Page 1
* Updated 12/5/2025 @ 10:20 a.m. (on Page 20)
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
AGENDA
Legislative Chamber, Room 250
City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
San Francisco, CA 94102-4689
Tuesday, December 9, 2025 - 2:00 PM
Regular Meeting
RAFAEL MANDELMAN, PRESIDENT
CONNIE CHAN, CHYANNE CHEN, MATT DORSEY, JACKIE FIELDER, BILAL MAHMOOD,
MYRNA MELGAR, DANNY SAUTER, STEPHEN SHERRILL,
SHAMANN WALTON, ALAN WONG
Angela Calvillo, Clerk of the Board
Agendas of the Board of Supervisors are available on the internet at www.sfbos.org
BOARD COMMITTEES
Committee Membership Meeting Days
Budget and Appropriations Committee Wednesday
Supervisors Chan, Dorsey, Walton, Mandelman 1:30 PM
Budget and Finance Committee Wednesday
Supervisors Chan, Dorsey 10:00 AM
Government Audit and Oversight Committee 1st and 3rd Thursday
Supervisors Fielder, Sauter, Sherrill 10:00 AM
Land Use and Transportation Committee Monday
Supervisors Melgar, Chen, Mahmood 1:30 PM
Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee 2nd and 4th Thursday
Supervisors Dorsey, Mahmood, Sauter 10:00 AM
Rules Committee Monday
Supervisors Walton, Sherrill, Mandelman
10:00 AM
First-named Supervisor is Chair, Second-named Supervisor is Vice-Chair of the Committee.
Page 2
The Levine Act
Pursuant to California Government Code, Section 84308, Members of the Board who have received campaign
contributions totaling more than $500 may be required to disclose that fact on the record of the proceeding.
Parties and their paid agents may also be required to disclose on the record any campaign contributions made to a
Member of the Board that meets the following qualifications for disclosure. A Member of the Board of
Supervisors is disqualified and must recuse themselves on any agenda item involving business, professional,
trade, and land use licenses or permits and all other entitlements for use, if they received more than $500 in
campaign contributions from the applicant or contractor, an agent of the applicant or contractor, or any financially
interested participant within the 12 months prior to the final decision; and for 12 months following the date of the
final decision, a Member of the Board shall not accept, solicit, or direct a campaign contribution of $500 or more
from the applicant or contractor, an agent of the applicant or contractor, or any financially interested participant.
The foregoing statements do not constitute legal advice. Parties, participants, and their agents are urged to
consult their own legal counsel regarding the requirements of the law. For more information about these
disclosures, visit www.sfethics.org.
Agenda Item Information
Each item on the Consent or Regular agenda may include the following 1) Legislation; 2) Budget and Legislative
Analyst report; 3) Department or Agency cover letter and/or report; 4) Public correspondence. These items are
available for review at City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244 or at
www.sfbos.org/legislative-research-center-lrc.
Meeting Procedures
The Board of Supervisors is the legislative body of the City and County of San Francisco. The Board has several
standing committees where legislation is the subject of hearings at which members of the public are urged to
testify. The full Board does not hold a second public hearing on measures which have been heard in committee.
Board procedures do not permit: 1) vocal or audible support or opposition to statements by Supervisors or by
other persons testifying; 2) ringing and use of cell phones or electronic devices; 3) bringing in or displaying signs
in the meeting room; or 4) standing in the meeting room. Each member of the public will be allotted the same
maximum number of minutes to speak as set by the President or Chair at the beginning of each item or public
comment, excluding City representatives; except that public speakers using interpretation assistance will be
allowed to testify for twice the amount of time. Members of the public who want to display a document should
place it on the overhead during their public comment and remove the document when they want the screen to
return to live coverage of the meeting.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION: The public is encouraged to testify at Board and Committee meetings. Persons
unable to attend the meeting may submit to the City, by the time the proceedings begin, written comments
regarding agenda items for the official public record. Written communications should be submitted to the Clerk of
the Board or the Clerk of the Committee: 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco, CA 94102.
Communications not received prior to the hearing may be delivered to the Clerk of the Board or the Clerk of the
Committee and will be shared with the Members.
COPYRIGHT: All system content that is broadcasted live during public proceedings is secured by
High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection (HDCP), which prevents copyrighted or encrypted content from being
displayed or transmitted through unauthorized devices. Members of the public who wish to utilize chamber
digital, audio and visual technology may not display copyrighted or encrypted content during public
proceedings.
AGENDA PACKET: Available at www.sfbos.org/meetings. Meetings are cablecast on SFGovTV, at
www.sfgovtv.org or Cable Channels 26, 28, 78 or 99 (depending on your provider).
LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS: Language services are available in Spanish, Chinese and Filipino for requests
made at least two (2) business days in advance of the meeting, to help ensure availability. For more information or
to request services, contact bos@sfgov.org or call (415) 554-5184.
Page 3
傳譯服務: 所有常規及特別市參事會會議和常務委員會會議將提供西班牙文, 中文以及菲律賓文的傳譯服
務, 但必須在會議前最少兩 (2) 個工作日作出請求, 以確保能獲取到傳譯服務. 將因應請求提供交替傳
譯服務, 以便公眾向有關政府機構發表意見. 如需更多資訊或請求有關服務, 請發電郵至
bos@sfgov.org 或致電 (415) 554-5184 聯絡我們.
INTÉRPRETES DE IDIOMAS: Para asegurar la disponibilidad de los servicios de interpretación en chino, filipino
y español, presente su petición por lo menos con dos (2) días hábiles de antelación previo a la reunión. Para más
información o para solicitar los servicios, envíe su mensaje a bos@sfgov.org o llame al (415) 554-5184.
TAGA SALIN-WIKA: Ipaabot sa amin ang mga kahilingan sa pag salin-wika sa Kastila, Tsino at Pilipino ng hindi
bababa sa dalawang araw bago ang pulong. Makakatulong ito upang tiyakin na ang mga serbisyo ay nakalaan at
nakahanda. Para sa dagdag kaalaman o para humiling ng serbisyo, maki pagugnayan po sa bos@sfgov.org o
tumawag sa (415) 554-5184.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Reasonable Accommodations
Title II of the ADA requires that all programs offered through the state and local government such as the City
and County of San Francisco be accessible and usable to people with disabilities. The ADA and City policy
require that people with disabilities have equal access to all City services, activities, and benefits. If you believe
your rights under the ADA are violated, contact the ADA Coordinator. Ordinance No. 90-10 added Section
2A.22.3 to the Administrative Code, which adopted a Citywide Americans with Disabilities Act Reasonable
Modification Policy.
Meetings are real-time captioned and cablecast open-captioned on SFGovTV (www.sfgovtv.org) or Cable
Channels 26, 28, 78 or 99 (depending on your provider). Board and Committee meeting agendas and minutes are
available on the Board’s website www.sfbos.org and adhere to web development Federal Access Board’s
Section 508 Guidelines. For reasonable accommodations, please email Board.of.Supervisors@sfgov.org, or call
(415) 554-5184 or (415) 554-5227 (TTY). Board of Supervisors’ Rules of Order 1.3.3 does not permit remote public
comment by members of the public at meetings of the Board and its committees, except as legally required to
enable people with disabilities to participate in such meetings. If you require remote access as a means of
reasonable accommodation under ADA, please contact the Clerk’s Office to request remote access, including a
description of the functional limitation(s) that precludes your ability to attend in person. Requests made at least
two (2) business days in advance of the meeting will help to ensure availability. For further assistance, please
contact Wilson Ng, ADA Coordinator, at Wilson.L.Ng@sfgov.org.
Know Your Rights Under The Sunshine Ordinance
Commissions, boards, councils, and other agencies of the City and County exist to conduct the people's
business. This ordinance assures that deliberations are conducted before the people and that City operations are
open to the people's review. For information on your rights under the Sunshine Ordinance (San Francisco
Administrative Code, Chapter 67) or to report a violation of the ordinance, contact by mail Sunshine Ordinance
Task Force, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244, San Francisco CA 94102; phone at (415) 554-7724; fax at
(415) 554-5163; or by email at sotf@sfgov.org. Citizens may obtain a free company of the Sunshine Ordinance by
printing the San Francisco Administrative Code, Chapter 67, on the Internet at www.sfbos.org/sunshine.
Ethics Requirements
Individuals and entities that influence or attempt to influence local legislative or administrative action may be
required by the San Francisco Lobbyist Ordinance (Campaign & Governmental Conduct Code, Section 2.100) to
register and report lobbying activity. For more information about the Lobbyist Ordinance, please contact the
Ethics Commission at 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220, San Francisco, CA 94102; (415) 252-3100; fax (415)
252-3112; website www.sfgov.org/ethics.
Under Campaign and Governmental Conduct Code, Section 1.127, no person or entity with a financial interest in
a land use matter pending before the Board of Appeals, Board of Supervisors, Building Inspection Commission,
Commission on Community Investment and Infrastructure, Historic Preservation Commission, Planning
Commission, Port Commission, or the Treasure Island Development Authority Board of Directors, may make a
campaign contribution to a member of the Board of Supervisors, the Mayor, the City Attorney, or a candidate for
any of those offices, from the date the land use matter commenced until 12 months after the board or commission
has made a final decision, or any appeal to another City agency from that decision has been resolved. For more
information about this restriction, visit www.sfethics.org.
Page 4
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
ROLL CALL AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Pursuant to Board Rule 4.7.1 the President shall present the ancestral homeland
acknowledgement of the Ramaytush Ohlone, who are the original inhabitants of the San
Francisco Peninsula.
COMMUNICATIONS
APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES
Approval of the October 21, 2025, Regular Board Meeting Minutes, and the November 3,
2025, Special Meeting Minutes at the Land Use and Transportation Committee Meeting,
which constituted a quorum of the Board of Supervisors.
AGENDA CHANGES
City and County of San Francisco Page 4 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 5
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed hereunder constitute a Consent Agenda, are considered to be routine by the Board of
Supervisors and will be acted upon by a single roll call vote of the Board. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a member of the Board so requests, in which event the matter shall
be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered as a separate item.
Questions on the Consent Agenda are on final passage, first reading, adoption, or approved, as
indicated.
Items 1 through 8
Recommendations of the Government Audit and Oversight Committee
Present: Supervisors Fielder, Sauter, Sherrill
1. 251042 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Bruno Mincin - $140,000]
Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Bruno Mincin against the City and
County of San Francisco for $140,000; the lawsuit was filed on June 25, 2024, in San
Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-24-615897; entitled Bruno Mincin v. City and
County of San Francisco, et al; the lawsuit involves alleged personal injury on a City
sidewalk. (City Attorney)
12/02/2025; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.
Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
2. 251043 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Jonathan Manalang - $105,000]
Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Jonathan Manalang against the
City and County of San Francisco for $105,000; the lawsuit was filed on August 26, 2024,
in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No.
3:24-cv-05972; entitled Jonathan Manalang v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.; the
lawsuit involves an employment dispute. (City Attorney)
12/02/2025; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.
Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 5 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 6
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
3. 251044 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Californians For Equal Rights Foundation - $50,000]
Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Californians For Equal Rights
Foundation, Ruth Parker, and Ellen Lee Zhou against the City and County of San
Francisco for $50,000 and non-monetary terms; the lawsuit was filed on May 31, 2023, in
San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-23-606796; entitled Californians For Equal
Rights Foundation et al. v. City and County of San Francisco et al.; the lawsuit involves
Plaintiffs’ allegation that the City participated in one or more guaranteed income program
the terms of which violated the Equal Protection Cause of the Fourteenth Amendment to
the United States Constitution, the equal protection guarantee in Article I, section 7 of the
California Constitution, and/or Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. (City Attorney)
12/02/2025; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.
Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
4. 251046 [Settlement of Lawsuits - Gajanan, Inc. et al. - $1,191,000]
Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuits filed by AGPME Tenant LLC, KPH
Management LLC, Mangal Inc., Gajanan, Inc., Engage Hospitality LLC, Engage with SF
Hospitality LLC, and Lombard Hospitality LLC against the City and County of San
Francisco for $1,191,000; the lawsuits were filed on February 9, 2016, and September 16,
2016, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case Nos. CGC-16-554309, CGC-16-550354,
CGC-16-550351, and CGC-16-554304, and California Court of Appeal Case Nos. A160539
and A168328; entitled Gajanan Inc. et al. v. City and County of San Francisco et al.;
AGPME Tenant, LLC v. City and County of San Francisco et al.; KPH Management LLC et
al. v. City and County of San Francisco et al.; and Mangal Inc. et al. v. City and County of
San Francisco et al.; the remaining issues in the lawsuits involve claims for attorneys’ fees
on the City’s appeal of the San Francisco Superior Court’s decision against the City on
attorneys’ fees, claims for interest on the City’s attorneys’ fees payment, and claims for
costs on appeal. (City Attorney)
12/02/2025; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.
Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
Recommendation of the Land Use and Transportation Committee
Present: Supervisors Melgar, Chen, Mahmood
5. 240637 [Planning Code, Zoning Map - Central Neighborhoods Large Residence SUD,
Corona Heights Large Residence SUD]
Sponsor: Mandelman
Ordinance amending the Planning Code to expand the boundaries of the Central
Neighborhoods Large Residence Special Use District (SUD), and to apply its controls to
all lots within the SUD, with some exceptions; to delete the Corona Heights Large
Residence SUD, and as a result to merge it into the Central Neighborhoods Large
Residence SUD; amending the Zoning Map to reflect the deletion and boundary expansion;
affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental
Quality Act; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under
Planning Code, Section 302, and findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the
eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1.
12/02/2025; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.
Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 6 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 7
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
Recommendations of the Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee
Present: Supervisors Dorsey, Mahmood, Sauter
6. 250983 [Police Code - Vehicle Sideshows]
Sponsors: Sauter; Mandelman, Sherrill, Dorsey and Wong
Ordinance amending the Police Code to increase the fine for misdemeanor convictions for
sideshow offenses from a maximum of $500 to a maximum of $1,000.
12/02/2025; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.
Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
7. 251051 [Public Works, Port Codes - Enhanced Enforcement for Vending Targeted
Merchandise Without a Permit]
Sponsors: Mayor; Dorsey, Mandelman, Sauter and Sherrill
Ordinance amending the Public Works Code in accordance with California Senate Bill 276
(2025) to authorize the enforcement of vending permit requirements through warnings,
infractions, misdemeanors, and fines up to $1,000 for vending certain types of
merchandise that are common targets of retail theft, on City property without a permit;
amending the Port Code to conform with those amendments; making additional conforming
amendments consistent with Senate Bill 276; accepting the recommendations and
findings of the Public Works Director pertaining to such targeted merchandise and
adopting such findings; and affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the
California Environmental Quality Act.
12/02/2025; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.
Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 7 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 8
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
Recommendation of the Rules Committee
Present: Supervisors Walton, Sherrill, Mandelman
8. 250982 [Administrative Code - West SoMa Entertainment Zone]
Sponsors: Dorsey; Mandelman
Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to eliminate the Folsom Street
Entertainment Zone and create the West SoMa Entertainment Zone, to include the
following streets: Folsom Street, between 12th and Russ Streets; Hallam Street, between
Folsom Street and Brush Place; Langton Street, between Folsom Street and Decker
Alley; Russ Street, between Minna and Folsom Streets; 7th Street between Folsom and
Harrison Streets; 8th Street between Folsom and Harrison Streets; Harrison Street
between 7th and 13th Streets; 12th Street between Harrison and Folsom Streets; 11th
Street between Harrison and Folsom Streets; 10th Street between Harrison and Howard
Streets; Howard Street between 10th and 11th Streets; Dore Street between Folsom and
Sheridan Streets; 9th Street between Harrison and Folsom Streets; Ringgold Street
between 8th and 9th Streets; and Heron Street between 8th Street and Berwick Place; and
affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental
Quality Act.
12/02/2025; PASSED, ON FIRST READING.
Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 8 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 9
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
REGULAR AGENDA
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Recommendation of the Budget and Finance Committee
Present: Supervisors Chan, Dorsey, Mahmood
9. 250978 [Appropriation - Department of Elections - Costs Associated with Statewide
November 2025 Special Election - $4,508,500 - FY2025-2026]
Sponsors: Mayor; Mahmood
Ordinance appropriating $4,508,500 of State cost reimbursement revenue to the
Department of Elections to support costs associated with the Statewide November 2025
Special Election in Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026; this Ordinance requires a two-thirds
approval vote of all members of the Board of Supervisors for $4,178,500 pursuant to
Charter, Section 9.113(c).
(Pursuant to Charter, Section 9.113(c), this matter shall require a vote of two-thirds (8
votes) of all members of the Board of Supervisors to approve such appropriation ordinance
for passage.)
(Fiscal Impact)
12/02/2025; PASSED ON FIRST READING.
Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
Recommendation of the Government Audit and Oversight Committee
Present: Supervisors Fielder, Sauter, Sherrill
10. 251045 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Tommy O. Johnson, John Doe, and Others Similarly
Situated - $5,845,000]
Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Tommy O. Johnson, by and
through his Attorney-in-Fact Rev. Doris White and John Doe, by and through his
conservator Thomas O’Connor, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated,
against the City and County of San Francisco for $5,845,000; the lawsuit was filed on
March 24, 2020, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CPF-20-517064; entitled
Tommy O. Johnson, by and through his Attorney-in-Fact Rev. Doris White and John Doe,
by and through his conservator Thomas O’Connor, on behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.; the lawsuit involves claims of
elder/dependent adult abuse, invasion of privacy, negligence, and violations of patients’
rights brought by over 700 former and current residents of Laguna Honda Hospital. (City
Attorney)
12/02/2025; PASSED ON FIRST READING.
Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 9 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 10
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
Recommendations of the Land Use and Transportation Committee
Present: Supervisors Melgar, Chen, Mahmood
11. 250966 [General Plan Amendments - Family Zoning Plan]
Ordinance amending the General Plan to revise the Urban Design Element, Commerce
and Industry Element, Transportation Element, Balboa Park Station Area Plan, Glen Park
Community Plan, Market and Octavia Area Plan, Northeastern Waterfront Plan, Van Ness
Avenue Area Plan, Western SoMa (South of Market) Area Plan, Western Shoreline Area
Plan, Downtown Area Plan, and Land Use Index, to implement the Family Housing Zoning
Program, including the Housing Choice-San Francisco Program, by adjusting guidelines
regarding building heights, density, design, and other matters; amending the City’s Local
Coastal Program to implement the Housing Choice-San Francisco Program and other
associated changes in the City’s Coastal Zone, and directing the Planning Director to
transmit the Ordinance to the Coastal Commission upon enactment; affirming the Planning
Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act; making
findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning
Code, Section 101.1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare
under Planning Code, Section 340. (Planning Commission)
(Pursuant to Charter, Section 4.105, the Planning Commission recommends General Plan
amendments to the Board of Supervisors for approval or rejection. If the Board fails to act
within 90 days of receipt, the proposed General Plan amendment shall be deemed
approved. Transmittal Date: September 22, 2025)
(Supervisors Chan, Chen, Fielder, and Walton voted No on First Reading.)
12/02/2025; PASSED ON FIRST READING.
Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 10 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 11
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
12. 250700 [Zoning Map - Family Zoning Plan]
Sponsors: Mayor; Sauter, Mahmood and Dorsey
Ordinance amending the Zoning Map to implement the Family Zoning Plan by: amending
the Zoning Use District Maps to: 1) reclassify certain properties currently zoned as various
types of Residential to Residential Transit Oriented - Commercial (RTO-C); 2) reclassify
properties currently zoned Residential Transit Oriented (RTO) to Residential Transit
Oriented - 1 (RTO-1); 3) reclassify certain properties from Residential districts other than
RTO to RTO-1; 4) reclassify certain properties currently zoned Neighborhood Commercial
(NC) or Public (P) to Community Business (C-2); and 5) reclassify certain properties from
Public to Mixed-Use or Neighborhood Commercial Districts; amending the Height and Bulk
Map to: 1) reclassify properties in the Family Zoning Plan to R-4 Height and Bulk District,
except for properties with structures designated as landmarks or contributors to historic
districts pursuant to Article 10; 2) change the height limits on certain lots in the R-4 Height
and Bulk District; and 3) designating various parcels to be included in the Non-Contiguous
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Sites Special Use District (SFMTA SUD);
amending the Local Coastal Program to: 1) reclassify all properties in the Coastal Zone to
R-4 Height and Bulk District; 2) reclassify certain properties to RTO-C and Neighborhood
Commercial District; 3) designate one parcel as part of the SFMTA SUD; and 4) directing
the Planning Director to transmit the Ordinance to the Coastal Commission upon
enactment; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California
Environmental Quality Act; making findings of public necessity, convenience, and welfare
under Planning Code, Section 302; making findings of consistency with the General Plan,
and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings under
the City’s Local Coastal Program and the California Coastal Act of 1976.
(Economic Impact)
(Supervisors Chan, Chen, Fielder, and Walton voted No on First Reading.)
12/02/2025; PASSED ON FIRST READING.
Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 11 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 12
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
13. 250701 [Planning, Business and Tax Regulations Codes - Family Zoning Plan]
Sponsor: Mayor
Ordinance amending the Planning Code to: 1) create the Housing Choice-San Francisco
Program to incent housing development through a local bonus program and by adopting a
Housing Sustainability District, 2) modify height and bulk limits to provide for additional
capacity in well-resourced neighborhoods, and to allow additional height and bulk for
projects using the local bonus program, 3) require only buildings taller than 85 feet in
certain Districts to reduce ground level wind currents, 4) make conforming changes to the
RH (Residential, House), RM (Residential, Mixed), and RC (Residential-Commercial)
District zoning tables to reflect the changes to density controls, and parking requirements
made in this Ordinance, 5) create the RTO-C (Residential Transit Oriented-Commercial)
District, 6) implement the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Transit-Oriented
Communities Policy by making changes to parking requirements, minimum residential
densities, and minimum office intensities, and requiring maximum dwelling unit sizes, 7)
revise off-street parking and curb cut obligations citywide, 8) create the Non-contiguous
San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency Sites Special Use District, 9) permit
businesses displaced by new construction to relocate without a conditional use
authorization and waive development impact fees for those businesses, 10) make technical
amendments to the Code to implement the above changes, 11) make conforming changes
to zoning tables in various Districts, including the Neighborhood Commercial District and
Mixed Use Districts, 12) prohibit Lot mergers on Lots with Historic Buildings, subject to
certain preservation obligations, and 13) reduce usable open space and bicycle parking
requirements for senior housing; amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code
regarding the Board of Appeals’ review of permits in the Housing Choice Program Housing
Sustainability District; also, amending the Local Coastal Program to implement the
Housing Choice-San Francisco Program and other associated changes in the City’s
Coastal Zone, and directing the Planning Director to transmit the Ordinance to the Coastal
Commission upon enactment; affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the
California Environmental Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General
Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making public
necessity, convenience, and welfare findings under Planning Code, Section 302.
(Economic Impact)
(Supervisors Chan, Chen, Fielder, and Walton voted No on First Reading.)
12/02/2025; NOT AMENDED, AN AMENDMENT OF THE WHOLE BEARING SAME TITLE.
12/02/2025; PASSED ON FIRST READING.
Question: Shall this Ordinance be FINALLY PASSED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 12 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 13
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
NEW BUSINESS
Recommendations of the Land Use and Transportation Committee
Present: Supervisors Melgar, Chen, Mahmood
14. 250985 [Local Coastal Program Amendment - Family Zoning Plan]
Sponsor: Mayor
Resolution transmitting to the California Coastal Commission for review and certification an
amendment to the Implementation Program and Land Use Plan of the City’s certified Local
Coastal Program to implement the Family Zoning Plan; and affirming the Planning
Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act.
(Supervisor Chen dissented in committee.)
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
15. 250811 [Building Code - Building Permit Expiration Timelines]
Sponsors: Mahmood; Dorsey
Ordinance amending the Building Code to revise the timing of expiration of certain building
permits and building permit applications; and affirming the Planning Department’s
determination under the California Environmental Quality Act.
(Supervisor Chen dissented in committee.)
Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING?
16. 250815 [Planning Code - Inclusionary Housing Waiver and Land Dedication in
Well-Resourced Neighborhoods]
Sponsor: Melgar
Ordinance amending the Planning Code to allow the City to waive the Inclusionary Housing
Fee and other requirements in certain residential and neighborhood commercial districts
outside of the Priority Equity Geographies Special Use District (SUD) in exchange for a
project sponsor’s agreement to subject all units in the project to rent control; and allow
projects in certain residential and neighborhood commercial districts outside of the Priority
Equity Geographies SUD to comply with the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance by dedicating
land to the City; requiring periodic reports to the Planning Commission; affirming the
Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental Quality Act;
making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of
Planning Code Section, 101.1; and making public necessity, convenience, and welfare
findings under Planning Code, Section 302.
Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING?
City and County of San Francisco Page 13 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 14
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
Recommendations of the Budget and Finance Committee
Present: Supervisors Chan, Mahmood, Sauter
17. 251104 [Grant Agreement Amendment - Episcopal Community Services - Sanctuary
Shelter - Not to Exceed $40,896,141]
Sponsor: Mayor
Resolution approving the third amendment to the grant agreement between Episcopal
Community Services and the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing
(“HSH”) for shelter services at Sanctuary Shelter; extending the grant term by 24 months
from June 30, 2026, for a total term of July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2028; increasing the
agreement amount by $15,140,870 for a new total amount not to exceed $40,896,141; and
authorizing HSH to enter into any amendments or other modifications to the Amendment
that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities, or materially decrease the
benefits to the City and are necessary or advisable to effectuate the purposes of the
Agreement. (Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing)
(Fiscal Impact)
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
18. 251105 [Grant Agreement Amendment - Felton Institute - Bayview Drop-In Resource
Center - Not to Exceed $16,854,149]
Sponsors: Mayor; Walton
Resolution approving the third amendment to the grant agreement between Felton Institute
and the Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (“HSH”) for Drop-in Center
operations, extending the grant term by 24 months from June 30, 2026, for a total term of
October 1, 2022, through June 30, 2028, and increasing the agreement amount by
$7,134,976 for a new total amount not to exceed $16,854,149; and authorizing HSH to
enter into any amendments or other modifications to the Amendment that do not materially
increase the obligations or liabilities, or materially decrease the benefits to the City and
are necessary or advisable to effectuate the purposes of the Agreement. (Department of
Homelessness and Supportive Housing)
(Fiscal Impact)
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 14 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 15
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
19. 251108 [Execute Standard Agreement - Not to Exceed $39,044,030 - Accept and
Expend Homekey+ Grant - California Department of Housing and Community
Development - Permanent Supportive Housing for Veterans - 1035 Van Ness
Avenue - Not to Exceed $3,000,000]
Sponsor: Mayor
Resolution authorizing the City and County of San Francisco (“City”), through the
Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (“HSH”), to 1) execute a Standard
Agreement with the California Department of Housing and Community Development
(“HCD”) and co-applicants Swords to Plowshares: Veterans Rights Organization and
1035Vets LLC for a total award not to exceed $39,044,030 under the Homekey+ Program,
including up to $36,044,030 disbursed by HCD as a grant to 1035Vets LLC for acquisition
of real property located at 1035 Van Ness for permanent supportive housing for veterans
(the “Property”) and support of operating costs, and up to $3,000,000 disbursed by HCD as
a grant to the City for rehabilitation of the Property; 2) accept and expend anticipated
revenue from the City’s portion of Homekey+ grant funds in an amount up to $3,000,000 for
the rehabilitation of the Property; 3) approving and authorizing the City to commit up to
$8,000,000 in required matching funds for rehabilitation of the Property and a minimum of
five years of operating subsidy, additionally the City committed up to 15 years of operating
subsidies through the City’s Local Operating Subsidy Program (“LOSP”) subject to budget
appropriations; 4) authorizing the City to assume any joint and several liability for
expenditure of the Homekey+ grant under the Standard Agreement; 5) adopting the
Planning Department’s findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority
policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and 6) authorizing HSH to enter into any
additions, amendments, or other modifications to the Standard Agreement and the
Homekey+ Documents that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities of the
City or materially decrease the benefits to the City. (Department of Homelessness and
Supportive Housing)
(Fiscal Impact)
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 15 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 16
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
20. 251147 [Loan and Grant Agreement - 1035Vets LLC - 1035 Van Ness Avenue - 100%
Affordable Veterans Permanent Supportive Housing - Not to Exceed
$11,000,000]
Sponsor: Mayor
Resolution approving and authorizing a Loan and Grant Agreement in an amount not to
exceed $11,000,000 consisting of a loan in the amount of $8,000,000 for a minimum term
of 55 years and a grant in the amount of $3,000,000 with 1035Vets LLC for the purpose of
rehabilitating real property located at 1035 Van Ness Avenue (“1035 Van Ness”) into 124
units of permanent supportive housing for veterans exiting homelessness under the
Homekey+ Program administered by the California Department of Housing and Community
Development (the “Project”); adopting findings that the Project and proposed transactions
are consistent with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code,
Section 101.1; authorizing the Mayor and the Director of Mayor’s Office of Housing and
Community Development (“MOHCD”) to execute the Loan and Grant Agreement, and
make certain modifications to such agreements, as defined herein, and take certain
actions in furtherance of this Resolution, as defined herein; and authorizing the Director of
MOHCD to enter into any additions, amendments, or other modifications to the Loan and
Grant Agreement that do not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City
and are necessary to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution.
(Fiscal Impact)
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 16 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 17
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
21. 251109 [Execute Standard Agreement - Not to Exceed $17,291,506 - Retroactive -
Accept and Expend Homekey+ Grant - California Department of Housing and
Community Development - Permanent Supportive Housing - 835 Turk Street -
Not to Exceed $13,729,907]
Sponsor: Mayor
Resolution authorizing the City and County of San Francisco (“City”), through the
Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing (“HSH”), to 1) execute a Standard
Agreement with the California Department of Housing and Community Development
(“HCD”) and co-applicants 835 Turk LLC and Five Keys Schools and Programs for a total
award not to exceed $17,291,506 under the Homekey+ Program, including up to
$3,561,599 disbursed by HCD as a grant to 835 Turk LLC for support of operating costs
and up to $13,729,907 disbursed by HCD as a grant to the City for the rehabilitation and
associated relocation costs for the real property located at 835 Turk Street for permanent
supportive housing (the “Property”); 2) retroactively accept and expend anticipated revenue
from the City’s portion of Homekey+ grant funds in an amount up to $13,729,907 to
support the rehabilitation and associated relocation costs for the Property for costs
incurred from March 5, 2024, through HCD’s capital grant expenditure deadline; 3)
approving and authorizing the City to commit approximately $16,270,093 in required
matching funds for rehabilitation of the Property and a minimum of five years of operating
subsidies, additionally the City has committed up to 15 years of operating subsidies
through the City’s Local Operating Subsidy Program subject to budget appropriations; 4)
authorizing the City to assume any joint and several liability for expenditure of the
Homekey+ grant under the Standard Agreement; 5) adopting the Planning Department’s
findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning
Code, Section 101.1; and 6) authorizing HSH to enter into any additions, amendments, or
other modifications to the Standard Agreement and the Homekey+ Documents that do not
materially increase the obligations or liabilities of the City or materially decrease the
benefits to the City. (Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing)
(Fiscal Impact)
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 17 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 18
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
22. 251155 [Ground Lease and Loan and Grant Agreement - 835 Turk LLC - 835 Turk
Street - 100% Permanent Supportive Housing - $1 Total Ground Lease Rent -
Loan Not to Exceed $12,922,000 - Grant Not to Exceed $13,729,907]
Sponsor: Mayor
Resolution 1) approving and authorizing the Director of Property and the Department of
Homelessness and Supportive Housing (“HSH”) to enter into a Ground Lease for real
property owned by the City located at 835 Turk Street (“Property”) with 835 Turk LLC for a
lease term of 55 years and total rent not to exceed $1 (“Ground Lease”) in order to
rehabilitate and operate a 100% permanent supportive housing, 106-unit multifamily rental
housing development affordable to very low-income households, plus one manager’s unit
on the Property (the “Project”); 2) approving and authorizing the Mayor and the Director of
the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development ("MOHCD") to enter into a
Loan and Grant Agreement with 835 Turk LLC to finance the development and
rehabilitation of the Project with a) a loan in an amount not to exceed $12,922,000 for a
minimum loan term of 55 years and b) a grant in an amount not to exceed $13,729,907
from California Department of Housing and Community Development Homekey+ funds; 3)
adopting findings declaring that the Property is "exempt surplus land" pursuant to the
California Surplus Lands Act; 4) determining that the less than market rent payable under
the Ground Lease will serve a public purpose by providing affordable housing for
low-income households in need, in accordance with Section 23.30 of the Administrative
Code; 5) adopting findings that the Project and proposed transactions are consistent with
the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1(b); and 6)
authorizing the Director of Property, the Director of MOHCD, and/or the Executive Director
of HSH, or their designees, to execute and make certain modifications to such
agreements, as defined herein, and take certain actions in furtherance of this Resolution,
as defined herein.
(Fiscal Impact)
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
23. 251111 [Accept and Expend Grant - Retroactive - California Department of Insurance
- Workers’ Compensation Insurance Fraud Program - $1,122,888]
Sponsor: Mayor
Resolution retroactively authorizing the Office of the District Attorney to accept and expend
a grant in the amount of $1,122,888 from the California Department of Insurance for the
Workers’ Compensation Insurance Fraud Program, for the grant period of July 1, 2025,
through June 30, 2026. (District Attorney)
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
24. 251154 [Accept and Expend Grant - Retroactive - California Department of Insurance
- Automobile Insurance Fraud Program - $347,069]
Sponsor: Mayor
Resolution retroactively authorizing the Office of the District Attorney to accept and expend
a grant in the amount of $347,069 from the California Department of Insurance for the
Automobile Insurance Fraud Program, for the grant period of July 1, 2025, through June 30,
2026. (District Attorney)
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 18 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 19
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
25. 251125 [Agreement Amendment - Active Networks, LLC - City Registration and
Facility Reservation System - Term Extension]
Resolution authorizing a two-year extension of the agreement amendment between the
Recreation and Park Department and Active Network, LLC for use of City recreation
programs and facility reservations beginning December 31, 2025, for a total term of
January 1, 2016, through December 31, 2027, with no change to the contract amount of
$100,000 annually, and to update certain standard contractual clauses. (Recreation and
Park Department)
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
26. 251130 [Contract Amendment - Priority Healthcare Distribution, Inc. d/b/a CuraScript
Specialty Distribution - Procurement of Specialty Drugs - Not to Exceed
$98,480,168]
Resolution approving Amendment No. 1 to the agreement between the City and County of
San Francisco, acting by and through the Department of Public Health (DPH), and Priority
Healthcare Distribution, Inc. d/b/a CuraScript Specialty Distribution, for the procurement of
specialty drugs, to extend the term by four years from November 30, 2026, for a total term
of December 1, 2023, through November 30, 2030, and to increase the amount by
$89,480,168 for a total not to exceed amount of $98,480,168; and to authorize DPH to
enter into amendments or modifications to the agreement that do not materially increase
the obligations or liabilities to the City and are necessary to effectuate the purposes of the
agreement or this Resolution. (Public Health Department)
(Fiscal Impact)
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
27. 251131 [Contract Amendment - Hyde Street Community Services, Inc. - Mental Health
Services - Not to Exceed $38,789,762]
Resolution approving Amendment No. 2 to the agreement between the City and County of
San Francisco, acting by and through, the Department of Public Health (DPH), and Hyde
Street Community Services, Inc., to provide mental health services, to extend the term by
two years from June 30, 2026, for a total term of July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2028, and
to increase the amount by $11,758,765 for a total not to exceed amount of $38,789,762;
and to authorize DPH to enter into amendments or modifications to the agreement that do
not materially increase the obligations or liabilities to the City and are necessary to
effectuate the purposes of the agreement or this Resolution. (Public Health Department)
(Fiscal Impact)
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 19 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 20
* Fixed to reflect the current (version 2) long title (12/5/2025 @ 10:20 a.m.)
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
28. 251145 [Grant Agreement - California Department of Social Services - Community
Care Expansion Preservation Projects - Anticipated Revenue of $7,431,615]
Sponsor: Mayor
Resolution approving an agreement between the City and County of San Francisco, acting
by and through its Department of Public Health (DPH), and the California Department of
Social Services and its third-party administrator BDO Government Services, LLC, having
anticipated revenue of $7,431,615 for a performance base period commencing on
execution of the Grant Agreement through June 30, 2029; and authorizing DPH to enter
into amendments or modifications to the agreement that do not materially increase the
obligations or liabilities to the City and are necessary to effectuate the purposes of the
agreement or this Resolution. (Public Health Department)
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
Referred Without Recommendation From the Budget and Finance Committee
Present: Supervisors Chan, Mahmood, Sauter
29. 250929 [Business and Tax Regulations Code - Extending Suspension of Cannabis
Business Tax]
Sponsors: Mandelman; Dorsey, Sauter and Mahmood
* Ordinance amending the Business and Tax Regulations Code to extend the
suspension of the cannabis business tax, through December 31, 2035, and remove
references to the cannabis business tax from the common administrative provisions
of the Code.
(Fiscal Impact)
Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING?
Recommendation of the Rules Committee
Present: Supervisors Walton, Sherrill, Mandelman
30. 240701 [Administrative Code - Reparations Fund]
Sponsors: Walton; Chen, Mandelman, Chan and Fielder
Ordinance amending the Administrative Code to establish the Reparations Fund.
Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING?
SPECIAL ORDER 2:30 P.M. - Recognition of Commendations
City and County of San Francisco Page 20 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 21
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M.
APPEAL PROCEDURES
Board Rule 4.18 provides that public hearings on appeals shall be scheduled for 3:00 p.m. If more than one
public hearing is scheduled, then the Clerk, in consultation with the President, may determine the order in
which the appeals will be scheduled. Second and later appeals may be scheduled at specified times later than
3:00 p.m. An appeal shall not be heard prior to its scheduled time on the calendar, and it may not be called
until the Board's consideration of appeals scheduled earlier on the calendar is completed. It is the policy of the
Clerk of the Board to schedule multiple appeals in the following order at 3:00 p.m:
1. Appeals where all parties have agreed to request a continuance or a tabling of the appeal.
2. Continued appeals from previous Board meetings (continued appeals will be listed in order of those closest
to deadlines for Board decision).
3. Appeals appearing on the calendar for the first time, in chronological order of receipt by the Clerk.
4. Multiple appeals appearing on the calendar may be staggered at times specific, beginning at 3:00 p.m.
5. Appeals involving participants who have ADA considerations may be set for specific times beginning at 3:00
p.m.
(The President may entertain a motion to continue this Hearing and associated Motions to
the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 10, 2026. Public Comment will be taken on
the continuance.)
31. 251094 [Hearing - Appeal of Determination of Exemption from Environmental Review
- Proposed 350 Amber Drive Project]
Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the determination of exemption from
environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act issued as a
Categorical Exemption by the Planning Department on May 29, 2025, for the proposed
project at 350 Amber Drive, Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 7521, Lot No. 005, which
proposes to install a new AT&T Macro Wireless Telecommunications Facility on an
approximately 104 foot tall monopole, consisting of 12 new antennas, and nine new remote
radio units and ancillary equipment within the P (Public) Zoning District and OS (Open
Space) Height and Bulk District. (District 8) (Appellant: Mitchell M. Tsai of Mitchell M. Tsai
Law Firm on behalf of the Diamond Heights Community Association) (Filed October 27,
2025) (Clerk of the Board)
Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED?
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above
matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors,
(1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the
public hearing.
City and County of San Francisco Page 21 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 22
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
(Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.)
32. 251095 [Affirming the Categorical Exemption Determination - Proposed 350 Amber
Drive Project]
Motion affirming the determination by the Planning Department that the proposed project at
350 Amber Drive is categorically exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board)
Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED?
33. 251096 [Conditionally Reversing the Categorical Exemption Determination -
Proposed 350 Amber Drive Project]
Motion conditionally reversing the determination by the Planning Department that the
proposed project at 350 Amber Drive is categorically exempt from environmental review,
subject to the adoption of written findings of the Board in support of this determination.
(Clerk of the Board)
Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED?
34. 251097 [Preparation of Findings to Reverse the Categorical Exemption
Determination - Proposed 350 Amber Drive Project]
Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings reversing the determination by
the Planning Department that the proposed project at 350 Amber Drive is categorically
exempt from environmental review. (Clerk of the Board)
Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED?
SPECIAL ORDER 3:00 P.M.
(The President may entertain a motion to continue this Hearing and associated Motions to
the Board of Supervisors meeting of February 10, 2026. Public Comment will be taken on
the continuance.)
35. 251098 [Hearing - Appeal of Conditional Use Authorization Approval - 350 Amber
Drive]
Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to the approval of a Conditional Use
Authorization pursuant to Planning Code, Sections 209.2, 303, and 304 for a proposed
project at 350 Amber Drive (Assessor’s Parcel Block No. 7521, Lot No. 005) identified in
Planning Case No. 2024-004318CUA, issued by the Planning Commission by Motion No.
21825, dated September 25, 2025, to install a new AT&T Macro Wireless
Telecommunications Facility on an approximately 104 foot tall monopole, consisting of 12
new antennas, and nine new remote radio units and ancillary equipment within the P
(Public) Zoning District and OS (Open Space) Height and Bulk District. (District 8)
(Appellant: Mitchell M. Tsai of Mitchell M. Tsai Law Firm on behalf of the Diamond Heights
Community Association) (Filed October 27, 2025) (Clerk of the Board)
Question: Shall this Hearing be HEARD AND FILED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 22 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 23
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
Pursuant to Government Code Section 65009, notice is hereby given: If you challenge the above
matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing described above, or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Supervisors,
(1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244; San Francisco, CA 94102-4689) at, or prior to, the
public hearing.
(Only one of the following two Motions should be approved.)
36. 251159 [Approving Conditional Use Authorization - 350 Amber Drive]
Motion approving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 21825,
approving a Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No.
2024-004318CUA, for a proposed project located at 350 Amber Drive; making
environmental findings; and making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the
eight priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Clerk of the Board)
Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED?
37. 251160 [Disapproving Conditional Use Authorization - 350 Amber Drive]
Motion disapproving the decision of the Planning Commission by its Motion No. 21825,
approving a Conditional Use Authorization, identified as Planning Case No.
2024-004318CUA, for a proposed project at 350 Amber Drive. (Clerk of the Board)
(Charter, Section 4.105, and Planning Code, Section 308.1(d), provides that the Board of
Supervisors may disapprove the decision of the Planning Commission by a vote of not less
than two-thirds (8 votes) of the members of the Board.)
Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED?
38. 251161 [Preparation of Findings Related to Conditional Use Authorization - 350
Amber Drive]
Motion directing the Clerk of the Board to prepare findings in support of the Board of
Supervisors' disapproval of the proposed Conditional Use Authorization, identified as
Planning Case No. 2024-004318CUA, for a proposed project at 350 Amber Drive. (Clerk of
the Board)
Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 23 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 24
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Reports from committees, if any, recommending emergency or urgent measures.
The following item will be considered by the Government Audit and Oversight Committee
at a Regular Meeting on Thursday, December 4, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. The Chair intends to
request the Committee to send the following item as a Committee Report on Tuesday,
December 9, 2025.
39. 251114 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Devon Anderson, Beverly L. Sweeney - $20,000,000]
Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Devon Anderson, Beverly L.
Sweeney on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated current and former
employees against the City and County of San Francisco for up to $20,000,000; the
lawsuit was filed on February 13, 2020, in United States District Court for the Northern
District of California, Case No. 20-cv-01149-DMR; entitled Devon Anderson and Beverly L.
Sweeney, et al. v. The City and County of San Francisco, et al.; the lawsuit involves an
employment dispute. (City Attorney)
Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING?
The following items will be considered by the Land Use and Transportation Committee at a
Regular Meeting on Monday, December 8, 2025, at 1:30 p.m. The Chair intends to request
the Committee to send the following items as Committee Reports on Tuesday, December
9, 2025.
40. 250886 [Planning Code - Adaptive Reuse of Historic Buildings]
Sponsor: Mayor
Ordinance amending the Planning Code to allow additional uses as principally or
conditionally permitted in Historic Buildings citywide, exempt Historic Buildings in certain
Eastern Neighborhood Plan Areas from Conditional Use authorization otherwise required to
remove Production, Distribution, and Repair (PDR), Institutional Community, and Arts
Activities uses, and from providing replacement space for such uses, make conforming
amendments to provisions affected by the foregoing, including zoning control tables;
affirming the Planning Department’s determination under the California Environmental
Quality Act; making findings of consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority
policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1; and making findings of public necessity,
convenience, and general welfare under Planning Code, Section 302.
Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING?
City and County of San Francisco Page 24 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 25
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
41. 251078 [Potrero HOPE SF - Street Vacation for Various Streets]
Sponsors: Mayor; Walton
Ordinance delegating authority to the Public Works Director to vacate certain streets and
public service easements in the Potrero HOPE SF Project (“Project”) site, generally
bounded by 26th, Wisconsin, 23rd, Missouri, 22nd, Texas, 25th, and Connecticut (south of
25th) Streets, and including portions of 22nd, 23rd, 25th, 26th, Arkansas, Connecticut,
Dakota, Texas, Missouri, and Wisconsin Streets, Turner Terrace, and Watchman Way, to
expedite implementation of the Project; authorizing the City to transfer its interest in the
vacation area to the San Francisco Housing Authority or the Project Sponsor; delegating
to the Director of Property authority to grant, accept, and terminate easements to facilitate
the street vacations; adopting a Public Works Order recommending the street and
easement vacation process; waiving application of Administrative Code, Chapter 23,
regarding real estate transactions to the extent inconsistent with this Ordinance; finding
the street vacation areas are exempt surplus property under the California Surplus Land
Act; authorizing official acts, as defined, in connection with this Ordinance; adopting
findings under the California Environmental Quality Act; and making findings of
consistency with the General Plan, and the eight priority policies of Planning Code,
Section 101.1.
Question: Shall this Ordinance be PASSED ON FIRST READING?
42. 250821 [Resolution of Intent - Street Vacation - 1236 Carroll Avenue]
Sponsor: Walton
Resolution declaring the intention of the Board of Supervisors to vacate portions of Hawes
Street, Griffith Street, and Bancroft Avenue for the development of the Fire Department
Training Facility at 1236 Carroll Avenue and setting a hearing date for all persons
interested in the proposed vacation of said street areas.
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
43. 251175 [Final Map No. 10857 - 1301-1341 Evans Avenue]
Motion approving Final Map No. 10857, a 20-Commercial Unit Condominium Project,
located at 1301-1341 Evans Avenue, being a subdivision of Assessor’s Parcel Block No.
5237, Lot No. 037; and adopting findings pursuant to the General Plan, and the eight
priority policies of Planning Code, Section 101.1. (Public Works)
12/02/2025; REFERRED to the Land Use and Transportation Committee.
Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED?
44. ROLL CALL FOR INTRODUCTIONS
Roll call for introduction of ordinances, resolutions, charter amendments, requests for hearings, letters
of inquiry, letters of request to the City Attorney and Board Members' reports on their regional body
activities.
City and County of San Francisco Page 25 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 26
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
45. PUBLIC COMMENT
An opportunity for members of the public to directly address the Board on items of interest to the public
that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board, including items being considered today
which have not been considered by a Board committee and excluding items which have been
considered by a Board committee. Members of the public may address the Board for up to two
minutes. Each member of the public will be allotted the same number of minutes to speak,
except public speakers using interpretation assistance will be allowed to testify for two minutes
and the interpreter will have two minutes for interpretation. If simultaneous interpretation services are
used, speakers will be governed by the public testimony time limit applied to speakers not requesting
translation assistance. The President or the Board may limit the total testimony to 30 minutes.
Members of the public who want a document placed on the overhead for display should clearly state
such and subsequently remove the document when they want the screen to return to live coverage of
the meeting.
FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE
These measures were introduced for adoption without committee reference. A unanimous vote is
required for adoption of these resolutions today. Any Supervisor may require any resolution to go
to committee.
Questions on the For Adoption Without Committee Reference Agenda are on for adoption, or
approved, as indicated.
(PUBLIC COMMENT for Items 46 through 52 will be taken during Item 45 - General Public
Comment.)
Items 46 through 52
46. 251191 [Dr. Jian Zhang Day - December 2, 2025]
Sponsors: Chen; Chan, Walton, Mandelman, Melgar, Sherrill, Sauter, Dorsey and
Mahmood
Resolution commending Dr. Jian Zhang for her outstanding contributions as Chief
Executive Officer of Chinese Hospital; and declaring December 2, 2025, as Dr. Jian Zhang
Day in the City and County of San Francisco.
12/02/2025; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD
MEETING.
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 26 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 27
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
47. 251192 [Affirming San Francisco’s Commitment to Decarbonization Efforts that
Center Environmental Justice]
Sponsors: Fielder; Melgar, Chen and Mahmood
Resolution affirming San Francisco’s commitment to advancing equitable building
decarbonization efforts in the State of California by centering the leadership and needs of
environmental justice communities.
12/02/2025; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD
MEETING.
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
48. 251193 [Drag Story Hour Day - December 12, 2025]
Sponsor: Mandelman
Resolution recognizing December 12, 2025, as Drag Story Hour Day in the City and
County of San Francisco.
12/02/2025; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD
MEETING.
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
49. 251194 [Urging State Legislature to Strengthen Protection for Tenants in
Rent-Controlled Units]
Sponsors: Melgar; Chen and Fielder
Resolution urging state officials to amend the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 or Senate Bill
330, including, but not limited to, Government Code, Sections 65941.1, 66300, and 66301,
that limited San Francisco’s ability to protect rent controlled units from demolition,
weakened tenants’ right of return after demolition or redevelopment, and undermined local
Housing Element Objectives to preserve affordable housing.
12/02/2025; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD
MEETING.
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
50. 251195 [Usage of Ultra-Processed Foods in City Departments]
Sponsors: Walton; Melgar, Chen, Fielder, Mahmood, Chan and Sauter
Resolution urging the Sheriff’s Office, the Department of Public Health, the Department of
Children, Youth and Their Families, and the Department of Homelessness and Supportive
Housing to review their distribution of ultra-processed foods directly and through
contractors and to align with the goals of California’s Real Food, Healthy Kids Act; and
urging the Department of Public Health to develop a framework for identifying and
evaluating ultra-processed foods for the City to use in decisions concerning food
distribution and procurement and for reporting purposes.
12/02/2025; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD
MEETING.
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 27 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 28
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
51. 251200 [Temporary Sidewalk Closures - Super Bowl LX Events - Moscone Center,
Grace Cathedral, and The Hibernia]
Sponsors: Dorsey; Sauter and Mahmood
Resolution authorizing the temporary closure of the public sidewalk, subject to
Interdepartmental Staff Committee on Traffic and Transportation issuing a permit for each
Super Bowl LX related event at the Moscone Center, Grace Cathedral, and the Hibernia, on
both sides of Howard Street between 3rd Street and 4th Street, from February 1 through
February 9, 2026, on both sides of Taylor Street between California Street and Sacramento
Street, from 5:00 p.m. on February 5 through 6:00 a.m. on February 7, 2026, on the north
side of California Street between Taylor Street and Jones Street, from 6:00 a.m. on
February 6 through 6:00 a.m. on February 7, 2026, on the east side of Jones Street from
California Street to 225 feet northerly, from 7:00 p.m. on February 5 through 6:00 a.m. on
February 7, 2026, and on the south side of Sacramento Street from Taylor Street to 325
feet westerly from 6:00 a.m. on February 6 through 6:00 a.m. on February 7, 2026, and on
the west side of Jones Street from McAllister Street to 140 feet northerly and on the north
side of McAllister Street from Jones Street to 140 feet westerly, from 6:00 a.m. on
February 6 through 11:59 p.m. on February 7, 2026.
12/03/2025; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD
MEETING.
Question: Shall this Resolution be ADOPTED?
52. 251196 [Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Schedule - 2026]
Motion establishing the 2026 Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Schedule, pursuant to
Board of Supervisors Rules of Order, Sections 4.2 and 4.2.1, by cancelling the Regular
Board meetings of January 20, February 17, May 26, September 8, October 13 and
December 1; and all Regular Board and Committee meetings during the spring, summer,
and winter breaks beginning March 30 through April 3, 2026 (returning on April 6, 2026),
beginning August 3 through August 28, 2026 (returning on August 31, 2026), and
beginning December 16, 2026, through January 7, 2027 (returning on January 8, 2027);
and further suspending portions of Board Rule 4.2. to effectuate certain dates within the
regular meeting schedule to augment the flow of business. (Clerk of the Board)
12/02/2025; REFERRED FOR ADOPTION WITHOUT COMMITTEE REFERENCE AGENDA AT THE NEXT BOARD
MEETING.
Question: Shall this Motion be APPROVED?
City and County of San Francisco Page 28 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 29
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
53. IMPERATIVE AGENDA
Resolution(s), if any, to be adopted within limits imposed by the Sunshine Ordinance and the Ralph M.
Brown Act, introduced today, not on the printed agenda. For such resolutions to be considered, the
Board must first adopt the Serious Injury Finding or the Purely Commendatory Finding and the Brown
Act Finding. Each motion requires eight (8) votes or a unanimous six (6) or seven (7). A unanimous
vote is required for the resolution(s).
[Serious Injury Finding]
Motion that the Board find that for the resolution(s) being considered at this time "the need to take
action is so imperative as to threaten serious injury to the public interest if action is deferred to a
later meeting."
[Purely Commendatory Finding]
Motion that the Board find that the resolution(s) being considered at this time are purely
commendatory.
[Brown Act Finding]
Motion that the Board find by roll call vote that, for the resolution(s) being considered at this time,
there is a need to take immediate action. The need to take action came to the attention of the City
and County of San Francisco after the agenda was posted.
(PUBLIC COMMENT WILL BE TAKEN on any Imperative Agenda item introduced.)
LEGISLATION INTRODUCED AT ROLL CALL
Introduced by a Supervisor or the Mayor
Pursuant to Charter, Section 2.105, an Ordinance or Resolution may be introduced before the Board
of Supervisors by a Member of the Board, a Committee of the Board, or the Mayor and shall be
referred to and reported upon by an appropriate Committee of the Board.
Legislation Introduced will appear on the Final Minutes for this meeting. Once the
Legislation Introduced is approved, it will be available on
http://www.sfbos.org/legislation_introduced.
City and County of San Francisco Page 29 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 30
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
Introduced at the Request of a Department
Pursuant to Rules of Order of the Board of Supervisors, Section 2.7.1, Department Heads may
submit proposed legislation to the Clerk of the Board, in which case titles of the legislation will be
printed at the rear of the next available agenda of the Board.
PROPOSED ORDINANCES
251177 [Settlement of Lawsuit - Edwin Jesus Rementeria Hidalgo - $70,000]
Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by Edwin Jesus Rementeria Hidalgo
against the City and County of San Francisco for $70,000; the lawsuit was filed on
September 9, 2024, in San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-24-617912; entitled
Edwin Jesus Rementeria Hidalgo v. City and County of San Francisco and Drew Raymond
Jackson; the lawsuit involves alleged personal injury from a vehicle collision. (City
Attorney)
12/01/2025; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT.
12/09/2025; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee.
251178 [Settlement of Lawsuit - R.C. - $900,000]
Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuit filed by R.C. against the City and County
of San Francisco for $900,000; the lawsuit was filed on January 5, 2022, in San Francisco
Superior Court, Case No. CGC-22-597432; entitled R.C. v. City and County of San
Francisco, et al.); the lawsuit involves an alleged sexual assault by a City employee. (City
Attorney)
12/01/2025; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT.
12/09/2025; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee.
251179 [Settlement of Lawsuits - Microsoft Corporation and Subsidiaries - $6,500,000]
Ordinance authorizing settlement of the lawsuits filed by Microsoft Corporation and
Subsidiaries against the City and County of San Francisco for $6,500,000; the lawsuits
were filed on February 26, 2021, April 23, 2021, and June 3, 2025, in San Francisco
Superior Court, Case Nos. CGC-21-590032, CGC-21-591004, and CGC-25-625880; entitled
Microsoft Corporation and Subsidiaries. v. City and County of San Francisco et al.; the
lawsuits involve a refund of gross receipts and homelessness gross receipts taxes; other
material terms of the settlement relate to Microsoft Corporation’s filing position with
respect to City taxes. (City Attorney)
12/01/2025; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT.
12/09/2025; RECEIVED AND ASSIGNED to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee.
City and County of San Francisco Page 30 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 31
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
251180 [Appropriation - Revenue Bonds Proceeds - Capital Improvement Projects -
Airport Commission - $9,016,051,176 - FY2025-2026]
Ordinance appropriating $9,016,051,176 of proceeds from the sale of revenue bonds or
commercial paper for capital improvement projects to the Airport Commission for
FY2025-2026; and placing $9,016,051,176 on Controller's Reserve pending receipt of
proceeds of indebtedness. (Airport Commission)
12/01/2025; RECEIVED FROM DEPARTMENT.
12/09/2025; ASSIGNED UNDER 30 DAY RULE to the Budget and Finance Committee.
City and County of San Francisco Page 31 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 32
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
251190 [Petitions and Communications]
Petitions and Communications received from November 25, 2025, through December 4,
2025, for reference by the President to Committee considering related matters, or to be
ordered filed by the Clerk on December 9, 2025.
Personal information that is provided in communications to the Board of Supervisors is
subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco
Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information will not be redacted.
From the Office of the Mayor, (MYR), pursuant Charter, Section 13.101.5(a), submitting
the appointment of Alan Wong as the District 4 Supervisor. Copy: Each Supervisor. (1)
From the Office of the Mayor (MYR), regarding the proposed Resolution authorizing a
six-month waiver of the City’s Behested Payments Ordinance for the Mayor, members of
the Mayor’s Office, and the Executive Director of the Office of Economic and Workforce
Development to solicit donations from nonprofits, private organizations, grantmakers,
foundations, and other persons and entities for the purpose of supporting the continued
economic revitalization of San Francisco, pursuant to Section 3.620(f) of the Campaign
and Governmental Conduct Code. File No. 251083. Copy: Each Supervisor. (2)
From the Office of the City Administrator (ADM), Capital Planning Committee (CPC),
pursuant to Administrative Code, Section 3.21, submitting approved action items and
recommendations from December 1, 2025, to be considered by the Board of Supervisors.
Copy: Each Supervisor. (3)
From the Department of Public Works (DPW), pursuant to Ordinance No. 15-25,
submitting the 2025 Commercial Vacancy Tax Exemption Annual Report. Copy: Each
Supervisor. (4)
From the San Francisco Arts Commission (ART), submitting the Full Arts Commission’s
meeting agenda for December 1, 2025, and Nominating Committee meeting agenda for
December 8, 2025. Copy: Each Supervisor. (5)
From the Planning Department (CPC), submitting a response to a letter of inquiry issued
by Supervisor Bilal Mahmood at the October 28, 2025, Board of Supervisors meeting.
Copy: Each Supervisor. (6)
From the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD), submitting a response to a letter
of inquiry issued by Supervisors Chyanne Chen and Bilal Mahmood at the October 28,
2025, Board of Supervisors meeting. Copy: Each Supervisor. (7)
From the Environment Department (ENV), pursuant to Environment Code, Chapter 2,
Section 203(g), submitting the Municipal Buy Green 2024 Annual Report. Copy: Each
Supervisor. (8)
From the Office of the Controller (CON), submitting the results of Refunding Certificates of
Participation (COPs), Series 2025-R2 and 2025-R3. Copy: Each Supervisor. (9)
From the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC), pursuant to Resolution No.
227-18, submitting the Status of Applications to Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E)
for Electric Service Quarterly Report from September to November 2025. Copy: Each
Supervisor. (10)
From the Ethics Commission (ETH), submitting a notice of proposed regulation
amendments regarding the required timeline for considering post-employment and
City and County of San Francisco Page 32 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 33
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
compensated advocacy waivers. Copy: Each Supervisor. (11)
From the Department of Elections (REG), submitting certification of the results of votes
cast in San Francsico for the November 4, 2025, Statewide Special Election. Copy: Each
Supervisor. (12)
From various departments, pursuant to Administrative Code, Section 12B.5-1(d)(1),
submitting approved Chapter 12B Waiver Request Forms. 3 Forms. Copy: Each
Supervisor. (13)
From the Department of Public Health (DPH), pursuant to Ordinance No. 10-25, submitting
Administrative Code, Chapter 21B, waiver notification. Copy: Each Supervisor. (14)
From the California Department of Parks and Recreation, submitting nomination notice to
add Kinmon Gakuen to the National Register of Historic Places. Copy: Each Supervisor.
(15)
From Alan Wong, submitting communications resigning form the City College Board of
Trustees and Children’s Council of San Francisco. 2 Communications. Copy: Each
Supervisor. (16)
From Kylie Orman and Alyssa Brady, regarding Jessica’s Law. Copy: Each Supervisor.
(17)
From Judy Gorski, regarding safety in District 4 and Sunset Dunes/Upper Great Highway.
Copy: Each Supervisor. (18)
From Jordan Wasilewski, regarding permanent supportive housing. Copy: Each Supervisor.
(19)
From Paul N. Dohrmann, regarding the Western Potable Emergency Firefighting Water
System. Copy: Each Supervisor. (20)
From Anthony Bishopric, regarding bike lanes on Market Street. Copy: Each Supervisor.
(21)
From Jacob Horowitz, regarding the Hearing to address concerns raised by community
members of neglect, abuse, and civil rights violations at the Taylor Street Facility located
at 111 Taylor Street, operated by the GEO Group, Inc.; and requesting the GEO Group,
Inc., Office of the Public Defender, Adult Probation Department, and California Department
of Corrections and Rehabilitation to report. File No. 250792. Copy: Each Supervisor. (22)
From Yesenia Lacayo, regarding the proposed Ordinance appropriating $3,500,000 from
the General Reserve to the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development to
expand access to existing coordinated services for immigration legal defense and
community response services to the immigrant community in Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-2026.
File No. 251080. Copy: Each Supervisor. (23)
From Maggie Hallahan, regarding the California Water Resources Control Board. Copy:
Each Supervisor. (24)
From Aaron Goodman, regarding the 19th Avenue repaving project. Copy: Each
Supervisor. (25)
From the Alliance for a Better District 6, regarding a project at 120 Stockton Street. Copy:
Each Supervisor. (26)
City and County of San Francisco Page 33 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 34
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
From Greg Pauxtis M.D., regarding John F. Kennedy Drive. Copy: Each Supervisor. (27)
From Randy Shaw, regarding the Commission Streamlining Task Force. Copy: Each
Supervisor. (28)
From Adrienne Hoyer, regarding sex workers in the Mission. Copy: Each Supervisor. (29)
From a member of the public, regarding the Ordinance amending the Public Works Code
to require the Department of Public Works to plant replacement Street Trees within 120
days of removal, require that Street Trees removed without a permit be replaced by Street
Trees of equal size, require that Tree protection plans include the applicant’s
acknowledgement of potential Tree replacement costs, and set maximum administrative
penalties for removing or injuring Street Trees; and affirming the Planning Department’s
determination under the California Environmental Quality Act. File No. 250836; Ordinance
No. 1-22. Copy: Each Supervisor. (30)
From a member of the public, regarding Labor and Employment Code, Article 21: San
Francisco Health Care Security Ordinance. Copy: Each Supervisor. (31)
From the Planning Association for the Richmond (PAR), regarding concerts in Golden
Gate Park. Copy: Each Supervisor. (32)
From members of the public, regarding Sunset Dunes. 2 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor.
(33)
From members of the public, regarding automatic sprinkler systems in existing high-rise
buildings. 50 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (34)
From members of the public, regarding lobbying activity in San Francisco government. 5
Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (35)
From members of the public, regarding banning plastic cigarette filters. 7 Letters. Copy:
Each Supervisor. (36)
From members of the public, regarding vehicles on Market Street. 9 Letters. Copy: Each
Supervisor. (37)
From members of the public, regarding public transit funding. 93 Letters. Copy: Each
Supervisor. (38)
From Sullivan, regarding behested payments. Copy: Each Supervisor. (39)
From Sean Feeney, regarding the Vaillancourt Fountain in Embarcadero Plaza (formerly
Justin Herman Plaza). Copy: Each Supervisor. (40)
From members of the public, regarding the proposed Ordinance amending the Business
and Tax Regulations Code to repeal the cannabis business tax beginning on January 1,
2026, and remove references to the cannabis business tax from the common
administrative provisions of the Code. File No. 250929. 12 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor.
(41)
From members of the public, regarding the Hearing of persons interested in or objecting to
the approval of a Conditional Use Authorization pursuant to Planning Code, Sections
209.2, 303, and 304 for a proposed project at 350 Amber Drive (Assessor’s Parcel Block
No. 7521, Lot No. 005) identified in Planning Case No. 2024-004318CUA, issued by the
Planning Commission by Motion No. 21825, dated September 25, 2025, to install a new
AT&T Macro Wireless Telecommunications Facility on an approximately 104 foot tall
City and County of San Francisco Page 34 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25
Page 35
Board of Supervisors Meeting Agenda Tuesday, December 9, 2025
monopole, consisting of 12 new antennas, and nine new remote radio units and ancillary
equipment within the P (Public) Zoning District and OS Height and Bulk District. (District
8) (Appellant: Mitchell M. Tsai of Mitchell M. Tsai Law Firm on behalf of the Diamond
Heights Community Association) (Filed October 27, 2025). File No. 251098. 9 Letters.
Copy: Each Supervisor. (42)
From members of the public, regarding the proposed Ordinances: General Plan
Amendments - Family Zoning Plan; Zoning Map - Family Zoning Plan; Planning, Business
and Tax Regulations Codes - Family Zoning Plan; and Planning, Business and Tax
Regulations Codes - Family Zoning Plan. File Nos. 250966, 250700, 250701, and 251072.
16 Letters. Copy: Each Supervisor. (43)
ADJOURNMENT
City and County of San Francisco Page 35 Printed at 9:58 pm on 12/4/25