February 3, 2026 and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for actions that have led to loss of life; urging state and federal partners to call for a third-party investigation on all deaths that have occurred as a result of actions taken by ICE officers; calling for a moratorium on ICE detention until a third-party investigation be conducted and corrective action be implemented; and reaffirming San Francisco’s commitment to upholding Sanctuary City policies. File No. 260042. 3 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (31) From Erica Wang, regarding the proposed Resolution supporting California State Assembly Bill No. 1537, introduced by Assembly Member Isaac Bryan, which seeks to prohibit peace officers from engaging in federal immigration enforcement activities through secondary employment, contracting, or volunteer service, and reaffirming San Francisco’s commitment to community trust, public safety, and immigrant protections. File No. 260044. Copy: Each Supervisor. (32) From Xiaojing Fang, regarding a proposed Amazon delivery center at 900 7th Street. Copy: Each Supervisor. (33) ADJOURNMENT City and County of San Francisco Page 29 Printed at 11:02 pm on 1/29/26